Top Ten Worst Actors

So, Paris Hilton is horrendous. Why on Earth is Johnny Depp on this list? He is a fantastic actor who plays similar roles that are publicized because he's good at them and it's what people like. But if you watch some of his earlier stuff, the roles are very different. "Ninth Gate," "The Secret Window," "Nick of Time," and more. Not massive blockbuster hits, but all are fantastic, and Depp plays his parts well. Can't believe he is on here.
I disagree with calling her a bad (or the worst) actress as a matter of principle. Being a bad actor presupposes that the individual is an actor, which in turn presupposes that the individual has a basic human level of emotional and intellectual maturity. Paris Hilton and a few other specimens on the list do not even come close to that. Nobody, except for people who seem to equate a celebrity with an artist, would bother to call her an actress.
She's only famous because of her dad! He's an awesome guy, and Paris Hilton is his little bratty daughter! BLAH! She's not a good actress at all! If I picked a grain of sand off a beach, it would be a better actress than her! I mean, what if sand were alive? Like, maybe if they were, the grain of sand could be a better actress, like... you know what I mean?
You know we're all being duped when people who have zero talent on all counts become famous. Talent is a necessity; being rich and shopping to the degree of overconsumption is not. Perhaps someone should let Paris know how unimportant and superfluous she really is. The only human she benefits is herself.

Sorry, but Miley Cyrus couldn't act as herself. I have tried to figure out what people see in her, but I cannot find anything more than ordinary. She appears egotistical and not very bright to me. It seems like she's one of those who simply got a great manager and tells the world, "I'm great, look at me," and the world buys into it. She also can't hold a genuine smile. She heavily relies on her looks and name.
Miley Cyrus should be #1; she's terrible! One day, she was the sweet, talented, squeaky clean Hannah Montana star, and then suddenly she's the cuckoo, crazy, insane, terrible role model! Miley, girl, just stop. And seriously, what mother would literally let their eight-year-old daughter listen to Miley screeching, "I came in like a wrecking ball!" at the top of her lungs? Miley, like I said before, just stop.
She should be at the top. She has ruined Disney since Hannah Montana, and now she has been in movies like 'Laugh Out Loud.' And she isn't any better at singing. I like 'Wrecking Ball,' but seriously, the video? Some kids love that song and may want to hear it, so they go onto YouTube to see their former idol humping construction equipment. Her life is going downhill at a pretty rapid speed. It's Lindsay Lohan all over again.
Miley should be number one on this list. She is terrible! Johnny Depp shouldn't be anywhere near this list. He is my favorite actor. The man can play any role. He is amazing!

Kristen Stewart is an emotionless shell of a person. She is a terrible actress and nothing but a pretty face. She ruined the Twilight movies. Not like they were good to begin with. You know where Kristen Stewart belongs? In Nickelodeon movies. I've seen child actors in Nickelodeon shows with more charisma and emotion than her.
Why did they even hire her? You know who should have portrayed Bella? Anna Kendrick! She's one of Bella's friends, she's much prettier, she has actual acting experience, and she actually has emotion! Why wasn't Anna Kendrick portrayed as Bella and Kristen Stewart as her stupid friend? The Twilight movies would have been much better with Anna Kendrick as Bella Swan.
She has the thought capacity of a guppy. Ask her to show deep emotion while reciting a line from the script - now watch her start to seize and foam at the mouth as she tries to do so.
I'm not a fan of Twilight, but my wife is a huge fan of it. So we watched the first movie, and my wife actually apologized to me for making me sit through that. I told her that there's no apology in the world that could erase from my mind the fact that I had just seen an entire movie with a 2"x4" cast as the female lead.
She actually has even less acting prowess than Hayden Christensen! I did not think that was possible.
I loved the Twilight books, but then the movies came out, and I felt like I was gonna be sick. I can't believe she keeps getting roles! That Snow White movie would have been great if she wasn't in it. Now I keep hearing rumors that she wants to play the lead in 50 Shades of Grey. Those are my favorite books! I swear if she gets that part, my life is over. Mila Kunis should play that part. She's not interested in it, but she would be the best for it, I think. Also, I have to agree with everyone else about Johnny Depp being on this list. I have seen so many of his movies, and he is not Jack Sparrow in all of them. Has no one seen The Tourist?
You guys are right. She only uses one face during her movies. She also destroyed a Snow White movie by using just one face. She has no personality, so how do my stupid sisters like a Snow White movie with her better than the Disney version? I keep from them that I like the animated one better. It is amazing, and my art class had common sense to like this version. I thought her Snow White movie lasted one hour longer than it really was because it was seriously creepier than a human-like Pokémon and her acting. Gosh, am I disgusted by that personality-less, blank-faced palette life ruiner.

