Top 10 Inaccurate Death Battles
They should do a sequel. It begins with past green lantern wanting to take the omnitrix to headquaters, but the moment he is about to take of to space, the omnitrix revives ben. Ben explains that the omnitrix will revive him when he dies. Or a different one could be present green lantern returns in the present, but alien x is still there, this confuses green lantern, alien x explains he will notice all of green lanterns time manipulation.
True green lantern has a chance of defeating ben, but not in the way death battle showed. In order to defeat ben, hal should have done something that causes serena and bellicus to prevent ben from doing something and then do something quickly that alien x can't survive, like force him to go to anur vladus (planet which alien x can't survive). Or that they force ben 10 become human again and prevent him from using alien x because they
Ben 10 wins. No contest. End of comment
OK not end of comment. Besides being green, and being aliens, these characters have nothing in common.
Yet another example of why using "composite" versions of characters is a bad idea. They used several versions of both characters, yet they didn't grand Ben access to the Ultimatrix. Also, Alien X is FAR more powerful than Wizard and Boomstick gave him credit for. Kuro the Artist, Chuck the Cyber Cuck, and Just a Robot all explained this when they power scaled Ben's aliens themselves.
The main reason for inaccuracy being the mega strike, due in part to the fact that Peach doesn't fly towards her opponent to kick them, and also who's to say it isn't just magic? But what people are saying is worse. Normal Zelda and Phantom Zelda are completely different, and composing them and letting Zelda just summon a phantom and jump into it as spirit Zelda right before is disappears would just make this even more inaccurate. I say summon a phantom because there would be no way to get one in their area. Besides Phantoms can be stopped in Wind Waker by attacking the red strings at the back of their armor. Try to make it more accurate by including other sources then Zelda just becomes more illogical and inconsistent than Peach, which really says something.
Someone needs to say it, 99% of the people who watched this had a Zelda bias. Look at YouTube comments, commenting how "defenseless" Peach is and how "badass" Zelda is. You guys really don't wanna listen when people don't agree, either. And you're talking about DEATH BATTLE being biased here? Okay, the Mega Strike was unnecessary, and that sheep shouldn't have fallen on Zelda. But those aren't the only reasons Peach got the win, DB just wanted to kill Zelda in a flashy way. And the Light Arrow thing? Peach has had reaction times of dodging Lightning, so she can see Zelda pulling out her bow. Maybe not firing, but pulling out the equipment takes a couple seconds. (Calling ScrewAttack! Death Battle because of their name change)
This is all I hear about disagreements here: Phantom Zelda, Hyrule Warriors, Light Arrows, Sheik. Mostly the last two. They talk about nothing actually important or outcome changing, and more about how "Athletic" Sheik is, even though Peach is also extremely Athletic as well. And you ask why Peach doesn't fight Bowser with her powers, well if Sheik is SO important then why didn't Zelda, in TP, transform into Sheik, knock out Zant when he invaded her castle, and acrobat the hell out of there? Shows just how much this death battle was littered with Zelda fans who know absolutely nothing about the opposing character...
This one was inaccurate. Zelda has magic while Peach has, like what. If you think Peach is strong then tell me how come she gets kidnapped in nearly every single mario game. Zelda should have won this but its just my opinion
This one is accurate. Mario may be a better series overall, but the Sonic characters are stronger in nearly every way.
Why is this here? The outcome would remain the same no matter how you spin this one.
Much like Mario vs Sonic, this battle had to many flaws.
Luigi far outclasses tails
They are idiots if they think that Hyper sonic would be overkill on Mario. Even Super Sonic is enough to beat the plumber.
Plus, inconsistent and very linear research. They clearly only did this battle again so that Mario could win.
Though I don't want to insert full opinion, as much as I prefer Mario I think Sonic wins due to MASSIVE speed advantage and other stuff.
Uh no. Sonic definitely beats Mario. Why is this number 3? Realistically if Mario and Sonic fought, Sonic would win in less than a second.
Death Battle gets so many battles wrong, and a correct one is first? I mean, the reasoning could be better, but I overall agree.
Starscream has traveled from Cybertron and back in Jet mode on multiple occasions, he is at least lightspeed.
Starscream's intelligence also seemed severely underplayed.
There's also the simple fact that Starscream cannot die and Rainbow dash has no way to bypass Starsceam's immortality hax.
This is the worst death battle, after Mario vs Sonic! Starscream, could have possess Rainbow Dash.
