Top Ten Phenomenal Questions People Don't Really Think About
The Top Ten
Okay, your view on speed of light is wrong. Time doesn't slow down because time is relative. You can however measure time in relation of the speed of light. Changing the time would only be possible if you travel faster than the speed of light. In theory! The thing is that if matter travels faster than light it becomes pure energy ( a theory by Einstein ) and when you have pure energy you won't get any chemical reaction. This means that measurable time will stop. Reaction is only possible if you have energy and vice versa energy is only possible if you have reaction ( a human paradox because if we could answer this we would be able to understand with exact proof the creation of the universe and life ). As we all know, life is made out of chemical elements and if there's nothing anymore to hold this together ( reaction / energy ) we would simply dissolve into pure energy.
Even if it is or will be possible, it's a bad idea. Think about it. If there was a time period where nothing was living, including plants, humans would not survive. Also, if you were a bad person, you could go back in time and shoot up a building and steal everything. And just before they could catch you, you could just go back to modern times. It's a very bad idea.
Yes, in a way. You could travel at the speed of light, because time slows down as you approach this speed. Let's say you were gone for 4.4 solar hours. At light speed, you wouldn't age at all, but the rest of us here on Earth would have aged eight years. Also, with time being one of the 10 dimensions, you could time travel with a black hole.
People think about this all the time.
It's very difficult to understand but the misconception of this question is to believe that time exists. As we all know, time is relative and the measurement of time was made-up by humans to make it us easy. Sure, we see progression of things around us and our life passing by but compared to a universal measurable scale this is no more than 1/10.000 of a second ( if not more! ). Meaning that our minds are too limited to understand a start or beginning ( and for that matter a before ). We can only make speculative theories about it but we can never prove exact facts about it. The greek philosopher Heraclitus said " The universe was always, is now and will always be, it's a eternal existence ". Another greek philosopher Parmenides said " Existence of the past and future are illusions. What was doesn't exist anymore and what will be doesn't exist. Only now exist for real ".
Religious beliefs may cause variation to people's view on this question. But if you're Christian like I am, ask yourself this: if God created everything, what was there before God? How was He created? The Big Bang is obviously a bunch of baloney, whether you're Christian or not.
I am an atheist and I don't necessarily believe the big bang theory, I mean I do but I also do...if that makes sense. I think it is a possibility but not the most true one. I don't even like the word time! This question is truly fascinating but also overwhelming. My theory is "Earth was created and no one ACTUALLY knows how but it doesn't mean their theories are wrong nor are they right."
Perhaps if you don't like the word time, you should ponder it more. - RockFashionista
I'm sick and tired of people saying god did everything! It seems religion is the answer for stupid people. "Hey, what happened? I don't know, so I'll just say god did it" And by the way, there's no such thing as time, time was just thought up by humans to make stuff more convenient. People need to stop mixing science and religion.
They definitely exist. There could be alternate realities; a different place but in the same place. There could be many versions of you living in these other dimensions. How do you get to these dimensions? Black holes.
Totally. When u take a shower, think of each bubble representing a universe. It would look infinite from the inside, but all around, on top, below to all sides, are more. So, YEAH. Totes possible
Why say the word "totes? " You seem very intelligent if you are thinking about something complex like this. You are too good for modern slang. - RockFashionista
If there are How would you get to those Dimensions? What ARE in those dimensions? This is a good question...
They do exist, it's just a question if we will ever be able to explore them.
They exist, it's just that they avoid our planet due to our stupidity.
Aliens who can live in the same atmosphere as we do can't exist in our galaxy because earth is the only planet that has a sun / planet distance made for our conditions of life. If aliens do exist in our galaxy it would be other organisms adapted to other conditions. At the other hand, if in another galaxy there is a planet with equal distance to a sun like in our galaxy, it is possible to find a species that lives in the same conditions like we and even have the same structure of bodies and mind like us.
Humans think aliens are weird green blobs with two antennas sticking out of their heads. Well, they may be, but there is a low chance of thus happening. Aliens are just some other living beings on other living planets. Who knows who is living up there on Mars, Pluto, Saturn? That is why we think they are "Aliens"
Technically, alien means a person or creature that is foreign to a specific place. We are aliens to maybe some other country. If aliens exist, they can be virtually anything. Like maybe a microscopic organism, some kind of animal, anything. As long as they are foreign. Which means that we are aliens to them and probably look like little green figures with big heads and narrowed black eyes slanting downward lol
What nonsense is this? Come on, members (and Admin) - "people don't really think about" this?! How do you define "people"? Most humans I've met and read about who have some basic level of reasonable intelligence and curiosity have spent a lot of time thinking about it
From my experience a lot of kids have god forced upon them, so when they get older they don't question his existence at all and become brainwashed. - SammySpore
I believe that there is a supreme being out there, whether it's the Christian God, Islamic God, etc. I personally believe in Christianity, as it makes a lot more sense than some other religions, and that's how I was eaised, but I definitely doubt almost everything in the Bible. Without the existence of God, the universe couldn't exist. Now, I'm no scientist, but if there is no outside force, then what created matter, electricity, atoms, cells, etc? I could easily be wrong, but that just never made sense to me. Nevertheless, great list.
