Top Ten Things in Horror Movies that Aren't Scary AnymoreBKAllmighty This list compiles the most noteworthy scare tactics in horror movies that have become so commonplace and clichéd that they are simply not frightening anymore (or, perhaps, never were to begin with).
The Top Ten
When a hand lands on someone's shoulder and you think "Oh no! The killer! ", but it's just the best friend. Or when something is shuffling in the bushes and when the branches are pulled apart OUT JUMPS... a cat. It's so commonplace these days that it's completely un-frightening. This is especially true when there's no REAL scare moments afterwards. When that happens, all the suspense is lost and the real scares that eventually happen are much less effective. - BKAllmighty
It could still work, if not for the clumsy use of faux-suspense music that always precedes it.
I blame FNAF. - Not_A_Weeaboo
Horror filmmakers went crazy over the "found footage" technique after 1999's 'The Blair Witch Project' became a pop culture phenomenon. It was cheap, it was easy, it was money in the bank. So, naturally, a whack ton of horror movies made in the same style started to pop up everywhere. And, for a while, it was great. It gave horror movies a more naturalistic feel which upped the movie's plausibility and, therefore, made for an enhanced experience for horror movie audiences. But, like any craze, it started to feel overdone and stale after a while. Nowadays, it's mostly been reduced to a lazy way to make empty jump scares. My what was found now be re-lost. - BKAllmighty
Not one of these movies with the shaky camera are scary at all. Not one. Worst of the worst, is Found Footage, and to hear fans actually fall for this and say they are scary is unbelievably bad as you can get. Never been a fan and never will be. I saw TBWP and that is not a scary movie at all and more a comedy at that. It started the crap and never ever did one after get any better. Keep these dead and no more made. I will be happy to never hear of one being released again. I won't see it.
Paranormal Activity was so bad. I can't stand this kind of movie.
Michael Myers was supposed to be dead at the end of 1981's 'Halloween II'. I mean, he was lying face down, completely engulfed in flames (a close-up of his mask on fire is the film's final shot). But, because 'Halloween III' (with its completely different story) was so poorly-received, they decided to bring the silent killer back for the fourth film. So they made it so that he was just in a coma. The series would continue on for many installments, each displaying Michael's inability to get killed. And I'm hoping you can guess what it is about this idea that renders it frightening. Well, if you can't...it's the fact that you know the killer we come back for the next movie (so what's the point of giving us hope that the killer MIGHT actually be permanently dead? ). You'd think audiences would clue in and stop paying money to see the same thing happen again (I haven't - mainly because I find these movies to be more fun than frightening anyway). - BKAllmighty
From the beginning of horror film-making, children were always a showcase of purity. That was, until movies 'Village of the Damned' and 'The Shining' changed everything. Creepy kids have been a standard practice in horror movies ever since, and it's getting old. What once was a shocking idea (think "The Exorcist") is now so commonplace that we're completely desensitized to it. I would argue that part of the reason why 'The Conjuring 2' packed a smaller punch than its predecessor was because of this very reason. - BKAllmighty
If you want to see creepy children, all you have to do is look at me. lol. - AnonymousChick
Again, it all started with one film. 'The Exorcist' paved the way for movies showcasing how demons binding to innocent people lead them to change color, contort their limbs, projectile vomit, crawl on ceilings, float in midair, throw furniture, curse profusely, and withstand normally-fatal injuries. And, yes, the thought of witnessing such things is terrifying... unless we're watching it all happen to someone we don't care about. And that's the fatal flaw that most modern horror movies fall prey to. These days, nobody is willing to wait long enough for the characters to become interesting and likable so when the individual becomes possessed ten minutes in, we ultimately don't care, and there's no weight to the situation (unless a dog's at risk, or something - then we care). - BKAllmighty
It's hard to believe that when George A. Romero's 'Night of the Living Dead' was released in 1968 it was considered to be horrendously gory and explicit as if it was that generation's 'Saw'. Well, it was all that and more, I'll tell you. But, boy, did it work wonders for the horror crowd. As you must know, the zombie sub-genre remains as one of the most popular commodities in pop culture today. They've featured in countless movies and are responsible for one of the most popular graphic novels-turned-television programs of all time ('The Walking Dead', of course). So, obviously, we still love zombies. But, are we still scared of them? I'd argue that our long-standing acquaintance with the grey-skinned brutes has left us unmoved by their nastiness. It's a pity, because nothing should scare us more than a hostile rotting corpse, you'd think. - BKAllmighty
I wouldn't really call zombie movies horror, but more action adventure since most of the time people are just travelling around the world running from zombies and shooting them down with shotguns - Mcgillacuddy
The fact is most of the zombie movies are comedy movies - zxm
As not scary as in shooter games...
