Top 10 Movies that Should Have Higher Rotten Tomatoes Scores

Brilliant film. Did it deserve Best Picture over Pulp Fiction & The Shawshank Redemption? That's debateable. Did it deserve the utter vitriol and backlash it received as a result (hence the lower than expected RT score)? Of course not. While slightly sappy, this is a very well done movie which is well paced, acted and written. Not to mention that this is one of the few movies to nearly bring me to tears. Great movie which is unfairly hated.

Terrific movie! Rotten Tomatoes sucks!
-Recondite

Great movie. Deserves a better score.

It's 74% Is Just About Right In My Opinion

Judging a movie by it's sequels is like judging a book by it's cover. It is a serious error in judgement.

My version:

Transformers 1: 88%
Transformers 2: 46%
Transformers 3: 90%
Transformers 4: 61.5%
Transformers 5: 15%
Bumblebee: 89.9%

Why does this movie have 67%?! It's the best of the franchise, and overall it's a great movie!

I loved this film!

What I'm seeing right now is that you're saying that more people need to like the movies you like? - NikBrusk

Cars series rotten tomatoes scores my version:
Cars: 100%
Cars 2: 62%
Cars 3: 85%

74%?!?! It's better than most of thr other Pixar movies! So stupid Rotten Tomatoes!

Deserves 89%. NOT 74%! So dumb Rotten Tomatoes!

This should get a higher score on Rotten Tomatoes. It only got an 84% on Rotten Tomatoes, while Star Wars Rebels, which isn't even that good, got a 100%.

Star Wars Rebels is overrated and Rogue One is underrated.

Maybe It Should Have Gotten The Same Score As The Force Awakens, But 84% Is Ok.

Rotten tomatoes is dumb! It should of got a 13%

71% is so low. This film was really amazing and is certainly one of the best works of Nolan. The movie deserves at least a 89%. I really just don't understand why it got such a low score.

Interstellar was amazing.

Underrated film.

It should be in the 90s.

Very underrated comic book movie, which is very adult in terms of character, thematic substance and moral ambiguity. Not to mention how great the acting is and it's love for the source material.

I really hope the critics read this. The lot of you, get yourselves psychiatrists or at least re-educated. Because seriously, how low this movie's score is is beyond me. Get an idea of cinematography will you, idiots.

Of course disney put this here

At the very least, this is a very ambitious and daring movie, the likes of which we don't see anymore, at least not on this scale. It's polarisation among viewers is understandable, but at the same time, this is a very interesting film which is very stylish and very well acted. Considering that and the fact that critics seem to love other films like this that are far inferior (like 2001 or whatever pretentiousness Terrence Malick feels poorly out), this deserves a higher score. Not a great movie, but a unique one.