Top 10 Worst Big Brother Winnersbooklover1
The Top Ten
Waste of a season, waste of money and waste of time to those people who watched this guy. The whole season was crap. The person who won ended up losing the money because of drugs.
Say no to drug and stay in school
This guy made fun of people with autism he's the retard.
BB9 was one of the worst seasons ever, but it's winner was awful too. Once Adam won the half million dollar grand prize he used the cash to go into the drug game. What a slap in the face to the hgs who played with him and the viewers who wasted their time. - BlackDiamondsV 3 Comments
The only reason Maggie is ranked this high is because people hate her personally. Her game play was rather good as she stayed loyal to her side of the house and was the ring leader. She got her biggest threats evicted and won because of it, don't vote for her just because you didn't like her!
Maggie winning Big Brother was THE WORST! The fact that she and her alliance they were always so obnoxious and still thought that they were always right just is delusional. Janelle should have won. Everyone knows that Maggie's "Friendship" alliance is the most hated Bog Brother alliance ever. They were practically the villans of the entire season. The fact that a person such obnoxious, annoying, hating, and undeserving won Big Brother 6 is just awful. Her personality was so dull and bad, she never got to go to any all-star seasons. Too bad for her.
That Maggie is the worst of the worst, totally a double face, insipid, stupid Jannele should have won.
When you rob the only 6 people in the house that were likable enough(the sovereign 6), then I will hate you forever. The only people from her alliance I liked were April and Cappy.V 6 Comments
In retrospect, I think Natalie was the better player (technically) by default since she WAS a player. Jordan really wasn't a player in her original season. Jordan is Big Brother's ultimate coattail rider and former BB HGs will tell you that Jordan winning BB11 was a fluke. Others came to play. Jordan came to be nice to everyone and watch the people who were playing the game take each other out.
Jordan never should have won. She didn't know what she was coming into and never truly played the game. Her win was entirely the result of luck and a bad jury.
Jordan was terrible. She didn't win any competition and Jeff made every decision for her socially. I was shocked when she was voted the winner.
She had no clue what she was doing.V 6 Comments
The final three were bull. The best social gameplayer was Amanda, whether she was liked or disliked she controlled every eviction until her own, the best competitive game player was Aaryn, despite her unpopularity. These two, alongside other main gameplayers including McCrae, Helen and Elissa took out the other decent players in the first few weeks, the ones that would have made great winners! So the game players kept taking out the other game players until there were barely any left and the floaters outnumbered the decent people. Nick should have won. Otherwise Aaryn or Amanda, even Kaitlyn, Elissa, McCrae or Helen.
Rambling over, tldr; Andy sucks
He was a rat and the ultimate floater. He was also a really big hypocrite, he says so much of how he hates bullies and backstabbers yet he does the exact same thing 10 minutes later. It sucks that he won but I'm just excited this season is over with. It was a crap shoot
The famous quote of "floaters grab a life vest" from Rachel Reilly, apparently didn't apply to Andy. From flip flopping from side to side, being a rat, he was the one that was involved in a lot of drama and he was a bully. Some people say he was a good game player but snap back into reality people, he didn't deserve to win. GM or even JUDD ( if he would have made it further) deserved to win.
Ultimate Flip-flopper... enough said.V 11 Comments
She just had far too many do overs. It was like they finally gave it to her out of charity. She was voted out of the house more times than anyone to play the game, before jeff and jordan handed it to her. She would shoot herself in the foot, then by saved by lucky twists. It was a trainwreck of a season when she finally won against a house of morons that were played by jeff, and jordan. No question about this one. She was aweful!
As much as I want to vote Jordan, this train wreck of a season was at it's lowest point when the queen of bitchiness won, just because ass in eye jeff and cry baby jordan and lover boy brendon wanted her to win over a much better player that wasn't in their alliance. I am thinking of making a blog to hating Jeff and Jordan.
Jordan should have won this season also. Rachel is a moron that just cried a lot. The only reason I really liked her was all the nip slips she gave the cameras.
Really? Andy is ranked higher than this b*tch? At least production didn't rig it for him, actually won some comps on his own merit, and played his own, less impersonal game. If Rachel went out the first week of BB12 because of how unlikeable she was, she wouldn't even be on this list.V 8 Comments
Lisa Donahue is extremely underrated. She was very observant and won competitions when necessary and threw them when it wasn't. She was also the only player that caught on to Danielle Reyes' alliance with Jason Guy, despite it being in the last week and she ultimately split them up. Did she deserve to win over Danielle (runner up)? No, she didn't, had anyone else been sitting next to her the answer would have been different.
I feel so bad for Lisa because she gets so much undeserved hate. It was the jury that decided to vote against Danielle. The only thing that Lisa did was make a final plea and bring Danielle to the final two. So for everyone who is hating on her and calling her disgusting you should be calling the jury bitter. Besides she definitely wasn't the least deserving person to win that season it's just that Danielle was the most deserving.
Danielle played a way better game. As Dr. Will said Danielle is the best player to never win the game. She should have won enough said.
