Top 10 Lamest Arguments Used by Christians

Let that sink into you. How DID you get here? The big bang you say? Alright, let's say that there were two billiard balls. One gets hit with a cue ball, and goes 3 mph. That ball hits the other ball, can it go more than 3 mph? No, of course not. In the big bang theory, two atoms hit each other head-on then exploded, creating the universe. Can two atoms seriously hit each other and create something bigger than possibly another element? No, it can't.

So, to answer how do you think you got here. The answer: GOD!

Seems to me that religious people are only aware of one alternative theory : the big bang. There are more theories than the big bang who are equally plausible. The oldest and now the less plausible theory is the god-theory. It's modern science and it's progressions that will maybe someday explain the beginning of the universe. It's certainly not the sudden proof of existence of god that will explain it!

I believed for thirteen years. Someone I knew believed and he used his religion to justify his poor actions. "God has a plan". He drank himself to death.

So is this the equivalent of saying that if you see a film, you MUST be an actor or actress?

I'm not a Christian but I once heard a pastor say that God answers every prayer. He answer with "yes" "no" or "not yet"

One time I was arguing with a Christian friend who tried to convince me God is the real god not Allah (I am a Muslim by the way). He told me to disprove god, I replied to disprove Allah. He got mad and asked about which religion got better MORALS, and I replied that morality is not relevant to reality.

The burden of proof isn't on somebody to prove that something doesn't exist, it's for somebody to prove that something does exist. Especially if the atheist isn't saying they believe that there is no God, but just saying they merely lack a belief that there is a God.

If god is omniscient it means he knows the future. If he knows the future it means that the future will develop the way he knew. If the future shouldn't develop that way it means he didn't knew the future. If everything develops because his omniscient it also means that everything happens necessary. And if everything happens necessary it means that there is no free will. You can't change something that will happen necesserary. And if there's no free will it means that people aren't responsable for their sins and acts. If god punish people because of their sins from wich they are not responsable it would mean that god is immoral. The conclusion is : Or god is omniscient and also immoral or he is not immoral but in that case he isn't omniscient. Logic says that god can't be omniscient and good if he gave free will to men. In more logical terms it means that there is no god and for that matter a god-given free will.

Again, this is not a lame argument. Believers say this because they know that there is more to the interaction between God and humanity than the stupid deus ex machines seen in certain forms of entertainment.

Again, this is not a lame argument. Beleivers say this because they know that there is more to the interaction between God and humanity than the stupid deus ex machines seen in certain forms of entertainment.

My church used to say this every time I would ask a question about God. I started doubting religion the exact moment they told me this sentence.

The idea of the universe just coming into existence is the second stupidest thing I have ever heard. There is absolutely no proof of it. But there is proof of God. Consider this:
All cells come from preexisting cells
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed

So the universe can not just come out of nothing

There isn't a Big Bang. If there was, how would those atoms be created? Would they be created out of nowhere?

Answer: The Big Bang

Why can't you Christians believe the works of science already?

Listen even if Christian God exists...and he has committed the sin of sloth lazy to not appear on earth in our time. He would not send his son down here to behave like a monster, Jesus who was supposed to be peaceful. "Fundie who believes come to Heaven" "Sinner you will be beheaded" The seas turn into blood, some evil looking horsemen appear, Sinners go to Hell.

That's crap because if you had to believe that than we're in the end of times for more than thousands of years now. However, I saw that you " cameo " will stop and make an end at your top ten sites ( for me that's worst than the end of times because your sites were really good ). Can you can reconcider it to do not so?

The bible is made by humans, so if you say " the bible says " it's the same thing that you say " people say ". And if I had to believe the morals and thinking of the stupid people that made the bible Thousand of years ago I would be stupid myself.

The bible says you have to stone people who are blasphemers to death.
People reason hatred against homosexuals with "the bible says it's bad" yet I wanna see somebody who is stoning a person for blasphemy. I mean, the bible says so...

Yep, it's a book. Written by humans. Who are flawed.

I agree on that one. The evolution theory is not an exact science but it also doesn't proof that therefor we came by the hands of a god. Just because science hasn't the answers yet to that question doesn't mean that one day that science will not be able to explain this.

Actually humans are more closely related to the great apes, not monkeys. And to everyone saying we evolved from fish, we evolved from single-celled organisms.

Monkeys came from other, less evolved monkeys and the evolution split down the line. We did not come from monkeys. Don't say this and look stupid.

