Top Ten Things that TheTopTens Should Have by 2018

That would be brilliant, so that you can just comment without needing to vote though some people always get offended when they accidentally fall for the vote button on the "Best Justin Bieber Songs". RiverClanRocks comment there makes me cringe

PLEASE... I hate having to vote on lists to add a comment why I don't like the reasoning to the list or whatever.

This and the number one needs to be real right now, it's not possible that you must vote for post a comment

While I agree with this it is unlikely to happen as it gives people a reason to vote on lists.

It's like that on all user themed lists. That's annoying. But you can remix though

Why you can not post more than one comment?

This is one reason why I hate that list.

Maybe. I've quite a few I'm not proud of. The thing is though, while any member regards a list they made as unworthy, others may find wholly entertaining; it's just a matter of taste. Another thing with list deletion is that if we all did this to our own personal lists, TheTopTens website would suffer badly.

I doubt Admin will ever do this. If they do it, we will lose lots of points. That means thousands of comments, posts, remixes, replies. This will change the history of toptens. Cause users will keep deleting their lists one by one. So I think it's better to leave it. But in some cases some lists are removable.

I feel that when you realise that lists cannot be deleted, you put in more effort on your lists so that they turn out as good lists. No list should get deleted

I used to think it was a good idea, I really want to delete some of my lists, especially the Harambe list. But I just realized if I delete my lists, then the list quality would go down.

I agree - this works for troll items. Yesterday I made a list about metal musicians with 10 items and I got 5 troll entries very quickly - Stevie Wonder, Prince and similar. I put 3 of them on dishonorable mentions but 3 is not enough. What if I get more troll items and they get into the top 5 of the list? I reported the errors ("don't belong") but from my experience this measure rarely works.

I needed this on the Worst Pokemon Characters list because there are more than 3 I wanted to put on Dishonorable mentions. Sometimes 3 isn't enough. Especially when it's list about hating something.

Yes!, By This Way, On The List Of Worst Video Games, I Can Get Halo 3, Skyrim And Super Mario 64 DS To The Bottom Of The List!, I've Gotten SM64, Ocarina Of Time 3D, And Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag At The Bottom, Someone Needs To Get Skyrim Towards the Bottom!

Five dishonorable mentions is better than three.

I think this is a good idea but I think that if you change your username you need to wait for long days to change it again like if you want to change your name on facebook

I wish I can, I have many usernames to choose for my username, BUT be sure I can do it as many times as I want but with a time gap like 60 days before I can change my name again.

Yes, let us change our usernames. But please don't pull a DeviantART and make us pay for it.

I used to want to change my username but now I'm cool with it.

Yeah this would be better than the current message system.

This would be a great addition - sadly it seems like some good lists by new users have just gone under the radar, and a random list button would probably help them to get the recognition they deserve.

Let it take you somewhere random. That'll be fun.

*Takes you to "greatest anime traps"*

I am totally in support of this.

I was bummed when this was removed. This needs to come back

I've said before in the hope that admin takes the hint that it would be good if users and visitors could reply to comments via the user's comments' section on their profile page instead of on the actual list. it would be good to be given the choice.

But it could take up space

There is already an option for it. Same with this list. See "Error Reporting" on this page. But it must be objective. Subjective list items aren't allowed for it.

For example this way you can prevent incorrect items from being added to one of your lists

We already have this for post comments, though I'd love to see this implemented with list comments too. If someone posted a comment several years ago which was based on old speculation of a T.V. show or major event, for instance, it will be much easier to deduce that it was accepted for the time it was put on the list rather than the poster possibly being mistaken as misinformed or a troll.

This would be a good update to the site seeing when we've made all of our comments it may even help out exactly what gen everybody is just by looking at the general perspective.

Whoever added this is a smart, smart person. I really want this since people STILL think I disrespect opinions nowadays.

Then I would know the actual day I joined. I said November 11 because of the post comment I made on my first or second day.

That, or at least more consistent image upload times. Considering the administration has a tendency to approve images whenever they feel like it, image upload times usually either range from taking at best less than a day to perhaps a week or two or maybe even a month to get approved. As someone who uploads images on my lists frequently, it would be a significant improvement to the image uploading aspect of TheTopTens if the administration were to have an organized and fixed interval for all image upload times to take. About 1 week is the fixed interval time I would recommend.

It took hours to upload my photos of Mickey Rooney and John Goodman yet about a week for my Mason Ramsey photo to upload.

It took 15 days for a couple of images I added to get approved.

Whenever I upload an image it takes at least a week.

Depends on how much exactly the item is troll. Things like, adding Nicki Minaj or Justin Bieber on best singer list isn't counted as troll. Though most trolls use these kinds of things. But, it could be based on opinions too. So, where there stands an opinion, that thing isn't counted as troll. No matter how much unpopular the opinion is. Only those are troll items, which CAN"T BE added to there. For example, someone added Taylor Swift on my "Most powerful countries of World War II" list. That item was deleted before it appeared.

This could work only if we have to give an explanation to why the entry doesn't belong. We could delete it first and if the explanation is approved it will stay deleted.

This would only work if we had to give an explanation why

Too easy to exploit.

Lists don't have date. But it shows how much old it is. So, I don't think its really necessary at this moment.

Yesterday I made my first list of this type and I admit this format is useful in some cases. I personally wanted to allow comments but there is no such option. Currently non-votable subjective lists don't allow comments. I think users should have an option to decide whether to allow comments or not.
I guess some of you never used it and maybe don't know how this looks like, so here's my list I am talking about: Top 10 Best Rock and Metal Singers Most People Never Heard Of
(in the list description I explain more things about this types of lists).

Yes, what's the point of the list if nobody can comment on it.

Why not try Discord? There is a chatroom for the website there

Good luck with that.

I don't see why we need admin's authority in order to delete our own accounts. - ModernSpongeBobSucks

Why do we need admin approval to delete an account anyway?

I can delete my nko32 account because I find it cringey but I need to ask admin to delete it

I know how to do this.

I don't really like that idea because I used to not like DCfnaf when I was a noob because he had the opposite opinions as me. (Now he is one of my favorite users because he's nice and we reply stuff and it's cool) I would have blocked him from my lists because he had opposite opinions as me. (I was the worst user ever) But I'm glad he goes on my lists because I just...want people to go on my list, you know. But if you could unblock, then this is a good idea.

It'd be kinda biased. We have to deal what comes for us. So I think we must have a good knowledge what we are submitting. Otherwise people will always come to question about our items.

No. Everyone has a freedom of speech, given it follows the policy.

No. They have a right to vote on any list.

It's already bad enough we're given a bad name on Encyclopedia Dramatica... Let's not make it worse with Wikipedia.

No
This is saying quite a lot about the adminstrator isn't it now

I don't think we need one

Remember when the dislikes appeared on the screen?

That sounds like it would cause controversy and hate.

Not really it's just cause more tension. Remeber the dislike buttons, guys?

Just imagine all the drama this could cause