Top 10 Worst Disney Animated SequelsMegaSoulhero Disney has had a bad reputation with sequels. So let's talk about the worst Disney animated sequels!
The Top Ten
This sequel makes me so mad! This movie is so good. But of course, Disney had to make a crappy sequel that had horrible animation, a bland villain, and a super boring plot line. I mean Madeleine has to be the worst, not to mention cheesiest, Disney villian ever.
Okay, I loved the first movie, but Hunchback of Notre Dame II should NOT have existed. Why? Because, it pretty much ruined everything about the original movie. Why did the creators have to go and mess-up such a beloved classic?! In this movie, Quasimodo gets a girlfriend, named Madellaine. Unfortunately, we find out that she works for the villain! That part kind of reminds me of another Disney film. Speaking of villain, the villain is not very interesting at all in this movie. All he wants to do is steal a bell, he is definitely NOT a great replacement for Judge Claude Frollo (the main villain of the first movie) I know a lot of young viewers were probably disappointed that Quasimodo did not win over Esmeralda's affections in the first movie. In this "crap of a sequel", Esmeralda is with Phoebus, both of them have a son, however, he does not add much to this film. To top it all off, the animation is garbage, the characters are very boring (plus, dull), and there is NO plot - Stazemar000
Don't really like the idea of Quasimodo having a girlfriend because I thought Quasimodo accepted that Esmeralda and Phoebus was a couple. - HowToTrainYourDragonFan1001
Hunchback of Notre Dame 2! A sequel that should have never happened! Why did Disney have to go and ruin such an awesome classic? In this movie, Quasimodo gets a girlfriend. But unfortunately, his girlfriend works for the villain! Kind of reminds me of another terrible Disney film! Also, the villain in this film is very uninteresting! All he wants to do is steal a bell! He is definitely not a good replacement for Frollo! Also, Esmeralda and Phoebus have a son now and he doesn't really add much to the film! And of course because of this movie's low budget, the animation is awful! I love Hunchback of Notre Dame but the sequel is terrible! - MegaSoulheroV 5 Comments
As much as I liked the first Pocahontas movie, it had a pretty good, but also emotional ending to it. So, they should've just let it be. However, the creators decided to make Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World. Maybe they thought that Pocahontas deserved a sequel, so there it was.
So, in this movie, Pocahontas travels to England after hearing about the "so-called" death of John Smith. Later on, we find out he's NOT dead, so we can assume that he somehow managed to survive falling into a river below when Ratcliffe pushes him using his foot. Also, Pocahontas meets John Rolfe and in the ending, they are shown to be kissing, so I could predict that they got married. I know they actually did hook-up in real life, but I would've preffered John Smith instead, since Pocahontas admitted that she loved him in the first film! Oh, yeah, speaking of Ratcliffe, he returns as the main villain in this movie and his design is just awful! What's up with his mouth? This movie's animation is ...more - Stazemar000
As much sad I hated the first Pocahontas movie, it had a pretty good ending. So they should've just left it alone. But they decided to make Journey to a New World! Pocahontas goes to England after hearing about John Smith's supposed death. We later find out he isn't dead! So predictable! She also meets John Rolfe! I know they actually did hook up in reality but I still don't really like them as a couple! There are songs in this movie but I don't remember any of them! Radcliffe also returns and his design is just awful! What's up with his mouth? This movie is worse than the original! And that's saying something since in the first movie, they had Pocahontas learn English from THE WIND! - MegaSoulhero
Pocahontas has always been a boring movie to me ever since I was a child the first and the second movie suck equally. - Rucas
She chose john rolfe over john smith. they made john smith irritating in the sequel
It's okay, but the first Mulan was definitely by far batter.