I think she did deserve to win, just not over Danielle.V 3 Comments
He won before Big Brother became it became the real Big Brother we know today. Why is he in here? It was hardly the same show!
Its kind of dumb that he's at 7. Its not his fault he went on Big Brother when it was a terrible show.
Wasn't even Big Brother back then really. No game play.
Hey I have to give him credit of winng he didn't have a legV 1 Comment
This is less of me saying Drew didn't deserve it, and more of me saying I would have preferred a win for Nakomis
Drew pretty much just had one move the whole game which was evicting Diane that's it.
Drew made an excellent game move in evicting his showmance, Diane Henry, as if he has taken her over "Cowboy" Michael Ellis he would have gotten second instead of first.
Worst winner to me. He used the money to become an actor, a failed actor. LAME!
Out of the brigade members, Matt should have won BB12. Hayden made no big game moves in my opinion and like Enzo, relied on other members to carry himself through.
He was an awesome player, but he was too expected to win. He was the obvious choice to win and it just made the season boring. He made NO big moves. The whole season was boring to be honest.
Rachel should not be on this list she was awesome and doesn't have the producers to thank so stop lying!
Hayden I think is a very good player, but I think that we saw the better player in Survivor: Blood vs. Water. In retrospect, I think that being 9th worst isn't that bad, mainly because there have only been 20 winners.
The worst winner by far. He had no idea what was going on for most of the season, had terrible social game and continuously overrated himself as a player. He basically just got lucky. Liz who actually had a hand in most of the evictions, kept her closest allies safe for most of the game and used Austin to the best of her abilities, which was how the most dominate alliance in the game (The Sixth Sense) ended up being formed, should have won.
It just goes to show that Big Brother is such a flawed game when brilliant players like Dan and Vanessa, who are light years ahead of their competition strategically, can still lose to floaters like Ian and Steve. Dan and Vanessa carried Ian and Steve for much of their games and even Ian and Steve would not dispute that. Ian won because of a bitter jury who didn't get to see all of Dan's brilliant moves and Steve's win was pure luck because he answered one more question correctly in a stupid, random, coin-flip Round 3 HOH comp. How the hell can you logically answer how a juror would answer a random question? Round 3 HOH should be skill-based like in BB Canada. Even Derrick would not have won had Cody not made the idiotic, boneheaded move of not bringing Victoria with him to Final 2. That was a $450,000 mistake that I'm sure Cody will regret for the rest of his life.
He needs to be higher up on the list. He was a floated much of the game, and was Vanessa's puppet the rest of it. When it came down to making big moves in the house, he really didn't make any. I think that Steve and Ian, need to be right under Adam.
Terrible winner. He floated until final 6 and got lucky on the final HOH. Vanessa should've won, but out of Steve and Liz, Liz should have won.V 4 Comments
He was never popular the only reason he got on the show was because Will wouldn't go on unless he was there I hope he paid Will half the money. In season 2 they kick them out right away for christ sake. He's just your typical lucky idiot just like Jordan Lloyd was except she was nice he's just an idiot.
If it wasn't for Dr. Will in All Stars, Boogie wouldn't have made it. He is a horrible strategist, and has lackluster game play. Without Will he never lasts, see season 14 for example. Hope that busted his ego.
He's a vile, despicable hypocrite with an ego bigger than his brain.
His Ego is far up into Will's Ass. He was like a Jordan who coasted along a player (Will/Jeff) and followed their game move. His "showmance" with Erika was a joke, which he believed was part of his strategy. And in BB14, he made himself to believe to be the greatest player of all time as Ian was his apprentice even though he cared about Frank only.V 3 Comments
Who made this list.. Evil dick was the only reason to watch... And he deserved to win... And I'm glad he did.. Chill town with mike and will was also fun to watch... These 2 are on the wrong list...
He suits his name well, he really is one - thetalkingtortilla
Dick's win was the most blatantly rigged in the history of Big Brother. He would not have made it to the finale (F3) if not for America's Player and would be universally hated (a la Maggie and Amanda) if he were female instead.
Are you KIDDING. If this guy didn't play the game, this show would be viewed by about, oh I dunno, 10? 11 people? THIS GUY IS THE BEST PLAYER OF ALL TIME ARE YOU KIDDING ME YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME - Untildawn8V 2 Comments
Floated through the game and rode that coattails of her alliance members. Was handed competition wins and was called out for beine a snake since day 1. She wanted to be the only female left, so she eliminated all her competition by getting the house to do it for her. She should've easily been picked off in the first few weeks like Frank and the'vonne, but had an alliance to shield her. Made no big game moves and sat around and did nothing. Constantly flip flopped from side to side in the house, getting Victor aND Paul, the only two who deserved the win at that point, up on the block. Then beats Paul in the end, who had multiple comp wins and every time he didn't win a comp, he was up on the block and possibly going home, because of a bitter jury, which ironically enough, we're primarily screwed over by Nicole herself. Floating you way to final 2 doesn't work except for this because the jury was overrun by dumbasses.
