Top 10 Inaccurate Death Battles
The Top Ten
The main reason for inaccuracy being the mega strike, due in part to the fact that Peach doesn't fly towards her opponent to kick them, and also who's to say it isn't just magic? But what people are saying is worse. Normal Zelda and Phantom Zelda are completely different, and composing them and letting Zelda just summon a phantom and jump into it as spirit Zelda right before is disappears would just make this even more inaccurate. I say summon a phantom because there would be no way to get one in their area. Besides Phantoms can be stopped in Wind Waker by attacking the red strings at the back of their armor. Try to make it more accurate by including other sources then Zelda just becomes more illogical and inconsistent than Peach, which really says something.
Someone needs to say it, 99% of the people who watched this had a Zelda bias. Look at YouTube comments, commenting how "defenseless" Peach is and how "badass" Zelda is. You guys really don't wanna listen when people don't agree, either. And you're talking about DEATH BATTLE being biased here? Okay, the Mega Strike was unnecessary, and that sheep shouldn't have fallen on Zelda. But those aren't the only reasons Peach got the win, DB just wanted to kill Zelda in a flashy way. And the Light Arrow thing? Peach has had reaction times of dodging Lightning, so she can see Zelda pulling out her bow. Maybe not firing, but pulling out the equipment takes a couple seconds. (Calling ScrewAttack! Death Battle because of their name change)
This is all I hear about disagreements here: Phantom Zelda, Hyrule Warriors, Light Arrows, Sheik. Mostly the last two. They talk about nothing actually important or outcome changing, and more about how "Athletic" Sheik is, even though Peach is also extremely Athletic as well. And you ask why Peach doesn't fight Bowser with her powers, well if Sheik is SO important then why didn't Zelda, in TP, transform into Sheik, knock out Zant when he invaded her castle, and acrobat the hell out of there? Shows just how much this death battle was littered with Zelda fans who know absolutely nothing about the opposing character...
This one was inaccurate. Zelda has magic while Peach has, like what. If you think Peach is strong then tell me how come she gets kidnapped in nearly every single mario game. Zelda should have won this but its just my opinion
This one is accurate. Mario may be a better series overall, but the Sonic characters are stronger in nearly every way.
Why is this here? The outcome would remain the same no matter how you spin this one.
Much like Mario vs Sonic, this battle had to many flaws.
Luigi far outclasses tails
But he really doesn't. This is actually one of the few fairly accurate Death Battles.
Starscream has traveled from Cybertron and back in Jet mode on multiple occasions, he is at least lightspeed.
Starscream's intelligence also seemed severely underplayed.
There's also the simple fact that Starscream cannot die and Rainbow dash has no way to bypass Starsceam's immortality hax.
This is the worst death battle, after Mario vs Sonic! Starscream, could have possess Rainbow Dash.
Even though I don't hate mlp fim I think starscream should of won
They are idiots if they think that Hyper sonic would be overkill on Mario. Even Super Sonic is enough to beat the plumber.
Plus, inconsistent and very linear research. They clearly only did this battle again so that Mario could win.
Though I don't want to insert full opinion, as much as I prefer Mario I think Sonic wins due to MASSIVE speed advantage and other stuff.
Uh no. Sonic definitely beats Mario. Why is this number 3? Realistically if Mario and Sonic fought, Sonic would win in less than a second.
Death Battle gets so many battles wrong, and a correct one is first? I mean, the reasoning could be better, but I overall agree.
Pit has fourth wall breaking skills that surpass deadpool in some aspects. like he has knowledge of many other video game characters that appeared on nintendo consoles. sora did do that, so there is a chance he knows who sora is and all of soras weaknesses.
They, didn't do enough research on pit, saying sora is faster, while pit is faster and not letting pit use his full potential.
Updated Sora stomps
Ben 10 wins. No contest. End of comment
OK not end of comment. Besides being green, and being aliens, these characters have nothing in common.
Yet another example of why using "composite" versions of characters is a bad idea. They used several versions of both characters, yet they didn't grand Ben access to the Ultimatrix. Also, Alien X is FAR more powerful than Wizard and Boomstick gave him credit for. Kuro the Artist, Chuck the Cyber Cuck, and Just a Robot all explained this when they power scaled Ben's aliens themselves.
