Top Ten Worst Video Game ReviewersChaotixhero Let's say there is this game or movie you wanna try out but is afraid it will might turn out bad. So you listen to a review and you believe them until you found out it was a good game/movie after all. Here are reviewers that suck at reviewing.
The Top TenXW
These guys should be #1 half of the time I don't agree with there ratings, even Gamespot is much better only because it isn't biased I mean Halo 4 a 9.8 that's overrating it a little too much don't you think, or basicly any Call of Duty game after Blackops 1 with a high rating is absolutely ridiculous. The sport games they rate way too high example Madden why it's the same game with an updated roster with absolutely no changes which can be said for other sport games. - htoutlaws2012
They are so ignorant some of there reviews are good but others suck. The Fox News of the gaming Media. Or am I wrong? - HeavyDonkeyKong
They're well-known for getting paid to give good scores for games we already know are barely worth crap. The only honest review seems to be Xtreme Paintball, which got a 0.7.
If a game doesn't have voice acting and is text-based, then that's a criticism. HOW?V15 Comments
I'm not even sure if this guy should count, considering he's an obvious troll if I ever saw one. However, he's heavily biased, he compares games to other games that aren't even in the same genre, his voice is very irritating, and he barely even looks at the games he review before dismissing them as bad. Take a look at his review of Undertale. Regardless of whether or not you like Undertale, you have to admit that he made a bad review. He spent more than half of the video complaining that the game couldn't run on older PCs, and he only looked at the game for about (I'm not kidding) 10 MINUTES before quitting! I'm sorry, but if you think you can form a solid opinion of a game by playing t for 10 minutes, you're a moron! Also, his complaints were just stupid. Even if Mr. gligar13vids is a troll or not, that doesn't change the fact that his videos are a pain to sit through, and he is in my opinion the worst video game critic ever.
This guy just takes good games and just say they are bad. He is obviously one of those first person shooter retarts. He mostly bash Sonic and Nintendo games and only say their music is good. - ChaotixheroV3 Comments
This guy is completely AWFUL at reviewing video games. He screams like a idiot and say things that's in the game but it really isn't. He mostly bash Sonic the most which is no surprise to me what so ever. - Chaotixhero
He's a stupid classic sonic fanboy who bash good modern sonic & he reviews game that never released yet
Yeah, he is annoying and swears too much…
Good thing that he came out as a TROLL!
They barely review games but that doesn't stop me from putting them here. They are also the same people that called the Wii U Nintendo's biggest mistake, make Goku lose TWICE against Superman in Death battle, and called Sonic Boom worster than (I'm not even kidding) Superman 64 and Aquaman: Battle for Atlantis. No wonder Screw Attack is now getting a little bit of hate. Screw them. - Chaotixhero
Everything older went downhill, and so ScrewAttack!
The only reason I watch is for death battles. - Skullkid755V1 Comment
I will admit he's still doing decent now compared to the others on this list but now he's getting... A little bit boring now. He starting doing re-reviews because "his older ones ain't so good because he was so angry". Who cares? - Chaotixhero
I thought he just made crappy, boring reviews on animation while getting angry.
He's a ripoff of other reviewers
This guy reviews animation, not video games.V4 Comments
His early reviews were short, but informed discussions of interesting games, but the last year or two his output has ceased to be worth watching. It seems like he is chasing YouTube metrics at the expense of quality
His content is enjoyable, What is he doing here.
He is great, what the hell is he doing here? - YordridgeV1 Comment
Yeah I put my own self on here. My reviews are pretty bad yet I still make more. I take videos off of YouTube and talk over them calling them my "reviews". I also sound so mellow and I barely edit my reviews. I also try to be funny but the jokes never works. Yeah...when I call myself a terrible reviewer, you know it's bad. - Chaotixhero
... Well I guess you could be biased but... - HeavyDonkeyKong
There's this guy that you should listen I don't know his real name but his user name is meltingman234 he's from YouTube & deviant art you should check him outV2 Comments
How on earth was this guy not on here to begin with?
He's a sonic fanboy who bash sonic unleashed
Truly the worst reviewer of all time, as he decides which games are good or bad and mostly most of them suck. He has been a rip off of the AVGN for a long time and should be number one. - BatmanOfToday
His sonic unleashed review & some of his Archie sonic reviews are okay. They are way better then his hideous spongebob Squarepants the Simpsons & family guy review.
I bet I hate everything unknown as alex. is displeased with mixedfan8643's star wars part 2 review & his sonic 06 review.
His sonic 06 review is terrible but it not the only terrible one there's more
This guy is a Disgrace to the Archie sonic fans.V14 Comments
These guy are not that good at reviewing. They are almost at IGN's level of suck. Thanks to to popular reviewers like SomecallmeJohnny, X-play is going down the market. - Chaotixhero
If any game comes in a blue case, you bet your ass it's getting a free pass.
Fairly harsh for an uninformed opinion. Whilst it is true that metacritic gathers the average opinion on games, they use a system using a significant amount of weighing where the values involved aren't published. As a delightful example reviews submitted by kotaku has a significantly (SIGNIFICANTLY) higher impact on the score (in fact the common belief is kotaku has one of the highest) then other smaller sources.
Which is why I'm also voting metacritic, not only is it widely used as a source of critic score without being properly understood, their business model is incredibly shady and the honestly vast corruption involved in the systems they use cause a much much higher amount of damage then the average reviewer will ever have the ability to do.
Anybody who votes Metacritic is a moron. It's literally just a tool for getting a comprehensive summary of the average opinion of a game, the same thing Rotten Tomatoes does for movies. They don't even review games. They just tell you what other people think of them.
You get the most reviews on there so that's helpful if you come across a game you want to check out bad or good. - htoutlaws2012
How? I agree mostly with the RTS reviews even though he destroyed civilization 5 and total war 2 AND angry joe actually put battlefield the cops and robbers one as one of the worst games of 2015. So your points are invalid. Also he barely reviews Call of Duty so you cannot get so salty because of the advanced warfare review. Or the over watch review. by the way ever heard of the witcher franchise s? I would say he loves those games.
Simply biased to all hell in every single way towards anything that isn't Battlefield or an RTS. Simple as that.V1 Comment
All about their videos about games are biased and talks down on games that don't deserve. Hitman Absolution is sexist because you can kill strippers and position their bodies around? You can do that for anyone regardless of sex, race and class.
But the worst is their reviews because they talk about the little, unimportant things in the games and barely talk about any of the gameplay, graphics and sound. If you want an example, watch their Rise of the TOMB RAIDER review.
Worst let's player ever... He also does reviews so he can be here.
Related ListsTop Ten Video Game Characters Top 10 Video Game Companies Of All Time Top 10 Best Video Game Series Top Ten Best Video Game Developers Top Ten Video Game Systems of All Time
List StatsUpdated 24 Oct 2016
1 year, 80 days old