Reasons Why Michael Jackson Is Better Than The Beatles

SmoothCriminal

Just the Top Ten reasons why MJ is better *no offense* Don't agree with the list? Vote for an existing item you think should be ranked higher or if you are a logged in, add a new item for others to vote on or create your own version of this list.

The Top Ten

1
Michael Jackson and the Jackson 5 combined has sold more records than The Beatles
The person who wrote this list is an absolute prick. Just because he sold more records doesn't mean his music is of better quality or is more influential. You need a pretty big list to list the accomplishments of the Beatles. Did you know Michael Jackson before he died owned all of the rights to the Beatles songs meaning he thought they were pretty damn good too. This list is a waste. MJ was a great artist but he was not the Beatles.
Michael Jackson is the best. End of story. I hate when I see a countdown of greatest ARTISTS, yet, they compare a band with a solo artist. I can't argue enough that had the Beatles disbanded, there is NO way the individual members would have accomplished what Michael Jackson accomplished ALL BY HIMSELF. Time has proven this. The Beatles' music did NOT break racial barriers. They are only popular in the U.S. and Europe. Michael Jackson's music is known WORLDWIDE. White America just cannot acknowledge a black man has won this title. I'm saying this, and neither white nor black. So sad. Racism will never end.
Well first off, the number of albums sold does not effect how good the music is. If that's the case, then Justin Bieber is a god of music. Second, the record sales of two artists combined are most likely going to be greater than the sales of one artist. This list is full of fail.

InsertNameHere

[Newest]The beatles sold millions of records in about 7 years.Michael needs his whole career and the jackson 5 records but they've still sold over1 billon records while Michael 's sold about 500 million records (which is a lot) but not quite enough.

2Michael Jackson has better selling singles
Michael Jackson's song had a lot of substance and he wrote most of them himself and they were all awesome, he is a legend.
The beatles have a better fanbase and no. 1 hits in America... I'll give them that, and I do love the beatles but Michael Jackson lasted 45 years making hits WORLDWIDE while positively trying to change the world. He also wrote and co-wrote almost every single song he released. (Over 300 for sure)
The beatles wrote all their original songs themselves not just some of them.The beatles have more no1's than any body else in most countries.Twenty in the us and MJ has12.
You said "The Beatles wrote all of their own songs" which is true. But they had four people in their band. Michael Jackson was one person and he wrote almost every single one of his songs. And you are also not including all of the number 1's Michael Jackson had in different countries that didn't get to number 1 in the U. S or all of the number ones that the Jackson 5 had or the Jacksons. So in reality, Michael Jackson did have better statistics than the Beatles. Even though many people assume this is not the case because of their ignorant judgments made about Michael Jackson that are not related to music.

3Michael Jackson is the most awarded artist of all time
That's because Grammy Awards didn't exist at The Beatles and Elvis's reign.
Beating Elvis and the Beatles

SmoothCriminal


4Michael Jackson has better selling albums
I think anything Michael did was golden his albums were beastly :D
The beatles have sold approximately a billion units and Michael approximately 5oo million units
Well duh Thriller, Bad, and Dangerous ;)

SmoothCriminal


5Michael Jackson had real style
The beatles were not just smoking marijuana.The beatles were four guys from Liverpool who were poor then they became rich because the were popular. How dare you! You should be listening to Imagine by John Lennon ( the greatest songwriter of all time in my option) Hey Jude and In my life.
John Lennon is one of the greatest songwriters of all time and should be recognized as so, but I don't think he can top MJ with his 45 years of self-written hits. However, it would have been amazing if those two, HUGE humanitarians would have made a charity song together. That would have been powerful.
Beatles took drugs. Michael also took drugs and died from it.
The Beatles were just 4 guys smoking marijuana (however you spell it), and Michael was a Real Dancer

