Top 10 Reasons Why Nirvana Is Better Than Linkin Park

The Top Ten
1 Nirvana worked harder to become a band.
2 They put more feeling and inspiration into their songs.
3 Kurt Cobain lets out more expression in his vocals.

Kurt Cobain's vocals:Quite great with some minor anger and little to no screaming.
Chester Burnington's Vocals: Too much anger and screaming not to mention shouting. Clearly Kurt Cobain has better vocals.

4 They have better songs.
5 They didn't go downhill.
6 Dave Grohl has more experience on the drums. David Eric "Dave" Grohl is an American rock musician, multi-instrumentalist, singer, songwriter, producer and film director. He is best known as the former drummer of the hugely popular 90s grunge band Nirvana and the vocalist/guitarist for the alternative rock band Foo Fighters. He has sat behind the ...read more.
7 Krist's bass is outstanding.
8 Linkin Park overshadow better modern rock bands.

This is quite true they even overshadow the Foo Fighters and Green Day. And both of those bands are better then Linkin Park.

9 The members of Nirvana have more experience with their Instruments.
10 Nirvana has a better logo.
The Contenders
11 Rap and Rock don't mix well

Rock & Rap are better off separate.

That's just an opinion

12 Linkin Park Songs Sound the Same

Yeah about 95% of their songs sound like the same songs over and over.

13 Kurt Cobain's screams are more impressive than Chester Bennington's screams

If you are being biased

14 Linkin Park sold out

Yeah, sold out of concert tickets because everyone loves them so much

15 Nirvana's not a nu-metal band

Which makes the band even worse

16 Kurt Cobain doesn't rap

Which lowers his marketing availability

17 They have better albums
18 Nirvana's lyrics weren't overly edgy
19 Nirvana's riffs are better than Linkin Park's riffs
20 They have better live albums
BAdd New Item