Top 10 Worst Animated Movies of All Time
"Foodfight!" isn't just a bad animated movie. It's a legendary disaster that has to be seen to be believed. Sure, the filmmakers were clearly ambitious when designing the movie, but they made every single wrong decision you can possibly make when putting it together. From its horrendous animation to its extraordinarily unfunny and often child-unfriendly humor, to its worthless story and charmless characters, "Foodfight!" sinks to depths lower than any other family films have ever sunk to. It's so nauseatingly misguided that it makes the terrible "Shark Tale" look like "Toy Story 2". And unlike bad movies like "The Cat In The Hat" (the Mike Myers film) and "The Room", it's not a so-bad-it's-good movie. Those two movies, and more, were daft, quotable, and just plain fun because they sucked, but "Foodfight!" is a horrifying experience with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Watch it once to see how bad it is, and never go back. And please don't buy it as a joke.
Words really can't describe how terrible this abomination of a movie is. As a matter of fact, it's so bad that it doesn't even deserve to be #1 on the Worst Animated Movies of All Time list. It deserves to be sent straight to hell and never brought back. If you want something that will legitimately scar you for life... I'm talking about on levels of your first time watching Boku no Pico and 2 Girls One Cup, then this is the film for you. The creators did probably every wrong thing you could do to an animated film.
Step 1: A dumb title. "Where the Dead Go to Die". Good to see that the creator of this garbage made it past the 2nd grade.
Step 2: Bad animation. This is a horror film, but the animation itself is probably enough to scare the hell out of you. It's worse than Foodfight!'s animation.
Step 3: Crappy voice acting. Probably the worst form of voice acting I've ever heard, and I've heard a lot of it before. It has to be heard for you to really understand how terrible it is. At least Foodfight!'s acting had a little bit of charisma. The actors for this film honestly sounded like they weren't even trying.
Step 4: Terrible story... wait, was there even a plot to this movie? Honestly, I was completely confused from beginning to end. The film's plot made very little sense and just a bunch of random crap happens.
Step 5: The shock factor. This is actually what throws you off away from the film's main plot. I'm not joking when I say this: there's a chance that the people who made this film could've been arrested for the stuff they put in it. I'll just give one example: A little boy gets (bleep) in the ass by a dog in one scene... That should be reason enough for you not to tempt yourself to see it.
If you think that no other film could possibly be worse than Foodfight!, then you are drop dead wrong. This film gives you a glimpse of what Hell is probably like, and that's nothing to be proud of. And I'm not even going to bother... more
Oh, yeah! There was TOTALLY a rapping dog on the Titanic. This movie could've been so much better if, when the Titanic sinks, the rapping dog dies too.
What the hell happened here? What kind of twisted imagery did I just watch? It raised many questions after I barely got past the whole film. Mainly: Why did this thing even exist? This is truly one of the most confusing, if not the most pathetic, attempt to make a "children's movie" with talking animals, bad animation, badly done characters, and even worse dialogue. It's no wonder nobody knew anything about this film. Probably because everyone did whatever they could to forget about it and wipe its existence off the face of the internet.
What can one say about this movie? First of all, the fact that there is an animated, kid-friendly movie about a tragic event is nothing short of embarrassing to us homo sapiens as a whole. What's next? "9/11: The Legend Goes On"? "Pearl Harbor: The Legend Goes On"? "The Tsavo Man-eaters: The Legend Goes On"? It's moronic.
Next, there's the legendary scene in this movie: the rapping dog. Mexican mice are unpacking and talking, as a tabby cat and a chihuahua (the reason they don't kill each other isn't mentioned) attack them. A Great Dane then scares the two furry fiends away and yells gibberish at the mice. Afterward, the rodents begin repeating animation as they play instruments (which, for some reason, sound like beatboxing) while the canine raps his famous line, "It's Party Time!" The dog's attire keeps appearing and disappearing illogically, and rap didn't even exist in 1912! The scene makes no sense.
Finally, we have the sinking. Only one character dies, and apparently, it's because she sang too much. Really? At least a dog-faced octopus doesn't appear.
The movie is okay in some ways. Let me outline the pros and cons of this movie.
