Top Ten Ways the Beatles are Better Than Led Zeppelin

The Beatles were the big bang of rock and roll. They were more innovative, artistic, and influential than any other band in history. Ask Eric Clayton, he was in awe of the fab four. Top 5 slots on billboard in 1964 and more hits down the list.

The Beatles broke up before Led Zeppelin released over half of their studio albums. Therefore, The Beatles are MORE Dated than Led Zeppelin, and they are both good. If it were this way, then we would all like Justin Bieber over all the other artists, and this would be an Anti-Beatles site.

By dated I mean Zeppelin sounds like it could only be recorded in the late 60's-70's. The Beatles' music is more timeless. - lavashooter

Can agree with paul better than plant but personally don't agree that john better than plant.though he is a good songwriter but plant has nicer voice(my opinion) - zxm

And entertaining, often pleasant, engaging personalities with thoughtful and witty perspectives to share. - Billyv

Led Zeppelin has good enough personalities. - Music_Lover123

The Beatles did more different genres of music just in "the White Album" than Pink Floyd or any metal band did in their entire career.

The Beatles are nowhere near the most diverse band. Pink Floyd, Metallica, and Judas Priest, are all more diverse, and so is Led Zeppelin.

This should be the top reason. Led Zeppelin got famous by covering old blues songs. - TheStargazer

Okay I agree led zeppelin covered old blues songs.But what about beatle's plagiarisms.never heard of it? they plagiarized chuck berry's songs. - zxm

That only happened once. Led Zeppelin got away with plagiarism on their first 3 albums all the time, unless they were sued. - lavashooter

They also got plagiarism cases. - zxm

I didn't know you liked Justin Bieber.

Ha ha,this doesn't work.cause its not a reason to be one better than another. - zxm