Ben might have went back in time a bit, but Green Lantern did a cheap move and went back to the very beginning of the fight (actually, even a bit before that) and cut off Ben's left arm. WITH SCISSORS. Whether the outcome is accurate or not, that move was cheap.
They literally contradict themselves when they try to explain the results. Not to mention that they compare green lantern to aliens that didn't even appear in the fight; making this entire episode feel like it was either rushed, cut, or possibly even altered last minute.
They factored in that Solaris feat which makes the Super Hedgehogs low multiversal since Solaris is a being that exists in all 3 timelines and has been stated that he can destroy dimensions and other universes. Since it did take 3 Super Hedgehogs to beat him, low multiversal would be a level that would make more sense than automatically making all of them multiversal. Plus this fight came out in 2011 which means that it came out WAY before Battle of Gods and Resurrection F. In a real fight, Shadow would make "VEGETAble soup for dinner!
Shadow was heavily downplayed. DB claimed that the super form can only last a few minutes even though that’s false. Sonic was able to stay in his super form for days in Sonic Advance. They also left out Shadow’s feat in defeating the past version of Solaris who was a super dimensional deity that was going to devour all timelines in the Sonic multiverse. Even then, they had Vegeta win simply due to plot-induced stupidity. When Shadow was teleporting Vegeta, he could’ve just teleported him into the sun and the fight would be over.
Nope, Vegeta deserved to win. Although maybe the explanation is inaccurate as seen by others.
Vegeta effortlessly defeats most of Sonic.
I’m not sure a split-second of contact would really do anything to wonder woman.
This is often talked about for several reasons. Mainly due to the incorrect math and verdict. Next there's the No Limits Fallacy they used for Yang's semblance. But the main reason this fight is so hated is because it was shameless promotional material for Volume 3 of RWBY, which unintentionally lead to the first Rooster Teeth Fan Exodus.
This is easily the episode I despite the most, not just because of the inaccurate outcome but because how Yang is portrayed in the fight. She behaves like a violent sociopathic during the fight and kills Tifa for doing her job. Worse still instead of punching Tifa in to oblivion ( which would have been a much better KO) Yang snaps Tifa's neck. Straight up murdering her. DB got everything wrong here. The math, the lore and the characters. Plus looking at the music that played, stuff in the background it's obvious the we're favoring Yang and promoting Rwby.
This whole episode screamed bias while shoving the Rooster Teeth sponsor in your face.
Somone on Screwattack actually did the math and PROVED this wrong. Look up "Yang vs. Tifa: filling in the blanks"
Generally hated the match-up in general. Not much correlation other than electricity, decent animation, and a flatout illogical death. Wasn't funny, either. Still better than Yang vs Tifa in my humble opinion.
God, I hate this Battle, Not only was it Unfair, Unfunny, and a terrible Matchup. But Pikachu Should of Stomped, He defeated Legendary Pokemon and when he was trained by Ash, Who was Blanka trained by? DAN HIBIKI!
Beating Legendary Pokemon is Nothing When Your Trained by DAN
In my opinion, it was the most unfair battle. Seriously, why would you put Pikachu against a guy resistant to electricity
It's completely stupid when they compare someone who controls electric powers to a Pikachu. Give them stronger opponent, not little poor Pikachu!
"OH, LOOK, A POWERFUL CHARACTER THAT CAN CONTROL ELECTRICITY! LET'S COMPARE IT TO PIKACHU! "
Why not Luxray or Electivire or Zapdos or heck, anyone else that controls electricity, not Pikachu? Leave him alone!
Just blatantly wrong research on this fight.