Ya good wasn't he some horrible guy before "He was forgiven" and, he was horrible with god controlling him or whatever.

If he died or if he had lived what would be the difference in my life?

And does that change my life in any way?

Yes and no. The Hebrews mixed history with theology, but there are huge portions of the bible that exaggerate, or try to tie religious belief with factual history, much of it being based on, or identical to, earlier Mesopotamian religious beliefs, in spite of things they knew were true even then. As well as many that contradict themselves. It is first, and foremost, a book of Christian theology, not history.

No, it isn't. But it's a great read, all those 1000+ pages.

If it's a history book, can I read about the Ancient Greeks in it? (sarcasm)

Personally, I think hell is fictional. And if I die, then I (plus everyone who dies) will stay in my grave.

Only if you did something really unthinkable, such as committing terrorism or murder.

It might not be so bad. I mean, they say there's pizza with pineapple there.

Except Humans are the worst species of animal on earth. Why are we so special just because we have managed to destroy the earth?

Thanks, Captain Obvious. Because God was a human (if he even exists, of course)

This is why I hate when people say that if they're abstinent or are pretty wholesome, they're a "child of god". I am abstinent and quite wholesome and I'm an atheist. If someone tells me I'm a "child of god/Jesus" because of my lifestyle, I'll tell them to stop giving me that schtick.

No, it can be possible without religion. I still have morals and I'm an atheist

But, Atheists don't really have a faith. Or do they?

This claim made me lose a brain cell

Ok I'm a Christian, and I cringe whenever I hear this argument. It's like saying that you're still alive because 2 midgets dropped a ring into a volcano. Do you think Lord of the Rings is a history book? No, you don't and Atheists don't think the Bible is a history book and therefore don't believe in God, so to an Atheist asking God forgiveness is like praising Frodo and Sam for their courage.

Ok looking back the Lord of the Rings refrence looks a bit akward, but it hopefully got the messagd across.

Conscience. And if they think that their conscience is clear it means that they think that they didn't do anything wrong because it's forgiven.

This is also not a lame argument. Theists believe in a close relationship with God, but it doesn't mean that they expect God to spoil them rotten. Hard times tend be a test of faith because God wants to see if humans are strong enough to deal with the harsh reality of the world.

If god is testing me for something I didn't ask than he must be a very evil person (or whatever he is). He likes to play with his supposed creation or what?

Why would God test me or anyone in general? Even though I am a Christian, this statement sounds stupid in my opinion.

The worlds temperature has not increased in any major way over the past century. It may have changed a few degrees every now and then but that is completly natural and has always occurred. No doubt greenhouse gasses are a problem but overall the mass hysteria over "global warming" is complete uncalled for and defiantly should not be a concern for our government despite what Obama thinks.

As a Christian, I disagree. Global Warming is real and we really need to fix this catastrophic situation as fast as possible.

To answer you question Tek, homosexuality is a sin, and just like if you were a murderer, you would go to hell for being gay. Some people claim they are Christians, but support homosexuality because they want to be accepted by the rest of the world not not be labeled a homophobic. These people do not demonstrate the true beliefs of Christians, and rather support gays so people don't attack them. Christians are called not to live by the worlds standard, but to live by gods standard. Therefore, Christians need to accept that both murder and those who practice sexual immorality are both sinners

Being satanic would mean that we're not atheists. If we believe in satan. We'd be killing each other.

YET YOU ASK US, 'what is stopping you from killing everyone. YOU say that we drink blood and use it to draw Pentagons. Few Christian's criticize. But some do. It is racist.

How are we Satanic if we don't believe in Satan...?

Time is relative. You can however measure time in relation with the speed of light. But when matter goes faster than light it will transform in pure enegergy. And beyond pure energy even time stops because it's impossible to measure something that doesn't react anymore. That is a proven scientefic theory. My question is, where is god in all that?

This is not a lame argument. It is used by beleivers because God is supposed to transcends humans in everything, including patience.

I can't believe my eyes! God made some people bad just because I'm suposed to help them? If one of those bad people is for instance a religious extremist who decides in the name of god to blow up with a bomb people who don't believe ( it can even be your family that is a victim of his acts ), I am the one who is suposed to help him? ( Response to the comment that god made bad people because we have to help them )

I know for a sure fact that I came from my mother! And besides that, what about handicap people, retarded people, bad people... is that the work of a good god?

Atheists can be good people (I'm an atheist and I'm not that bad) and they get their morals from either their family or their environment (I.e. me).

I get my morals from myself. And I'm a good person!