Top Ten Questions for Admin About the Terms of Use

I would like to know in case it happens to me.

It depends on the infraction.

The random and purpleyoshi98 got banned for criticizing Danteem. Yet Danteem got to make TWO other accounts after sending death threats, making posts about killing users,and making porn posts. Are the admins FAVORING Danteem?

When considering all of the circumstances surrounding the user's actions, we felt it was appropriate to give the user another chance.

Danteem's death threats probably weren't even death threats. They were probably just "I will beat you in Super Smash Bros."

They weren't even proper death threats, I'm pretty sure they said stuff like "I will handcuff you to Mario"

You can't run a site without terms of use; sure they might be bad and may need changes but you can't run a site without terms of use and that's pretty much a fact

If 100 people signed a petition to view both sides of arguments, would you?

That really depends on what you consider to be common. The vast majority of users have never received a warning.

Yes, I'm on my final warning. So I'm gonna be extra careful of the things I do.

Yes its easy to get a warning and also easy to get suspended.

No, suspensions are based on past behavior which cannot be altered.

People whining about the policy is one of the things that annoys me most about the site. It's almost getting me to the point where I'm going to support the policy just to troll the site even more. - Blaze

People have a right to express their opinion. It can be annoying when people get upset about things that are not true or accurate, but it seems to be unavoidable.

The policy was created because some stupid sensetive visitor made a "high-quality" post about everything wrong with the site. The date? February 19th 2015.

If we see something that needs to be addressed, we will do so.

I do not think so. In fact, I know many users who are underage.

No. I was 10 when I joined in July 2014 and I was never suspended

As is stated in the Terms of Use, "we reserve the right to remove any or all posts by individual users, terminate user accounts, or limit access to The Site"

This also depends on the infraction.

Because the way it is structured allows it to bypass the assumption that it is trolling, at least according to the Terms. As of now these kinds of lists are deemed by the administration team to be not against the Terms' policies under trolling or offensive content, thus, they cannot be removed until someone can prove they are against the Terms.
That's my thought, anyway.

And he told people to get a life, called them bad words, and to go to hell

Because she retired for unknown reasons and asked admin to remove her account

Because she retired and requested her account to be removed

I never knew her, but what did she do?

That's because she retired.

Yeah. And also, why can't we delete a vote?!

I posted something before I made an account. I later made an account and I really want to delete it, but I can’t. Please help me

Like this but with names (I would not even do this to my worst enemy, but I know people who would. That's why I can make it.): Hey *! I hate you so much! Go die in a hole, you (record amount of swears)!

In terms of bias, I assume you mean certain users having a greater chance of being suspended for violating the rules than others.
Here's my take. Users that get more warnings/other punishments have a greater chance of getting harsher punishments if they continue to violate the Terms. I assume it is this way for other sites as well. I don't really consider it that great of bias in my opinion. Just follow the damn rules.

Just ask the admin that question personally, and he will delete it if you reply to the message saying you still want it deleted.

Because some people perceive it as rude.

Yeah, @admin, I would like an answer why you allow a 20 year old wanting to have sex with the brain of a 12 year yet don't allow a post series