Worst Movies of 2018
The most horrible cinematic failures and flops to be released in the year 2018!
I was originally going to be near silent about this, but by god why is this garbage of a film series being advertised everywhere?! I didn't even know it had such a fan base? I don't even know what people find good about these movies!
Whenever I got to IMDB this is advertised. I had free time in class so I went to use it and literally had to be careful of getting caught.
The only good thing about this movie might be that beautiful RnB song by Rita Ora and Liam Payne in the soundtrack.
I was forced to watch this at the Regal Cinema at Gainesville, VA with my younger sisters and some other kid yesterday and it was bad, very very bad. It's about some police dog who finds out that a pet show has become a front for animal smuggling so he and some other dogs and 3 pigeons try to save some animals affected by it. Oh, and it's supposed to be a comedy and it fails as one in so many levels (even though there were a few chuckles/laughs here and there but they were minor). Also, I think it was directed by the same guy who directed the first Scooby-Doo live-action movie and the live-action Smurfs movies (Raja Gosnell) so it's one of those generic, formulaic, and downright cringe-worthy talking animal movies that we've seen a thousand times before crossed with a generic, formulaic spy movie that we've also seen a thousand times before thus making this the most generic, formulaic, play-by-the-books, Great Value/Market Pantry/Kirkland Signature/whatever-brand movie I've ever seen. ...more
This film is absolutely appalling. This is maybe one of my least favourite movies. I hated it, and one of the worst movies of the decade. Absolutely atrocious movie.
Watched the trailer and got depression. My little sister wanted to go see it about 2 weeks later. Obviously Satan possessed her.
Why are there spawns of movies about talking dogs and cats. Not a good movie.
I LOATHE this movie. This definitely deserves to be at #1. I didn't like Gnomeo and Juliet. It wasn't abysmal, just bad... The animation was great, and I like how they keep the story relative to the original Romeo and Juliet. That's about it. This movie completely makes every character other than Sherlock and Watson useless to the story. I'm fine with the creators creating a separate story involving Watson and Sherlock. This movie had a boring story, and characters that were either pointless, boring, or annoying. The only plus? The animation has greatly improved. The textures are on point, from the ceramic the gnomes are made of, to the plastic Irene is made of. The 2D animation segments are also really great. That's about it. Don't take your kids to see this movie. If you want to see something better with them, go see SmallFoot or The Incredibles 2. You could also go see Isle of Dogs.
Sherlock Gnomes at #3... okay, so for the real question, has anyone heard of the Will Ferrell version of Serlock Holmes? It just came out this week and it is not just the worst movie of 2018 but one of the worst movies of all time. I don't like this movie but the Will Ferrell's version made this look funny in comparison.
I was forced to watch the first one in 4th grade and it was the most forgettable movie ever.
The trailer for this sequel looks boring and dumb, and it's full of fart jokes and innuendos.
I thought it was pretty good. Johnny Depp and Emily Blunt did a great job.
This will probably be an unpopular opinion, but I actually kind of look forward to this movie. Just checked out the trailer, and it's way better than the actual show. It's actually funny and not immature, it has a lot of superhero jokes and makes fun of itself for the reasons people hate TTG. The show sucks and is unfunny, but damn, this movie looks better than I thought it would be, I thought it would suck. Let's see how this movie goes, it actually looks pretty good.
For some reason, it has an 89% on rotten tomatoes. How does a movie on Teen Titans Go (a show that everyone hates) have a higher percentage than Infinity War(83%)?
No, I refuse to believe that the R.T critics agreed on that.
I believe that CN forced the critics to give it a high percentage, making people intrested and paying money to see it, making more box office success for the movie, giving CN more money, which was the reason why they made this movie.
What the hell happened to CN?
People who are putting this on a top 10 worst list have not seen the movie.
The Teen Titans Go show is really bad but this movie is shockingly great, dare I say the best comic book movie of the year great.
Yes I'm shocked but the people on here voting for this clearly haven't seen this movie.
