Top Ten Reasons Harry Potter Is Better Than TwilightI love Harry Potter and Twilight but there are a lot of reasons Harry Potter is better. There are some spoilers if you never watched / read Twilight or Harry Potter!
The Top Ten
Haha I'm gonna do a rewritten Twilight. Obviously it would be illegal to be published. But I have got the books (and Harry Potter books but I like both) I would make sure Edward has fangs and is just like vampires are.
This list is bad as Lord of The Rings is better than Harry Potter.
When the confused Harry Potter with The Worst Witch.
All of the below are very true, but this one the most. Twilight just doesn't seem all that good. Harry Potter has a much fuller plot structure, the way everything adds up to several climatic moments. But Twilight, on the other hand, is basically just a bleak love story about sparkling vampires and idiot werewolves. nothing to see there. And Harry Potter much better written; I don't even need to get into the nonexistent well-writtenness of Twilight.
With Harry Potter, you never doubt that Hogwarts in real, or think that Hermione may not be an actual person, you just know they exist. And you feel exactly what the characters are feeling and understand why they make a choice when they do. With Twilight you just sit there and wonder why Edward sparkles.
Harry potter, neville and so many other characters taught me to be brave, and never give up. Hermione grainger taught me to stand up for myself, not to let people bring me down, you are amazing, just because one side lets you down, you have another side to bring you up. Hermione dealt with racism, and bullying.. And what did bella teach me? Your nothing without a man, if the one you love leaves you attempt lose all the friends and family you do have, don't try and live your own life. Which morals sound better to you? - datmidna
Harry Potter: Stand up for what you believe in, if you fall down, get right back up. Life won't always be happy, but you can make it happy.
Twilight: If you don't have a boyfriend, you should go kill yourself.
Hmm, which morals are a better idea?
Harry potter's moral are better. Bravery, friendship, faith and love of family while Twilight is just like those stupid teenagers who long for a lover. Stupid young love. Hey I don't hate love story but the twilight's moral is not amazing even my parents hate it. They think this is too stupid.
Harry Potter teaches you to be brave and to do what is right. Twilight teaches you that if you don't have a boyfriend, you're nothing. I'll let you be the judge.
Harry potter had daniel radcliffe, rupert grint tom felton emma watson and many others who gained success through the harry potter movies, not to mention alan rickman, ralph fiennes, helena carter, maggie smith and many other famous names. No offense, but I think they went for looks over acting skills with most of the actors and I think robert patterson was a better cedric than edward! - datmidna
Harry potter's Hermione is played by Emma Watson and she was expressive while Twilight's Bella swan is played by Kristen Stewart which is emotionless (fun fact was made fun of in a episode of we bare bears
Robert Pattinson was way better as Cedric than Edward. And he actually said he preferred Harry Potter! Sure, he died, but so did all the best characters! Except Hermione, but yeah.
I am in seventh grade, and my gym teacher has literally told me that with my small part in the school play last year I was better than Kristen Stewart in however many movies there are of Twilight.
I've never really read Harry Potter, but that's not necessary to know it's obviously better than Twilight
Harry Potter is based on friendship and family love, with some romance thrown in there. But Twilight has nothing but romance. Seriously? - WheresMyGuitarPick
Now, twilights plot is a true love story, and harry potter is about true love, friendship, fantasy, courage, power, corruption, and so many other things. A general question- do you prefer glittering fairy princess variety vampires or wizards and withches, a teen who has to fight evil? - datmidna
In Twilight, the plots aren't so exciting to me, but I love the one's in Harry Potter. They are VERY interesting
Edward is not a sparking fairy princess, go and hang yourself.
I absolutely love universal studios islands of adventure, mostly because of the wizarding world of harry potter. There are also various other attractions world wide. I'm not sure but I don't think there is a twilight attraction. - datmidna
Wizards and witches are better than vampires! I find them annoying and people love them because of their immortality, sexual needs and appearance.
, If they did have vampires they probably wouldn't SPARKLE IN THE SUN! In other words they couldn't be as stupid as twilight. - AnnaOfArendelle332
Even though there was magic, it had rules, and drew on mythology for its monsters, and Latin for its spells. Twilight ignored the rich, frankly terrifying multicultural history of blood-sucking monsters, and made one of the most feared creatures of all time into a sparkling teenager.
