Worst Movies Based On Good Books
The Top Ten
Even if you don't enjoy reading the books the movie is just way too stereotypical.
Stereotype 1: Percy Jackson woahs at literally everything. Even walking down the street is apparently something new to this guy.
Stereotype 2: Annabeth and Percy, even though they had no chemistry, become boyfriend and girlfriend.
Stereotype 3: The black guy is a crazy ladies man who is hilarious.
Stereotype 4: Hades is the devil. NEWS FLASH: Hades is probably the nicest god of the big three.
There are so many more but these cover the three main characters and one of the bad guys. I'll post a companion comment with the books in mind.
No one hates the Percy Jackson movies more than Percy Jackson fans.
Its an abomination.
Firstly, they took away Annabeth and Grover's personalities. Annabeth literally won no fights and her kick butt nature was taken away, along with her past and her Yankees cap. Grover was turned into some buff ladies man which is the complete opposite of his personality.
Not to mention the story line was completely changed ( they were not looking for pearls), Luke seemed like he was acting for himself, Kronos was not mentioned and so many other characters were taken away. Annabeth wasn't even shocked buy his betrayal.
And they never battled a hydra in the first book.
Annabeth's hair is supposed to be blonde and curly and she is supposed to have grey eyes.
And all the characters were to old. This basically runes everything. And annabeth and Percy were not supposed to make love eyes at each other.
1. The main villain, Ares, isn't in the movie.
2. The true main villain, Kronos, isn't in the movie.
3. Clarisse, the bully villain, isn't in the movie.
4. Mr. D, the douche villain, isn't in the movie.
5. Charon's entire character is removed.
6. Procrustes, a side villain, isn't in the movie.
7. Echidna and Chimera, two more side villains, aren't in the movie.
8. The Furies, three more side villains, don't appear in the movie aside from one who appears once.
9. The main characters are all around twelve in the book.
10. Luke isn't the final battle.
11. This is the change I do enjoy, which was making Grover black, but I still have to include it.
12. Sally Jackson isn't rescued until after Percy brings Zeus the bolt.
13. Sally, who ends up killing game by using Medusa's head, isn't given that honor. Instead, it is played out as an accident, destroying the idea that she can live by herself.
14. Percy doesn't use the flying shoes as that would be ...more
This should be #1, because it was a good book to start, but ruined as a movie. The movie did not follow the plot at all.
Only at #4? As someone who saw this and Percy Jackson movie, let me say that at least the Lightning Thief was good in its own right, even if it was almost nothing like the books.
This ABOMINATION, on the other hand, fails on almost every level (creepy looking and OOC characters, cheap production, terrible script, racist and sexist stereotypes, sexual innuendos galore, etc.). If I'm perfectly honest, I blame the director, Bo Welch, for this. A lot of this jargon was actually going to appear in the Grinch but Ron Howard had the decency to put his foot down and set a limit on how much of this bull crap (especially the innuendos) would make the cut, meaning the rest got carried over to The Cat In The Hat and Bo Welch delightfully gave that jargon the rubber stamp of approval. DreamWorks being involved this time around, unlike The Grinch, probably didn't help matters. There's a reason they almost went bankrupt - people got turned off by too many pop culture references in their ...more
UGH! I HATE this movie! It's sickeningly colorful, the characters personalities are abysmal, and the Cat and the fish are both extremely ugly (I wouldn't be surprised if the cat was a pedophile)! So many pop culture references! When I first watched it on Cartoon Network, I wanted to turn it off SO BADLY, but there was nothing else to watch! Don't watch this movie! Burn it with fire! 0/10!
The book, was creative, goofy, had a ton of effort put into it. Do you have any idea how much trouble Dr. Suess went through to publish this? He couldn't find anyone who would publish it, so he became a publisher who published it himself. The movie on the other hand, is the worst. Most kids today have read the book and don't even know that there IS a movie.
Don't watch it. I'm telling you right now.
I thought this movie and the book it was based on were just depressing. the idea of the girl drowning in the lake almost made wanna cry. this is a movie that I will not ever watch again because it describes the harsh reality of losing someone young at this age.
This movie was really good. The book was amazing. If kids are too young to face "harsh reality," when should they have to?
It's really good!
Movie was way better than book.
Rant on the movie you Caillou.
Talk like it was a great book but how famous is it? It's a meh book.
I can rant about this movie on and on and I'm pretty tolerable about changes from the source material but this movie wasn't even good on it's own.
A Really Disappointing Movie, Nice Book, But Really Disappointing Film
Love the movie.
The actor Ed Speleers is gorgeous lol.