See it, it's great.
I agree this movie isn't great and the cartoon is weird. But Teen Titans Go! To the Movies actually did improvements to the show, despite a few un-needed gross-out jokes. The TTG in this movie believed that they were just a joke and realize their mistakes from the show. However, the soundtrack was cringy.
Possibly the worst movie I've ever seen! The fact that this movie was made is a direct insult to the horror film industry!
I was hoping that Warner Bros can make a movie for NES Godzilla. But this is kinda good. I'll see it soon.
It isn't even that scary, just creepy at some scenes. I expected more of it.
You know what. Screw christian movies! How about read the bible! The bible has every moral everyone needs to know. This doesn't. This movie screws up so many hearts in so many levels by insulting so many people. And if there's a 4th movie, that will fail easily.
I mean, the first one was good, I am a Christin and I like how he stood up for what he belives, but then the second one went down hill... And now there's a third one... But good content!
Have not seen it's predecessors, but I heard it is offensive to non-christians. definitely will be one of the worst.
This series is dumb, and insults Christians and Atheists.
This is the first movie I thought was so bad, I felt compelled to warn others not to waste their time watching it. Probably the worst movie I've seen since Battlefield Earth. I kept watching hoping that there would be an "ah ha" moment; yet, as the storyline unfolded, it just became more and more unintelligible. I had to stop half way through. I was getting a headache trying to make sense of it. This is a kids' movie? The next day, I thought I would give it a second chance and watch the 2nd half. Turns out the 1st half was the better half. I never read the book but can only surmise that there was too much left out to keep the story cohesive. The time travel visual effects were terrible and appeared low budget. My favorite scene (because it was visually entertaining) was the flying cabbage scene; yet, I couldn't help but to be concerned that the kids were going to fall off. Repeatedly hearing the name "Charles Wallace" became utterly annoying and contrived. Why not Charles, Chuck or C? ...more
This movie was poorly cast, poorly costumed, and strayed too far from the book. I like that Meg is a different race than in the book - that offers a refreshing perspective, but she looks NOTHING like either of her casted parents, and so this is completely unconvincing. Oprah was a poor choice for Mrs. Which, who is a "wisp." Oprah is the polar opposite of a wisp, and the makeup artist's attempt to overcome this obstacle only resulted in her resembling an amazon glitter warrior instead of a wispy ethereal being - poor casting. Reese Witherspoon was a fun character until she became a little too mean to Meg. Her character isn't supposed to be mean. She made a nice recovery at the end, but what kind of message are sending our children when the only white female character is also the only mean and petty character in the entire movie? I wanted to see a beloved book brought to life - not butchered! Instead we saw an agenda - One with the Universe. As far as thinking it's for kids - I don't ...more
I personally thought that this movie was made to promote feminism because of female heroism (which is not a bad thing), almost every character is female, and that the lead actress, Storm Reid (cool first name), said that she hopes this movie will inspire young girls everywhere (I think). This is my opinion, I don't know if anyone else thinks this. Besides that, I thought it was pretty dull and the acting wasn't all that special. The best thing about the movie was the visuals. They were really good. I can kind of relate to the protagonist a little bit as well.
I had a sliver of hope that this movie was going to be good (from looking at the trailers). But when I watched it I thought it was an abomination. This movie was poorly cast, poorly costumed, and the CGI was horrible for a Disney movie. This movie was nothing like the book and the plot didn't make any sense. 0/10
Seriously, Sony? You've done so much wrong, and you still give us terrible looking movies. There's no way I'm going to see this movie.
Is it weird that I think the sequel is way better than this one? Because this movie is basically Furry Vengeance 2: British Edition.
So what's Daisy Ridley got into other than the latest Star Wars movies? Umm... nothing interesting.