I used to think he was funny, but that was because I was in middle school. Now I think he's nothing more than a complete waste of time and money.
Seriously, how did this guy even get popular? I can understand why, but in all reality, he doesn't deserve it. You know why? Because he's just another juvenile delinquent who has a bad habit of thinking he's funnier than we are. Not only do his films rely on the same damn formula, but they're just painful and unpleasant to watch. Sure, he's made a few good movies (Hotel Transylvania and The Wedding Singer), but those are very rare, and he usually comes out with a great big pile of crap. Even back in the 90s, he still had some horrible movies.
I'm glad to see this guy's popularity is finally declining. I'm glad to see his fans have finally grown up and moved on to find better things than his bad taste excuses for comedies. If you're wack, you're not going to last forever. And Adam Sandler is wack. He's going to go in the same ...more
Adam Sandler is hated for a good reason. He makes terrible jokes that you would swear a monkey with a typewriter came up with. Are people even laughing at him? They must be; otherwise, how else would he be popular? Adam Sandler used to be hit and miss in the 90s, though. Even if you didn't get his jokes, you still felt like he was trying. Adam Sandler is different now, though. You would believe that he's a humanoid robot trying to be human but failing horribly. In every movie he's in, it seems like he's the same character, not the character he's supposed to be playing. This makes every movie he's in called a "Sandler film," even though he's not even the director. You have to call that bad acting. The plots of his movies are horrible too, but this is just about Adam Sandler, so I won't get into that. All in all, Adam Sandler should just stop. He has made enough money for a living, and he should know by now that he's not going to get any better.
I used to think he was funny, but now... I don't know what the hell I saw in this guy back in my teenage years!
He is extremely juvenile, which can be funny at times, but that's what most of his movies consist of. Most of his humor relies on farting, pooping, and hitting on girls. There's no subtlety in his humor, and he tries way too hard to be funny that it's just painful to watch. It just baffles my mind how he's been able to grab the attention of audiences for so long and even have his hand and footprints on the cement walk of the TLC Chinese Theater.
It just pays to be stupid, I guess.
Where do I start with this assclown? I watched some of his old movies from the 90s, and to be honest, most of them weren't that good at all. I never thought Adam Sandler was a good actor, even from the beginning. His sense of humor always involves poop jokes, pee jokes, hitting on girls, acting like an idiot, and doing dumb voices. Those can be funny at times, but that's what all of his comedies consist of. It gets really annoying, really fast. And he never tries anything new. He just uses the same formula over and over and over again! Adam Sandler is ass. That's all I have to say. He's one of the worst of the worst. Run away from his movies if you ever see them.

Never seen any of his movies. But he deserves this vote because he's POS. He supports the Russian war, backing Russia. He's pals with Putin.
Action movie stars aren't known for their acting, although there are some action movie stars who can be brilliant at acting. Seagal, on the other hand, is so bad that you can't call him a true action movie star. He doesn't even look intimidating or cool.
If you want to see a true action hero, I would recommend Bruce Willis, Daniel Craig, Jason Statham, Tom Hardy, Harrison Ford, or Bruce Lee. Even the worst action movie stars are better than him.
Keanu Reeves might suck as an actor, as he is more cheesy than nacho cheese dip, but I will always hate Steven Seagal for his pathetic one-liners and repetition. One movie with him in it is enough, but 50? Okay, I might be exaggerating, but we can all agree that Steven Seagal shows up way too often in movies. When Steven Seagal gets over himself, I will get over this, and maybe vote for Keanu Reeves.
Steven seagal is lame. He continues to embarrass martial arts and fitness with terrible technique. He's not only a fake professional, he looks like dog the bounty Hunter. I wouldn't piss on a fire to save a soulless douche who panders people by race. South park roasted his ass last week. He is Fat sack No talent wannabe. Get out the airwaves and hibernate.