"I worked behind the scenes" -Nicole. I watched those live feeds and the ONLY DAMN THING YOU DID WAS BONE COREY. And the bb18 jury was the WORST jury ever, voting for the winner based on personal reasons and NOT who had played a better game. Pathetic winner, should be higher on the list as time goes by
Her win against Paul was one of the worst endings of a Big Brother season ever considering how it was the longest to date. Her strategy was alright, but mediocre for a winner.
Everyone hates Nicole even though she played a very good game lmaoV 6 Comments
Jun Song perfected the floater strategy and applied it as it should be applied, not like people use it now. It is easy to argue that Allison Irwin (runner up) should have beat her as she had the same strategy, honestly, Irwin probably used it better as she so easily manipulated Nathan...
Just because IRS jun
Jun was very smart to make a Final 2 pact with the most hated girl (by other HG) of the season. Because if Jun went to the finale with Robert, she would've lost. Jun was a very good player, the perfect floater (Not like the floaters of recents seasons (except Shelly))
Jun is like, the 2nd best winner and wayyy far from ever being the worst.V 1 Comment
Definitely one of the best Big Brother winners ever. Dan played the game that was necessary to get him to the final two but in the process did the one thing you do not do in Big Brother: blatantly back stab every juror without mercy or acknowledgement of the fact that they are real people. When it comes down to gameplay Dan dominated the house, got everyone to do exactly what he wanted at any given time, but pissed off every juror. To win Big Brother you cannot have the jury hate you. It just won't work. Meanwhile Ian played a respectable game, flipping on his coach and original alliance and forming The Quack Pack as well as making bonds with the right people at the right times. He won four HoH's and two Veto's to Dan's one HoH and one Veto. Ian was also targeted by Dan multiple times and escaped, winning comps to get off the block every time he was in danger. Ian played Big Brother the way Big Brother was designed to be played. Make friends and control your own fate by winning ...more
If it wasn't for a ridiculously bitter jury, Ian wouldn't even be eligible for this list. Dan should've won by unanimous vote.
How is Ian below Steve? Steve actually had enough brain cells to cut Vanessa and have a much better speech than Liz. Ian, on the other hand, got lucky that the jury was extremely bitter because Dan would've otherwise beat him 7-0. Also, Steve actually saved himself the first week and allowed himself to stay longer whereas Ian would've been cut the first week if not for the coach's twist. Overall, fifth worst winner behind Adam, Jordan, Rachel, and Dick.
He was Dan's puppet. He would have gone out the first week if Boogie didn't win the coaches' competition. He is majorly overrated.V 1 Comment
Derrick got extremely lucky in his season, as he played with complete idiots. I hope he gets asked back as it would be nice to see him play with people who actually understand the game and can put up a fight.
Derrick was fortunate to play with a cast who handed him the game! No one had the balls to make game moves, no one challenged his authority and he coasted. I'm more mad at the cast for being complete wussies. - BlackDiamonds
HE DIDN'T DESERVE TO WIN. - KyleMan2000
The winner of biggest idiot in big brother history
What? He didn't win! He never came back... he wasn't the winner of season 13... he didn't even make jury... WHAT the - Untildawn8
WHY IS LAWON ON THIS LIST THIS IS ACTUALLY SO FUNNY. also the fact that he is currently the 2nd best winner according to the list makes it even funnier
The boss baby
Dan is one of the best strategists in the history of the game. In Season 10, he easily could have been evicted second, right after his first alliance member and closest ally got evicted first. However, he was able to completely turn the game around and showed how he was completely loyal, allowing the rest of the house to turn on each other. Eventually made it to the end by a powerhouse alliance and brilliantly allowing alliance members to get all the blood on their hands, manipulating the hell out of them. Reversely, in Season 14, he arguably played a better game, making incredible moves, stabbing people in the back left and right. His funeral goes down as one of the best game moves in the history of the game. The only reason that he lost the season is due to a bitter jury. He easily should have won the game and was the clear winner. He's the only houseguest that can compare to the legend of Dr. Will Kirby
He has the best overall track record in Big Brother history, winning in his first season (season 11) and earning the runner up position in his second season (season 14).
I don't think he was THAT good of a player. In season 11 people were just really stupid and in season 14 jenn frank and Danielle had no brains and they were all betrayed by Dan. Plus his jury management was awful in each season but in season 11 the jury was less bitter. Bb14 jury was more bitter although Ian deserved to win too
He has as much charisma as a toddler. Stupid and overrated. He's like the Russell hantz of Big Brother.
The most overrated player in history. In season 2 (his first season) he floated his way to the end, the only decent move he made in that season was that he evicted Hardy. In his second season, Big Brother 7 (All-Stars) he played a much better game, however, he is still extremely overrated.
Related ListsTop Ten Best North American Big Brother Winners of All Time Best Pinoy Big Brother Winners of All Time Best Big Brother Winners Best Big Brother US Players Best Big Brother Alliances
7 years, 280 days old
Top Remixes (6)
2. Jordan Lloyd - Season 11
3. Dick Donato - Season 8
2. Rachel Reilly - Season 13
3. Adam Jasinski - Season 9
2. Maggie Ausburn - Season 6
3. Jun Song - Season 4
View All 6