Top 10 Reasons Why Super Smash Bros Is Better PlayStation All-stars Battle Royal

Ok, this is actually a fair point. I do prefer Smash Bros over PSASBR, but that is because the roster and maps are bigger and better, your attacks can actually kill people rather than just specific ones and there is better character balancing. The other points are not good points.

1999-Super Smash Bros. (Nintendo 64)-12 Characters
2001-Super Smash Bros. Melee-26 Characters
2008-Super Smash Bros. Brawl-39 Characters
2012-PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale-20 Characters+4 DLC Characters (Emmett Graves from Starhawk, Isaac Clark from Dead Space, Kat from Gravity Rush & Zeus from God of War)
2014-Super Smash Bros. for 3DS & Wii U-51 Characters+5 DLC Characters (Lucas from Mother 3, Mewtwo, Roy from Fire Emblem, Ryu from Street Fighter & the recent Cloud Strife from Final Fantasy 7)
The Super Smash Brothers roster has gone from 12, to 51 plus DLC characters. PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale only has 24 characters (four of them are DLC). That's a real lack of characters. No Crash Bandicoot, Spyro the Dragon, or any other first party, second party, or third party PlayStation character we love so much is on the roster.

I agree, though Playstation All Stars has some memorable characters however the roster just pales in comparisont to Super Smash Bros., SSMB has Mario, Link, Kirby, Pikachu, Samus, Ness, Captain Falcon, Wario and more well know Nintendo characters while PSASBR despite have characters like Jak, Ratchet, Nathan Drake, Kratos, Parrapa its roster contains a lot of lesser known characters and they didn't even include characters you'd expect to be in it like Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Sora from Kingdom Hearts, or even Lara Croft.

Other than the top 2, the reasons are either stupid, biased or just incorrect

This is just plain bias

Yes, it does actually

The graphics are roughly the same. If anthing, graphics are better in PSASBR

What does this even mean?