Ok, so I don't see how a school of wizards and witches are realistic, but you can associate them as real people. Twilight have empty gaps to fill in for bella, edward, and that's the reason it's a saga- identify those people with yourself. You can also see dobby and draco and dean are different, but many characters are nameless, faceless in twilight. - datmidna
Okay I'm not implying that harry potter is a non fiction book series but Bella just randomly falls in love with some guy and the affection between them doesn't even show. Ron and herimone don't fall on love in the first book they actually slowly progress throughout the books and make a realistic relationship.
I can totally see a world much like Harry's with a secret entrance to the Hogwarts Express and the fact that they can ride a broom! Oh yeah the best series EVER!
That is NOT what they are talking about! They are talking about the characters pasts, relationships with other characters, and the fact it took TIME for the characters to fall in love. It wasn't talking about thae fantasy parts of it. - AnnaOfArendelle332
Always a good quality to have in a book. - AnnaOfArendelle332
Greetings, new best friend.
*slow claps* your powers of perception are amazing, my friend.
Harry is brave and has gone through so much, even embracing possiblity of death. Bella is a normal girl in love with a vampire who somehow gets a war started! And when Edward leaves she mopes around months, didn't think of getting contacts! - datmidna
Main character is fantastick
The first three harry potters weren't exactly the best movies but the first two twilight movies were boring, and the love expressed in the books didn't show. Plus, harry potter had better music, special effects and let's be honest, twilight's acting wasn't very good. - datmidna
I thought Prisoner of Azkaban was one of the best movies in the franchise - HarryPotter12
The Harry Potter movies are amazing just as the books, but the Twilight movies are a lame copy of the books and they are pretty good actually...
The visual effect are way better in Harry Potter. The actor have also acted way better in Harry Potter
This is probably what takes it for me
Twilight had on bad movie and the rest were unwatchable. Harry Potter has 4 great movies, 2 good movies and 2 amazing movies. It is a crime that filth like Twilight should even be mentioned next to Harry Potter. Potter is the best
In most stories, whether they are romantic ones or not, the hero (main male character) gets together with the heroine (main female character). In HP, Hermione (the series' heroine) gets together with Ron, whereas Harry (the hero & protagonist of the series) gets together with Ron's sister (who is such a minor character, she cannot even be considered a secondary heroine, whereas Ron is the secondary hero, after Harry).
The romance, actually progresses. In Twilight they fall love SO quick. I know it's a romance book, but at least take some time for the characters to grow more interested in one other before starting a relationship. While, Harry Potter and other characters in the series take awhile to develop feelings for other characters. And do NOT get me started on Bella becoming suicidal because her boyfriend dumped her.
People argue that Twilight is more realistic (um.. Vampires don't exist) but actually, in real life, you don't fall in love straight away and you don't always get the person you want but you move on and find love elsewhere (Harry/Cho/Ginny, Hermione/Krum/Ron Snape/Lily- he didn't move on but oh well)
So true! In the first book of Twilight Bella immediately falls in love with that sparkling vampire (Edward). Where as, so doesn't happen in HARRY POTTER! Yes, there are more books in HP than in Twilight. But do what? It takes time to fall in love and twilight had four books, didn't it? So it would have been better if Stephanie Meyer had left the first book for letting Edward and Bellla knowing each other and then they 'SLOWLY' fall in love in the second book. Whereas in Harry Potter, that's what happened (Ron and Hermione slowly fell in love, the same with Harry and Ginny)
Edward sparkles? SPARKLES? I respect if you like Twilight, but please sparkling vampires is the way you KNOW that your book has hit rock-bottom. Also on the other note: Did feminism never happen in the Twilight Universe or something? Bella can't do anything on her own without her sparkling vampire! Steph, we need to talk about 1920, you know, when women could vote and stuff. But I guess it's not important enough as long as we have Cedric... sorry *Edward* our sparkling hero to teach young, impressionable girls that as long as we act stupid. We'll be fine, or just attempt to commit suicide when he breaks up with you for your safety. Thank you Stephenie Meyer, for setting girls back 50 years...
Laugh out loud! I hate you Kristen Stuart! But I don't want you to die, so you can keep on pulling that same expression over and over and over and over and over and over. But seriously, no one should say "go kill yourself" and stuff, because we are all human beings and you would hate if it happened to you
I'm sorry, but seriously? Was Stephenie Meyer actually being serious when she made a book about about a sparkly Vampire and who in their right mind would cast Kristen Stewart as an already abysmal character?
