Top Ten Worst Things About Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Long Haul Movie

robertoiglesias271

The Top Ten

1 The new cast!

The new cast sucks very much and can't replace the original cast. Why does Rodrick look like Squidward from Spongebob? - robertoiglesias271

The point is, it's not the diary of the wimpy kid that I know

The should be arrested for identity theft!

The heck rodrick looks so emo

V 2 Comments
2 Character development

The new cast makes another problem: Bad character development. Everyone in the movie is now boring and lame. - robertoiglesias271

3 Jokes

The movie's new jokes are just dumb and crappy. Don't get me started on this. - robertoiglesias271

The jokes were not even funny and were more disgusting than funny really­čśĺ Diaper hands, there is no comedy in the movie whatsoever.

4 Skipping books 5-8

Didn't exactly start off great, either. - mattstat716

This reason really is a big problem. The stupid crew just rushed from the 3rd and 4th books to the 9th book. That's like the Harry Potter movie series skipping books 4-8 to make the cursed child movie. what?! - robertoiglesias271

5 So many changes

This movie is like the middle school movie. They both mess up the film and make too much changes. - robertoiglesias271

6 The trailer

The trailer makes this movie look like Planet of the Apes(2001) and makes the movie weaker. - robertoiglesias271

7 Rowley tags along

In the book, Rowley does not go on the trip, but in the movie he does. This just shows how bad Greg's family is and how Rowley had to go from a minor to a main character in the film. - robertoiglesias271

What?! He was in it for like 2 seconds._.

8 Rowley again

Rowley traveling sucks, but he does not do anything! What was the point of him if he is going to be like Greg's shadow that isn't noticed?! - robertoiglesias271

9 The Pig

The pig looks stupid, is stupid as hell, and really is just so sad! The pig is either not making any action in the film or causes so much action it's horrible! Ugh! - robertoiglesias271

Hated it in both the book AND the movie.
Oh, *joy.* - mattstat716

10 Rodrick

He doesn't even look like the book character.

The heck he looks so emo

Is this REALLY him? - mattstat716

The Contenders

11 Greg and Rowley Look 8 Years Old
12 The plot

The plot is boring, has no actual climax, rising action, or falling action, and sucks! This really doesn't do any good for the movie. - robertoiglesias271

13 It relies on too much bathroom humour
14 It doesn't fit with the other movies

The other movies were actually pretty funny. This one was pretty bad, we all know that. Especially that they now look NOTHING like the book. And do you remember that scene where they were in the car, about to start the road trip, and Greg and Rodrick just pull out their PHONES- Which they never even had in the first place? In the other movies(and all the books), Greg never had a phone. Nope, never. His parents only got him some ladybug phone, which could only call either home, or 911(basically not an actual smart phone). So where did the phones come from? There was never a scene where they got those. Also, in Dog Days, Greg was practically already teenager. In the new cast, he looks young again(like 8 or something). And his mom is just more annoying.

Same with the guy below, Greg never had a phone! He only had a ladybug that calls home or 911! Also I get that they had to replace the old cast because y know it's been 5 years since the last one but they could've at least made them look like who they are! Greg looks like a 3rd grader even though he's suppose to be a teenager! And Rodrick looks like his old self+ an emo+squidward tentacles+a lesbian=this! Also the jokes are very unfunny like the "diaper hands joke". This movie sucks no wonder why it only grossed 40 mil whereas the 1st three movies grossed around 70mil!

15 The acting was bad
16 The book is less boring
17 Susan Heffley has a terrible role.
18 The diaper hands thing
BAdd New Item
P