Pros:
- Olympia (A genius who is usually the voice of reason to her mom and Norm)
- The 'Whatever' lady (Relatable)
Cons:
- Animation (Although the animation is the heaven of awful movies, it still sucks. There are unusual camera shots, and the movement of the characters sometimes feels fast-paced. For example, the scene where Mr. Greene was dancing with Norm when he got hired)
- Personalities (Some characters are usually very bland and show very little personality traits)
- Characters (Although I like some characters, like Olympia, there are characters which I despise. These include the lemmings and bird. The lemmings are just 'there' as plain backup characters, while the bird is plain annoying. I just wish he was shot to pieces.)
Who is the evil mind behind this film? Joking aside, Norm of the North is the worst animated film I've seen so far. Norm is a bad lead, the lemmings are bad comic sidekicks, the villain has the usual views and motivations, and is flat, like all the other characters in the film. The script does not know where to go, proposing choices suitable to chance, predictable clichés, and bad jokes, which would not make even a child laugh. The animations are very bad: the characters move in an unnatural way and the graphics are still back in times gone by. A film that I would not recommend even to my worst enemy.
The animation is terrible. There's a lot of filler. All the characters are annoying and/or stupid (Speedy in particular. At one point I was rooting for a guy who tried to kill her). The plot is dull and uninteresting, which is not made better by the fact that you won't really care about any of the annoying/stupid characters. The message is also poorly executed - it tries to be "it's good to be careful, but it's also okay to take some risks", but comes across as "Being careful is important. LOL, just kidding. Feel free to do something stupid and dangerous".
I swear I have absolutely no idea whatsoever how the people who make these kinds of ripoff movies don't get sued. Like, do they have the U.S. government behind them? Is there something in the Amendments that I missed? How the hell do these guys do it?!
The pink car's voice is so bad I can't even describe how bad it is.
EDIT: The pink car's name is Speedy, I think. DO NOT listen to Speedy's voice unless you want brain damage.
Where do I begin? The designs are horrendous, it's ridiculously boring and unfunny, and the characters are so bland and unlikable. This might as well be called the cliché movie because that's what it is. A pile of clichés taken from better movies. But one thing that bugs me is the premise. Everyone talks about how it's ripping off Wreck-It Ralph, Inside Out, and The Lego Movie, and they're right. But this movie does it in the worst way possible.
I mean, let's get into the mind of a kid for a second. Doesn't every kid imagine what their toys do when they aren't around? Don't a lot of kids think that characters from movies and games have their own lives? Doesn't everyone, kid or not, imagine what's going on in someone else's head or how it works? Yes. Admit it, you all thought of these things at one point. I certainly did. But who the heck imagines what emojis do? No one! Why would we? It doesn't make sense!
This film is a bit like Bubsy 3D, in that it was originally known as "The Magic Roundabout," but for some reason at the last minute they decided to shove this thing in the US. While it's nowhere near as bad as The Emoji Movie, it still shows why this shouldn't be happening. Its biggest problem is that it feels like a disorder of another movie - it clearly takes the story from The Lord of the Rings.
As a result, this movie feels like a jumbled, unoriginal mess. Our protagonist starts out to get candy, but then discovers his adventures, so he decides to go with his friends. It feels like what was planned as two movies were merged into one due to how the two settings clash. The mediocre animation does not help its case.
Please, please, please, PLEASE watch the British version. It's so much better than this horrible voice-dub excuse. The original may be cheesy with a bunch of puns, but this version exploits and overuses them to the point where the creators would turn in their graves. This film is awful, with Goldberg's voice-acting as the cow Ermentrude and the lazily-written jokes. This film has pop-culture references like from Lord of the Rings, and I didn't find that funny at all.
That's why I recommend you watch the British film. Yes, surely it has puns and the plot can be ridiculous, but it's more subtle than... this.
Seriously? Whose bright idea was it to make this piece of... I can't even give it a name. It's that flipping terrible. I can't believe that some idiot company would rip off, insult, and mock a genuinely good movie, especially one coming from Disney or Pixar. Although I've got to admit, I haven't watched the whole film. Because I couldn't. I only managed like 8 minutes of it because it's just so hard to watch and impossible to enjoy. I mean, come on, this THING is aimed at kids. I don't think kids would enjoy this movie very much, let alone adults. And by judging the animation, it looks like a very badly animated Chuck E Cheese flick that it's horrifying. The graphics are even worse. They look as if the film was still in development or something. Or like they've made it in 5 minutes, while Pixar and Disney take YEARS to make. In fact, all of the films in the company's library are like this, because they rush it just to get it out at the same time as the other (not to mention the much, much better) film as it comes out in cinemas.
