PG-13 Movies That Should Have Been Rated RHernandez1614
The Contenders: Page 2
Why should that be R. If any Adam Sandler movie should be rated R that isn't, it would be You Don't Mess With the Zohan.
This movie should be R because of a guy being shot in the head and a tank falling onto a construction worker made a strong explosion that I could even see the body parts.
This is rated R
Nah it IS the most violent Jurassic movie but nowhere near anything even slightly R. It's only slightly more violent than Lost World. - Extractinator04
No...there wasn't much more violence than in the previous movies. Think of all the deaths the Spinosaurus and Tyrannosaurus Rexes caused. And don't forget the Velociraptors. The violence, intensity, and blood are all about the same, so this movie should be rated PG-13.:)
-Written by an 11 year old kid
This should stay pg-13/12a because blood is only occasional ( like the bbfc says) and it is brilliant
Dude dinos r bloody but I still think PG-13V 1 Comment
Are you kidding me? This deserves its PG-13 rating.
I know it's not PG-13, but it still should've gotten an R rating because of the face peeling scene.
What is a PG movie doing on a PG-13 list. - Extractinator04
If that's a walking doll I would be out thanks a lot
This classic movie is only PG; although, considering the specific scenes within the movie, it would be close to being R-rated.
If not, at least it would be PG-13, based off today's standards.
They should've unleashed the blood and guts and gore and the insane fatalities instead of selling out in order to please the kiddies, making a mortal Kombat movie PG-13 is a giant slap in the face to the fans, when the reboot/third film comes out, it NEEDS to borderline NC-17 and have all the blood, gore, and fatalities unleashed and NOT HOLD BACK
It would've got the R rating if they actually put blood and gore in it just like the game.
Mortal Kombat is rad:) and people know their own movie-watching limits so I don't know what to say...
-Again, posted by the 12-year old kid(Drako)
The (probable) reasons this movie didn't get an R rating was because, even though it had insanely graphic violence, it was animated, and had minimal sex and swearing.
Should definitely be R/15 because the sex is VERY strong.
I've seen a million more R movies that I would recommend before this filth.V 1 Comment
It was less violent than the first one, does have some graphic moments but not much. Also, surprising how much sex and language was in this one unlike other Batman fare, but still not an issue. - Extractinator04
Nowhere near R, not very PG-13, really. - Extractinator04
F words, drugs, no pants, and porn. Rated R all the way!
Yes, it was PG-13 and it should be rated R due to the violence and possibly the language.
LOTS of sex
Related ListsTop 10 PG Movies That Should've Been Rated R Top 10 G-Rated Disney Movies that Should've Been Rated PG Top Ten Child Stars from 13 to 22 Who Have Gotten Pretty Rated R Top Ten Movies That Should Be Rated R Top 10 PG Rated Movies that Should Be Rated G
4 years, 358 days old
2. Sucker Punch
3. Pearl Harbor