I don't think Bieber can sing, I don't think he can act. He sucks. I believe he has helped other people, but that doesn't mean he's a good person. He has done more bad things than good. The only people that like him are the females because of his looks. Okay, the point of why I voted for Bieber is that he is too overrated. He acts like a girl, his voice isn't that good, etc. Hope the Beliebers don't get me wrong, but this is a fact. You can ask everyone, and they'll say the same things about him (except for the Beliebers).
He is the worst singer, the worst of everything. Like, people have more talent than him, but he has zero talent. He tries to act cute, but only 7-year-olds and 8-year-olds watch his songs. People have so many good talents, but he has none, yet he earns millions of dollars. He only has all that money because kids like his videos and watch them. Why does he try to act cute? Like, there are just little kids watching his music and videos, anyway.
He thinks he's a gangster when he's not. I believe this kid has the mind of an ultra-retarded fish. Whatsoever, he should be number one on the list. And even if he has the mind of a fish, I would ask him, 'What color is the sky? Is it orange or blue?' He would probably say, 'It's orange.' He's a clown, a fool. He's spoiled as crap, has a bunch of money. He's not worth singing on stage. He went to jail... Yeah, he has the mind of an ultra-retarded fish.
Justin Bieber sucks. His movie sucks, his songs suck, and he has a terrible voice. I get annoyed hearing "Love Yourself" on the radio.
Justin Bieber: Never Say Never and Justin Bieber's Believe might be the two worst Justin Bieber movies, or of all time.
But I liked how he played in Zoolander 2 because the enemies killed him, and it's good.

This guy is so incredibly bad at directing and acting, but he still thinks he is a genius. He is such a unique phenomenon that Hollywood is actually making a movie about how his infamous masterpiece, "The Room," was made. Tommy, you have no talent at all, but I still love you for your awkward acting and your attempts to look like a normal person, even though you act more like an alien who doesn't know anything about humans. Tommy Wiseau is terrible, but not painfully terrible like Kristen Stewart. He is so terrible that it's really entertaining to watch him.
Normally, you can tell when a performance is bad because you can recognize an actor "emoting," which means they are artificially expressing an emotion instead of genuinely feeling it. However, when you are unable to discern the intended emotion the actor is trying to convey, you know the performance is absolutely dreadful. It becomes even more disheartening when the actor appears to have no understanding of the concept of "character motivation," as evidenced by his statement, "Haha, what a story, Mark!"
He is a terrible actor, but his acting is of the "so bad it's good" variety. However bad he may be, people are entertained by it enough that they are still watching the movie repeatedly and talking about it after all this time. People still watch him act for fun. Nobody gets any enjoyment out of actors like Hayden Christensen; there isn't even any novelty value.
"Oh, hai top tens. It's good, ha."
Seriously, this guy makes those people from Twilight look like Humphrey Bogart. Granted, he's only done one movie, and it was a self-funded project, but come on, surely he must have thought to take acting lessons first?
But, as the "great" man would say, "Don't worry about it."

Keanu Reeves is terrible. Plain and simple. Robert Pattinson shouldn't be on the list (and this is coming from a guy) because his performance in The Rover was fantastic and he's obviously got acting chops, he was just in Twilight so he got a bad rap. I don't quite understand why Brad Pitt is on the list at all. Has anyone even seen 12 Monkeys, Inglorious Basterds, or Snatch? Adam Sandler is a close second, but he was good in more than one movie. Keanu Reeves wasn't, and he just had to say things in a mysterious voice and dodge CGI bullets. I guess he was good in Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure, but I'm not sure if he knew people were filming him.
He was great in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, and he has played every role since then exactly the same. Except in Dracula, where, for God only knows why, the director let him try it with an accent. If I recall correctly, over half of his lines in The Matrix were questions and not longer than five words each. Until the soliloquy at the end, he never said more than two sentences in a row. That script was built for him.
This guy's so wooden he puts my dining room table to shame. Obviously, he's not an intelligent man, but he looks pretty, so he's a crowd-puller for the studios that employ him. He needs a very special award for his role in Dracula. His ability to express fear and despair is masterful, and the accent is the best ever! He deserves to be number one on this list, but then again, he looks like a number two!
Yes, Keanu Reeves. No diversity, same roles... Spewed out over and over. Plays a pretty good stoner/surfer though. But, when you put him in Dracula with Gary Oldman, and he butchers an English accent that bad... No excuses. I mean, you can't say that he hasn't tried, but a piece of plywood could play Neo.
Worst films,
#1 - whoever he was in Dracula
#2 - My Own Private Idaho*
Watch him butcher Shakespeare, messy Van Sant film. Decent, but mucked.

