Top 10 Military Tanks
The Top Ten
The rather new model is unbeatable,.
It has an anti rocket system, it is fast, well armoured, has superior radar capabilities and can shoot in angles where other tanks cannot shoot, the top is flatter than the ones of other tanks and therefore harder to hit. Also it has outside cams and radar target system.
A true masterpiece
Claiming to be the second best in the world for military technology, Israel put its technological knowledge to work. The Merkava (Chariot in English) showed most of its efforts in the 80's and the Gulf War for being a stand alone MBT. With the engine in the front rather than the back, this gave the Merkava an advantage for armor and crew protection.
The best tank in history when it comes to armor, innovative in crew safty for it's design puting the engine in the front and having a door in the back, can go in every terrain, extremely high accuracy and fire power, and has the ability to transport infantry troops and bring them to the heart of the battle, carrting them inside and letting them exit through the doors in the back.
Incredible tank! Especially now that it uses the worlds most up to date anti tank missile defense system
The M1 Abrams could lose a fight vs a T-90A or a Challenger. The reason I voted for it was because there are more, and are easier (by 10-15%) to produce. Also, they are making improvements to it. What I don't like about it: 1) It's overrated (Admit it). 2) Many where lost due to enemy fire in both Iraqui Freedom and Desert Storm and never revealed to be destroyed. 3) Its big engine which sucks fuel till the last drop (Remember considering how much fuel it will take up if there are many of them). 4) I just hate how some say an Abrams can destroy a Challenger 2 or a Leopard.
The original M1 Abrams model from the early 1980's was considered the best tank ever made. Yes, a Leopard or a Challenger could give it one hell of a fight, but this tank has just been proven time and time again to be the legend of all battle tanks.
Unlike it's newer models, such as the M1A1 and M1A2 varients, this one has many features that changed how tank fighting can be done forever. A true relic to all military junkies and historians.
Leopard tank is bettter no war to sugar coat that but 408 awesome tanks vs 8325 Great tanks whos winner now the Abrams. However there is no war to test tanks like these great ones in real combat the only tanks are Cold war junk and Russian and Chinese tanks don't come close to the US Abrams, German Leapord, UK Challenger, South Korean Black Panther, Israel Merkava, Japan's New TKX, and the French Leclerc are all better tanks than the 3rd world plus China and Russia. Now it is a battle of High Ultra High Tech vs Mass production. that is it no need to argue
The M1 Abrams is the most proven mbt of today with the most battles fought in than any other modern mbt. I have no doubt it could defeat the Merkava mk 4 with a good crew
From its startout in the Gulf War to now, America has produced what is perhaps the Best Tank ever made. Though older models showed problems, it didn't stop it from becoming a hell bent fighting machine. Packed with a modern gun, super armor, and a well maintanced crew, this MBT shows many promises for a tank that was not made in large numbers during production.
Why 2%? M1A2 Abrams is the best tank in the world. This tank is used in battles for 30 years and he win with everything.
Hands down most powerful and reliable tank in all environments and situations.
Coolest tank ever man watch its video on YouTube its awesome
Many claim that it's the best MBT in the world today by stats. Indeed the Germans created a unique tank that could seem unstoppable. But, it's lacking in battle history on the field, that still doesn't mean that it's deadly. Everything about it is superior, the ability to drive in deep waters to even being more fuel efficient than the American Abrams tank.
Truly advanced I went yo the PanzerMuseum and Bovington which the people said Germans where the masterminds of tanks the new 2a7 is about 1.32 better than the Abraham's that's
Seriously? 4%? Come on people! Trust the Russian metal a bit! First they said American Lockheed Martin F35 would rule the sky and Russians will lose their advantage in the skies but in the end, Russian Sukhoi Su-57 disappointed the Americans by giving them a run for the money. In my views, Russian metal can be always trusted.
As a M1-A2 SEP Abrams gunner with combat experience, I can tell as a simple matter of fact that the Armata, though untested in combat, is on paper, simply the best operational tank in the world. Let's not forget too, that at a third the cost of my Abrams, the economic impact in a real world scenario gains huge points as well.
