Top Ten Reasons Why Queen is Better Than the Beatles
The Top Ten
I love both Queen and The Beatles. Don't make me choose! I don't know whether to disagree or not! I'm dying right here! HELP ME! - Misfire
True my friends and I love singing along to Bohemian Rhapsody. "the best song ever." RIGHT!
Every person has his own greatest song. To proclaim a song is the greatest is as stupid as saying a certain girl is the most beautiful girl in the world.
For me, this is not even the best song of Queen and for Bohemian they nicked a few things for the Beatles.
This is a total invalid argument.
Last time I heard so is Hey Jude and A Day in The Life, heck even Come Together. - StalinV 7 Comments
Freddie has a better voice than John, Paul, George and Ringo put together! He's a better musician and a better songwriter. The Beatles were good when they were all together but their individual music was mediocre when they split up.
There is no comparison. Freddie was a real talent, amazing singer, amazing voice, he was the greatest. There will never be another Freddie.
Fact. Paul McCartney or John Lennon are not in the same team with Freddie in singing skills.
Yes, obviously. And Freddie is a better songwriter and better musician.V 25 Comments
Hey Jude is a good song, but very repetitive at the end. - Userguy44
No comparison whatsoever. Hey Jude is the MOST BORING song ever. It goes on and on ad nauseam ad infinitum whereas Bohemian Rhapsody is the ultimate creme de la creme of songs.
Oh my goodness, Bohemian Rhapsody is FAR SUPERIOR to Hey Jude... NO CONTEST! It's one of the greatest, if not the greatest, song of all time. Hey Jude just rambles on and on ad nauseam ad infinitum.
Bohemian Rhapsody is much better than anyi song from the Beatles. It's a fact.V 5 Comments
I-- I... I can't... can't choose... - Misfire
Agree. Like, I only know Eleanor Rigby and Golden Slumber as the Beatles songs. Peace!
Nice try, but Queen comes not even close. A complete crap argument. - SintJohn
I'm not a fan of both groups, I have always knew many queen songs even if I didn't know who they were, but on the other side I always knew who the Beatles were but never knew one of their songs.V 3 Comments
The beatles didn't do any other genres, but queen did. and when they did a different type of music they rocked it.
What a poor argument! In my opinion Queen and Mercury are getting overrated these days. Some people even believe Mercury is the greatest singer that ever lived. Singers like Callas, Pavarotti or Caruso are way way way better singers. And in rock I can mention Orbison and Arethe Franklin. - SintJohn
Saying a band is overrated is a awful reason, I'm not the biggest Beatles fan either but come on better reasoning then this would be appreciated. - BoredJeff02
Eric Clapton isn't a bad guitarist. - Userguy44
This is true, not many can play like "God" [aka Clapton]; only a fool would think otherwise. Brian May could only wish to be able to play like George Harrison, much less Eric Clapton. You weren't actually thinking of comparing John Deacon with Paul McCartney on bass were you?
"Brian May could only wish...? " Are you serious? George, God rest him, was the most rudimentary of lead guitarists. There is NO comparison here. And Clapton has ALWAYS been overrated.
George is an underrated guitarist. Nowadays more and more people realize he was pretty good. Not in the same league as Jeff Beck for example. But Brian May is also not in that league.
For me the way George played his 12 string Rickenbacker on the Hard Day's Night album is a moment in rock. It inspired the Byrds to play Dylan in Beatles style and the triangle Dylan-Byrds-Beatles propelled the folk rock scene. Being inventive and creative is more important than being just technical. And for that George is a great guitarist. - SintJohn
And during the seventies Wings was a better live band than Queen. Queen made name and fame during the mid eighties. But comparing concerts of the eighties with concerts of the sixties is comparing concerts of the sixties with the forties. - SintJohn
Beatles stopped going live so they could experiment more, and this was the era when the Beatles arguably had the best music. - Stalin
Beatles are amazing as good as queen but queen are a better live band
Freddie was a better piano player, though Paul can play classical piano. But Paul masters also at least another 12 instruments which make him the far better musician than Mercury.