Hayden Christensen sucks. He spews out stupid lines without ever really listening. He simply doesn't understand. It's not fair. They treat us like animals, so I slaughter them like animals. I hate them. And I don't like sand. Thank goodness he's not doing much anymore. He's just a pile of pig crap.
Indeed. Well, some of these other people aren't too bad beyond internet hype. However, this guy is the real deal. He can't act for toffee in anything and weakens any film he shows up in. I hated something like Jumper, for example, but it probably wouldn't have been so bad had someone else been in the lead rather than this hack. His blank stare and extremely monotone voice reduce any sort of range he attempts, and his poor acting otherwise makes him look out of place in anything he's in and takes you right out of the film. Thankfully, he isn't working much anymore, so now we don't have to suffer for it. Thank God.
I love Hayden! He's been one of my favorite actors since I was a little girl. Star Wars is a serious movie and he shows seriousness. The definition of no emotion is talking in monotone and constantly having a "frozen" face. Obviously he's not that terrible because if he was that terrible he wouldn't be selected for movies. I really disagree with this specific comment "Hayden can't play any role but an overly emotional angsty teenager. Get the hell out of my movies" I very much disagree with because they aren't your movies. Hayden is a great actor in my opinion!
I thought the Star Wars prequel trilogy (unlike most) was really good. All the actors fit, except for the kid who played Boba Fett. He had about as much emotion as a rock. Then, Hayden was just terrible. His little monologue about sand was painful. He was a little better in Revenge of the Sith, but that's because he has no emotion in his acting. And Anakin was much darker in that film.

I was going to go with Kristen Stewart but her performance in Personal Shopper was great. Hayden Christensen's facial expressions are brilliant and emotive. Angelina Jolie was incredible in Maleficent. Tommy Wiseau was so bad it's good. Adam Sandler was good in Punch Drunk Love and Happy Gilmore. Nicolas Cage has been in many great films. This guy, though, has never had a good performance - I mean Bio-Dome. Come on! He's so obnoxious and irritating.
He was funny in most films like Encino Man, Son in Law, In The Army Now, The Curse of Inferno, and the two Goofy Movie. And I hate to admit that they were watchable. That was except for the crap pieces of diarrhea he made like Jury Duty, Bio-Dome, and more recently Opposite Day and Adopted.
If you've seen him once, you've seen him a thousand times. He acts the same way in every scene, and it gets old very quickly. What people find entertaining about him escapes me.
Is this idiot still "acting"? I'd rather have my fingernails pulled off with pliers than ever watch 5 minutes of anything this dip is in!

I can't believe that this actress is actually considered as one of the best and hottest actresses of all time. She's the most boring actress I've ever seen when it comes to acting. Her portrayal of emotions and expressions is very bad, and her voice is very annoying to hear. On top of that, I think she's one of the ugliest actresses working in Hollywood. She's just lucky to be dating the most popular and overrated Brad Pitt, and that's why she's actually getting all the attention from the media. If a "pretty boy" like him likes her, then she must be considered pretty. That's what the media circus is trying to sell us anyway. As for me, she's just a bad actress who undoubtedly belongs on this list.
I find her to be aloof and not in touch with the real world. She seems to treat her adopted children better than she does the ones she gave birth to, especially the first child she had with Brad Pitt. She is a home wrecker. She couldn't keep that stupid relationship with Billy Bob Thornton together. Brad, you are a great actor and humanitarian. What are you thinking?
I find her to be very annoying. If you watch her movies, she's always playing roles that are tough or just likes to show off her toothpick figure and so on. I still can't believe she has won an Oscar for her terrible performance in Girl, Interrupted.
Most overrated actress of all time... Can't believe she gets this kind of recognition... Not deserved. The same expression in every movie. Very similar to Brad Pitt... It's always Angelina Jolie acting the role of... She never fully turns into that character, like Meryl Streep for instance.