- They used Savage Hulk (the common "HULK SMASH" one) despite that being his weakest incarnation. If they were including World Breaker, then they should've given him the intelligence that Hulk had in that storyline
- Hulk never fought Sentry as World Breaker, he only went WB after the fight was over. He fought Marvel's equivalent of Superman to a stalemate while not even in his strongest form
- Also in the Sentry fight, Hulk didn't revert to Banner because his anger just ran itself out, it was because Sentry's aura has an innate calming effect, which is why he was brought to fight Hulk in the first place. Banner even Hulked out again not 10 minutes after the fight was over
- His healing is not tired to his anger, nowhere is that ever stated
- Hulk's strength was stated to be limitless by an omniscient being, so his anger's not just gonna "run out"
- For Doomsday, he isn't flat out immune to brute force as he's been ...more
This was also right, Spawn destroys Kratos.
Kratos Should have Won
Kratos is a GOD, WHY HIS LOSE FOR A DEVIL?
Did you just watch the Fight & Nothing Else not the Bio & Aftermath
Whoa, at least Charizard put up a good fight against Agumon! This battle is legit. Even if Tai didn't interfere with Red, Charizard was RECHARGING from Blast Burn. That's why it lost. Pokemon is the better franchise, but Digimon are stronger than Pokemon. Sorry, Charizard. :(
I prefer Pokemon over Digimon but honestly I agree that Digimon wins. Wargreymon should've been way bigger in the actual fight making it near impossible for Charizard to even hurt him.
This one is accurate. Even though I'm a huge pokemon fan, Digimon just straight up destroys pokemon
Pokemon is better not Digimon
Hey, does anyone have a link to Drax laughing from Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 2?
Nope, this one is right. Batman is just some rich dude with some fancy toys. Spider-Man on the other hand is not. He’s got superhuman strength and abilities. And two words: Spider Sense
Seriously, Darth Vader could win against Doom.
The new canon Darth Vader Is by way more powerful than Legends. He is able to defeat a highly tech army alone. The telekinesis proof of Doom is not apply to a Force User. Also Vader Is a better combatant than Doom.
Vader could decapitated Doom.
And if Vader can defeat Doom, the Emperor can literally destroy Doom to micro particles.
Vader would instantly murder Doom, end of story.
This one was incredibly dumb. They should've been putting Thor against Superman instead. Wonder Woman isn't like Thor anyways.
They lowballed Thor just so Wonder Woman could win.
It just feels like they let WW win so feminists didn't piss their pants.
How is this not on here?
Gaara, OP weilder of the Ichibi, has fought dozens of shinobi with all types of abilities loses to the girl who could barely stop a building from sinking.
Okay, DB, you do you.
Yup. A guy who can intercept amaterasu, catch a meteor, and block a city buster after it detonated loses to a girl much slower than sound who once held a sinking building, and once fell in a hole and could barely hold a couple tons of dirt and rocks from caving in. If they both tried to fight over the same grain of sand, Gara wouldn't even notice the amount of force she can apply...if she were fast enough to apply any before she died.
It was just wrong in most ways.
I will say nothing else
Bomberman was criminally under-researched in my opinion.
Not a Bomberman fanboy, but fhis one was inaccurate. REALLY inaccurate.
Guys, we have a problem. No one, and I repeat, NO ONE has voted for this massive dud in Season 1, yet I see a vote for a nonexistent "SpongeBob vs Pikachu" on here. Why is this a problem? Because the research for this fight was a complete mess. First of all, just because Dig Dug has better mobility in the ground doesn't mean anything. Especially when Bomberman is stronger than Regulus, who smashed the Omni Cube so hard it destroyed galaxies. Strength isn't everything, sure, but that doesn't mean Bomberman doesn't destroy Dig Dug in other categories too.
Bomberman's taken a planet-sized explosion at the end of Bomberman Hero, and no it's not subtle unlike other feats of durability, it's right in front of your face. Not to mention, he's not as dumb as rocks as portrayed in the fight. He's taken out other, more experienced bombermen, especially Black Bomber. The only reason they considered him stupid is because he can get trapped with his own bomb, which is player error. ...more
Yoshi is my favorite game character of all, but I seriously think they loved Yoshi too much and just wanted to keep him alive. Riptor is a brutal fighter who would have killed Yoshi right away.
This is also right. Yoshi effortlessly kills everyone in Killer Instinct.
Yoshi couldn't even fight Toad. That's how weak he is.