This tank has a lot of future. This is so much better than the Abrahams because its fast, it's highly protected and has one of the best turret in the world.
First tank in the world with unmanned turret, lighter with 48 ton, fast with 90km/h, maximum of three crews and 125 mm cannon will replace with 152 mm cannon in near future.
What was a strength of the Abrams is now a major drawback, it's power system! Not only for being a fuel waster but because it's engine generates huge amounts of heat that allows it to be targeted that much easier by just one generation of advancements in new anti tank weapons! It's armor is also no longer the standard and it uses a version of the Leopard tanks gun? Which they are updating. If I was being shot at or was using conventional rounds, give me the Challenger still. However, these clams that the Abrams has been destroyed in number are idiotic. Don't think that the US Army has not addressed this problem, for they had a plan to replace this engine with guess what before the funding was killed. Also, the Leopard is being updated to newer standards at a much faster rate and it the preferred tank of most all armies in NATO that did not build its own. The Abrams is a fine tank, is built in much higher quantities, and has an array of ammo that will take anything out so don't worry ...more
I would say this is the currently the most powerful tank in the world but with that being said, it is hardly revolutionary for its time. It is quite comparable to other western tanks such as the Challenger or Abrams. I feel as if this tank has been voted to #1 because it is technically speaking "the most powerful tank of all time" due to the fact that it is the best modern example, however is it really the most powerful tank of all time - for its time? How many wars has it won? Sure it has only lost a single crew member in combat but that must be put into perspective, how much time on the battlefield have these tanks actually spent after all?
The Leopard 2A7 outclasses all tanks currently in service. The Germans continue to produce an amazing battle tank.
And for those of you who say that the T-34, tiger and, especially, the Maus deserve to be in the top 10, you don't know your tanks. Look at how many issues plagued the T-34
There is a reason why all of the armies of Europe, Canada, are adopting this tank. Especially as it has proven it self as a multi role tank, being used in multiple battles in Afghanistan.
A vastly inefficient, and overhyped tank which true stats are often overstated. HALF OF THEM BROKE DOWN BEFORE EVEN SEEING COMBAT. Not to mention that their armor was not substantially better than it’s vastly superior (logistically) adversary the T34. It was much worse armor wise than the often overlooked soviet workhorse the IS2 (a truly GREAT heavy tank introduced in 1944). The Tiger front upper glacis was 100 mm thick sloped at roughly a 90 degree angle (extremely inefficient).Despite all of this raw armor the tank could be penned by the majority of Soviet Tanks with the introduction of the T34-85 (1943). This was due to it’s poor armor profile. A truly inefficient and piece of crap design. Only things that were good about it was the gun (which was excellent throughout the war), and the armor (which was ONLY truly effective when the Tiger was first introduced).
The Tiger is pretty obviously one of the most legendary tank of WW II. The tiger was a masterpiece of the Germans, combining very thick armour, with very powerful shells from its Flak36 8.8cm anti tank gun, and its intimidating size. This tank, even though legendary had a few not so good points. The speed and mobility of this tank was obviously not the best due to its thick and heavy armour, and it was pretty expensive to produce due to the size and complicated controls and designs. Although some bad points have been just listed, we all know that all the money and hard work paid off for the Germans as quite a decent number for a $100, 000 tigers have been produced and feared throughout the war by the Allies and there is no doubt that this is still probably one of the top tanks of WW II.
Germanys great successes can not finished without one of the Greatest Tanks of all time. It's strength in numbers and toughness at the time was so excellent, that it top off the Sherman by a long shot. But, it too, had mechanical failures of its own. Main reason why it's said to fail can go along with many other panzers of its time, it was too expensive compared to its T-34 opponents.