This sequel isn't that good. Mulan 1 is definitely better than this. - HowToTrainYourDragonFan1001
Hear my plea
Erase this movie
This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen! No exaggeration! This movie is absolutely terrible! Mulan was such a great movie! So it really bothers me that the sequel is this bad! Every character in this movie is unlikeable! Especially Mushu! He loses his job as royal guardian because Mulan and Shang get engaged! So in order to keep his job, he tries to break them up! And to think I hated Ariel for being selfish! Also, Mulan is completely out of character in this movie! There are three princesses who are forced to get married but they fall in love with Yao, Ling, and Chien-Po! And Mulan is happy about this even though if the princesses don't go through with the arranged marriaged, China is doomed! Mulan did not care about love in the first movie! She cared mostly about family and honor! The arranged marriage never happened so we can all assume that China got destroyed! I hate this movie so much! There isn't a single redeeming thing about it! It is awful! It is terrible! I've only ...more - MegaSoulheroV 3 Comments
Liked Cars. Fell asleep in the theater while watching Cars 2. Liked Cars 3.
I find it VERY hard to believe that people actually like this movie! Why would ANYONE think it's a good idea to make Mater the main character? Sure he was kind of funny in the first movie, but no one wanted him to get his own movie! Mater is the Jar Jar Binks of this movie and John Lasseter is the George Lucas of Pixar! This seems more like fan fiction than a movie! A movie about cars who are spies? Seriously? I can't believe one of the best animation studios made something so unwatchably terrible! This movie straight up sucks! Cars 2 is definitely Pixar's worst movie! And they're making another sequel for some reason! Well at least it's taking more of a dark turn and it will be about Lightning McQueen. So hopefully it's better. - MegaSoulhero
I don't hate this movie, but I definitely don't like it. This is definitely the lowest point in Pixar's animated films. By the way, did you see the teaser trailer for Cars 3? It's actually pretty intense. There might be some hope for Cars 3 after all. - phillysports
Cars one was an amazing movie with a wonderful soundtrack, cars two was a joke of a movie with a mess of a plot and a boring theme. I saw a teaser for cars 3 and I have to say I am impressed it looks like it will be a good movie. - RucasV 3 Comments
That scene with Belle and her derp eyes really scares me! I would talk about the plot, but this movie barely has a plot! Just like Cinderella 2, the movie is made up of different segments! They are all terrible! The animation is the worst I've seen in a Disney film! I watched this movie expecting it to be so bad it's good! But it's not! It's just bad! I hope the Beauty and the Beast remake will be good! - MegaSoulhero
I've never heard of this - 1507563
This sequel was VERY unnecessary! The first movie was good but did people really want a sequel? They should call this movie Dreams DON'T Come True! This movie involves three stories and each one of them involve Cinderella planning an event. I didn't like any of them! The animation isn't that great, the stories are badly written, and it's a huge step backward from the original movie! At least the third one was better than this! - MegaSoulhero
I'm sorry but I really like the sequels - 1507563
I don't like this movie because the stepmother rewinded time and at the end the prince and Cinderella are in love again and the fairy godmother never changes it back...But the prince never remembers danceing with cinderella
Okay, so. I only watched this movie to see whether it was good or bad. But, I have to admit, it wasn't as great.
So, in this movie, Ariel and Eric give birth to a girl named Melody. Didn't think she was great, but she was a little bit tolerable than Ariel. Also, Ursula has a sister named Morgana who was never mentioned in the first film. Basically, Morgana threatens to kill Melody if King Triton doesn't let her have power. In order to keep Melody safe from Morgana, they decide to get advice from Donald Trump and build a wall around the castle to separate it from the sea. Does that part ring a bell? In the first movie, King Triton forbids Ariel from going to the human world. In this movie, Ariel forbids Melody from going to the sea. So, it's basically the same thing with Ariel and her father! Also, why couldn't Ariel just tell her daughter why going into the ocean would be a bad idea, huh?! Ariel is also a hypocrite, since she does not understand Melody's issues even though she ...more - Stazemar000
In the Little Mermaid 2, Ariel and Eric have a kid named Melody. I hate her! But she's still more tolerable than Ariel! Also, Ursula has a sister named Morgana who was never brought up in the first movie and threatens to kill Melody. In order to protect Melody from Morgana, they decide to take Donald Trump's advice and build a wall to separate the castle from the sea. Sound familiar? In the original, Ariel's father forbids her from going to the surface. In this movie, Ariel forbids Melody from going to the ocean! So it's basically the same premise! Also, Ariel is STILL horribly unlikeable! Why couldn't she just tell her daughter why she couldn't go into the sea!? Also, she doesn't understand the problems of Melody even though she herself had the same problems in the first movie! What a hypocrite! Morgana is WAY too similar to Ursula! She even has the same voice as her! This movie has a lot of problems! - MegaSoulhero
Have you read The Little Mermaid book? Its very different to the Disney film and wouldn't have a sequel ever.