George is a better guitarist than Brian. You only have to ask Brian himself, he is actually a great fan of George. - SintJohn
Paul mastered a lot of instruments though, not a real valid argument - magnolai-ia
Freddie's piano ballads are GORGEOUS! This is not to say Paul is bad though -! And LOVE Brian
No way, George was for sure better and Paul was too.
Another completely stupid argument. During the second part of their career The Beatles released classic albums like Revolver, Pepper, The White Album and Abbey Road. And these albums are constantly at the highest ranks of the all time greatest albums lists. Queen comes not even near.
And Queen was not constantly great, remember crap like Hot Space. - SintJohn
Okay, well you shouldn't make that assumption unless you really have heard at least half of their songs. What about Somebody to Love, a raw, heartbreaking ballad loved by so many? The Prophet's Song, a powerful, melodic and complex epic that gives Led Zep's best a run for its money? Scandal, a catchy yet sardonic song that actually does tackle a social issue- press harassment? 39, a gorgeous folk song about relativity? And finally, Bohemian Rhapsody itself, which despite having BECOME a drunken singalong, is SO innovative, original, and emotional?
The reality is that all of Queen's music has proven to be nothing but football stadium crowd hype or drunken singalongs, while the Beatles addressed a wide variety of societal, political, and personal issues, in a way that had not been done before or since.
The Beatles were so great, that some of George's songs that were rejected by Paul and John were still better than anything Queen ever did. George's "Northern Songs" catalogue alone is far superior to Queen's catalogue.
While yes, Ringo didn't have the best singing voice, where he shined is that he almost never missed a beat at all. - Stalin
No doubt he was, but Ringo is a 100 times nicer guy and still a good drummer. He was exactely what the Beatles needed. - SintJohn
True! - Userguy44
What's wrong with it? - Misfire
Another crap argument. But it shows how great The Beatles were. They had so much output of such high quality in just seven years time. And with each album they set new standards. This fact alone makes clear The Beatles are the greatest rock band in history. - SintJohn
Mmm not completely tru, they both have A LOT of songs, now I love queen AND the beatles, for life’s sake, I grew up with both and they both have a lot of songs - magnolai-ia
Bad reason - Userguy44
You can also say exaggerated and too theatrical. A matter of personal taste. - SintJohn
In some cases yes, but it can also be rlly good to not always have too much emotion, it can come over as dramatic both bands have emotional songs - magnolai-ia
That is very true
Not true, and now we have streaming and other digital stuff. What's the point? - SintJohn
The Beatles have 12 queen has 15
The Beatles made far more complex music than Queen. You are misled by the technique modern studio's of the seventies. - SintJohn
There's no comparison. At all.
Oh that’s 100% true
Hell yeah! Freddie was like Mozart when he wrote that 😂
While The Beatles have an entire station. this argument is invalid. - Stalin
Complete crap, McCartney is the master of the ballad and John and George were great too. - SintJohn
Love of my life as example - Userguy44
They both had extremely good ballads, to be honest idek why people r fighting over which is “better” both bands have extremely good songs among decent ones. although freddie might have a better voice john was the leader of a band in the 60s that changed music. who cares who is “better” to be honest they r both amazing bands - magnolai-ia
They were both good, in different ways perhaps but both were extremely good bassists - magnolai-ia
Paul and John Entwistle are the top bass players. Including their basslines. - SintJohn
Another one bites the dust!
Deacon was better. - Userguy44
No doubt about this
Related ListsTop Ten Reasons Nicki Minaj Is a Better Artist Than the Beatles Top Ten Ways Led Zeppelin is Better Than Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones, Queen & the Who Top Ten Queen Songs Which Are Better than Bohemian Rhapsody Best Albums Between the Beatles and Queen Top Ten Songs Between the Beatles, Queen and Nirvana
2 years, 166 days old
2. Freddie Mercury Has a Better Voice Than Paul McCartney
3. Bohemian Rhapsody is Better Than Hey Jude
2. Bohemian Rhapsody is Regarded by Many as the Greatest Song Ever
3. Bohemian Rhapsody is Better Than Hey Jude