Worst Things About the Ben 10 RebootThe 2016 (it was released last year in other countries) Ben 10 reboot is just another crappy reboot of an awesome Cartoon Network show. It's one of the worst CN shows of this year, and here's why.
The Top Ten
I never wanted a reboot.
I wanted to see Ben GROW UP. He was my childhood cartoon hero and I always loved how I first saw him as a kid, then a teen- heck I even saw him as a MAN.
Forget that. I WANT TO SEE BEN GROW UP.
If kids wants Ben 10, then maybe just bring Ben 10 back- the Ben 10 we know and love.
Let's face it. It's tiring to see even a fictional character you love to be just the same. It makes you feel like you're being left out. You get to grow old; they don't because they're cartoons. But the Ben 10 series before, that just brings us happiness and a sense of closeness to a beloved character.
Also, I think that break up with Julie in Omniverse is crap. Did Ben not even try to get to her? They could've at least shown detail. They really had chemistry and Julie's been with Ben longer than anyone else has from what I can remember. I feel like throwing all that away was a big waste.
I hope they could give their relationship another chance. How about it? Ben ...more
Seriously, Man of Action? Season 3 of Alien Force, Ultimate Alien, and Omniverse were terrible! Do you think after all those terrible spinoffs, we would want ANOTHER Ben 10 show! Heck no! Especially in this day and age, where Cartoon Network has fallen into another deep, downward spiral since at least late 2015, would we really need another crappy reboot of an awesome show?
Not a valid reason
I hate when people do reboots because 99.99% of the time they destroy the show/ movie hints why some actors are even quitting their roles
yes - BoyGenius234
Why do so many Cartoon Network Originals nowadays use almost the exact same art style? The trend started with Adventure Time in 2010, and now every CN Original show has gone on to feature the same art style: noodle legs and arms, jellybean teeth, and thick outlines. Heck, when I first saw a promo for We Bare Bears, I thought it was Adventure Time at first.
Ben 10 (2016) has shinier hair, and the skin isn't just one flat color. But if you make the characters less detailed then they look exactly like characters from other modern CN shows. I also kind of think the art style is babyish. The art style looks like it could be from a Nick Jr. show. And the backgrounds look very unfinished. Also, in scenes where there are crowds, the crowds look like multicolored circles rather than actual people. It's true.
From what I've heard, there have actually been poor toy reviews. As if the negative reception of the show itself wasn't already bad enough. While I have nothing against merchandise, as I do occasionally like to get some based on franchises I like such as anime series I've watched and video games like Pokemon, merchandise doesn't make a good show. To think Sym-Bionic Titan got screwed by the network all because it couldn't get a toy merchandise line. Bah, Christina Miller is no different from Stuart Snyder from this perspective, being that she seems to care more about making money with merchandise than pumping out good shows. The only exception seems to be OK K.O. Let's Be Heroes, since she's both investing in the animated T.V. series and the video game series based on this new franchise. Other than that, she's got a long way to go if she wants to earn the praise of Cartoon Network's old fans. Miller aside, Ben 10 (2016) only exists as purely an example of the worst of the Miller era ...more - ModernSpongeBobSucks
All Man of Action wants to do is milk the hell out of their cash cow. Does any kid in this day and age that was not born when the original Ben 10 was around know what it is anymore? Hopefully if toy sales go bad, it'll get cancelled.
I never believe this, mlp and transformers were suppose to do that but they didn't - BoyGenius234
Tara Strong still voices Ben, but all of the other voice actors have been replaced. They didn't even call the original voice actors to reprise their roles. What in the world? It's clear that this is following in the footsteps of the PPG reboot, since they changed the voice actors in that show too. At least in TTG, they got the original voice actors back.
Yeah, he does kinda look like he did in that episode'don't drink the water', I think it's called.
It's just his iconic shirt for the first one.
As white as milk
The difference between TTG and Ben 10 is that TTG got good ratings and that's why it gets marathoned. Meanwhile, Ben 10 didn't even become a huge hit with audiences and CN still marathons it anyway. Heck, if you turn on Cartoon Network right now, there is a likely chance that Ben 10 is showing right now.