Really Sony? How have you not learned your lesson
Unbearable, the jokes are among the worst I have seen in an animated movie, rather Emoji Movie, the main character is such an unlikable jerk and the jokes were forced, mean or disgusting, there is this one joke in the middle of the movie that was so annoying! And on top of that, there is a character puking in the movie! And I'm not going to say what he puked because it's that disgusting, oh and speaking of the character who puked, an annoying little duck that tries to eat everyrthing, he goes on my nerves so much! The only good character was Stanley, but even he was annoying! Oh I have'nt gotten to the story yet, it's about a goose called Peng that must take care of ducklings because his wing is broken, before his wing got broken, he was flying his some bbirds and wodnered why they had to fly in the shape of a V, so they flew in a shape of a hashtag! What!? It even tries to be hip and cool for kids! I don't even think birds care about flying in an A or a B or whatever! Emoji Movie, ...more
I'm not confident about this movie since I watched it on Netflix. But this seems like a generic student animated film that wasn't on theaters. By just looking at the poster, there's nothing anything good about it.
Looks awful, and on top of that it's by Open Road Films, the "studio" that made The Nut Job and its sequel.
What's next? The Hide and seek movie? The Freeze Tag movie? The Floor is lava movie?!
We already had a vulgar interpretation of the Muppets long before this film came to exist, Peter Jackson's Meet the Feebles. The only major differences is that Meet the Feebles was an idea first and a product second, took risks with how dark it wanted to go, and actually wanted to be a Muppets satire.
This has the same sins as Sausage Party. Repeatedly using profanity and cheap crude humor in attempt to be funny, no wonder this was a box office bomb.
This is without a doubt Hollywood's stupidest idea... hopefully of all time.
It's going to be a box office bomb. Also, Sesame Street sued it, and I think they had a right to do that
Great movie but extremely overrated (it even made the song one of the most overrated things in the world and made me like the song less) and the Oscar nominations baffled me (because it got mixed reviews from critics).
A disaster. Complete waste of time.
The only good thing I can say about this movie is that the animation is a nice step-up for the first one. We got more unlikable characters, more unfunny jokes (especially when Ralph does the Fortnite dance), no build-up, no creativity, no fudging thought whatsoever. The princesses are obnoxious, loud, and get really annoying, on your nerves easily and at this point, they aren't affective at their own personalities like they were in their own movies. The most cringeworthy part is when Ralph and Vanellope wanted to play rich-playing video games. When they got here, they just see a bunch of cars and roadkill animals. This lady is from Slaughter Race. Her name is Shank and I hate her. At least there are some tolerable characters over here. The soundtrack is pretty good. There are no villains unlike the other Disney movies, just a humongous virus named Arthur and an ugly monster named Double Dan. It's stupid. It's lazy. Vanellope is a butthole. Ralph doesn't have a personality. Scenes ...more
I was hyped up to see this movie, but now, I don't like it anymore. It ruined everything for me. It had a bad plot, compared to the infamous Emoji Movie. To make matters worse, this was largely panned by everyone in this site, especially you. It's extremely overrated, just like Frozen and Zootopia. We've got this bad-ass female character named Shank. Speaking of Shank, she's the worst character, a complete moron who annoys everyone. Her actor wanted to make her more famous. There are so many plot holes in this movie. - 1. This movie kept on focusing on Vanellope going to Slaughter Race and hang out with the princesses. 2. One of the characters from the first movie have been butchered badly (mainly Vanellope). 3. Ralph had became an Internet meme all around. This movie tries to be cool, but it comes off as a sell-out. Like what I said before, I heard that Rich lied about the appearance of Mario. This movie is stupid. Everything about it. It opens with trying to find the wheel of Sugar ...more
This was one of my most anticipated movies of the year, seeing as I was a huge fan of the original. While this one does a neat job of presenting the internet in a similar manner to how the original portrayed video games, just about everything else was a flaw. The story was too left-liberalistic, way too much over-exposure of memes I didn't even know of (and what the heck even is BuzzTube). And who could forget the ending which un-does everything the original stands for, and the disturbing villain?
