Top Ten Greatest Battlefield Tactics of All TimeMany battles in the old days were won by a bunch of shirtless hairy guys screaming "BLOOOD!!!" and hacking at each other until one side is decimated. Nowadays, usually whoever is quicker at bringing out the atomic bombs wins the war. But, sometimes battles aren't won like that. Sometimes, you really need to use tactics, smart ideas and strategies, ambushes and traps, that will win you the fight. These cases are pretty rare, but there are some pretty good situations where amazing battlefield tactics have turned the tide. Please note that I got lots of the info here online. I hope you enjoy, because it took me a VERY long time to make this particular list.
In 9AD, A huge army of Romans were lured into an ambush by these Germanic "barbarians". The Roman general led three legions through the Teutoburg Forest to suppress a Germanic revolt, and when his 20,000 men were strung out along the line of march, the Germanic leader and his army, who were hidden in the forest, struck with the full force of their warrior army. Most of the 20,000 men were massacred. The Roman defeat wasn't just bad, it was embarrassing. Ambushes demand patience and careful location-choosing, with precise coordination of each strike arm. The Germanic tribesmen, so often thought of as wild barbarians, were not thought to be able to plan such an organised attack.
Teutoburg was one of the worst defeats in the history of the Roman Empire. It was pretty bad. Small groups of Germanic Barbarians just slowly destroyed multiple legends of Romans.
I learned about this in school a few weeks ago
It’s so funny a surprise attack was so successful. I guess times were different back then. After all, it was 2012 years ago.
This is one of the greatest examples of military strategy, and it happened very recently. The unexpected appearance of enemy troops on a side or from behind can damage an army's morale, and if an army is encircled, it can be deprived of supplies or be attacked from any side. Eventually, if completely cut off, it must cut its way out, surrender or fight to the death. This tactic is called envelopment, but it is rarely used as it is so difficult to pull off. The tactic was employed at Stalingrad by the Soviets and against the Germans in Operation Uranus, in 1942. With the Germans pinned down and unable to maneuver, the Soviet delivered a heavy artillery bombardment from 3,500 guns on Romanian and Italian positions on either side of the city, then unleashed several armoured formations, including three tank corps. They combined mobility and speed with devastating firepower, driving deep behind German lines to cut off and then defeat the entire German army in Stalingrad.
This is my personal favourite. It seems really smart and cool. I would love to see a movie like that someday.
Brought an end to one of the longer battles in history at Stalingrad. Also a huge turning point for WW2 in the Eastern front.
Ever heard of Napoleon? He was the brains behind this one. At Austerlitz in 1805, Napoleon chose a deployment that would tempt the opposing Austro-Russian force to attack him on his right. In doing so, he knew he would be able to overextend his enemies. Although under significant pressure, Napoleon held his reserve back until he was absolutely certain the allies were committed, then he struck. His troops smashed the allied centre, beat off a counter-attack and then curled around the isolated allied left. It was a decisive victory, won by the precise commitment of resources at the critical moment.
Napoleon was a military genius. Austerlitz was one of his best victories.
Sometimes, crazily enough, just dramatically and very suddenly charging at the opposing and stronger army will be intimidating enough to win the battle. This was the case at the Battle of Arsuf during the Third Crusade (1189-92). It was the Europeans against the Saracens, and it was not looking good for the Europeans. The European had marched under a rain of arrows for hours, as Saracen archers tried repeatedly to goad them out of their tight formation. If they separated, they could easily be picked off one by one. So, obviously, they wouldn't do that, right? The Saracens were thinking that too, when suddenly, the knights charged at Saracens' infantry and light cavalry. The effect was so dramatic and shockingly surprising that the Saracens broke and fled, or were crushed by the sheer weight of the attack.
this is funny, but not smart
Napoleon sure was busy. This is the second one featuring him on this list, and it was in the same year! But this time he had his butt handed to him. Napoleon ordered his men to concentrate all French and Spanish naval forces to break the Royal Navy and thus pave the way for the invasion of England. But some smart British military guy called Nelson proved adept at unnerving his adversary and off-balancing the French plans. At Trafalgar, Nelson broke with the traditions of naval warfare and thrust two columns into the French line to bring about a fight where his men's superior seamanship and gunnery would win the day. The French were pinned into place and then thrown into confusion by Nelson's bold and courageous action, producing one of this country's most glittering victories.
Remember how I said Napoleon was a genius? Well this is a rare case of him not being a genius.
It’s funny to see Napoleon, who is so famous at everything, get humiliated so badly 🤣
Deception is something that works when you plant enough doubt in your enemies minds that they change their plans. This worked a long time ago, During World War I. Anyways, the Royal Navy (british guys) struggled to find a solution to U-boat attacks in the Atlantic. Yet it was noticed early on that the Germans preferred to surface and use the less sophisticated main armament on the foredeck to sink their victims. A number of 'Q-ships' were deployed as a solution. Q-ships are civilian vessels with concealed guns and big weapons and stuff. With holds packed with wood to enable them to float even when torpedoed, they were deliberately sent into areas where U-boats were known to be operating. As the U-boat surfaced, side panels were dropped to clear the line of fire for concealed guns, and by doing so they sunk the U-boat after it surfaced to attack a merchantman off south-west England.
Deception is always key. I love those U-boats.
This is probably the most famous other than the infamous “surprise attack!”
I like this one because it happened really recently, which shows how tactics can still be used today.
I think that this is a type of warfare when you concentrate all of your forces to a very small portion of the enemy, like a flank. This works because the rest of the bigger army is much slower in getting to the small part of their army that is being attacked, and by the time they get controlled and in the right direction, the portion of their army that the concentration was performed against will be decimated, and the army employing the concentration will have retreated. An example of this was in 1917, when the Jagdgeschwader (were they trying to make it impossible to spell?) formations used this to win a battle spectacularly against the opposing allied forces.
During various wars, the Netherlands have had to use crazy military tactics to win wars, the most notable of which in 1584 to 1546, which I’ll explain to you in a second. The Netherlands is a very low country. The only reason they aren't almost completely flooded is because of their dikes. In this case, they literally moved the dikes and flooded their land, which was a very effective way of stopping the opposing armies. This enormous opposing Navy would arrive, deposit an enormous force of soldiers, and the moment they get on the ground, "bye bye, land"! The Netherlands immediately flood them. Hey, they can't invade something that doesn't exist!
This is hilarious. “The enemy is approaching, sire! What do we do?”
“We must destroy our own land, men! After all, you can’t conquer something that doesn’t exist!”
“What ARE you SMOKING, sire?!?!”
One of the tactics wich requires the whole military.
Best example is the capitulation of France after 4 weeks of fighting.
The downside is that it is useless in long wars because it is relying on quick and decisive battles.