Okay, you know how I said that I've not seen the whole film. I didn't watch the film itself, I've watched a few clips of the film from a bad review on YouTube. It was more than enough to make me understand that this is probably the worst movie I've ever watched. In the film, there is no character development. There's no plot, no storyline, the characters look as creepy as the devil and don't do anything. All they do is just talk and talk and talk about what the secret recipe is. And the way their mouths move when they speak... ugh! Disgusting! It's basically just filler, wasting about an hour or something of precious time where you could've watched a film that was trillions of times better, like Ratatouille in this case. Or Inside Out, The Lion King, Big Hero 6, Mad Max, Star Wars, Fast and Furious, How To Train Your Dragon, Madagascar, Toy Story... Anything! Anything is better than this tripe, even Frozen. Heck, even staring at a... more
Frozen is definitely not the worst animated movie out there. It's only the fact that it refuses to go away that makes it my vote. They keep dragging this movie through the dirt and trying to make it into something that it's not. Mini-movies, t-shirts, plushes, toys, everything has and will have Frozen on it.
From how much hype this movie has gotten, I feel like it would make the movie feel like such a disappointment for someone who had never seen it before. The movie is actually not that bad of a children's movie. It's just a case of extreme overhype that got out of hand and destroyed anything this movie had to offer.
This is most really the worst and overrated thing. It deserves a lower rating with extremely negative reviews from critics who were dumb enough to do film reviews for this and giving all fake praises for it. They themselves couldn't realize how the story and songs were irrelevant and annoying. It also doesn't really deserve to win a single Academy Award and hence it deserves to get flopped up. It has really been bribed for its almost universal praise from the critics and also bribed for receiving an Oscar for this disgusting and hateful thing.
The motion-capture is uncanny and awkward. The plot repeats itself three times to fill the 90-minute mark. The characters are all horrible, especially our protagonist. This film pulls the "they're dead, but then they're not dead" card to an insulting degree.
The film tells the children watching that if you're ever a well-behaved, good kid towards your mother, you are at risk of getting your mother kidnapped by aliens. This film even has the gall to spout a bunch of pro-family nonsense, saying how nuclear families are the only fit family types. As a member of a non-traditional family, this infuriates me. This film deserves its place as the biggest animated box office bomb of all time, and let's hope that ImageMovers Digital stays dead along with this movie.
This has to be one of the worst animated Disney films of all time. The animation sits right in the uncanny valley, the main protagonist is fairly unlikable, and the story rips off movies far better without adding anything interesting. I showed a friend a few still frames from the movie, and he agreed that the aliens look disturbing enough to avoid the film.
The FOURTH crappy Christmas movie I have reviewed and it's by the same company that made Jack and Jill. The humor is some of the worst I have heard. Everyone sounds monotone, except the old man, who has a super obnoxious high-pitched voice. The reindeer who eats poop are the stuff of nightmares. While technically the animation is superior to that in Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer, it makes up for it by having the old man's design be the most uncanny thing ever. The story is so badly written that people are out of control by making it! Another huge problem is, similar to Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer, this movie is mostly filler. There is a hilariously bad song that is absolutely unbearable. A bland Chinese waiter (seriously - his name is "Mr. Chang") and an obnoxious old man make this the most tedious, annoying thing ever.
"Whipping out your big white scary moon"? That's pretty racist. If not, that's not all. There are so many "bad words" (including the word "crap" every time) that give a negative connotation to the environment and Sandler as well as people's minds. The one main actor was so haughty about not only himself but the characters as well. As for the information, the first few parts started out fine, but as it progressed, there was more and more nonsense happening, making it seem like they only focus on Hanukkah even though it's a Christmas movie. What's more, the reindeer were crazy and ignorant. There was almost no difference between ignorance and learning. Like one of the other reviews, I should have known when I watched it that everything is a mess.
The assets are all reused from the first movie, like they bought the licenses and use them without reason here and there, like the sheep inside the city. All 3D models from the first movie make their appearance.
The first Hoodwinked was a good movie, even though its animation looks like it was taken from a PS1. The movie makes up for it with a smart story, memorable characters, and good humor. However, when the Weinstein Company released a sequel six years later, it ruined the franchise and bombed at the box office. Additionally, this movie had a plot that had nothing to do with the first film.
Also, the animation didn't improve much, going from PS1 to PS2 quality. In this movie, the characters were stereotypical and didn't maintain the charm of the original. At least the voice actors were still the same. I recommend not watching this and suggest watching The Peanuts Movie or Minions instead.