If you think it was rubbish then you think Barry Trotter should have a movie. Barry Trotter and the Shameless Parody, Barry Trotter and the Unnecessary Sequel, and Barry Trotter and the Dead Horse.
They kind of ended the whole series in two movies instead of 6, and the ending makes absolutely no sense, way worse than the first one.
This movie made no sense. Kronos rose in the fourth book, but he never rose as his true form, nor was he that easy to beat. Nobody looks like how they are described in the books, and the movies ruined the books. The books are much much Much (x 10,000) better than the movies.
Just Like The First Percy Jackson Movie, Not A Horrible Movie, But The Books Are Far Better
Even worse than the first movie, and that's impressive.
I loved these movies. They were amazing.
What in hell is this movie doing on this list?!
I thought the movie was actually all right. Mr Lewis didn't have much humour in the book(by the way I love comedy, who doesn't? ) and I'm glad they add some in the movie.
Amazing books, mediocre movies..
We don't need anymore remakes!
This remake was amazing! I really don't get why people hate this remake. Chloe Grace Moretz is a great choice for Carrie! It was faithful to the original film, it was really intense, and suprisingly, it can be emotional at times! Seeing Carrie getting bullied and getting abused by her religious fanatic mother made me feel bad for her!
Now u will know she sucks
Holly Hills was a terrible character and the films were all generally quite depressing. Nowhere near as funny.
These 2 movies are 2 of the worst movies I've ever seen, the funny thing is there are more books after the 2nd one and they were gonna make the other ones into movies too, but these movies bombed big time at the box office so the producers killed all the other movies they were gonna make, and thank heavinly Jesus because these movies were HORRENDOUS
The book was good but not the movie.
Patty Ferral was horrible! Scratch that. Calling her horrible is quite nice. She's a demon possessed child!
Were the Twilight books any good? I haven't read them but from what I've heard, both novel and film were terrible.
I agree. Carrie was really good. And what is Lion Witch and Wardrobe doing on her
The Books Were Trash, This Was Trash
I actually really liked Carrie.
The Book Was Trash, And This Was Also Trash
I read the series. Perhaps my favorite books series ever. But this movie does not do it justice. THANKS BAY,YOU RUINED I AM NUMBER FOUR LIKE TRANSFORMERS. THANKS YOU EXPLOSIVE JERK.
The series is amazing I've read it all but the movie made the whole story just like every other bad forgettable action movie ever.
The movie will better if it directed the original writters, BUT NO, LET'S DIRECT A MOVIE BASED ON A BOOK WITH Michael BAY, IF WILL BEEN GREAT (sarcasm)
Are a scenes that don't like just the book got and got so much errors for example
1- In the book, John got the scar in a boat, in the movie got the scar in a beach
2- in the book sam is redhead, in the movie is brunette
3- in the book Henri dies in the battle at the school, in the movie dies in the battle at the incoporation of the web site of aliens
4- in the book the house of the party is in flames, in the movie only John save Sarah and more later escape
5- in the book the principal of the school show John a article that show he is a alien, in the movie that don't show
Conclusion: the movie was produced to got money
Hey! It's Jack Black! I love Jack Black!
This Film Is A Guilty Pleasure For Me
I love this movie! At least is better than "The Cat in the Hat"
Hey this was a decent movie
this film was trying so hard to be good
Instead it was basically a remake of hunger games
I liked this move my only problem is that the scene for Edward getting stabbed is made and cutout, otherwise great adaptation
All the good parts (like someone getting stabbed in the eye) are out
The First Film Was Okay The First Book Was Decent, The Second Movie Was Bad, The Second Book Was OK, The Third Movie Was Bad, The Third Book Was Mediocre
Good animation, but apart from that, it was a bit of a mess.
I actually like this a lot more than the recent versions. Tim Curry is a much better Pennywise (The new guy was hindered by too much CGI).
Everyone spoke about this at the time it first came out but now that time has gone by, people aren’t really going to remember this one that well. All because of the 2017 version. In my opinion, that version was better as it got a bit more right than the original mini-series
The novel was pretty good. The movie sucked.
This movie was very disappointing compared to the book. It is nothing like the book and LOTS of the scenes are not how it happened in the book.
The only characters that seemed accurate were Angel and Gazzy. The rest of the cast looked nothing like how the characters were protrayed in the book. And they never said Fang’s name once in the movie.
Never read the book but this movie was so stupid. And I hated Rose in this movie. So whiny and arrogant.
Actually I like the film better than the book. When I read the book, I expected more out of it, but I was mildly disappointed and I fail to understand its praise.
This movie was bad, but Orson Scott Card said way before this was made that Hollywood could never due his book as written.