There was this one scene where Morgana (Ursula's sister) threatened to kill Melody. So, Ariel and Eric had no choice, but to keep Melody away from the ocean. So, what do they do? Well, there was this other scene where they take Donald Trump's advice and build a big wall around the castle to separate it from the sea! Does that sound familiar? And how did Melody get to the ocean when the wall is around the castle?! I did not see any holes or doorways! She's 10 years old and she's a human! Humans cannot really fly or jump very high, you know.
Speaking of Morgana, she was never brought up in the first film, which is stupid! Morgana is way too similar to Ursula! She even has the same voice actor who played as Ursula in the first movie! - DJMarikaGirl006
The fact that they even made a sequel to the first Planes movie is really surprising! But the fact that they released it less than a year after the first one is even more surprising! But to be honest, the sequel is actually not as bad as the original! It's still pretty bad though! Dusty gets his engine damaged and the parts can't be replaced. Then he joins a fire and rescue team. The storyline is uninteresting, the characters are forgettable, but it's still an improvement over the first one. I think they're original plan was to make Planes a trilogy but I'm pretty sure they're not making a third one. - MegaSoulhero
(in the style of the Tootsie Pop commercial)
Q: Why did they make a sequel to Planes?
A: The world may never know... - phillysports
The beast hates Christmas because it was the day he was cursed. Wow. Ebeneezer Scrooge and The Grinch had better reasons to hate Christmas than the beast. - HowToTrainYourDragonFan1001
A Beauty and the Beast Christmas movie sounds like it would be a great idea! But what we got was an absolute failure! This movie is absolutely horrendous! The plot is that Belle wants to bring Christmas to the castle but Beast forbids it. The reason why he forbids it is because Christmas was the day he was cursed. And in that flashback they showed us, he was an absolute jerk as a human! No wonder he was cursed! He basically has NO reason to hate Christmas! Beast is absolutely unlikeable in this film! I know he was mean in the original, but here he is just cruel! He locked up Belle even though she was doing something nice for him! We are also introduced to a pipe organ named Forte. He is the villain of the film and he is very dull! In fact, most of the characters in this film are dull! I'm also not a fan of the songs! There is a lot of wasted potential in this movie! - MegaSoulhero
More like, Disney breaks characters from a wonderful recent film of theirs and several classic characters of theirs just to how scream "woke" and "progressive" they supposedly are.
If I never see those "comfortable" Princesses or that gangster chick Vanellope just decided was her new best friend anywhere ever again, it will be too soon.
Vanellope was such a selfish little witch with a capital B in this movie, and it was way too obvious that we're SUPPOSED to love that chick from that Grand Theft Auto Auto ripoff.
Guys, stop. This movie was really good because they did product placement, but not useless like "The Emoji Movie" where they just placed it for no reason. In this movie, they visited places that were actual websites, but it was actually useful for the plot, like going to "EBay" to buy a steering wheel for Sugar Rush, and that's about it. Also, the plot was good, the characters are good, it was a really good, quality movie. The only problem was that Ralph was a bit more of a buffoon, and that Felix hardly appeared, but the parts that he appeared in were golden. Overall, great movie, though not as good as the original.V 5 Comments
I actually liked this movie. But, for those that don't, I respect your opinions. - Stazemar000
I love the first Fantasia. It’s the best Disney movie ever. The sequel however...it sucks. Basically the new segments are awful and boring (except for Pomp in Circumstances). Basically the characters don’t add up. And worst of all...WHERE IS CHERNABOG! He’s the reason why Fantasia 1940 was awesome! Without him, a Disney Fantasia sequel will suck. Chernabog is the best Disney Villain ever. This should be on top 10. - asantalo
The movie is kinda well hard to explain.