Foodfight! was much better than this. At least those characters were original and had potential if the animation and dialogue were better. They could have kept the Grocery Store mascot idea with the same characters, animated the movie much better, and given us a great turning point/climax. Dex and Daredevil Dan actually had good designs and were likable, especially compared to this abomination, The Little Panda Fighter.
Not only is it a rip-off of Kung Fu Panda, but the characters are hideous and have broken models. Their bodies distort and wrinkle at the weirdest points in time, making me slightly grossed out and very disturbed. The animation is terrible and looks like a PS1 game, if not worse. The lip-sync is completely off, the story itself was boring as hell, and the ending was a disappointment. But that shouldn't even matter because the whole movie was, too. This movie belongs in the depths of Hell.
How this is rated below some of the above movies, like The Nut Job, My Little Pony, Doogal(!), Frozen(!?), and even Foodfight, is a question that should never even have had to be asked. Before you vote Foodfight as the number 1 spot on this list, I beg of you, watch The Little Panda Fighter first. I just did, and I have wasted 50 precious minutes of my life that I will never get back. I regret ever making the decision to watch this movie and see just how bad it really was because, trust me, it lived up to the rumors.
I agree that the idea of Santa transitioning from a pirate to Father Christmas sounds like an interesting paper idea, but that's where it stops. This movie introduces new plots but dismisses them so quickly that we did not have time to actually see them. It starts with Santa as the captain of some pirates who steal toys for gold. This sounds interesting, but as I said, it's told with no explanation or substance, and it's removed so quickly. Oh yes, the zenith of the humor is about pooping in a peanut barrel. I will say nothing else about that.
Santa has a brother named Dingle, who cheats in a game of bowling with Santa. That's another deduction. Bowling is the title of the movie, but it's just shoehorned into it like Plankton in Atlantis SquarePantis. The plot is too "busy" for bowling to even be in it. Anyway, Santa and Dingle sword duel over bowling, which leads to them falling into icy waters, freezing them. They wash up on shore, where three elves find them. They have this orb thing - I don't care where it came from. It's just there. The orb melts the ice off Dingle and Santa, and Santa's behind catches on fire from the orb, which makes the elves sing a song about it. I actually laughed at this scene, but for the wrong reason. The elves actually enjoy being in pain, which seems very strange. That's just a sample of the plot or beginning of the movie. This movie suffers from a poor plot, poor characters, laughably awful humor, and poor animation that would make The Nut Job 2 blush.
The fact that Frozen is ranked above Ratatoing, Elf Bowling, The Nut Job, The Emoji Movie, and Norm of the North is just stupid. Frozen deserves way better than this. That movie had a great plot, great characters, beautiful animation, memorable songs, and many moments where I blushed seeing my favorite character sing "For the First Time in Forever."
You know that episode of SpongeBob where Plankton smells terrible because he smells like failure? That's what Walt the Pig smells like, failure! Also, how is this only 42 when Frozen is 7, Brave is 31, and The Lego Movie is 20? And I wasn't even that big a fan of The Lego Movie. But at least it had good animation, wasn't a rip-off of Charlotte's Web, and people actually LIKED IT.
What did THIS movie score? A 1.3 on IMDb, 12% from the Rotten Tomatoes audience (it used to be 0%), and 16% on Google users. The other three movies scored at least 7.2 on IMDb, and 76% on Rotten Tomatoes from the audience and 79% from the critics. By the way, if you haven't noticed, this movie really sucks. I wasn't that big a fan of The Lego Movie, but it wasn't THAT BAD. And Brave and Frozen are good movies!
At first, I thought this was made by the same people behind Ratatoing and The Little Panda Fighter, but no, it was made by the same people behind A Car's Life: Sparky's Big Adventure. It's a rip-off of Charlotte's Web. The characters are pretty annoying stereotypes. The animation is horrific. The lip syncing is off. The designs are really ugly. The horses have no mane or tail. The chickens look more like ducks. The textures are poorly made overall.
The only redeeming qualities of this movie are that some of the voice acting is decent, and there was like, one moment that made me chuckle. Everything else about it ranges from bad to horribly awful. The humor consists of terrible puns, pitiful attempts at slapstick, and random instances of bodily functions. So yeah, the humor is basically non-existent. The main character is extremely unlikable. I realize that the point is that he's supposed to learn his lesson, but we still need to be able to root for him!
