PG-13 Movies That Should Have Been Rated RHernandez1614
The Top Ten
R all the way
Uncut version is better
Too much violence
Fantastic film but waayy to dark and disturbing to be PG-13
I’m watching it right now, yeah it should not be pg 13V 1 Comment
A majority of Earth's people died. It needed to have blood and less comedy. - Hernandez1614
So Teens Don't Have To See A Michael Bay Film
Should be Pg-13/12a
This Shouldn't be PG-13. As for: Poltergeist (1982), The Ring (2002), Drag Me to Hell (2009), Robocop (2014). And why isn't Split this list? Defiantly R.
I love sucker punch o yeah its about girls dancing for people, that spells rated r all over it
There is a psychopath in the movie who kills people for fun. Sometimes is disturbing.
I'm concerned how kids are going to react after parents take them to see this movie.
Sometimes the impression is more than the actual vision.
This is a good movie and while it came close for an r rating I guess it wasn’t enoughV 4 Comments
Very scary and needs to be rated. However, once you start watching the movie, it will give you a definite lesson such as don't be so ignorant about having no idea of ghost existence. They are everywhere and they can attack anyone else. Above all, be aware and open your mind when you're buying a house that is not familiar to you especially its history.
Creepy, creepy. It's a little too much for this 13-year old.
Its creepy for PG-13
Yep I agreeV 1 Comment
This movie shouldn't have been R. It was a cool movie, but confusing. I liked Terminator 2 way more. - Alpha101
This movie shouldn't have been Rated R. Actually, the first three probably could've been rated PG-13 today - maybe. People jump at blood in a movie. They think it's really bad. I don't understand it.
Should've went for an R. The Terminator movies were meant to be rated R. Nothing makes me madder than when a good R-rated franchise gets ruined with a PG-13!
Very disturbing movie, too much, I believe for a thirteen year old. It also delves into deeper and perhaps, darker themes than outwardly supposed, such as eating disorders (If you don't believe me about this, just watch the movie and try to pick up on the hints, there are a lot. )
I can tell by the name - Ajkloth
There is literally a scene which resembles emetophilia. This should be R.
Whoever made this PG-13 should be shot in the face because zombies and PG-13 do not mix at all, zombie movies NEED to be excessively gory
This movie is bloody and includes sequences of strong violence, this movie shouldn't even be pg-13 on the theatrical version.
I can see the dark shadow of the private parts of wolverine when nude in a bath tub.
This is R
This remake is pg-13 and doesn’t have any real blood or gore, so it’s definitely pg-13 worthy
This movie is barely even worthy of PG-13 it is more like PG
Yeah I still can't see this being below PG-13 there is a lot of destruction and stuff. Plus a weed joke. - Extractinator04
Coulson's death almost caused the entire movie to be R
Unlike the other 007s. This is R Rated scale.
Too Risque and Violent.
This movie's a little intense for a PG-13 rating.
Why is this on the list?
Cannibal Corpse is in it. Enough saidm
Too much nudity. - BoltMarksman
Not even close to being rated R.
But the nudity isn't sexualized. If a movie's nudity is sexually provocative, it should be slapped with an R rating.
Full frontal nudity...that is all.
This movie should be R because of a guy being shot in the head and a tank falling onto a construction worker made a strong explosion that I could even see the body parts.
This is rated R
Should definitely be R/15 because the sex is VERY strong.
It's austin powers for christ sake.
I know it's not PG-13, but it still should've gotten an R rating because of the face peeling scene.
What is a PG movie doing on a PG-13 list. - Extractinator04
This Movie Should Have Got an R Rating From the Start!
If that's a walking doll I would be out thanks a lotV 2 Comments
Why should that be R. If any Adam Sandler movie should be rated R that isn't, it would be You Don't Mess With the Zohan.
Nah it IS the most violent Jurassic movie but nowhere near anything even slightly R. It's only slightly more violent than Lost World. - Extractinator04
No...there wasn't much more violence than in the previous movies. Think of all the deaths the Spinosaurus and Tyrannosaurus Rexes caused. And don't forget the Velociraptors. The violence, intensity, and blood are all about the same, so this movie should be rated PG-13.:)
-Written by an 11 year old kid
This should stay pg-13/12a because blood is only occasional ( like the bbfc says) and it is brilliant
Dude dinos r bloody but I still think PG-13V 1 Comment
Why is Star Wars on the list? Are you completely mad?
So many people were killed, and when the planets were destroyed, and countless billions of people died in their own hell.
So much violence.
I thought the others were intense enough, but I've changed my mind after seeing this.
Spare the teens the embarrasment of this “movie” go watch Empire Strikes Back
Are you kidding me? This deserves its PG-13 rating.
They should've unleashed the blood and guts and gore and the insane fatalities instead of selling out in order to please the kiddies, making a mortal Kombat movie PG-13 is a giant slap in the face to the fans, when the reboot/third film comes out, it NEEDS to borderline NC-17 and have all the blood, gore, and fatalities unleashed and NOT HOLD BACK
It would've got the R rating if they actually put blood and gore in it just like the game.
Mortal Kombat is rad:) and people know their own movie-watching limits so I don't know what to say...
-Again, posted by the 12-year old kid(Drako)
The (probable) reasons this movie didn't get an R rating was because, even though it had insanely graphic violence, it was animated, and had minimal sex and swearing.
I've seen a million more R movies that I would recommend before this filth.
It was less violent than the first one, does have some graphic moments but not much. Also, surprising how much sex and language was in this one unlike other Batman fare, but still not an issue. - Extractinator04
Nowhere near R, not very PG-13, really. - Extractinator04
F words, drugs, no pants, and porn. Rated R all the way!
Yes, it was PG-13 and it should be rated R due to the violence and possibly the language.
LOTS of sex
A bit too mature. - BoltMarksman
Related ListsTop 10 PG Movies that Should Have Been Rated PG-13 Top 10 G-Rated Disney Movies that Should've Been Rated PG Top 10 PG Movies That Should've Been Rated R Top Ten Movies That Should Be Rated R PG Movies that Should Be Rated R
5 years, 287 days old
2. Sucker Punch
3. Pearl Harbor