We humans can 't describe what we call God is. What kind of alive he, she or it is. Maybe all we can say is we have a universe inside electricity, cells, atoms interacting with a greater universe outside. Yes...the Universe may be God. We are made on His image and likeness...and alive he is. Nothing is created, nothing is lost everything changes.
The comments prove that people don't actually think about this. Tons of people are just saying "Of course God is real! You shouldn't try to make people question it! " People just assume that God is real and don't think about it.
It is possible if you really believe that you are possessed. It is a fact that the human mind is so strong that it can change your physical condition. There are proves of people who'd believed that they had cancer ( but they hadn't cancer to begin with! ) so hard that the brains developed signals towards the body that actually the body began to manifest real cancer. So, if your brains would really believe that you are possessed it would manifest to you as real. The difference however is that cancer is a proven fact ( and for that matter it would give you the real thing ) and that demons are not ( meaning that you and only you would see or feel the presence of demons but nobody else would see them ). While one believe can manifest itself to a physical fact the other believe can manifest itself to a paranoid fact which falls in the category of psychological facts.
As a schizophrenic, I always wonder about this. Although usually people don't remember being possessed by demons when they are.
Pure evil IS demonic possession. "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."
Yes. There are many accounts of people being possessed and having to need an exorcism.
Sane or insane are just words to indicate a state of being. For instance, In the 18th century people with epilepsy were in the category of insane people. With the medical knowledge we all know that this isn't true and that this 18th century concept was wrong. Trough history many categories of insanity changed also with the ethics of the time and used by authorities for social control. This means that a concept like " being normal " changes with the times. It doesn't follow a path of progression with a rectilinear development. What was normal or sane in the past can change as insane in the future and what is concidered as insane then change again as normal in a further future. It all depends of the ethics of the times. It can even be possible if we should have a regression of the society with loss of knowledge in the future that people with sickness will be categorized as insane again.
Maybe Earth is another world's hell.
I did not add this question, but whoever did, the answer is NO.
"Sanity" is a concept but there are some crazy people in this world, but then again everyone is a little crazy.
If you can accept the mistakes or regrets as part of life, why should you go back to the past? It's only possible in the future to do not the same mistakes again and to trying to fix what went wrong. It could sometimes even better your situation than to be stuck in the past.
No. What was done in the past stays in the past. We are supposed to learn from those mistakes.
To that I answer by other questions : Is there a need to fix the mistakes of the past? Aren't we strong enough to go on with the mistakes we did?
But well. I'm pretty sure there's a way though I don't really want to change the past since it's what makes us strong today.
Hope so. Then nobody will have to deal with wrecking balls, tweaking, or licking hammers.
Thoughts of babies is not only based on images ( or pictures like you called it here ). It's also based on memories and sounds. Recognition of forms and quantity and sound ( which is the basics of intelligence ) plays a role too ( meaning that they're are able to understand without express them in language, the different forms of things and persons, to make the differences between people he is seeing because of the sound and forms they have etc... ). Once the difference is understood in their minds ( they won't forget the next day what has memorized the day before ) babies are able to express themselves with " crying " to get attention of the thing or person he is thinking about. They can even dream about their experiences ( of what they saw or heard ) like adult dreams ( distortion of thoughts, strange stories etc... ). Scientefic proofs has discovered exact dreamwaves in babies like they are in adults. In fact you can say that babies behave the exact way like adults who can't speak. ...more
Since they can't understand language, I would imagine babies do think only in images.
This is the only question I had never thought about on this list
This is definitely the one that I pondered over the most
Of course there is! Have you never heard about third parties, others than you who agree on reality? The third man theory is very well explained in the theory of perception by Aristoteles. I suggest you read it before asking stupid questions like this one.
Everything anybody ever valued or struggled for... it's all a monstrous, demented gag!
- The Killing Joke
No. To hate everything is impossible. It would completely overload your brain. Oh, not like that? Well the, possibly. It all matters on your perspective. Could we get back to immortalised and stuff now?
This sounds like something Disney1994 would say. The answer is, yes. If you really wanted to, you could ALWAYS find a reason to hate something, regardless of quality. Let's face it: with movies and T.V. especially, it's impossible to please everybody. It's just a fact of life.
Well, this is a matter of opinion, in many cases.
It depends on why you hate something.
Your brain links together images from your early life, with words that go along with it. Using that knowledge, you can try to figure out what something means with no almost context at all How your brain configures your thoughts and runs through it is hard to explain.