The tiger tank when mentioned sent fear through allied tank crew. It's frontal armour is virtually invincible to most allied tanks. The only way for a T/34 or a Sherman to destroy a tiger was to get in close and hit it from the side. No easy feat since a tiger with it's awesome 88mm gun could destroy a T/34 before it ever got close. I think it should be number 1
The t-90ms has been severely updated from the older t-90 models it brings to the table modern fire and control systems and improved defensive and offensive capabilities which can rival even the Abrams. What is not understand is that the T-90 has been upgraded because of the constant effort by the Russian military to improve their weapon systems. The ability of the T-90 to adapt and overcome can not be understated and is the greatest part of the weapon system that has served the Russian military from 1992 to present day and is still a very capable and competitive weapon system in the international community.
I hate when people say that this is JUST an upgraded T-72. What does the word "upgrade" mean? Improved, better, etc. This (Beautiful looking) tank could easily destroy an Abrams with its 125mm 9M119 Svir cannon which can also fire guided ATGMs that could help destroy a helicopter. It's also a way smaller target than most modern tanks and goes up to 40mph, almost as fast as the Abrams. They also use Kontakt-5 Reactive Armor which makes them immune to depleted uranium.
Originally named after the T- 72BU, the T-90 is the most current tank in the Russian Federations services. Similar to most modern MBT's, the T-90's toughness suits its purpose on the field of action. It also has been seen to successfully drive underwater and get hit by 7 RPG's but still remains operational.
Well the t 90 can face an m1a1 anytime anyday and anyplace why abhrams fires a shot and the arena counter defense measures kick in and if that fails you got era and if that too fails then you got the composite armour and if that fails... THEN ITS ALL UP TO GOD
New British supertank 2miilion lbs a 250 mm cannon and 4 yes 4 30mm mini guns. Also a shark launcher.
Tank does not exist
It is sometimes used to destroy challenger tanks and Abrams tanks
I love this tank
We will prosper!
In terms of a specific weapon system's influence over the course of a war, T34 stand out supreme in military history. In T34 the soviets had a a bulk tank immensely superior to the German bulk tanks, making up for the German superiority in moral and training during the first stages of the war. This, along with other factors, gave the soviets the breathing space for regrouping and getting even. Later on, equipped with an new turret, a superior gun and well-trained troops, T34 spearheaded the largest offensive the world has ever seen. I am aware of no tank that influenced the course of a conflict (and the design of tanks) so deeply.
If we are choosing the best and most influential tank in history, there is no match to T-34. Modern Abrams and Leopards never fought against an equal or technologically superior opponent. Abrams was tested in the Iraq wars, but USA and coalition would have prevailed even without any tanks on the battlefield whatsoever thanks to superior air power, better trained ground troops, better battlefield intel. The war was won even before Abrams crossed the Iraqi border. T-34, on the other hand, fought against opponents (Tigers and Panthers) that were technologically superior, had better crews and were part of the best military machine of the time. T-34 stroke the right balance of armour, fire power, speed and technological complexity; was easy to manufacture and maintain.
You can't "what if" the history, but I can clearly see a scenario where outcome of the most defining battles of WWII could have been different if T-34 wasn't there. Battle of Moscow and Battle of Stalingrad, no-one can ...more
The Leopard tank DID NOT SERVE IN WW2 it was developed in 1965. The leopard VK1602 light tank was planned by the Nazi's as a recon vehicle but never was built. The T34 is the best ever the Tiger was a better built tank but was difficult to maintain on the battle field. The T34 was easy to drive, maintain and built in the tens of thousands. It was fited on the fly with a 75 mm gun or a self propeled gun when needed. The sloped armour was revolutionary. It won the Eastern Front.
This deserves to be the first because in it's time had fairly average armor and a fairly average gun. Not to mention it's sloping armor which reduced the chance for a shell to penetrate through it's armor and the sloping armor was new to it's time. The best thing about this tank is that it was very cheap to produce. RUSSIA PWNS
Challenger II and Leopard II Tanks will give a M1A2 Abrams a run for its money however similar to the Challenger none have been lost (complete lost) due to enemy fire. Friendly fire and accidents have brought a handful down but no enemy fire has ever penetrated the Abrams and destroyed it. There have been some incidences where a Abrams is damaged by enemy fire but not much more than that. On top of all this the Abrams has been produced on a mass scale especially in comparison with the Challenger (#2 Tank) and Leopard (#3 Tank). In addition the Abrams has repeatedly proven itself in war, where in contrast the Challenger and Leopard due to limited numbers had a much less of a role (Leopard didn't even fight in desert storm by the way). Also any other tank outside of these three is crushed by anyone of these three, that includes but is not limited to the T-90A T-90 T-80 T-72... Etc.