In total agreement with this one! Personally, I believe he should have just remained as Cedric Diggory (what a shame he was killed... But he was far more attractive). I honestly can't stand the actor nor his character in Twilight. I won't even get started on that trash! I actually liked him when I first saw him in Harry Potter: The Goblet of Fire, but when he chose to act in Twilight... Worst mistake ever of his acting career. I swore, by the first line he spoke, I fell asleep, which is only a good ten or fifteen minutes into the entire movie, and by the time I woke up, the credits were rolling. True story. I mean, he's just bland, not even attractive, and not to mention WAY TOO overrated for that small role he plays in Twilight. Sigh, without fan girls, where would these actors be?
I don't understand why people think he is good these days. He is massively overrated. I have seen The Lighthouse and Good Time and was unimpressed. His accent was so inconsistent, even in the same sentences, and he looked out of his depth against a great actor like Willem Dafoe. He was decent in Good Time, but his role was not that challenging, and he came off as phony. His accents in The Devil All the Time and The King are so embarrassingly bad, yet his fans still defend it. He often tries too hard to look natural with his facial expressions and mannerisms but ends up looking like a wannabe DDL or Christian Bale. He also has a massive ego as he refuses to have a dialect coach, which he sorely needs, and slags off Twilight as if he is so much better than it. Twilight is the only reason he gets roles because indie directors know people will actually watch their films with him in it. He is so overrated, and it baffles me as to why people think he is great.
I can't really remember any of his acting, I just remember he's kind of a dick! I don't even like Twilight, but it should be common sense that if people pay you to work on a movie with them, you don't go around giving interviews claiming how you hate the series and it's really crap, just to regain a fraction of your already microscopic popularity. It's plain rude. If you think that, Robert, then why did you take the job? What a sad, strange little man.
This guy should be number one. He is yet another celebrity ruining my generation. He's like the Justin Bieber of the movie world, only more masculine and has actually hit puberty. But the point is, he's another person in this generation who has undeserved admiration from girls my age. I'm so glad the movie trilogy is over though.

If he weren't 6ft2 or whatever tall height he is, no one would ever notice this loser. When I look at him, all I see is his height and the foolish facial expressions he makes. When I look at someone like Liam Neeson or Kevin Kline, I don't even consider their height because they possess so many other admirable qualities. There are plenty of guys like that Kutcher dude, they just aren't 6ft2... If you ask me, he should be number 2 on this list. Christopher Lambert should be number 1.
Need I say more? It seems like everyone has said almost everything that is wrong with this useless excuse for an actor. Oh, why am I kidding myself? That isn't even half of it! The guy is just a crappy actor to start with, and it feels like every time I see him on TV trying to act serious, I just can't take him seriously. This guy will always be known as that retarded kid from That '70s Show. I honestly don't understand why he is so famous! The guy has not done anything remotely watchable since That '70s Show! It just blows my mind! Bottom line: a huge stinker douchebag!
Get real! People treat and adore him (Lucky not everyone) like he's one of the best actors of all time. He is a mediocre actor and in one or two movies fair, but he will never become a great actor and certainly not an icon of the cinema. He doesn't get better with the years in his acting skills, which proves that he doesn't have it in him to be considered a great actor. Not very talented and therefore too overrated.
He is terrible. I can't even name a good movie that he was in. "Dude, Where's My Car?" There is some quality cinema. Now he is taking over for the best television actor of all time? Sure, the ratings have been good the first couple of weeks, but how long before people get sick of the same story of a 32-year-old man who acts like he's twelve? I'm already there.

His movie career summed up in one sentence: "I'm the good-looking, cool guy who can't act, but I will because I'm good-looking and cool." He's a real-life Zoolander, another "hot guy" who, in reality, has a face people can't resist punching.
He's a bad actor, period. He's a great performer and singer, but in life, not everybody is cut out to be an actor. His acting is below average.
One of the douchiest actors I have ever seen. If I see him pop up in a movie I have paid for, I immediately leave the cinema and ask the staff for a full refund.
The only movies he is able to be in are the ones where he doesn't need to wear a shirt.

Just watch Freddy Got Fingered and tell me this douche mongrel can act. This movie is seriously one of the worst movies I have EVER seen, and I watched The Room. I honestly thought this movie was far worse than The Room. For him to be the main actor in this movie is just sad. It could be the worst movie of all time. He should be top 5 material on this list, at least. Also, the list of movies that he has been in is hilariously unimpressive.
I do not recall Tom ever stating that he was a great actor. He is what he is and has never tried to be anything else. You either love him or hate him. I don't think he cares either way.
He is the worst comedian ever. His comedy film "Freddy Got Fingered" was one of the worst. Other comedic actors, such as Charlie Chaplin and Mr. Bean, are way, way better.
Tom Green should be at number 1. Has he ever made anything successful? He also made that piece of crap movie Freddy Got Fingered.