The basic of knowledge is the recognition of forms and the quantity of forms. With that basic information in our brains we have developped language. So if you talk or read a language you are in fact given meanings or a remembering ( Plato's anamnesis theory ) to a basic knowledge that was already in your brains.
It just fascinates me that when I read, words on paper have such an impact on my mind.
I think this too often. Do I think and then assign words? Or do I think in words? Would it be possible to truly think deeply without language? It's no wonder language is such an imperitive part of the human experience.
Sin is a " word " and is a concept that has no objective meaning. It is a subjective belief. Because of that it belong in the category of " ethics ". Accepted in religious ethic but in many philosophies not accepted as ethic because of it subjective proposition ( only observations can be in the category of verifications ). So, since the question is about " guaranteed " the answer is for objective lack of reasons no! The religious proposition would say yes, but since this can't be verified because of its subjectivity it really depends on peoples subjective choises between religion or science.
Well, here's the thing: EVERYONE is a sinner, but if you confess your sins to God and accept him as your savior, you'll be fine.
I believe that if someone as a sinner regrets what he/she did as a sinner, may be forgiven by God.
I don't believe in the afterlife. Once your heart stops, it stops. Your brain no longer functions. It's impossible that you have some essence that leaves u. Once your dead, i.e. an empty shell, period.
Heat death. Entropy. I'm no expert, but I think that's what it's called. If everything is truly expanding... There will be a point when we stop and all the stars will be so far away we can't see any of them anymore and then expanding will stop and the universe and all energy will reach some sort of equilibrium and stop being able to do anything and it will all be over.
Or, we keep accelerating... and then at some point.. the universe will all come crashing back and we will see the blinding light of billions of falling stars and be crushed into a dense point to explode back out again. "The Big Crunch" is what I think that is called.
Or we just keep going... Forever. Maybe breaking the speed of light and then life won't be possible but the universe will be there.
And there are more hypothesis' but these do it for me. I won't be here to see any of them anyways.
Yes, there is proof that the universe is degenerating but before this will happen it's for sure that our sun will end in our galaxy. This means the end of life in our galaxy. But don't be alarmed. We're talking about billions of years before that will happen.
Yes, everything must come to an end. Since insects have no prior knowledge of death, they probably think that they will live forever, or do not really think about it at all. We are insects. The universe is our life
Yes, in 5.5 billion years. Get ready folks!
It could be possible if when you traveled back in time and you were in a different position than you were in the past, you could be in a different place than your past body and find it in a different place. But if you were in the same exact position you were in the past, your past and present bodies could collide and form one of you. So my answer is yes and no. Time travel may not even be possible, anyway.
If this is possible the answer would be no! If you had to go back in time it would also mean that you are leaving the present time. You will be missed in the present. You will go back as you were in the past, meaning that if you go back, let's say two years back, you will be two years younger again. If you want to go back before you existed, it would be impossible because your physical condition didn't exist. And even if you would be able to go back before you existed with your present physical condition it would mean a changing from the past. You come back in the present and the world would be changed. But we're talking theory here! It's just facts in speculative thinking and not facts in proven exact thinking!
I find this highly unlikely, however, it definitely could if you travel through dimensions while going back in time.
Matters. It would create a paradox, ripping a hole in the fabric of the universe, but yes
Yes. Absolutely. The existence of mayonnaise was brought in this world to provide the humanity with serene and beautiful sounds as pleasure to our ears. When you touch even just a fragment of the smooth albeit greasy substance, it will always radiate such mellifluous tones and rhythm (be aware that some mayonnaise are very shy and insecure about their voices so the sounds may be very, very, very, VERY, hushed). The next time you take that container of mayonnaise from the shelf or the refrigerator, give them an embrace because they deserve all the love in this world for their music!
No Patrick, Mayonnaise is not an instrument.
Horseradish is not an instrument either.
Mayonnaise isn't an instrument but it can be used as a tool ( making something based on mayonnaise, changing the chemicals by reactions that are in mayonnaise to produce something else etc... ). But the main utility of mayonnaise is to leave it like it is and to eat it.
No Patrick, Mayo is NOT an instrument. Now, can we get back to more civilized questions?
I always think about this. Everything is happening somewhere. It's really interesting to think about, really.
I am always wondering this every time I have a crazy delusion. But maybe that's just the delusional me.
Yes. Parallel dimensions are completely probable, and since they are parallel (emphasis on parallel) the exact same thing could not happen (on exact). The real question is, is there an original universe, or are they all in sinc
I like this one. It would be a good plot for a Pixar movie.
