Top 10 Biggest Sony Pictures Animation Cash Grabsiliekpiez Sony Pictures Animation is a pretty hated animation studio. For reasons like cash grabs, making sequels to every successful movie they make, etc. Some of their cash grabs almost Go the Distance. They make so many cash grabs, sequels and overshadows some great movies like Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs. So, let's talk about some of the biggest they have done and see just how big, not put thought into, or simply make it to get money they have made. Illumination when they have enough movies will also probably earn this list. Sony have hope however, with the upcoming animated movies Spider-Man Into the Spider Verse which I am highly looking forward to. Most of these movies suck, pretty much like most of their movies. But they need to get their act together. Fast.
However, Sony seems to have some creative people with good ideas to get them out of the quicksand they seem to be in and evolve. Because at their best, it is on the level of Dreamworks's best works, their best movie without Aardman is Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, an excellent film and honestly beats most Pixar works, except for 7. It shows that the cash grabs are taking over the other films which have heart and dedication thrown in. Will they do it? Honestly, I do not know but the new Spider-Man movie I am highly looking forward to but they need to stop doing the sequels, cash grabs, and do a creative idea that will maybe work.
The Top Ten
In my old cringeworthy self, I proclaimed I love this movie. In reality, I hate this movie. This movie directly rip offs The LEGO Movie, having a character so they can have Wlydstyle. In fact, their character design is similar. The LEGO movie is amazing, and should be loved. We have HI-5, voiced by a horrible voice actor James Corden, who is a terrible comedian by the way. We have Patrick Stewart play poop, no that is not clever. However, the movie also thinks it is super clever. This is a big issue, as it is not clever. It is pandering on every sense of the word. In fact, Gene voiced by the OK comedian, TJ Miller, is also not a good character. In fact, the animation is kind of decent. That unfortunately makes the movie even worse as they put in that effort for the Emoji Movie. In fact, the message is just "be yourself" not clever with messages in animated movies coming out with movies like "Zootopia", "Inside Out" coming out with great messages. The jokes are near Eight Crazy Nights ...more - iliekpiez
When I saw the title of this list, I knew this would be at the top. Anyway, just a horrible, horrible movie! Avoid
Other people have already perfectly described why this exists as the single worst movie in all of existence, ever. - HeyheyIzDaKaykay
Wow, this is the most predominantly voted first placer I've ever seen in any list here.V 12 Comments
I really like the original Surf's Up, it deserves much more attention then it gets. Now, a sequel came out, but it did not even try. It was basically just to serve as a crossover with WWE. WWE thought that they would mix. Oddly, enough this was a terrible, terrible film. First of all, this does not mix at all. Wrestling and Surf's Up do not mix, oddly enough like all the Hannah Barbera crossovers they have done: (The Flintstones, Scooby Doo, The Jetsons all were in a crossover with WWE. Second of all, you kind of ruin the characters. Chicken Joe is unfunny and annoying, he was funny in the first film. Jon Hader, returns wasting a good voice talent on a terrible film. Next, Cody is ruined and his character is very different and worse from the original. The voice acting all the wrestlers (except for Cena) do badly, as they cannot voice act. Overall, this is one of the worst animated movies of 2017. - iliekpiez
I loved the first one. When I saw the trailer for this one, I was disappointed. I'm sure it's a fine movie for young family audiences. But I still wanted something more. - ShuhBanggg
I hope that Jeremy Shada got paid a lot for this... - phillysports
The original Surf's Up was a great movie, we didn't need this unnecessary sequel/WWE promoting propoganda. - SailorSedna
Open Season, a severely underhated film series, which are all bad and all worsen in quality, was not even worthy of a sequel. Let alone 5 movies, and was Straight to DVD, thank god this was not released in theatres, it is not the worst animated movie of 2015, far from 'Minions', and 'Strange Magic' exist. But the ability it has to be so unfunny in every single sense of the word, that was a Halloween special that will be remembered, hopefully as a Halloween Stinker of a movie, with some of the most unfunny jokes that nearly on the quality of the Emoji Movie. The characters are very annoying. What are people complaining about with Mater? They reach a level that HI-5 is on. Ed in particular is the worst character, and this movie and franchise needs to stop. - iliekpiez