Twilight vampires are not glittering fairy princess vampires.
The vampires are different.
Do you know witches used to be ugly green with long noses, warts, dressed in just black and where always evil.
Just take Twilight as different to Count Dracula.
I’n the movies Evanna/Luna was really pretty and lunas my favourite character but not because she’s pretty. I like her because she is smart unique strong and kind she would never be my favourite character if she was just a perfect Ravenclaw
Nobody likes Hermione because she's pretty, because she's just average until about the Prisioner of Azkaban. Nor do they hate Neville because he looks a bit goofy when he's younger. Robert Pattinson is hot. Get over it, or watch the Goblet of Fire.
I think it really true
I snorted on my cereal. But good point...
Died, but yah, accurate.
As a series, harry potter sold 4 times as many books as twilight, and harry potter is 36.36% higher selling if all the series had the same amount of books. The harry potter movie series made 7.7 billion dollars. The twilight series made 3.3 billion dollars. You do the maths. - datmidna
Yeah, the individual Twilight movies were more successful, but that's only because Robert Pattnison's hot. He has more fangirls than Daniel Radcliffe so more teenage girls went to see his movies. Fact.
I'm a teen girl I think that every guy in Twilight is UGLY and they look like horses with butt chins - Lunala
It just makes so much money
Characters in Harry Potter have their own flaws and characteristics, but Twilight characters have no depth and practically no personality. Edward is flawless, faceless, and sparkles like a pixie. He's described as having a perfect crooked smile, however that works, and is supposed to be really hot. Belle Swan's name literally means "beautiful swan". Her only described flaw is being clumsy, and that something about that feels kinda forced. Both Sparkleprincess and Clumsygrace are very bland, and don't have any depth or character. Harry Potter characters are a lot more colorful, and have their own flaws and average characteristics.
Harry has flaws like a normal person. As do all the other characters. Edward has literally no flaws.
Harry: Arrogant, intimidating, sometimes shouts
Hermione: Bossy, know-it-all, critical
Ron: A bit goofy and dumb, foolish
Ginny: Really hot-headed, rude, rather blushy and fangirl-y
Neville: Chubby, clumsy, forgetful
Luna: Really weird, gullible
And millions more! But literally, what flaws to Bella and Edward have.
Clumsy! How stupid! That's barely a flaw.
Yeah. That's a good point. I'm writing a book, too, and it's actually all about my main character's flaws x3
Sirius BLACK. Jacob BLACK. Sirius turns into a big DOG. Jacob turns into a wolf, which is part of the DOG family. Sirius has a flying MOTORCYCLE. Jacob has a MOTORCYCLE. Sirius was created first. Do the math.
Even though they appear in different book series, I guess they are from the same family... because I guess that's what the author would have wanted.
Exactly. Twilight came out in 2005 and harry potter in 1997-98. Moreover, Sirius Black was mentioned in the very first book. Hagrid borrowed the motorcycle from him. He tells Dumbledore so. So there
It is a copy of Sirius black
Hermione granger teaches girls to be independent and brave. Bella just falls off a cliff just because Edward ditches her! How dumb!
People say that Bella is a better role model than Hermione, Ginny, Luna and many more. But what does she actually teach? Without a man you are nothing, and its okay to fall off a cliff if your man leaves you. All the lessons that Hermione or Ginny or Luna or anyone else from HP taught about true friendship, bravery, intelligence, courage, true love... it goes on but people say that Bella is a better role model for girls. Like twilight actually sets women back to the time when they had no rights. Like seriously twilight? - Hpforevah
Hermione is super smart, loyal, independent, and compassionate. Luna is weird, kind, dreamy, and smart. Ginny is fiery, kind, strong, and beautiful. Nymphadora Tonks is clumsy but kind, loyal, and brave. Fleur is beautiful but loyal, and brave, and does not care if her husband has scars on his face. And Cho is kind and strong and beauitful. Lily is protective, kind and the untimate mother. McGonagall seems strict but she is smart and fun.
Seriously, boo Bella.
Every reason I see for Twilight being better has bad spelling, bad grammar and is as shallow as a kiddie pool.
So I can't like Harry Potter and Twilight?
X3* What is wrong with me today?
I would write a paragraph or two about how this is true, maybe even more...but it's roughly past midnight, so...