So now this is an outdated item. Ben 10 luckily averages about 4 showings per week, and OK KO gets the 3rd most showings on the channel.
If the reboot is now getting low ratings, this combined with poor toy reviews and negative reception of the show should hopefully be enough to convince the network to cancel Ben 10 (2016). - ModernSpongeBobSucks
The original used to be brave and fight many creatures from different places the new one can't even run 2 miles
Grandpa Max not being voiced by Paul Eiding is just wrong. He IS Max and that is what we need. I like you David Kaye, but please do other work. - 445956
In the original 2005 series, Grandpa Max was my favorite character because of how cool he was. He was an interesting, alien vanquishing hero. He was also skilled in combat, and had an odd taste in food. He was also there to break up the arguments between Ben and Gwen.
Now, he is completely useless. The show would actually still be the same if he wasn't in it. Just like Ben and Gwen, they completely destroyed his character. Destroyed it, like in the other Cartoon Network reboots.
Why would you take inspiration from two of Cartoon Network's most reviled programs in recent years?
For starters, the Ben 10 reboot puts more emphasis on comedy than action like the other two shows. Like PPG 2016, they changed the voice actors for no reason, and it tries too hard to be hip. And all three of them have lazy animation and sell tons of toys. Plus, the Ben 10 reboot is 11 minutes instead of 22 minutes, just like the other shows.
I know people hate Gwen in the 2005 series for being rude to Ben, but here's the thing. Gwen was specifically designed to be a foil to Ben, because of how dumb Ben can be sometimes. But in the reboot, Gwen became nice. TOO nice. She only exists in the show to be a follower and to agree with everything Ben says.
I think that the term of "Gwen agreeing with everything Ben says" means that she will agree with the useless statements he says including his personality.
I usually don't have a problem with silly T.V. shows, but the fact that this is yet another Cartoon Network reboot that focuses more on comedy than action does nothing more than add insult to injury. The 2005 Ben 10 had great action and cool aliens. The Ben 10 reboot is now 3% action and 97% comedy, like TTG and PPG 2016.
I like the original theme song because of how memorable and iconic it was. "It started when an alien device did what it did..." It was so catchy, it had cool sci-fi effects and I think its one of the greatest cartoon theme songs of all time.
In the 2016 theme song, all it does is count off Ben's aliens while repeatedly screaming "Ben 10! " over and over. How are today's kids supposed to now WHY Ben can turn into aliens? In the original 2005 theme song, it explains how the Omnitrix got onto Ben's wrist and that it allows him to turn into different aliens. The reboot's theme song doesn't explain any of that.
One significant point that fellow YouTuber athemocracy made in his Ben 10 (2016) video was that the reboot doesn't do anything to explain Ben's origins to newer viewers. Only older viewers who are familiar with the Ben 10 franchise would be able to know such, and even so, they would only be turned off by the reboot's shoddy production values and lackluster episode plots. As for newer viewers, since they know nothing of Ben's origins, it's essentially creating an audience-alienating premise and not really giving the newer viewers anything informative about the franchise's lore. What this only does in the end is just solidify Ben 10 (2016) as a corporate cash grab in the form of a pathetic reboot of a beloved first installment in a beloved franchise in a desperate attempt to sell toys and garner ratings. Oh, and as another one of Christina Miller's biggest blunders of all time during her presidency at Cartoon Network. - ModernSpongeBobSucks
Why didn't they use the original 10 aliens? They removed Wildmut, Ripjaws and Ghostfreak, and replaced them with Cannonbolt, Wildvine and a new alien called Overflow which is basically a ripoff of water hazard.
And the worst? They redesigned Stinkfly and made him look human, I mean come on!
I actually thought it was Big Chill at first - 445956
Just like PPG 2016, the new Ben 10 clearly has the "It's just a kids show vibe" and clearly was made by Old White Executives in Suits who are trying too hard to be hip with the kids
Related ListsTop Ten Best Things about Social Media Top 10 Weird and Confusing Things About Certain Cartoon Character Designs Best Things About Lil Baby Top 10 Best Things About the User Sop Top 10 Things That You Now Wish You Didn’t Know About Certain Cartoons
1 year, 223 days old
2. The animation is generic and lazy
3. It's boring