Challenger 2 has not been lost to enemy fire and has the same Chobbum armour (which is also British by the way) as the M1. One was once stuck and attacked by insurgents with assault rifles, 14 RPGs and a anti tank missile and still survived. Another survived 70 RPG hits whilst in all service life only one has been lost (to friendly fire from another challenger 2) and two damaged.
This should be first. It doesn't matter how modern or advanced the Abrams is, an ungodly amount of them have been destroyed while this beasts death count still stands proudly at zero. The only reason I don't have an opinion on the leopard is because it hasn't even entered combat yet.
The challenger mk2 has praticaly impervious armour which has been able to whithstand anti-tank mines/missiles and has a world record for hitting a moving target from around 5.5km away. Along with its AP rounds it can distroy an enemy tank before it had even seen the challenger coming.
Also it has a excellent operating range unlike the m1 abrams which needs a ridiculous amount of fuel to operate even over short distances
Got great accuracy,new mk2 has ERA,good if not superb armor, got ATGM firing capability (LAHAT), great firepower and good mobility. For a new tank what else do you need. I'm sure with time it will evolve into something much better. DRDO guys need to solve the weight problem though, it's very heavy (mk2 = 69-67 kg).
This is has the best ever turret of any tank able to penitrate 167mm of steel alloy type 3 armour!
Now Arjun tank got superb firepower.
East or west india is best
It was known as the heaviest tank in history and weighing at almost 2 million pounds, this beast can't be mistaken. The thought of what it could do on the field would be mind boggling. Sadly, it never saw the field of war and only two were ever made. The first was destroyed in a bombing, while the second was captured by the soviets.
Version that was designed for combat may have had 7in gun and more armour
First one is not destroyed by bombing. It didn't had turret and ammo
The biggest and heaviest tank ever built it weighed 188 tonnes
It may have gotten its butt kicked by the tigers, but one thing to remember is that this tank had way more survivors than the tiger. Mainly because of the amount of malfunctions in the tiger tank. This left them trapped and weak in the middle of a battle. Also they ran out of fuel 50 percent of the time also making them vulnerable. Most documentaries forget to include these facts. The tiger only wins if it doesn't have any malfunctions. I'm not saying the Sherman is perfect though. It also has some malfunctions.
I've always had a thing for this tank, In World war 2 It was One of the Most if not The Most Reliable tank out there, While sure, Most people think that The Main Variants had A standard gas engine that would burn Up in a Hearbeat when hit, It was actually Usually the Ammo storage, This was found out when Sherman's knocked out in combat were sometimes examined and the fuel was actually still usually found intact, Now There's a solution to this, The M4A1 76(W)(W Stands for Wet Ammo storage), this version and its M4A2 76(W) counterpart had different ammo storages then a Standard Sherman, and it would save Many of the crew members of these types if they were hit.
Now here comes the Armor Problem, Your standard sherman variant has 2.0/2.5 inches of armor, although you could Add extra armor to the sides and front to help somewhat solve this problem, there's also a not well known HEAVY tank variant of the Sherman, called the M4A3E2 Sherman Jumbo, Its Front Glacis was About 5-7 Inches ...more
It was incredibly easy to produce. It was considered to be incredibly reliable, even the soviets with their T-34 masterpiece loved this tank. The controls are so easy to use even an idiot could figure them out. The Sherman sported a wide range of variants. They were equipped with flamethrowers, AA guns, rocket launchers, smaller cannons, larger cannons, and could become bridging units if need be.
Accurate, easily produced, and realiable in engagements the Sherman showed us just what it can do. This battle tank was used for many wartime situations not only including both the Pacific and European tours, but also in the Vietnam and Korean wars too.
Easily up to the standard of most Western and Russian tanks.