Even though I don't hate mlp fim I think starscream should of won
Pit has fourth wall breaking skills that surpass deadpool in some aspects. like he has knowledge of many other video game characters that appeared on nintendo consoles. sora did do that, so there is a chance he knows who sora is and all of soras weaknesses.
They, didn't do enough research on pit, saying sora is faster, while pit is faster and not letting pit use his full potential.
Updated Sora stomps
They factored in that Solaris feat which makes the Super Hedgehogs low multiversal since Solaris is a being that exists in all 3 timelines and has been stated that he can destroy dimensions and other universes. Since it did take 3 Super Hedgehogs to beat him, low multiversal would be a level that would make more sense than automatically making all of them multiversal. Plus this fight came out in 2011 which means that it came out WAY before Battle of Gods and Resurrection F. In a real fight, Shadow would make "VEGETAble soup for dinner!
Shadow was heavily downplayed. DB claimed that the super form can only last a few minutes even though that’s false. Sonic was able to stay in his super form for days in Sonic Advance. They also left out Shadow’s feat in defeating the past version of Solaris who was a super dimensional deity that was going to devour all timelines in the Sonic multiverse. Even then, they had Vegeta win simply due to plot-induced stupidity. When Shadow was teleporting Vegeta, he could’ve just teleported him into the sun and the fight would be over.
Nope, Vegeta deserved to win. Although maybe the explanation is inaccurate as seen by others.
Vegeta effortlessly defeats most of Sonic.
Why did Zoro win? Erza had better defenses and only lost because she took off her armor. Why did she do that again? Zorro is just a guy with a bunch of swords
This is often talked about for several reasons. Mainly due to the incorrect math and verdict. Next there's the No Limits Fallacy they used for Yang's semblance. But the main reason this fight is so hated is because it was shameless promotional material for Volume 3 of RWBY, which unintentionally lead to the first Rooster Teeth Fan Exodus.
This is easily the episode I despite the most, not just because of the inaccurate outcome but because how Yang is portrayed in the fight. She behaves like a violent sociopathic during the fight and kills Tifa for doing her job. Worse still instead of punching Tifa in to oblivion ( which would have been a much better KO) Yang snaps Tifa's neck. Straight up murdering her. DB got everything wrong here. The math, the lore and the characters. Plus looking at the music that played, stuff in the background it's obvious the we're favoring Yang and promoting Rwby.
This whole episode screamed bias while shoving the Rooster Teeth sponsor in your face.
Somone on Screwattack actually did the math and PROVED this wrong. Look up "Yang vs. Tifa: filling in the blanks"
They really should have waited until after Resurrection F came out. As of that movie, I feel like Goku would actually have a shot.
He said post crisis superman but they still used pre crisis feats
Not fair because Goku will kill him in 10 seconds
I’m not sure a split-second of contact would really do anything to wonder woman.
Generally hated the match-up in general. Not much correlation other than electricity, decent animation, and a flatout illogical death. Wasn't funny, either. Still better than Yang vs Tifa in my humble opinion.
God, I hate this Battle, Not only was it Unfair, Unfunny, and a terrible Matchup. But Pikachu Should of Stomped, He defeated Legendary Pokemon and when he was trained by Ash, Who was Blanka trained by? DAN HIBIKI!
In my opinion, it was the most unfair battle. Seriously, why would you put Pikachu against a guy resistant to electricity
It's completely stupid when they compare someone who controls electric powers to a Pikachu. Give them stronger opponent, not little poor Pikachu!
"OH, LOOK, A POWERFUL CHARACTER THAT CAN CONTROL ELECTRICITY! LET'S COMPARE IT TO PIKACHU! "
Why not Luxray or Electivire or Zapdos or heck, anyone else that controls electricity, not Pikachu? Leave him alone!
Just blatantly wrong research on this fight.