All of the designs look like they're ripped from somewhere. The animation itself is okay for the most part, but there are certain instances where the motions have no weight to them. Not helping is the fact that this film looks like it was rendered on a Commodore 64. The film has no sense of what culture or era it wants to represent. The cars and buildings look distinctly '50s, but the bad guys talk like they're from the '30s. Not to mention that the soundtrack consists of modern pop songs.
Speaking of which, what on Earth is "Gangnam Style" doing in this movie? It randomly starts playing during one scene, as well as during the end credits, but still makes no sense in context. Like I said, the song most certainly does not fit the era they're trying to represent. The lyrics of the song are not appropriate for the film's target audience. And worst of all, this is clearly a shameless attempt at pandering to the kiddies by being "hip" and "cool." Here's the problem: "Gangnam Style" was a dated trend a year before this film was even released.
Also, the film has very strange editing and cinematography at certain parts. Overall, this is an extremely incompetently made film, and no one should ever have to endure the displeasure that comes from watching it. While I don't think it's the worst animated film ever, it's definitely the worst animated film of 2014, and it deserves every bit of hate it gets.
While I initially thought this movie was decent, further reflection made me realize how terrible it is. The plot essentially rehashes the first movie's problem, but with more characters who don't really contribute much. The first film was clichéd, but it's impossible to count all the clichés used in this one, such as the main protagonist not wanting his friend to hang out with the bad boy. It would be fine if this movie did something new with any of them.
The comedy in this movie is somehow more childish than in the first, and the animation only makes that more obvious. Oh, and Mater got much more screen time than necessary. If it weren't for the sequel to Frozen, I would have given up here.
What a stupid movie! It's secret agent versus professor and race car versus evil race car? It got 39% on Rotten Tomatoes, and I was really disappointed along with Planes and the first movie. Actually, the first movie was worse than this. It sucks big time. There were actually battles, but the ones battling are supporting characters (except for Finn). The fighting was not bad, but the story was awful, really.
I would put "Friendship Is Magic" up here too, then. All My Little Pony generations are girly, even "Friendship Is Magic." You think it's not girly because it's anime style, and this is the plot of the first episode from 1986: The ponies are on their way to Flutter Valley for the "Sun Tuesday" celebration with the Flutter Ponies. Meanwhile, the Witches from the Volcano of Gloom are busy hatching a plan to destroy Flutter Valley and the Ponies, allying with an army of giant bees to get their revenge on the Flutter Ponies. The bees steal the precious Sun Stone, and if the Flutter Ponies can't get it back, their home will be destroyed.
The voice acting is even worse than in Tentacolino, and the story doesn't know what it wants to focus on. The animation is also worse than Tentacolino's. It is very cheap and looks like it was made in a North Korean sweatshop. The characters are SO UNBEARABLE.
And the songs...
Good GOD, these songs are terrible. "There's Always Another Rainbow" sounds like Clarice from Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer was on drugs and drunk at the same time. By far the worst song, though, is "I'll Go It Alone," performed by... UGH! Lickity Split (the character who sang the song)'s voice sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard. Need I say more?
Overall, this film is terrible IN EVERY WAY! NEVER watch it! Although it has assets worse than Tentacolino, it's still better than that trash, but it still sucks SO MUCH! Please, just don't watch that film. Watch Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back instead.
Don't get me wrong, I like a bit of sappiness in animated films every now and then. Films such as My Neighbor Totoro and the 2006 Animal Crossing movie are good examples of films with no stakes or drama, but they teach us valuable life lessons to help us in life and are very therapeutic to watch. This film, not so much. This is the kind of film that expects you to have its life lessons shoved down your throat, but they only come off as "manipulate your parents to give them what you want" or "dreams happen in an instant," which is just totally not true. Plus, you grow out of brattiness when you're an adult and have a proper job. And of course, the film's sappiness does overstay its welcome, without giving people a chance to breathe.
When Don Bluth gave us Rock-a-Doodle, Thumbelina, A Troll in Central Park, and The Pebble and the Penguin, he very specifically geared those films towards complete losers who never had any friends in school. Even Chicken Little is a better movie than all four of those combined!
Why did they actually make a sequel? Wasn't that god-awful animated Titanic movie enough to scar moviegoers? Did they really have to scar us even more with bad animation and an even more ridiculous plot than the last film? It amazes me how the people behind these movies continued to insult our intelligence as a species by downgrading an already terrible movie to something that's just unbearable.