All those comments here about an afterlife, heaven etc... makes no sense ( Just adding that I don't have a problem for those who believes and have faith in that. It's their opinion. ). It makes no sense because if you say that there's life after death you are in fact saying that death doesn't exist. You are just saying that you travel from here ( life) to somewhere else ( afterlife, heaven... ), going from A to B, a passage in time ( but time is relative and " eternal life " therefor relative for that matter ). Has anybody ever proven that death doesn't exist? Because if you talk about an eternal afterlife you accept the fact that you will never die. And nobody can't say or proven that death do not exist. Death? It's there and it's real because if everybody would be so sure that it didn't exist, why be sad, why crying for someone you just lost?
I believe that there is an afterlife. When you die, your soul rises out of your body up into a hidden dimension which would be heaven, where you meet deceased family, friends, and possibly even pets. Looking down onto Earth, watching over your loved ones until they too pass into your dimension. But that's what I believe and I'm not 100% sure that that's what will happen. It could possibly be something like that, or something else entirely. Whatever it is, I hope that there is an afterlife. I couldn't imagine just everything going black and that's that. Something has to be there. Hopefully.
I think you go to a parallel universe where you get to try again. Don't get me? Follow along. Let's say you are attempting a dangerous stunt (Driving over 12 double Decker buses on a motorbike) then you fail. Then I believe you are sent to the parallel universe where you were just about to start the stunt. To try again
I have heard rumours of going to heaven and looking down on people. I think that it is impossible to go to the afterlife because even if you did you technically just started a whole new life for free. Kinda like saying lifes cheap. Personally I think you go into an endless dream. Not the afterlife. Literally a dream. Like alice in wonderland. Because when you die people think you will see nothing but black forever. But remember you have just fallen into an eternal sleep, technically just like falling asleep reguarly. Heaven? People can have their own opinions on that.
I will be friends with SpongeBob characters, Rick and Morty and stuff...awesome!
Yes of course. You have to ask first permission by an apple who was picked up by an unicorn. Afterwards you make a soup and invite a butterfly ( any butterfly will do ) to eat together with you. Then you ask the butterfly your wish and he goes flying to the southpole to ask his master ( nobody really knows who he is ) and he will decide if your wish will come true. It's simple as making a car!
Probably, because I'd love to put Erza Scarlet into this world as my body guard
Yes... Method acting.
There was something, they were called DINOSAURS.
People this is true not a joke dinosaurs came before humans
Is this a joke?
Wow! Is this a phenomenal question? Or is the one who wrote this question a phenomenal thing?
I have thought of this before
Just because there's a delay of lightwaves and soundwaves to reach the signal in our brains doesn't mean that we don't live in the present. Your body is there and the delay in your brains doesn't change the presence of your body. You're simply not conscience of the speed of light and sound. And conscience is psychological, not physical! The question here is if we don't live in the present, not of our conscience of it. In other words, we live in the present because you have to exist with a body and a mind to have the experience ( even a delayed experience ) of a present. It's also conscience that gives us the " feeling " of time. Time is relative on a universal scale. The measurement of speed of light and sound is a calculation made up by men. The time of speed doesn't exist by itself.
Yes. Light and sound take time to reach us, so all the things we see, hear, touch, taste and smell have already happened by the time we experience them. When we see a bird fly by, for example, that event is already in the past by the time we experience. So yes we do not live in the present.
Well, DUH! It's the present to us, but reference to doctor who when the master takes over the first time as Harry Saxon, its hard to explain, but there was a paradox that made an entire year never happen, so the present was a year BEHIND. BAM PARADOX!
Yes, because our brains don't receive information immediately. It takes as little as a split second for us to process everything, but even those few moments count.
Because different things appeal to different people. Everyone in the world has a unique brain, even though everyone's brain functions the same. (Unless you take drugs or have mental illness.) Okay, my point is, you can't please everyone. It's almost like with how people view physical appearance. Different styles appeal to different people. Same goes with music, movies, television, books, social media, and so much more.
I voted for this because my girlfriend is best friends with the person I hate
Because some people can't defend their opinions on their stand on certain things when questioned.
People's brains opperate differently and see the world differently. Humans are naive and we see what we want to. If we don't want to like something we wouldn't
First of all, there's nothing phenomenal about this question, second, it's not grammatically correct.
As long as I'm alive rock n roll will live! I'm 15 and a female and I don't care my religious family thinks of me, go guns n roses comeback! 1rock will live!
Rock and roll will never die. The Original " rebel side " of rock and roll is over, that's for sure. It was a rebelious musical form in the 50's and 60's ( a anti-establishment ) but when time moved on it became accepted by the establishment itselfs ( mainly because they knew how to make money of it ). The last attempt to make rock and roll rebelious and dangerous again was in the mid-seventies with punk rock but that was really more a searching to be provocative and therefore a faillure in a social context. Rock and roll is not dead and it comes back once and a while but you will never have the real thing again. The best you can get is a revival of the music ( or just listen to all this great rock and roll records of the past.).
I think this is my most repeated question
I don't know if Kim Kardashian is a man...