This can go head to heat with the British challenger
Brilliant thank though seriously undegunned
Best tank in Africa
Designed to survive everything and it could very well do so with some modern weapons. And armour.
This is supposed to be on no. 11
Best tank ever
Best in zarb e azab and other operation specialy better then arjun tank
The T72 often gets a bad reputation for it’s pitiful performance while serving for the Iraqi army. However the reality is that the T72 was a masterpiece in tank engineering at the time of it’s creation. The reason for this, was it’s ability to take out any tank that was available during this time, and the extremely cheap, and cost effective design it possessed. It’s poor performance in the Iraqi army was due to it being used with poor tactics, practice ammunition (horrible no uranium core), and it being a down graded export version of an already downgraded tank (the T72m).Not to mention it had to face a modern, and fully equipped Abrams.😧
Just simple mass production
Did great in the gulf war no sarcassum
The Pz. Kfw. V Panther was the best operational Main Battle Tanks of WWII. It's primary advantages over other tanks of the time were it's strong angled frontal armor, faster turret traverse, and speed. It's 75mm gun also had excellent range and accuracy. Now remember that the 75mm American short guns and 57mm Soviet AT guns were also accurate, but they could maintain stopping power at long ranges like the German guns could. Building a tank that could hit a target at 1200 Meters wasn't that difficult, but building a tank that could DESTROY targets at that range was an entirely different story. However, like many German Vehicles of the time, the Panther was over-engineered, and thus very expensive to produce. It also carried sufficient side armor, but was still prone to AT Rifle hits.
After the initial faults were fixed it performed better than any other tank of the war, this was because it had a overall better cannon (7.5cm KWK 42L/70) and its armour was almost immune to the cannons of the day and some later guns, it was fast for its size and was better at cross country than others
Panther has everything like tiger (it also includes good armor) but it's much faster!
It was an awesome thing
Which tank had the thickest armor?
The most powerful gun?
Even though this tank had a bad track record for its mechanical failures, it was still one of the at least top three of the most powerful tanks in ww2. The only reason why it was not number one is because there were only 500 of these beasts produced, but they were still increadibly effective. should be at least top seven or eight, not number 22.
In my opinion and I have done a lot of research into W.W.11 tanks nothing could beat a Tiger 2. Unless the tank broke down or ran out of gas otherwise forget about it no contest.
Ok how is this thing down here? Do you know that Germany plans to re use them upgraded!?!?
It was a very powerful tank. It could knock out an tank
Centurion is undoubtedly one of the greatest tank designs of all time. It was in service around the world as a universal tank for decades and is still in use as a combat tractor.
Saw service in North Korea with the British where it was very valuable as a force multiplier.
Also with the Australians during the Vietnam War.
Showed itself to be the best tank of its time in the 6 Day War and Yom Kippur War where armoured units such as the 7th and Barack brigades faced down T55 and T62 tanks who sometimes outnumbered them 15-1. Awesome tank.
How is the best tank EVER not in the top 10? It served from the end of WW2 to now in some countries and preceded ALL other MBTs, yet I find it 36th. With a powerful gun and thick armour, it could take on any tank of its day and come out victorious. Even now, it is still an effective weapon, so why isn't it no1?
I hate it when people think the Centurion wasn't great. It was the single best British design of the 1940's. I think the person who designed this list was slightly brain-dead.
I'm going to buy one of these for a paddock basher.
The Challenger 2 may be slightly heavier than most MBT's there for slightly slower, neither was it built in as many numbers as the T-54/55 or as successful as the T-34 but it has the best gun and with a rifled barrel so it hits what you're aiming at, the best in targeting technology, best life support systems, best camo fitted and best in MBT armour. It's also not as bigger target as the M60 or the Abrams
Supplied to two armies including the United Kingdom and oman army. The newer design off the Challenger I, sent in for many peacekeeping missions in the Middle East. Many missions showed that it was impenetrable to all enemy fire, except for IED's.
Anyone else wonder how it stood LESS than the challenger I?
Best tank on list many tanks forgotten though