(cough cough cal of duty cough cough)
ps:i know Call of Duty is not scary...
If your adult memory goes back as far as the early 2000's, you'll recall how torture-porn horror movies were everywhere. There was the 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre' remakes, the 'Saw' series, and countless others that have since faded from memory. Well, for me, that stuff was never "scary" to begin with. It just made me feel sick. But for others, the sight of someone losing a limb or being cut in half was as frightening as anything. Well, while the concept of being disemboweled should be disturbing to anyone with a sense of self-preservation, it's just not frightening to watch anymore. Like I said, it's just gross. - BKAllmighty
Implied violence is much better. The last scene of "Secret Window" where you see a decaying dead body for a split second before a fast cut to Johnny Depp eating meat is a great example... That movie always creeps me out.
Blood and gore never scared me at all. Seriously, people who are easily scared by this are probably scared by movies like 300. - Mcgillacuddy
Disturbing, not scary...
You've seen this before, I'm sure. A guy's walking in a dark hallway when, all of a sudden, a monster jumps out of the darkness and terrifies the guy (and the audience with him) and he wakes up in bed, realizing that it was all a bad dream. He goes to lay back down. As he rolls over in bed he sees the monster laying right beside him and BOOM! You have an extra, "unexpected" scare that takes advantage the audiences' false sense of safety and security. Well, like everything else on this list, it's becoming old hat now. Sometimes, if done cleverly enough, some forms of this tactic may still work, but most of the time you can see it coming from a mile away. - BKAllmighty
Every time the movie's protagonist is shown running from the killer (or whatever it is that's after them) we see him/her stopping at a certain point because they feel confident that they've given the evil-doer the slip. Of course, we know that the big scare is right around the corner and that the villain is really behind the next door the hero opens (or something relative to that). The only times where this does not happen is when there's a "fake jump scare", and we've already covered that. - BKAllmighty
WE NEED A REAL ESCAPE MAKERS!
The fridge door one would be a person opens a fridge door and when he/she closes it back something pops up from behind it. - Mcgillacuddy
Yeah..that's why people are so bored - Ananya
Since there are two equally known versions of this scare, I decided that not crediting both in the item title would be wrong, hence this two-named list item. Now, the premise is simple (and predictable). Someone is either doing something in front of a mirror (e.g. brushing their teeth) and something happens that leads them to bend downward (e.g. spit out their toothpaste into the sink). The camera pans downward with the action, taking the mirror out of the shot completely. Once the person stands straight upwards again (facing the mirror directly) something awful happens (a scary face takes the place of the normal guy's in the mirror or said scary face is revealed to be standing directly behind him). I'm going to let you figure out the "fridge door" variant of the scene for yourself (if you don't already know it), since it's pretty simple. - BKAllmighty
Chucky is kinda scary but mainly funny
"Who is Annabelle"
The haunted doll. You've never seen the movies?
Who is Annabelle
Annabelle is dumbV 1 Comment
Related ListsTop 10 Rock Bands That Aren't Together Anymore Top Ten TopTenners Who Aren't On That Often Anymore Biggest Rappers that Aren't Popular Anymore Top 10 Music Genres That Aren't Worth Listening to Anymore Other Than to Criticize Top Ten Movies People Say Are Scary But Aren't
2 years, 354 days old
2. The "Mirror" or "Fridge Door" Scare
2. The "Found Footage" Technique
3. Demonic Possession