Worst Death Battle ever.
While I do think Tracer rightfully won, there is so many problems with this, that it's down right disappointing.
1) They did a horrible job of explaining Scout. The facts they mentioned were inaccurate, for example, they said if you use the Force-A-Nature with the Bonk! Atomic Punch, you get more mid air jumps. Two problems here. One, The Force-A-Nature does not give you more jumps with Bonk. The gun they're talking about is the Soda Popper. Two the soda on the Soda Popper is the Crit-A-Cola, not Bonk.
2) The Tracer in the battle used two specials. I don't know too much about Overwatch, but from what I've heard, this isn't possible.
3) In the battle, Scout was able to attack under the use of Bonk. That isn't possible. Plus, Tracer survived a taunt kill.
4) The Tracer "dodged" a bullet feat was bull. Widowmaker was not aiming at Tracer to begin with.
5) They go on, and on about how Scout runs and is fast. It's true. So why the hell does Scout mostly ...more
I think this is honestly the worst. It should have been a stomp for Scout if they actually correctly researched him. There lies so many problems in the battle in research.
1) They just keep going on and on about how fast Scout is. When it comes time for the battle though, he stands still most of the battle. The battle is more like Heavy vs Tracer. Even after saying how fast he is, fast enough to outrun automatic fire, they just lowball it and say he's only 2mph faster than your average human.
2) They've got the concept of Bonk wrong. They say the Bonk makes Scout invulnerable from damage, which is correct and can't use any guns which is also correct. The thing is, this also restricts the Bat, which Scout uses while under the effects in the battle. You can taunt kill though.
3) They mention that Scout has the Sandman which can stun enemies. Alright sweet, we know that Tracer is heavily walked by stuns. In the battle? Haha, nope. Scout doesn't even use it. They ...more
It's funny how they did make maths to calculate the strenght of balrog and tj combo by punching a robot few mts in the air and instakilling and elephant yet they wouldn't make the same for scout sending to fly a heavy weapons guy 82 feets in the air when using his taunt kill and instakilling a bear instead they just used wikipedia for the amount of sugar in the bonk atomic punch while they miscalculated tracet's reaction time to ridiculous degrees they could have make math to calculate:
how much stronger and tough must be scout in order to metabolize quickly all the sugar and radioactive waste in the can of bonk in just few seconds withouth dying cause any normal human or in this case a "glass cannon" would inmediately die by this
-how much strenght does scout needs in order to double jump: there's a video on youtube explaining that in order to double jump you would need the strenght of a nuclear warhead and kick the air below you so faster that would allow you to make a second ...more
You seriously have to put that old joke here?!?!
The one that shall not be mentioned
As someone who likes Death Battle, follows along by looking at the characters, and finds a lot of their winner choices to be accurate (despite the various mistakes they make), I have to say this is legit one of the least-accurate Death Battles thus far (particularly concerning the Carnage analysis, "hilariously nerfed" is putting it LIGHTLY). This is the case, and yet somehow it's still not nearly as bashed as other fights, including those with accurate victors (yes, that includes Superman and Green Lantern; sorry, folks, they're just that insane). If anything, it seems most people are fine with this one or now believe Lucy would indeed win when the best that could legit be accomplished of her is a double KO. That's being quite generous, though, as a fragile glass cannon pushing back against a nigh-unkillable eldritch abomination, she'd more than likely be the one stomped, not the one doing the stomping.
I actually really like this one. They were good opponents for each other, but carnage would’ve won, and they underestimated his speed
This fight just sucked badly. They hilariously nerfed Carnage while buffing Lucy acting like her best feats can be done with no effort.
I'd rather not talk about this one...
Really, if Boba Fett got his ass owned by a blind Han Solo I'm pretty sure Samus Aran could beat him. Not to mention Samus has a wider arsenal than Boba.
I personally think Boba Fett should have lost even more then he did in the Video because they made the mistake of giving him Beskar(Mandolorian metal) which is lightsaber resistant but Boba canonically only has Dura steel which is much weaker
Samus destroys Boba Fett in every way shape and form.