This is not a cash grab. I kinda like these movies, it's the third movie that was bad, at least that's in my opinion. - DinoLover4242
I agree - B1ueNew
You can like this movie, that is perfectly okay. But. A movie based off a popular mobile game, that is severely oversaturated, boring and not very interesting and having many different themes just to get more downloads. (Angry Birds Star Wars-just why? ). Anyway, we have a cliché story, where someone didn't trust someone, they proved to be right and the untrustworthy person is the villain (the pig). Also, this is worse than Sing. (pretty impressive to me). We also have a message about controlling anger, blah blah. It also has some very bad jokes, I mean a lot, this is a awful animated comedy. We have one good thing: Terrence is kind of funny. (He's got one funny moment). But then we have characters like Chuck. Chuck is terrible and worse than Gene from the Emoji Movie. This movie sucks. Sucks hard. - iliekpiez
Ugh why does this atrocity exist? - Randomator
This movie is just horrible - darthvadern
This wasn't a Sony Animation release, it was animated by Sony Imageworks. Anyway, the Angry Birds movie is a good movie.V 4 Comments
The Smurfs movies (cartoon and live action ones) will be remembered as some of the worst movies that Sony Animation has ever done. While the Smurfs is beyond bad, the Smurfs 2 is one of the worst sequels of the 2010s, saying quite a lot. Smurfette is the focus. Now, I feel like she is only the focus because they have a big celebrity, in this case, Katy Perry. A very distracting voice actor. Of course she makes friends with the the other smurfs, of course they get accepted, blah blah blah, just as cliché as the movie Avatar. It also has very bad CGI, not improved the first film, tells you just how much thought, innovation was put into this pile of garbage which is nearly worse than the Green Lantern movie. That is saying a lot, considering that movie's quality. The characters are awful. None of the actors are good, they have as much personality as Kristen Stewart in Twilight. The character by the way, are awful and almost insult the actual good cartoon. - iliekpiez
Open Season has a trilogy. This is a part of the not so good series, that were getting worse and this is the worst of the trilogy. Scared Silly is worse, but still this movie is not very good. Another terrible movie by Sony, that was bringing up the effects of Open Season 2 but in fairness to that movie, it was a 4/10. This movie is a 3/10 but very nearly on the level of Scared Silly. This movie has hit the run out of ideas button and has a circus, a misunderstanding and is so predictable it makes other two movies look like The Mona Lisa. The comedy never made me laugh, and the character remained as annoying as ever, no change at all there. Also, the fact that got terrible reviews makes me happy. - iliekpiez
The worst Open Season film, at least that, in my opinion, the first, second, and fourth are better. - DinoLover4242
Sony had a not very good year in 2017. That is kind of just scratching the surface, they had the worst year of all the animation studios in 2017, and maybe the worst in studios in general. The Star, sucks. It is pretty crap. Now, we have a donkey who wants a bigger life, which has been done so many times it deserves its own cliché studio. In fact, I think that they focus it on animals just so they can get more money out of the movie. In fact, if they focus it on Joseph, who was interesting by the way, not like these animals who are bad characters, but also bland characters as well. We also have some very bad jokes, and some very annoying characters. (sorry if I am getting repetitive, Sony has a knack for doing this a lot). In fact, the story is not very interesting and gets boring pretty fast. A bad movie in a bad year for animation. - iliekpiez
As a Christian, I was totally disgusted by this nonsense filled, unfunny, generic, clichéd film and the fact they had to associate the story of Jesus with something like this. There were better film versions of the story, like Rankin/Bass' The Little Drummer Boy which came out 50 years ago and still has aged like a very fine wine, while this one will age as well as cow's milk.
