Top Ten Ways the Beatles are Better Than Led Zeppelinlavashooter I saw a "Led Zeppelin are better" list, so let's counter that.
The Top Ten
The Beatles were the big bang of rock and roll. They were more innovative, artistic, and influential than any other band in history. Ask Eric Clayton, he was in awe of the fab four. Top 5 slots on billboard in 1964 and more hits down the list.
The Beatles broke up before Led Zeppelin released over half of their studio albums. Therefore, The Beatles are MORE Dated than Led Zeppelin, and they are both good. If it were this way, then we would all like Justin Bieber over all the other artists, and this would be an Anti-Beatles site.
By dated I mean Zeppelin sounds like it could only be recorded in the late 60's-70's. The Beatles' music is more timeless. - lavashooter
The Beatles changed with every album. Led Zeppelin and most other bands just sounded the same all the time.
The Beatles did more different genres of music just in "the White Album" than Pink Floyd or any metal band did in their entire career.
The Beatles are nowhere near the most diverse band. Pink Floyd, Metallica, and Judas Priest, are all more diverse, and so is Led Zeppelin.
Can agree with paul better than plant but personally don't agree that john better than plant.though he is a good songwriter but plant has nicer voice(my opinion) - zxm
And entertaining, often pleasant, engaging personalities with thoughtful and witty perspectives to share. - Billyv
Yes,but george martin isn't a band member of beatles - zxm
But the band was fortunate and smart enough to use his help, which enhanced their creations. And they gave him credit. - Billyv
This should be the top reason. Led Zeppelin got famous by covering old blues songs. - TheStargazer
Okay I agree led zeppelin covered old blues songs.But what about beatle's plagiarisms.never heard of it? they plagiarized chuck berry's songs. - zxm
That only happened once. Led Zeppelin got away with plagiarism on their first 3 albums all the time, unless they were sued. - lavashooter
They are both very influential, but if it weren't for The Beatles, none of the great bands you hear today would be around.
Yes I agree with here.though I am a big fan of zep but beatles where more influential.most influential rock artist is elvis presley,then its beatles. - zxm
They also got plagiarism cases. - zxm
As much as I want to point out that looks do not matter, it is kinda true.
Ha ha,this doesn't work.cause its not a reason to be one better than another. - zxm
Beatles also stole songs. - zxm
No, The Beatles always credited the original artists. Zeppelin rarely did unless they were sued. - lavashooter
Related ListsTop 10 Reasons Why Led Zeppelin Is Better Than the Beatles Top 10 Reasons Pink Floyd, the Beatles, and Led Zeppelin are Better Than Coldplay Top 10 Ways Carly Rae Jepsen is Better Than Led Zeppelin Top Ten Ways Led Zeppelin is Better Than Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones, Queen & the Who Top Ten Reasons Why Pink Floyd are Better Than Led Zeppelin
1 year, 214 days old
2. Led Zeppelin's materiel is somewhat dated, The Beatles have aged better.
3. The Beatles have 3 of the greatest song writers ever
2. The Beatles have 3 of the greatest song writers ever
3. The Beatles were more diverse in their music