Taylor Lautner was literally the best actor in Twilight out of the main three. Unfortunately, that means absolutely nothing. He was the only one able to show one genuine emotion and didn't stutter through his lines, but that's because he was Taylor Lautner playing Taylor Lautner, and that worked out for the role of Jacob because his personality in real life mostly fits Jacob (mostly being the operative word because he was not good at portraying anger). But in all his other roles, he's not so good.
He was good in Cuckoo and okay in Grown Ups, but the reason he works there is that nothing about his performance is supposed to be serious - he was supposed to be over the top cheesy. Right now, he's alright on Scream Queens, but that's because he's forgettable - you barely ever know his character's there. However, it's definitely an improvement from his previous acting because unlike his fellow Twilight actors, he knows he can improve, doesn't think he's the best, and stops ...more
How Taylor Lautner is not the runaway leader on this list is truly shocking! His acting was so bad in the Twilight movies, I could see it in the trailers for the movies without even having to watch them. I watched twenty minutes of one of the movies just to laugh at how bad his acting is. It worked for about ten minutes, but my laughter quickly turned to anger and I turned it off after twenty minutes! I could take no more.
Really tried to like him, but in the end, I realized he cannot portray any emotion well when he is acting. His lack of emotions makes me want to bash my head against the ground to demonstrate it for him. Even acting frustrated doesn't seem easy for him. Abduction made me want to cry, Twilight made me want to laugh, and Run the Tide made me want to scream. For a heartthrob, he cannot even get my heart in the right place.
Even his co-stars have admitted he was the weakest link in the Twilight films when it came to acting, which he still isn't unless you're in denial. The last Twilight movie has a scene in which Pattinson laughs behind Taylor's back at his horrid line delivery, and the director didn't even cut it from the film.

Yeah... Also, Nostalgia Critic has only done 2 movies with Shaq, so... I don't see how that's an astonishing amount. But yeah, Shaq used to act. Never again...
Shaq: One of the greatest basketball players of his generation and one of the worst actors of all time. Hopefully, there is going to be no Kazaam 2.
Is this for real? Somebody put Brad Pitt ahead of this awful actor on this list. Whoever did this list is high. Shaq's dumbass should be in the top 5!
He should stop acting and stick to basketball, because his acting sucks.

Holy crap, why is she only at #14 yet Kristen Stewart is at #2? I mean, Kristen is by no means an Oscar-worthy actress, but she definitely has her moments where her acting is good, and even when she sucks, she at least tries. Megan Fox, on the other hand, is only where she is because of her looks. She puts absolutely no effort into her acting.
Why isn't Megan Fox exclusively a porn actress? No matter she's in, she's always grunting and breathing heavily like she's having sex anyway, and people only watch and hire her because she's hotter than hell (even if she's a putrid actor). So what's the difference between her and a porn star? Nothing.
I was going to vote for Shaq. He's terrible at acting, rapping, and took part in one of the worst games of all time (Shaq-fu). Plus, he is an overrated basketball player. Anyway, back to what I was going to say. Megan Fox may be drop-dead sexy, but she's not a good actor.
I definitely hate her in Jennifer's Body. Jennifer Check is a sorry excuse for terror, and the movie is pure garbage! I was half asleep through the whole thing. BORING AS HELL!

Why isn't he number 1? This idiot has ruined every single movie he's been in with his abysmal acting skills and lack of talent, whether as a side character or even worse, as a main character. The only reason he made it in Hollywood is because of his connections, not because of his nonexistent "talent" as an actor, and the only redeeming quality about him is his great directing skills. The performance in Daredevil is the worst in history, and it's hard to imagine anything surpassing it. I'm astounded by the fact that he doesn't hold the record for the most Golden Raspberry Awards in history.
This guy is living proof that you don't need talent to make it big. You just need the right people pushing your way for you. I tell you, from the first time I saw this guy in "Dazed and Confused" (and I don't mean the Led Zeppelin song), I knew he was going to someday make it really far in Hollywood. He didn't even need fellow Bostonian Matt Damon helping him get over on everyone, because the executives in Hollywood were primed, waiting for someone like him without a shred of talent that they could mold into a blockbuster fool like this guy. Everything he does is suspect because of his lack of talent. It just goes to show that the old saying is true: "It's not who you know, it's who you are." Well, you can figure it out. If you actually think this guy can act, then I know what you have been doing too. Anyway, this guy sucks more than Sean Penn's brother did in all his scenes in "Super Troopers."
He was in Gigli, but keep in mind that he was in Argo, Good Will Hunting, The Town, and Gone Girl. And he directed Argo and The Town. I do think Gigli alone should have him on this list, but with the movies he's done in recent years, I don't think he should be this high.
Well, to be honest, he was a bad actor before. I hated his acting in Pearl Harbor. But now, in 2015, he is getting better. Well, his acting in Gone Girl is awesome. Also, he is the pick as Batman in the upcoming Batman vs Superman. I hope he will do well in that too. It's nice to see someone getting better after all.

