Top Ten Flaws With the Holy BibleLet me get this straight, I do believe in God, and I do consider the Bible to be mostly accurate. But there are some things in the Bible that I, and many others, do not agree with. What are some things that YOU do not agree with the are contained in the Bible? This list is not intended to offend anyone, this is just my personal opinion.
I believe that this is completely wrong. Literally everything is a sin. It is 100% impossible to be free of sin. The whole reason why everyone is afraid of homosexuality is because of some book. I really am sorry if this offends anyone, but this is a website for opinions and that's why I will say mine. It may be a sin, but we homosexuals are just tired of hearing it over and over again.
Let me get this straight: You think you can pick and choose what you want from the Bible, especially the Old Testament? Read the four Gospels; Jesus treated the Law n an inseparable whole. If you don't agree with the Bible, just say you're not a Christian and think the Bible's bullcrap. But don't speak out of both sides of your mouth. Also, if you can arbitrarily choose what you like out the Bible and say, "THAT part isn't true, but the parts I like are", do you think your preferences determine what is true in the Bible? If I would prefer to fly, can I do that?
The bible states that this is a sin. I am not homosexual, but I do not see anything wrong with being homosexual.
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
Homosexuality was probably a sin back then because there weren’t that many people. So we needed heterosexuality. Nowadays, not only are there a ton of people, but it is beginning to get overpopulated. So it should be fine today.
The Bible never directly says that slavery is just, but there is a little bit of evidence in scripture which states that slavery is "ok."
"As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are around you. You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their clans that are with you, who have been born in your land, and they may be your property. You may bequeath them to your sons after you to inherit as a possession forever. You may make slaves of them, but over your brothers the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another ruthlessly."
Well, slavery was kinda normal in ancient times. It continued on until the 1800s basically. However, if slavery is allowed, then why did the Jews continue doing it if they were enslaved by the Egyptians?
This doesn't encourage slavery. It states the times. Plus, back then, most slaves wernt black, they were war slaves, which we still have common today.
Reason I left conservative Christianity. And became just a Theist
This isn't even meaning that women are the inferior gender LOL. There are tons of women in the Bible that are heroes. Considered to most cultures during biblical times, the Bible gives women many more rights than were usual. Women are equal to men, there is no place in the Bible which says differently. Saying "wives, submit yourselves to your husbands" isn't saying, women, submit to men. This is saying, I believe, that Wives should give themselves to their husbands, depend on them and obey them. And husbands are supposed to submit themselves to the church. There's nothing wrong with this.
The bible, along with the Quran and a few other religious books, states that men are above women.
"Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church."
And then they wonder why I say that religious women are A) mentally retarded B) enjoying being told they are inferior. Why would any woman be a Christian? This makes no sense to me, you can't just ignore the fact that it's written
Women are not property. They should not be treated like it either. They should not be forced into marriage or anything of the matter
Goodness! This I believe in the sense that it was written, was talking about when a man divorces his wife cause he lusts after another woman. And that, is in fact adultery. Please read the context the verse was written in before making a foolish statement on the internet
The bible states that if you get a divorce, you should not remarry, for if you do, you are committing adultery.
"Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery."
Seeing as cameras didn't exist in Bible times, why oh why did no one do a small painting of Noahs ark. I have got history books of times before cameras with paintings of what they looked like.
Maybe gilgamesh was written about this flood? Maybe the Bible tells of how it happened and why, and gilgamesh included it, as it happened?
It's total bullocks and it's practically copied from the Epic of Gilgamesh but with names changed.
It's a childish story, no one older than 10 should believe it happened.
The bible states that you should not ever get a divorce... So if you partner is abusive and hateful, you are just supposed to put up with them for the rest of your life?
"What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."
Marriage is also supposed to be holy, not on a whim. If you truly love who you are marrying and have dated them enough and know them enough, you should have no problem keeping them
You don't disown your father because he is abusive. Why then should it be different in marriage. Your souls are bound together, signing a form doesn't change that
What in the cases of Infedilety? Or Domestic Abuse? Or the partner commits a heinous act?
No joke, this is actually a thing.
"If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity."
The military is clearly not for this
Be puting reference
Ok, WHEN IS A WOMAN GONNA GRAB TESTICLES IN A FIGHT? THAT IS HIGHLY IMPROBABLE.
Philosophy is in no way "evil." It should be encouraged! I personally believe that it should be mandatory to take Philosophy in High School. It is more important that people give it credit for.
"See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ."
By the way what do philosophers have to say
"everything is nonsense" why do I need someone to tell me that?
THE BIBLE AT TIMES IS PHILOSOPHY. HYPOCRITICAL MUCH? No wonder when some say I am philosophical I am evil
And no one even says what it was except most say "apple"
Looking at how many teens explore their sexuality. Nobody listens to this scripture
Imagine how many problems in this country would be solved if this was obeyed.
Lets bring back the word "Bastard" if a baby is born without marriage.
This one made sense back then since there were no abortions, but now there are sooo...
The bible states that it is easier for a camel to fit into the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter heaven. It does not say that if you are rich, you will burn in hell, so you should not become rich. But it is saying that you should not desire to be rich. I have to disagree with this. Wealth is very important. Sure there is a lot of greed in this world, but if you are a kind hearted individual, you should strive to become rich.
Sometimes you need wealth for food, shelter, supplies, etc.
However, not all millionaires are greedy. Some might donate lots to charity, like Bill Gates does.
Its wrong to be physically attracted to someone also, its called adultery. So we all get a ticket to Hell for that.
Desiring for extreme wealth has led many a rational human to fall. So this is actually wise in saying.
Actually, the bible constantly states that you should always give to the poor. But there is one instance in the bible where Judas wants to sell something and give the money to the poor. Jesus replies that "you will always have the poor, but you shall not always have me." Saying that, he used the stuff on himself. This one instance does not make any sense whatsoever. Why would you promote giving to the poor, but then say that you are far more important than the poor? It is true, but it is also selfish.
You must have read this part with your eyes in your mouth. Spit them out, put them back in your socket and go read the entire passage again
Always help those in need. But if the person is leeching off you. It is wrong
There is one instance in the bible where a huge battle takes place. The "good guys" win, and they begin to take prisoners. But God told a very wise man that there shall be no prisoners. So the man orders the prisoners to be executed. That does not sound evil at all...
How is anyone in a war Good?
This is total bullocks
Where is it written?
Let's walk around a desert for 40 years.
"My feet are in agony arrrgghh"
"This is boring"
I can't believe this idiot that obviously doesn't know what's best for humans thinks that we will all bend our knees to him.
You know illustrations in the Bible after the dead sea scrolls. It might have made the Bible a bit more believable?