Looks like something IHE or Mr. Enter would review on, even though I didn't like either of them. That explains why this movie sucks, while The Emoji Movie is just terrible as this. Unlike the first movie, it isn't good at all. Just annoying and generic. I mean, what were you thinking, Rich Moore? You said you wanted to put Mario into the movie, but you lied. And that makes me want to create a movie that trolls shouldn't be taken seriously on. That's how bad this movie is, no other explanation needed.
The plot is very derivative and while it may not come close to Die Hard and reinforces how Hollywood cinema is lacking originality, I can see that any movie with Dwayne Johnson is very enjoyable, there is a lot of suspense and the action and stunts are exhilarating. 4/5
Generic, stupid garbage. One of the worst mainstream big budget action movies I've seen in years.
Oh, hello "Die Hard"! Hello, "The Towering Inferno"! Mind if I combine you and cast The Rock as the lead?
Even though this was geared towards older audiences than The Great Mouse Detective, this movie somehow manages to be way more obnoxiously childish than the animated Disney film (which is one of Disney's greatest and most underrated by the way).
WHY is this only 27?!? Above actual GOOD movies like Ant-Man and Wasp, Solo, Aquaman, and Teen Titans Go to the Movies (don't hate on me please)! This is just disgusting! Don't watch this at all!
A very imbecilic and sad attempt to make a movie, its endemic of what Hollywood has been reduced to! It's a complete insult.
Its time to go back to film school!
I had heard that the movie was so terrible that many audiences were shouting, cringing and leaving the theater.
Let's be good by stealing from other movies!
This movie was great! Not as good as the first one, but an awesomne sequel overall, don't get it how everyone ranks this below the first two entries, it was way better than the second one in my opinion
Suck on that, Oswego Carters'! In fact, most of the films higher on this list are stuff that deserve the Seal of Garbage even more, just like you for your taste in general!
Just some filler and a cash grab, wasp looks pretty cool and good though
Get this in the top 10
The first Jurrasic World was awesome. The sequel was good but very forgettable (except the Blue scene at the end).
I didn't like Jurassic World so I don't have any hope for this.
The first movie was awesome, but this was a let down.
An underrated movie
"When Amy Schumer was a child, everyone laughed at her because she wanted to be a comedian. No one is laughing now" might be the most true quote I have ever read.
Amy schumer go away already I don't want to see your crappy movie
I feel stupid
I haven't seen it yet, but pretty much anyone at my school thought it sucked. I thought the clips I saw sucked though.
It might not be so bad for people who don't really care about the first Pacific Rim, but as someone who is a huge fan of the original, this sequel felt like a slap in the face. Mako is killed off for no reason, Newt is the twist villain for the sake of having a twist, and Riley is not even mentioned in the film. Not to mention, the action and visuals don't even come close to being as good as the original made five years earlier. Just awful...
No way this film is only #20. The first movie was AWESOME. It had those awesome Kaiju vs Jeager fights for 1-hour straight.
The script. Really? What am I even watching? So, lets get this straight, the story is about the Shao industries organising a drone program, but this rogue Jeager named Obsibian Fury attacks Sydney and Antartica for no reason, but later on, it turns out to be controlled by a Kaiju and then, the drones activates and opens the portal to let the Kaiju in, and then Jeager pilots (who are all kids) play with their Jaeger robots. This is just an insult to fans of the original.
And then, let's talk about that STUPID plot-twist where Charlie Day's character, Newt, is the villain. And why is he the villain? He wants to end the world by making the Kaiju make Mount Fuji errupt to destroy the world. Why does he want to end the world? Because he just wants to. He's just a villain because... he's a villain with no character writing or development. Even his reasons ...more
Firstly Mako dies and secondly Newt becomes the villain. Would have walked out of this if I went alone when either one of the two events happened.
So you're telling me I'm this movie any average joe can pilot a jaeger now?
Awful remake of the Charles Bronson classic with Bruce Willis giving another phoned-in performance.
You can't beat the original with Charles Bronson.
Bruce Willis just doesn't care anymore does he?