And the fact they had a bird twerking, is there some zoophile somewhere behind the scenes? Stuff like that needs to go away from family films. - SailorSedna
I don't find this movie series bad, but the fully CGI movie of 2017 was way worse. - DinoLover4242
I know added the sequel. That does not change that this terrible film was not made for money. The Smurfs was a good cartoon, but oversaturated. I would not pick them out do on a movie on. Sony did anyway, of course. And the film made money, but critics hated it. The acting has as much personality as a paint can. Neil Patrick Harris looks bored and probably wondering why he signed up. We have Katy Perry, because a big celebrity has to be needed. Azaria does do a good job as Gargamel, so credit to him though. The CGI is very ugly. Now, they did not even put effort into this. Surely, they did not put any effort what so ever. Next, make the most cliché plot for these movies (cartoon-live action) is to have them stay with a human/humans and they end liking each other, making the story very cliché. Another thing is that it is cartoon live-action incarnation in that they are never good (excluding who framed Roger Rabbit). Almost as bad as the sequel. - iliekpiez
I really like the original Hotel Transylvania and I personally enjoy the sequel it was pretty bad. I could not say more than that, I enjoy the animation and I like other monsters (excluding the girl wolf, Mavis) and I still enjoy Dracula, but the jokes do not work, the story feels reused as Drac zings again, (you should zing once-according the first movie) and the character of Johnny has dramatically devolved from the first two, and is almost as annoying as tow mater. The villain is pretty weak and bland and the character of Dennis, as he has also devolved. The fact that it is on a cruise ship, 100% shows they just went and pressed the run out of ideas button. - iliekpiez
This movie is amazing in my opinion - darthvadern
I wasn't angry at you, it's just I get upset when people think I'm a troll - darthvadern
This is Sony Animation's first film released in 2018, and it was pretty bad. Yeah, it definitely wasn't good. The CGI has barely evolved from The Smurfs, which is not something to brag about to the people. Also, the character of Peter himself is my least favourite character. I kind of hoped that the farmer would roast him so he would stop being so annoying. He was very unfunny, James Corden, a very voice actor, and comedian. Gleeson does give a good performance as the villain, I will say that as he is a very good actor. But, why waste that on Peter Rabbit? I mean, the film is bad, I cannot worsen that status but, yeah, bad, but not more than that. - iliekpiez
Twerking, making fun/cheering of an old man dying from a heart attack, that allergy mocking, and especially that love triangle/borderline bestiality subplot should not belong in a film based on a beloved children's book for kids and families, it's bad enough that a lot of films in that genre nowdays has stuff that is not appropriate (even the cover is stupid, with Peter looking like he's posing for some pin-up magazine).
I can't believe this crap got decent reviews from critics and was supposedly a box office success...and am angry this shallow, terrible version of the story (which is nothing like the book) is how a lot of people nowadays will be introduced to the story of Peter Rabbit...Sony Pictures Animation is to family movies as LJN was to publishing video games as Central Park Media was to licensing anime. - SailorSedna
It was kinda good movie in my opinion. - DinoLover4242
It was okay
This sure as hell isn't a Sony Pictures film. Knowing them, however, we may get this crap. If one can make a movie or emojis, they can make one of anything, no matter how stupid.
This isn't even an official film. - SailorSedna
What? This movie was a masterpiece (at least in my opinion), the story was actually pretty good even though a bit clichéd - darthvadern
This is the worst of the Smurfs film, way worse in my opinion than the live action/cgi hybrid film versions, using so many non-movie-related cliches and is predictable compared to the live action versions. This is the true cash-grab that Sony Pictures Animation has made. This movie doesn't deserve to exist. - DinoLover4242
The fact that people bash ElectricDragon505 for bashing Sony Pictures Animation films such as the Hotel Transylvania trilogy, The Emoji Movie, the live-action The Smurfs films and so forth (yet he was also in trouble for praising Aardman in general and Surf's Up 1) is why people are sickened.
Related ListsTop 10 Cartoon Cash Grabs Top 10 Movie Cash Grabs Top Ten Best Movies from Sony Pictures Animation Reasons Why Sony Pictures Animation Sucks Biggest Cash Cows of All Time
21 days old
2. Surf's Up 2: Wave Mania
3. Open Season: Scared Silly
2. Hotel Transylvania 3
3. The Angry Birds Movie
2. Open Season: Scared Silly
3. Surf's Up 2: Wave Mania