- They used Savage Hulk (the common "HULK SMASH" one) despite that being his weakest incarnation. If they were including World Breaker, then they should've given him the intelligence that Hulk had in that storyline
- Hulk never fought Sentry as World Breaker, he only went WB after the fight was over. He fought Marvel's equivalent of Superman to a stalemate while not even in his strongest form
- Also in the Sentry fight, Hulk didn't revert to Banner because his anger just ran itself out, it was because Sentry's aura has an innate calming effect, which is why he was brought to fight Hulk in the first place. Banner even Hulked out again not 10 minutes after the fight was over
- His healing is not tired to his anger, nowhere is that ever stated
- Hulk's strength was stated to be limitless by an omniscient being, so his anger's not just gonna "run out"
- For Doomsday, he isn't flat out immune to brute force as he's been ...more
How is this one so far down? Whether you think Superman should’ve won or not, this DB was fraught with poor research. Siting multiple canons, non-canons, and using feats from Saiyan Saga Goku and calling Superman “limitless” even though he’s not. Again, not necessarily implying that Goku should have won, just that they wanked Superman to the point of borderline omnipotence while using speed feats from early DBZ for Goku. If you are a DBZ fan, you have the right to be upset at this gross misrepresentation of the character you favoured. And if you are a Superman fan, you should be dissatisfied by the hollow victory presented in this Death Battle, because if Superman really is the better player, then you deserve a true victory.
When I made this list, I did NOT say that it would include accurate ones. Superman would beat Goku.
Really should be #1.
This was also right, Spawn destroys Kratos.
Kratos Should have Won
Kratos is a GOD, WHY HIS LOSE FOR A DEVIL?
Whoa, at least Charizard put up a good fight against Agumon! This battle is legit. Even if Tai didn't interfere with Red, Charizard was RECHARGING from Blast Burn. That's why it lost. Pokemon is the better franchise, but Digimon are stronger than Pokemon. Sorry, Charizard. :(
I prefer Pokemon over Digimon but honestly I agree that Digimon wins. Wargreymon should've been way bigger in the actual fight making it near impossible for Charizard to even hurt him.
This one is accurate. Even though I'm a huge pokemon fan, Digimon just straight up destroys pokemon
Pokemon is better not Digimon
Yoshi is my favorite game character of all, but I seriously think they loved Yoshi too much and just wanted to keep him alive. Riptor is a brutal fighter who would have killed Yoshi right away.
This is also right. Yoshi effortlessly kills everyone in Killer Instinct.
Yoshi couldn't even fight Toad. That's how weak he is.
Worst Death Battle ever.
I agree that Kirby would defeat Buu (assuming you don't powerscale Buu to ridiculous levels that are far superior to anything he's displayed, as the DBZ community loves to do), the explanation was weak at best. They mention Kirby is physically equal and, at points, superior to Buu. While this is likely true (he did punch a moon-sized meteor so hard it was sent flying away four thousand times faster than it arrived, defeated an omnipotent being in what was basically an arm wrestle, and threw a monster out of the galaxy) they showcased...none of these feats. In fact, the only two they mentioned were both of them surviving planet-explosions (and somehow thinking it meant for for Kirby than it did for Buu) and Kirby throwing a 3 ton monster at escape velocity, a feat Buu has already far surpassed. Love the animation, but the explanation could have used plenty of work. Heck, they didn't even mention that Buu was weak to positive energy, which Kirby is literally composed of.
Sigh, The Episode that made The Death Battle Fanon Wiki think Kirby is the Strongest Character, And HE'S NOT!
Kirby effortlessly beats Buu.
Gaara, OP weilder of the Ichibi, has fought dozens of shinobi with all types of abilities loses to the girl who could barely stop a building from sinking.
Okay, DB, you do you.
Yup. A guy who can intercept amaterasu, catch a meteor, and block a city buster after it detonated loses to a girl much slower than sound who once held a sinking building, and once fell in a hole and could barely hold a couple tons of dirt and rocks from caving in. If they both tried to fight over the same grain of sand, Gara wouldn't even notice the amount of force she can apply...if she were fast enough to apply any before she died.
It was just wrong in most ways.
I will say nothing else
Nope, this one is right. Batman is just some rich dude with some fancy toys. Spider-Man on the other hand is not. He’s got superhuman strength and abilities. And two words: Spider Sense
Long live spider man
If they've read both of their comics, they should know that although Batman defeated other super soldiers, Captain America actually fought other soldiers that are 2 to 10 time as powerful as he is. They downplayed the super soldier/leader of the Avengers while giving the Dark Knight too many advantages despite the fact that even though he could beat other skilled combatants, he isn't the individual who can beat powerful or close-to-powerful beings without having or using their weaknesses (ex., he can't beat Superman without using or having Kryptonite).
This one was incredibly dumb. They should've been putting Thor against Superman instead. Wonder Woman isn't like Thor anyways.
They lowballed Thor just so Wonder Woman could win.
It just feels like they let WW win so feminists didn't piss their pants.
How is this not on here?