Anyways, we Harry Potter readers/watchers/I-did-both-people have a far fewer cringe issues in our fanbase than the Twilight fanbase. We are more...in depth about everything, and we realise when enough is enough. We know the flaws and limitations of characters and plots. We recognise this all, and therefore, prevent more of our fandom from rotting. Keep it up, and we'll have a more clever fandom than Twilight will ever have.
True* Seriously, I misspelled like, three things already!
Expelliarmus for a start.
I hope someone uses Avada Kedavra on Bella Swan, Edward Cullen and Jacob Black - Lunala
Isn't there a place for Umbridge in here, she deserves this!
Not even Umbridge is as abusive as Buttchin Cullen - Lunala
Umbridge... - Hermione_Granger220
When the love of his life left, he dedicated his life to protecting her son.
When Edward left, we all saw how Bella handled it first by acting as if world ended, then by being the parasite she is and latching onto another naive boy Jacob, showing she is ok as long as there is a hot boy around.
Originally vampires looked bloated and had purplish skin due to drinking blood, as opposed to being very attractive to mouth-breathers, also vampires originally burned in the sun, as opposed to SPARKLING!
Yeah, I couldn't finish the first chapter of the first book of twilight, meanwhile I've read every book in the Harry Potter series about ten times. Harry Potter made me want to be a witch more than ever. Twilight ruined vampire Halloween costumes for me. I wholeheartedly agree with The Oatmeal about twilight. Also Edward is the worlds biggest Gary-Stu ever, but Harry has flaws like a normal person.
- Linna Hart
It also ruined werewolves.
Bram Stoker's Dracula is a real vampire story - yungstirjoey666
Not just guys, but girls as well - yungstirjoey666
The publisher of Harry Potter made J.K. Rowling use that as her pen name just so that more boys would read it. I literally met one of my best friends, who is a guy, by asking him if he liked HP while we were awkwardly standing there in gym class
Hermione - fights death eaters and bellatrix
Luna - fights death eaters and bellatrix.
Ginny - fights death eaters and Bellatrix.
McGonagall - sets up the school for battle, bad*ss teacher
Tonks - auror, fights death eaters
Bella - falls off a cliff.
Ummm, Hermione, Ginny, Luna, Tonks, even Bellatrix are role models! And what about Bella? She throws herself off a cliff when her man leaves her!
The best of the million reasons why harry potter is better than Twilight
I’m pretty sure that Edward Cullen is secretly a fairy woman fish hybrid.
Enough said, Luna is amazing
No Luna no good
Harry potter is my siblings favorite movie 4 and5 years old
Twilight Moms exist. I've lost faith in humanity.
True. Anyone can read HP.
Little kids. Teens. Adults. HP is a book ANYONE can enjoy.
I’m a teenage girl and I hate Twilight. Bella (From Twillight) is a stupid Mary-Sue, Edward looks ugly and unattractive like a horse with a butt chin, Jacob looks like a stupid bald gorilla. - Lunala
"Dobby hates Bella Swan! Even though Dobby wants to be a free elf, Dobby doesn't want her socks! Dobby thinks Bella Swan is a bad girl! "
Bella Swan stinks so bad that even Dobby doesn't want her socks - Lunala
THIS is for sure. Dobby is so sweet, and cute.
I feel so sorry for AniMat and etc that they got threatened for having positive opinions on Harry Potter and hating Twilight. What makes Twilight and Fifty Shades of Grey too overrated is that it contains female disempowerment and extra negative stereotypes. There are reasons why I do not know much about Twilight, because I avoid it for good! And yes, I shall check out Lord of the Rings PRONTO.
Overhated you mean.
Overrated? LOL do you know the definition about overrated. all 5 twilight film got rating under 5 isn't overrated. you can say twilight overrated if this movie has many fans and got rating over 8. also we are know twilight has many haters like 1:1000 ( lovers : haters )
Yep! - Hermione_Granger220
Role models, like Hermione, Ginny, Luna, McGonagall, Fleur, Cho, Lily.
OUR Bella is WAY better then THEIR Bella. OUR Bella is a #BossWitch and Lord Voldemort’s most loyal supporter. THEIR Bella is a girl who has all the guys drooling over her EVEN THOUGH she is a butt to them.
Agree you can cry and laugh
Heck Ron x lavender is a better love story than any Twilight couple
Yeah. But neither is Twilight. This is actually not such a good example.
