Top 10 Greatest Tennis Rivalries

The Top Ten
1 Roger Federer v. Rafael Nadal

This has to be it. The greatest rivalry I've seen in my life up till now.

2 Martina Navratilova v. Chris Evert
3 Pete Sampras v. Andre Agassi
4 Venus Williams v. Serena Williams
5 John McEnroe v. Jimmy Connors
6 Bjorn Borg v. John McEnroe
7 Steffi Graf v. Monica Seles
8 Bobby Riggs v. Billie Jean King
9 Ken Rosewall v. Rod Laver
10 Novak Djokovic v. Rafael Nadal
The Contenders
11 Don Budge v. Gottfried von Cramm
12 Boris Becker v. Stefan Edberg
13 Lleyton Hewitt v. Roger Federer
14 Chris Evert v. Evonne Goolagong

Chris Evert was definitely the superior player and her relentless game was too much for Evonne, who seemed to, from early on, accept that Evert was better. This is going by some post match statements from Evonne.

They had some good matches until 1975. Chris was 3 years younger and still in her teens. After her 19th birthday in late 1974, Chris just took charge and it was all over for Evonne. Evonne would win a few more matches against Evert but there was never any doubt about who the superior player was. Evert killed the debate.

Evonne won their first meeting and there was excitement about these 2 and who would take over the mantle from King and Court. Evert then murdered Evonne the next 5 matches after which Evonne was perpetually playing catch up. Evert had taken over.

The contrasting styles, similar ages both vying to be number 1 made for an exciting rivalry. It did not quite live up to expectations mainly due to Chris Evert who generally dominated their matches and was clearly the better player.

15 Chris Evert v. Margaret Court

I have seen them play and I always felt that Margaret feared Chris. And with good reason - all her strengths were neutralized by Chris.

1. The big serve - Chris seemed to read it uncannily.

2. The net game - Chris made her look foolish coming to the net with her passing shots, disguise and the absolutely devastating lobs.

3. Margaret's reach, as a result of which she was supposedly difficult to lob. Well…. Not for Chris!

4. Margaret's fitness level. She was one of the fittest players on the circuit, but Chris made her move so much that it drove Margaret to exhaustion.

On top of this, Chris remorselessly attacked Margaret's backhand which collapsed against the bombardment from Evert.

Evert made Margaret nervous and that only made matters worse for her and did not quite make for a great rivalry.

Styles make rivalries. While Margaret, in my view, should be rated higher than Chris in an all-time list based on achievements, I think when it comes to head to head between the 2 of them, Evert comes out ahead. Evert had Margaret's game all figured out from early on which enabled her dominate their head to head.

They needed to have played at least 2-3 more years when both were at their peak. Sadly, that did not happen. But considering how much Evert troubled Court in the very early 70's as an up and coming teenager when Court was number 2, most experts seem to feel that Evert was and would have been a terrible match up for Court.

This is an under-hyped rivalry. Margaret was the number 1 in the early 1970's and dominating women's tennis. Chris, age 15, all of 98 pounds and 5ft 2" tall played the World number 1 in 1970 and beat her in straight sets. A shocker. Chris won their next 2 matches also in straight sets. They played 13 matches in all, with Chris ending with a 9-4 advantage.

Their styles were contrasting - Margaret was a big server with a good net game; powerful and fit. Chris was a baseliner with good return of serves and a 2-handed backhand. It was fascinating watching Chris handle the Margaret serve and the duel between the net rusher and the baseliner.

BAdd New Item