SmoothCriminal


6Michael Jackson had amazing moves. He is/was the most famous dancer of all time
It doesn't exactly take talent to dance, even though I like MJ, the Beatles actually played instruments and had to learn these to become famous, putting more effort into it
Did you just say it doesn't take talent to dance? Try doing it once while performing on stage in front of 72,000 fans, while singing, never missing a choreographed step on stage, and while never losing your breath to sing. If you think playing a guitar/keyboard/whatever and singing while standing in one place is harder than that, you don't know the entertainment business at all.
Yeah! the beatles didn't dance at all, they only sung
The Beatles can't dance with gutairs

7Michael Jackson is/was named the most successful artist of all time
The Beatles were not even on the top 10 for this poll/or other contest

SmoothCriminal

Wikipedia which is only the most reliable source on the web because it actually gather's evience says the beatles are the most commercialy succesful and most influencial musicians in pop history.

8MIchael Jackson had bigger crowds than The Beatles at tours
On the Bad tour the last leg, it had over 130 THOUSAND people, and on the Dangerous Tour on one of the legs it had 7 SOLD OUT CONCERTS, and over 507 thousand people attended

SmoothCriminal

But Michael Jackson could hear himself, The Beatles couldn't because the audience was so loud

9Paul McCartney even admitted that MJ was going to be bigger
Well if this is true, then Paul McCartney is totally right... I admire the Beatles a little, they got quiet a lot of songs which really are meaningful and shows how good lyricist they are. However they don't get you off your seat... They are not "out of the box", plus, they don't dance... Their voice, average.. moreover some of their songs mean nothing... Well the Beatles are good but not great, they just keep on writing and writing with no sense... At times when they attempt a rocker voice, you'll hear like a phlegm is about to get out from their throats especially that of John lennon's voice... seriously not even a justifiable comparison to how amazing Michael Jackson is... Well maybe they are not so famous also, one factor is that they rose to fame when technology or tvs are still that advance, however they are not so staggering and dashing either, they sound so boring, look boring and AVERAGE, they are like the Jonas brothers of today

Well Paul would say that, he's very British and very modest! The Beatles are so much better than MJ. Me not being a fan of his has nothing to do with it!

Britgirl

This was suppose to be an Private interveiw in the early 80's

SmoothCriminal


10Michael Jackson sold over 800 million records on his own
False, he sold less than half of that number.
Actually you are wrong... I have studied intensively both the Beatles and Michael Jackson over the years I believe both have had the most influence on musical culture today. However, Michael Jackson has now factually sold over 1 billion records and holds 51 music awards while the Beatles hold 22 music awards (one of which they received that is called the "Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award"). Plus, we are only talking about Michael Jackson and the Beatles when we should be including the Jackson 5's hits and the Jackson's hits. Not to mention, Michael Jackson has over 300 songs he wrote himself that were unreleased from his already stellar 7 studio albums (which all were number 1) that could easily be re-mastered and sold as hits today. With all matters collectively gathered, Michael Jackson has had a much more successful career as an entertainer and he is an incomparable musical icon.
And there's 4 of the beatles members, and that's like outnumbered, just imagine if they were 4 MICHAEL JACKSONS

SmoothCriminal


The Contenders

11Michael has a better voice and greater music talent
You cannot disagree

12Michael Jackson was famous world wide
Beatles are not known in asian countries but MJ is

13Michael Jackson inspired several artists
Well, so did the Beatles. And the Beatles came earlier, so still inspired more

PositronWildhawk

Um the beatles are the most influencial pop act of all time.Michael was one of their biggest fans...

Comments About This List

Featured Lists
Popular Lists
New Lists

Posts About This List

Be the first to add a post about this list

List Info

This list was created 3 years, 198 days ago and has been voted on over 100 times. This top ten list has been blogged about 1 times.

Updated Tuesday, October 21, 2014


List Error Reporting

See an item on this list that's misspelled, duplicated, or doesn't belong? Let us know. Click here to report the error.