Top Ten Ways the Beatles are Better Than Led ZeppelinI saw a "Led Zeppelin are better" list, so let's counter that.
The Beatles were the big bang of rock and roll. They were more innovative, artistic, and influential than any other band in history. Ask Eric Clayton, he was in awe of the fab four. Top 5 slots on billboard in 1964 and more hits down the list.
John Lennon Paul McCartney and George Harrison were the best I love hey Jude best song ever
The Beatles broke up before Led Zeppelin released over half of their studio albums. Therefore, The Beatles are MORE Dated than Led Zeppelin, and they are both good. If it were this way, then we would all like Justin Bieber over all the other artists, and this would be an Anti-Beatles site.
The Beatles changed with every album. Led Zeppelin and most other bands just sounded the same all the time.
The Beatles did more different genres of music just in "the White Album" than Pink Floyd or any metal band did in their entire career.
The Beatles are nowhere near the most diverse band. Pink Floyd, Metallica, and Judas Priest, are all more diverse, and so is Led Zeppelin.
Magical Mystery Tour, that's all I have to say.
John Lennon and Paul McCartney are actually good singers, Plant is still pretty good though
Nahhh. Robert, Jimmy, John, and other John have stronger personalities. The reason why I say this is because Zeppelin had more sex appeal. They knew how to shake the arena more than the beatles. Sure, the beatles were more. But Zeppelin was more progressive, with other bands at the time like Grateful Dead, Cream, Yes, Black Sabbath, and even Deep Purple. To go back on topic, Zeppelin showed off their personalities, with Plant showing his sex appeal on stage, Page wearing cult related clothes on stage, Bonham being the shy guy, and Jones having a big smile on his face while performing. Besides, the Beatles were not who they seemed to be when they were off stage. So there you have it, Zeppelin has stronger personalities
And entertaining, often pleasant, engaging personalities with thoughtful and witty perspectives to share.
Huh... no, I disagree. John Paul Jones is a virtuoso. Argument is invalid.
I disagree. John Paul Jones is a virtuoso bassist and his arrangement is incredible
They are both very influential, but if it weren't for The Beatles, none of the great bands you hear today would be around.
This should be the top reason. Led Zeppelin got famous by covering old blues songs.
They also got plagiarism cases.
Beatles also stole songs.
I agree with this, apart from Stairway To Heaven, All My Love, and Immigrant Song, Led Zeppelin's lyrics aren't that great.
As much as I want to point out that looks do not matter, it is kinda true.
Although I like The Beatles better, this isn't a good reason.
What a valid reason that is.
Not a good reason.