1. The rapping dog was in Titanic: The Legend Goes On, which didn't have a sequel. This is a sequel from The Legend of the Titanic.
2. Learn how to draw an octopus.
3. Make a Horrible Histories animated Titanic movie, then it's more accurate to what happened. Not everyone lived happily ever after.
4. Whoever did this made a cartoon of my favourite toy when I was little, Puppy in my Pocket.
Okay, I'm about to go on an epic rant, so yeah.
Why would this god-awful piece of crap they dare to call animation even exist? I mean, the first movie was awful, and for some reason, some genius decided it was a good idea to make a sequel that was even worse. Seriously, everything about this atrocity is bad. All the characters are either stupid, annoying, or just plain unlikable. The plot is... I don't even know what to say about it. And the worst part? Tentacolino's name is Ollie or whatever in this movie. Like, what the hell? That whole rant would be twice as long as this one, so I'm not going to say it.
In conclusion, just stay away from this pile of dung people dare to call a movie.
"This movie was awesome (and everything is awesome!)"
Thus, the word "awesome" has lost all meaning.
And no, I would not enjoy Barney or Dora. You people incessantly praising this movie would! Really, it has just as much substance as those.
I agree that this movie definitely could have been much better, and that the plot was very overdone, but I don't think it deserves the #15 spot on the worst movies of all time. I have definitely seen far worse movies than this that aren't even on here (The Legend of Kung Fu Rabbit).
I see why the movie is rated 81. It is because the classic Legos are animated, thus making the movie less than cool. I've watched this movie, and it makes no sense, but the story is at least understandable. Also, Morgan Freeman was in it. He played Vitruvius.
People say this movie's a ripoff of Up (that great Pixar movie), but I don't think it is. Really, I don't! Unless there was a racist scene in Up that I missed. Plus, how is this movie ranked lower than The Lego Movie?
This needs to be higher. Plus, this movie is very offensive to Chinese people because Guto never calls Ching Ling by his real name. He always refers to him as "the Chinese guy," "Beijing," and "China."
It's not really a rip-off of Up. Only the cover is supposed to look like Up's so people accidentally buy it. The movie itself is horrible, though.
The animation in this movie is just awful, and what was the whole plot of the movie again? Please, someone tell me because I forget. The only reason this exists is for Christian families to watch and learn Bible verses. That's literally it.
This movie is really dumb. The plot is extremely stupid. Here is a summary: The son is sad because his dad is so awesome, and he feels like a loser. The son does not go to his dad's game. The son's friends ruin the dad's game, but the dad is still mad at the son for some reason. The son wants to go to the wild because he can roar, and apparently, going to the jungle is magically supposed to make you roar. The son goes in a big shipping crate. The second the shipping crate closes, the son decides he doesn't want to go to the wild. The dad makes a feeble attempt to save his son. The dad gets his friends to come and help him save the son. The dad talks to a drunk bird.
The dad and friends go in a garbage truck. A squirrel falls off. The garbage truck goes into an alley and starts trying to murder them. They don't get murdered. Some dogs start chasing them because apparently, dogs are now unafraid of animals 15 times their own size. The dad is too stupid to fight the dogs. The dad and friends go into the sewers. Crocodile 1 and Crocodile 2 scare the crap out of them before giving them directions. The dad and friends hijack a boat. The squirrel comes in riding Canadian geese. A goose says "eh" 5 billion times. >>insert multiple offensive Canadian puns/references<<. They go across the ocean to an island that is about to explode. Wild animals are for some reason walking in orderly lines onto a big boat. The son thinks it is a wonderful idea to run off into the jungle that is about to be exploded by a volcano instead of waiting on the big boat to go back home. The dad and friends follow the son. The dad doesn't eat a gopher thing, and the friends find out he isn't from the wild (wow, what a shocking plot twist). >>insert Dad's very emotional confession<<. >>insert 15 minutes worth of the son and dad and friends wandering around aimlessly in the jungle<<. The dad ditches his friends. Cannibal buffaloes capture all the friends. The... more
I had never heard of it until I saw the cover. It looks like a bad ripoff of Trolls. The cover graphics aren't too bad, but lots of ripoff movies invest a lot in the covers to fool grandparents into grabbing the wrong one because they tend to get modern cartoons, movies, games, etc., mixed up. The CGI is probably grime from a toilet bowl.
The Bergens from Trolls would get severe food poisoning if they ate these stupid Trolls rip-offs!