Zac Efron is just a pretty boy who is a pretty bland actor, and he got his career made by Disney. "What is this 'High School Musical'?"
"Well, little Johnny, 'High School Musical' is a musical movie about teenagers in high school who don't hate being in high school enough to sing about their high school activities."
'17 Again' was about a guy who, somehow, turned 17... again and went back to high school, then made up with his ex-wife. Just what? Firstly, the writing, I feel, set Efron back even further than he already was. Additionally, Efron's version of the character was literally his character from 'High School Musical,' just without any music. Zac, here's a tip: just no, just no.
I think people have misunderstood this list. It's not a list of "Actors You Hate"; it's the "Worst Actors." Zac Efron sucks a lot more than Johnny Depp, who isn't actually that bad. Furthermore, Lindsay Lohan would be completely awful if it weren't for her role in Mean Girls.
He is so horrible he should be in the top 5. And what the hell is Johnny Depp doing on this list?!? He should be on the most genius actors ever list. This is screwed up.
I hate this annoying low-life actor. I mean, he's definitely the worst. Hot? Haha, I'm laughing just at that one word. He's anything but hot or good at acting. He's bad too. I can't even watch his movies a second time.

Forget his looks, he brings no depth to any character he plays. He fortunately gets offered good films but runs along the well-written storylines like a desperate child searching for his identity. He so badly wants to be good, but I feel no empathy in his films. There is nothing behind the eyes. Who forgets it's Brad Pitt during the film? No one. There is no hate here, just a sadness that better actors rarely get the chance to play a juicy role because of the box office Brad.
He is one of those pretty packages with nothing inside. If you want to ruin a film, hire this guy. He has no range in terms of characters. Benjamin Button could have been an interesting film... except for his wooden performance. The Tree of Life was amazingly bad. His accent in Inglorious Basterds was atrocious... embarrassing. I can't think of anything he was good in except for his first hit, A River Runs Through It... where he was perfectly cast.
Yes, he can act, but sometimes he pushes his luck too much with the type of characters he decides to play. Unfortunately, his handsomeness works against him sometimes when he plays a nerdy or serious character. The acting doesn't suck, but his handsomeness while the character is not supposed to be so makes it a less congruent character sometimes.
Brad Pitt should be much higher than #18. He is simply one of the most wooden, uninspiring actors in movie history. The man sounds like he's reading his lines off a piece of paper. Number 1 and number 2 are not only appropriate positions on the list for Brad Pitt and Keanu Reeves, but they are also accurate descriptions of their acting ability.

Totally relies on the "flash the big, expensive smile" trick to compensate for her significant lack of acting skills.
She is beyond self-absorbed and as shallow as they come. I cannot stand watching her ever, and I don't.
The big joke is when they cast her as a beautiful woman. Not!
Totally overrated, she's Pretty Woman in all her roles.

Definitely up there with the worst (using the word "actor" very loosely) actors of all time. How she got past auditions, I'll never know. Obviously, it's a case of "who you know" rather than "what you know" when it comes to this lack of talent.
Breathy! So breathy! If it weren't for sighing and rolling eyes, what else would she have left to act with?!
I wouldn't watch anything with her in it. She's an awful, awful actor.
Terrible, terrible, terrible actress!

Jessica Alba is only cast to show herself half naked. She is just as bad as Tara Reid but has a better body, so people put up with her. It's shameful because women make up less than a third of speaking roles in Hollywood, and her horrible acting is taking up too much of that low percentage so that people can ogle her breasts. Did people forget that we have models to ogle at, and they don't have to open their mouths?
Should be number one on the list. Watching her is like watching an acting student trying too hard. She thinks she's all that and has an ugly personality!
She could be on the 1 because she cannot act. She cannot become a good actor. She is a little bit ugly, oh sorry, very ugly or not. I want her on 1.
Beautiful but horrible actress... I have never seen a mediocre performance from Jessica Alba... only horrible and a little less horrible.

Bill played "Himself" in every role. No versatility.