Best Picture Oscar Winners That Didn't Deserve Itegnomac It's never easy picking a Best Picture winner but some years you have to wonder why some movies win over movies that are much more deserving.
The Top Ten
This is so weird. Why would Shakespeare In Love win over Saving Private Ryan. I never seen either film but Saving Private Ryan should have won. It doesn't sound right if Schindler's List was the only film by Spielberg that actually did win best picture.
Uhhh that movie was terrible. It felt as if it was an ordinary fan fiction about Shakespeare. It's a shame "Saving Private Ryan" didn't get it. A good cast (besides Ben Affleck) with poor acting throughout the whole film, and an old reused dynamic for a romance story, just with Shakespeare. Definitely the #1 worst chosen movie to win best picture.
Every one who voted for Shakespeare in Love over Saving Private Ryan for best picture all deserve the hell they've made for themselves. - egnomac
Saving Private Ryan was the supurior film. Plain and simple.V 3 Comments
Gangs of New York should have won but apparently the academy loves musicals better than movies better than movies that are really good. - egnomac
Why did the Academy give The Award for this Movie I'm not saying the Academy is stupid or dumb its just that it doesn't deserve to Win Best Picture The Two Towers should have won
Gangs of New York, or The Pianist should have won!
The Two Towers is Way better than this musicalV 1 Comment
Did anyone actually see this movie it even surprises me that this movie was nominated at all. - egnomac
Not a bad movie, just no where near as good as the likes of Hugo, Midnight in Paris, or The Tree of Life. - Badwolf
It Won Only Because It Is B/w
Booriing I really don't care much for silent movies. - egnomac
I find it hard to believe this boring movie beat out such greats as The Social Network, 127 Hours and Inception - egnomac
Not bad, but inception really deserved the oscar
2010 is the only year that I have watched all of the Oscar contenders. Black Swan or The Fighter should have won. The Kids are All Right would have been a great choice too.
The King's Speech was middle of the pack of the nominees. It was still better than Toy Story 3, The Descendants, and The Social Network, though. But I have to admit, I HATED Inception. 127 Hours was cool for what it was, but depended on Franco, so didn't deserve Best Picture.
There are a lot of super dumb Best Picture wins, but this has to take the cake. I am willing to say that this was the WORST Best picture nominee in its year, and as proof, just look at the other ones:
127 Hours - Amazing movie, James Franco is stunning.
Black Swan - Story, direction, and acting are lightyears ahead of this
The Fighter - Not a lot better, but the acting is top-notch
Inception - Possibly one of the most original movies ever. Astounding in visuals, acting, and storyline
And so on. I can do this for every movie nominated. The King's Speech sucks
This movie proves that Oscars is all politics. It deals with racist issues so the political correct thing to do is give this movie an oscar. But the movie itself was very lame and there were too much cliches being used. As for the acting nobody was standing out for this picture. All this actors and actresses ( some are overrated ) were certainly not giving their best performances, despite what the press told us. This is the kind of movie you only watch one time and than you forget about it, because there's no one scene in it that will stuck in your mind afterwards. It's so lame in fact that this movie will not give you something to think about.
This was such a pretentious, silly movie. It was all, "People are still racists even when they think they're not." Yeah, we know. This film beat "Brokeback Mountain" for best picture which was a mistake. People still talk about, refer to, joke about "Brokeback"; who ever references "Crash"? I'm still bitter about it, obviously. - Blue_Devereaux
Not as bad as everyone says but it was just too contrived. And obviously much better films nominated that year.
Nothing against Kathryn Bigelow but Avatar was the movie everyone paid their hard earned money to see that year - egnomac
Slumdog Millionaire is nothing compared to The Dark Knight. It is considered one of the greatest films ever made and didn't even get nominated
Why the dark knight don't was nominated?
Too bad TDK did not even get nominated for best picture.
TDK NOW AND ALWAYS
Goodfellas should have won the award. Great storyline, great acting (Joe Pesci and Robert de Niro). Truly it was a masterpiece by Martin Scorsese.
Dances with Wolves rejuvenated the western genre. What did Goodfellas do? - jezza0
An over-long epic film that doesn't do much for me in the way of movies. - dureckl
As dull as dishwater
If Citizen Kane is suppose to be the greatest movie of all time than how in the world did it lose to this forgettable movie. - egnomac
In my opinion, boyhood was better, and why they don't nominated interstellar?
Outstanding performances of the actors and actresses ( especially Naomi Watts as usual ) and exeptional camera and lightning techniques but the story or script wasn't worthy enough to be nominated in the first place.
This was a particular year of bad movies, but this was the worst. Pretentious crap
Other movies such as 'Whiplash', 'The Imitation Game' and 'The Theory of Everything' were more deserving of the win.
But at least it didn't go to 'American Sniper'.
The Shawshank Redemption is undoubtedly one of the most unforgettable movie in the history of cinema and giving away the best picture to forrest gump just proved that academy awards really deserve this much attention that we tend to give to it.
Forrest Gump beat Pulp Fiction AND The Shawshank Redemption!
Not the worst movie of all time but certainly not one of the best movies of all time. The many Oscars and nominations for this movie were exagerrated. As a matter of fact, I found this movie even very boring at some moments in the film. It's almost a pitty that Sally Field ( one of my favorite actresses ) was in that movie. And Tom Hanks didn't really deserved a oscar for his performance. In other words ; A too overrated movie that didn't deserve all that attention!
It did deserve Best Picture - PeeledBanana
Both the movies deserve an oscar
A greedy cash in on a tragic story about people who didn't even EXIST. James Cameron, you can do better than this! But still a better love story than Twilight...and 50 shades trilogy
So which film wins the Oscars for 2016?
Not the brilliant musical with outstanding musical numbers, beautiful acting and a great story that also deals with the dark side of the entertainment industry.
Not the heart-wrenching true story of Desmond Doss who was persecuted for his faith in the army yet ended up saving dozens of lives without firing a single gun.
It's the mediocre SJW film about a little boy who is bullied into thinking he's gay because he's more intelligent and less aggressive than other boys and grows up to become a drug dealer with no friends. - Fortifier
Boring as almost every Meryl Streep movie.
The Color Purple OBVIOUSLY needed to win! OBVIOUSLY!
Overlong and dull. It looks nice but is really just a melodrama
Above Vertigo? ARE YOU KIDDING ME, ACADEMY?
It didn't win. Argo won. But Life of Pi should have won. But Silver Linings was better than argo. - Martin_Canine
Boring and overrated with an winning boring and overrated actress ( Jennifer Lawrence ).
No, it didn't deserve the award... Probably why it didn't win it
Related ListsTop Ten Best Picture Oscar Winners Most Overrated Best Picture Oscar Winners Top 10 Best Picture Oscar Winners of the 2000s Top 10 Best Picture Oscar Winners from 2005-2015 Most Undeserving Best Picture Oscar Winners
4 years, 310 days old
3. Shakespeare In Love
2. The Artist
3. The King's Speech
2. Shakespeare In Love