Good one. no dumb desperate girls, no cliches
Maybe Twilight does tool
At YouTube on Team Starkid's channel, there are three funny musical spoofs of Harry Potter. Does Twilight? I think not.
Too* CELEBRATING FOURTH SPELLING MISTAKES IN LESS THAN TWO MINUTES! YAY!
Harry kill Voldemort. Bella marry Edward. Well is it hart to understand, Harry Potter is way better than Twilight!
Jk rowling is a complete genius. the plot, the storyline, the characters, the theme, the connection with latin and mythology is incredible. anyone would agree that it would be incredibly hard to write out a series or even a book like harry potter. the story isn't simple, if you were to sit down and explain the story it'd take you a good 20 minutes and still leave out amazing features. as for twilight ''a girl moves to forks, vampires go live there because the weather sucks and there is hardly any sun. the girl falls in love with edward, a vampire. he then leaves and she mopes for months and jumps off a cliff. bla bla lra there's wolves who hate the vampires. bla bla bla. the bella gets pregnant with a vampire baby that kills her. she then lives and goes to fight with voltori because the kid is half human and could expose them. bla bla bla the vampires win.the end. see no "wow' no "holy crap did that just happen" no "what a complicated story" twilight is too simple. hp is a fictional ...more
Harry Potter tells us to follow our dreams and destinies and to not wait for things to happen for us but to work hard for them.
Whereas twilight makes people(girls especially)think that all they have to do to have a happy life is to sit there and look pretty.
Because of Harry Potter I want to learn Latin and to write my own book
Whereas when I watched twilight(yes I didn’t bother reading it)i figured “you know what even if my book sucks it will still be better than twilight. With all do non-respect to twilight and sincerely yours the whole Harry Potter fandom.
P.S if you need a more sassy reason why twilight sucks*litterally* I’ll be at your service
-the half blood prince(ess)
The Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them movie and book expand on this point. Not only are there vampires and werewolves, but unicorns, centaurs, mermaids, hippogriffs, mountain trolls, thunderbirds, pygmy puffs, etc.
Yup. It certainly does. I especially like pheonixes. There are hippogriffs, snowy owls, pymgy puff, trolls, dragons, unicorns, werewolves, centaurs and much, much more.
Harry Potter vampires, which are mentioned once in book 6, are better than an entire series full of Twilight vampires.
Hermione Granger is brave, comapassionate, bossy, very smart. Bella is boring. Hermione is a great role model, so is Ginny, the sassy, I-Won't Back-Down, talented, kind girl. And Luna, the kind and sweet, who shows everyone that being weird is ok. And Fleur Delcour, who is beautiful but kind and rough. Minerva McGonagall, the strict but lets people have fun
Yup. And good quotes. This is my favorite from Hermione: Books! And cleverness! There are more important things.. friendship, and bracery
Gred and Forge- excuse me, Fred and George, are the most hilarious humans ever. And Ron, Peeves, The marauders, James II, Lee, heck, even Snape has more humor to him than Twilight. Harry Potter made me laugh out loud, and my sister to then think I was crazy. HP is very funny.
When Harry broke up with Ginny for her safety, she re-started the DA, tried to steal the sword of Gryffindor, and fought in the battle of Hogwarts to help save the wizarding world. When Edward broke up with Bella for her safety, she tried to kill herself.
Yeah. *cough cough* That's TOTALLY true.
To br fair some of the fans of HP are rabid, but same goes to Twihards too - Lunala
Even before I wachted the movies, I had a burning idea of what all the characters in HP looked like! - FennikenFan9
To FennikenFan9: Me too! And I was correct! :D
I'm pretty sure Stephenie Meyer did research too. No just WRITES a book. Believe me, I tried as a kid, and it ended up being about two kids who, alone, travel in a plane from some imaginary country to Canada, and it costed them only one cent. And they didn't have to do any paperwork, nor did they have to become pure Canadians or at least Permanent Residents. Twilight isn't THAT stupid, is it?
Jo actually did research. Steph just added 'effects' to the vampires; such as glitter - which would never make me look at them in the same way as I used to before twilight. People say that jo ruined wizards by writing about this book? I think not. Extensively researched and not just abracadabra for a spell. - Hpforevah
Ever notice that Expecto Patrotum means "I await a guardian? "
Bella and Edward, anyone? Not exactly first rate development.
Please. Don't even get me started...