But the Hook one (when he got defeated but the crocodile part is better) in the battle scene is very hilarious.
It's my first Peter Pan film before the second was the first original.
This movie is awesome and you know it!
I Only Put This On The List To Troll You Off - VideoGamefan5
Not the worst but not as good as I expected it to be. To hell with this movie anyways. Incredibles 2 is where it's at now biatch - McgillacuddyV 3 Comments
Ugh, thanks to whoever put this movie in. Did not do the original film justice in any way. - Mcgillacuddy
I actually quite liked this fim. - HowToTrainYourDragonFan1001
Guilty pleasure. I liked this movie - Mcgillacuddy
I actually liked this movie to be honest. A lot better than The Lion Guard - Stazemar000
This movie was adoable! - RucasV 2 Comments
I liked this film. I guess this is a guilty pleasure since not manty people like The Lion Guard. - HowToTrainYourDragonFan1001
Maybe not a sequel but takes place after a first film, and this film and the show that followed it just sucks and are the worst animated series of the modern era.
This isn't a sequel, but it was a pretty bad movie.
Lion King and Lion King II were good movies, but this just makes me wanna take a wrecking ball to it - Stazemar000
I Like this Film better than number two
I have never heard of it but Ariel's Beginning? Is it more of a prequel?
Are they even making this?
Already love it 😁😁why is this even here😕😕
This is bad - 1507563
Here are my issues with this sequel: the story's not entertaining, the characters are uninteresting, the comedy's not very funny and even the songs are ridiculously forgettable. Why did they have to make Scamp sound like a little girl? Speaking of which, this should have been about his sisters. In fact, it is never mentioned what their names are. But is there something good about it? Well Scamp's relationship with Angel is beautiful but the rest of this is bad. Not the worst, not awful, just badly bored me to death.
Lady and the Tramp was such a cute movie about two dogs falling in love! It was very popular so it made sense that they wanted to make a sequel! But by making a sequel, they decided to completely rehash the first movie! Yeah, this is basically the first Lady and the Tramp movie, but instead it's about their son named Scamp. Whom I hate! Honestly, they could've chosen ANY of their other kids but they went with Scamp! I don't even know why they even decided to still call it Lady and the Tramp! They're both hardly in it! I would personally stick with the original. - MegaSoulhero
The first lady and the tramp was boring as hell this movie was adorable, funny, and cute it was also targeted at a younger audience - Rucas
I used to watch this so many times. - asantalo
I cringed so hard that my face broke! Someone break this movie!V 1 Comment
In 2000 already got a Tarzan 2, it’s called TARZAN + JANE
Bad Story Bad Supporting Characters Bad Idea Bad As A Whole
I Return Into a Child!
I like it - PeeledBanana
This is considered the best Disney direct-to-dvd sequel - PeeledBanana
Pumbaa will go Super Saiyan when he sees this on the list! >:D - The Ultimate Daredevil
I agree too good idea.
This isn't for Disney, but it's still an amazing movie.
They could of invited Peppermint patty to see that Snoopy came back at the end.
This movie is boring and wasted potential plus I saw it in 3D and there’s hardly any 3D in it! Also why is The Lion King 2 on here? I love that movie!
It's better than its predecessor.
Related ListsTop 10 Best Disney Animated Sequels Top Ten Animated Disney Movies That Deserve Theatrical Sequels Top 10 Best Non Disney Animated Movie Sequels Top Ten Disney Animated Movies that Didn’t Need a Sequel but Got One Anyway Best Disney Animated Movies that Have Sequels
2 years, 199 days old
Top Remixes (5)
2. Cars 2
3. Planes: Fire & Rescue
2. The Hunchback of Notre Dame II
3. Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World
2. Return to Neverland
3. Mulan II
View All 5