Top Ten Most Self-Sufficient States In the United StatesTurkeyasylum What state do you think could keep themself together? Could it be Alaska, California, or any state?
The Top Ten
California produces the biggest percentage of America's produce. California leads the nation in energy, technology, and entertainment. If California were to strike out on its own California would see more upside than downside. While the rest of America would deal with price surges in fruits and vegetables, California would likely see an economic boom.
I don't think California could stay alive with mostly Democrats they would not have to many weapons and with there large population I dougt they could survive
California grows over 2/3 of the nations food and has one of the biggest tourism industries
yesV 3 Comments
Texas is the only energy independent state, it even has its own electrical grid while other states have to share with each other.
Texas has a great economy mainly based around oil, but there are many others. Not to mention Texas was its own country once, and I'm sure they could make it work somehow. Others that could be self sufficient are California, New York, and Alaska.
Texas is also oil-rich, like Alaska, and has a staple in tourism. - Turkeyasylum
Texas should keep the Democratis and the big government out and it will be my next state! I live in California and it's a joke, Democrats are ruining this beautiful stateV 2 Comments
California and the West couldn't last a year without the water provided by the Great Lakes. Michigan has everything it needs in theory. It has plenty of fresh water. It has plenty of farms with plenty of variety (second only to California, but again, how is California going to water those crops without Michigan? ). It has the now-profitable Big Three car companies. It has the untapped goldmine of resources in the Upper Peninsula. Coal, lumber, oil, you name it is up in the UP. It has a strong tourism economy (so much so that they have a law saying public schools must start after Labor Day to encourage tourism). The only state that can compete with Michigan is Texas because they have lots of military bases and oil, whereas Michigan only has enough of those for itself. But again, Texas doesn't strike me as overflowing with fresh water nor farms.
Michigan is the most self sufficient it has the factories in Detroit the cherries in traverse city all the medical support you would need in Grand Rapids it's got the timber and wildlife in northern Michigan and has control over the Mackinaw bridge and to top all that it has plenty of farms all over the state and plenty of guns for protection against those who would try to steal from there riches so yeah Michigan is by far the most self sufficient!
Michigan grows more food then Colorado and Wyoming combined it also has control of the auto industry besides that it has tons of copper and coil in the UP and with Detroit coming back as a leading business city and with more wood than any other state really is it even a question who's the most self sufficient
We got Farms, we have a resurgant Detroit, and we grown up with the Values of the American Dream. Also, we felt the BernV 4 Comments
An extremely large population that would be hard to feed without imports and you never want to rely on imports for your sustenance
Home to one of the most developed cities in the world, it would be a prosperous place if the crisis of the US splitting were to happen. - Turkeyasylum
Idaho has a low population it would be easy for them to grow enough food to survive
Why is Idaho on this list anyway?
Because Idaho is a heck of a lot more self sufficient than California. - BrideiMacBellaV 1 Comment
Alaska is resource-rich, and its small population could lead to instant money. But, they shouldn't burn down all the glaciers. - Turkeyasylum
I like my home state but it's not in a good place if the borders with PA and IN close. Rationally, I had to vote for MI here. - bagel
I think that it's because they won the national championship. My state.
Ohio is the one better then Louisianan and and are extremely nice but they love to do the finger and pic their butts and noses sorry people in Ohio but you guys really do it
Seattle, as well as a high amount of food growth. - TurkeyasylumV 1 Comment
I think North Dakota could survive but what about the savages? And North Dakota has tons of peep squeaks that run a round and mine oil...
Oil has been discovered there, and it's being mined as we speak. - Turkeyasylum
Wisconsin is the dairy state by trading with Michigan for supplies they could stay alive with there low population
Is it possible cheese exports could keep the state alive? - Turkeyasylum
Vermont has a small population, yet they are extremely smart. - Turkeyasylum
The absolute most sufficient state. A true Louisiana native can survive anything, anywhere and for any period of time. Don't get caught in the swamp after dark if you don't have any friends here. Most importantly we help each other, Lake Charles, La is the fastest growing city in the US and many nations are consulting this great state on methods, policies and procedures concerning rebuilding and resilience. Once revival hits us, there won't be any stopping us, God bless Louisiana.
Who said most powerful? This was the most self sufficient. If you want to talk warfare La sinks a couple of ships north of Baton Rouge in the Mississippi in October they cut the entire central portion of the country off from fresh fruits and vegetables from central and South America, heating oil, etc. As far as seeing bombings, radar sights can see thru rain. You can bomb all you want if you can't put in ground troops who cares blow the bridges and see what happens about getting in.
Louisiana has its foot in almost every industry from tech to agriculture, it's resource rich, and its population is just right in regards to self sustainability; that being, its population isn't too large to be reliant on others for resources and isn't too small to lack in production of products. It's also the home to 3 of the USA's largest ports, as it controls the mouth of the nations longest and perhaps most valuable river.
In regards to California and Texas they would be able to sustain themselves well for the beginning of the term; however, both states are prone to droughts and water shortages which could, in the long term, lead to famine as the states try to satisfy the needs of their large populations.
What idiot said Louisiana could survive there tiny they barely grow any food and who gives a crap about the river were in there 21st century not everything is shipped by ships not that I'm saying they could not find a way to become self sufficient but in no way would they be the most self sufficient state by farV 2 Comments
Without a doubt Florida would definitely be one of the most self sufficient states. Floridas agricultural is thriving year round because of the temperate climate along with the ocean to provide food. Fuel is not a problem in Florida because many cities are nuclear powered and the potential of rich untapped oil resources offshore. Lots of timber, manpower, tourism, solar energy the list goes on...
Florida has the potential to produce more produce than that of california at a cheaper cost since it wouldn't need to run as much irrigation and we can grow year round. As for oil we can drill for it off shore and being nearly surrounded by water means that there is a booming fishing industry. florida is one of the leaders in tourism in the entire country and it's citizens take their 2nd amendment seriously so it would definitely be able to defend itself. the only problem I see would be a lack of mineral resources such as iron and coal.
If the states were to separate, Missouri would do just fine. We have an extensive agriculture base, and enough access to the raw materials for our industry to prosper. As for oil...we'll steal it from Oklahoma and Arkansas.
With lots of farmland, transportation infrastructure and access to international trade, Georgia would have a fighting chance to make it on the outside.
I think with there low population they could catch fish and hunt dear to stay alive also the do grow a little food there
Needs to be above Mississippi. - SteelCity99
Arizona has a very small population I think it could survive
Colorado has a smaller population they could probably move into the mountains and live up there with there cattle and by moving there military up there they could survive
Possibly the ranches and gold could keep them alive
California could easily be taken over by Colorado and the gays could be enslaved =)
Related ListsBest Presidents of the United States Best Sports in the United States Top Cities in the United States Things Wrong With The United States Best United States Allies
List StatsUpdated 21 Aug 2017
2 years, 160 days old
Top Remixes (4)
2. New York
3. New York
View All 4