Top 10 Most Inaccurate ScrewAttack Death Battles
I like the part where they used screen timing to decide how fast the omnitrix was vs the scissors. Like bro you can't ANIMATE the speed of light in real time so of course it took "2.1 seconds" for the big bang to reach ben. Major L on this one
They literally contradict themselves when they try to explain the results. Not to mention that they compare green lantern to aliens that didn't even appear in the fight; making this entire episode feel like it was either rushed, cut, or possibly even altered last minute.
Ben might have went back in time a bit, but Green Lantern did a cheap move and went back to the very beginning of the fight (actually, even a bit before that) and cut off Ben's left arm. WITH SCISSORS. Whether the outcome is accurate or not, that move was cheap.
The main reason for inaccuracy being the mega strike, due in part to the fact that Peach doesn't fly towards her opponent to kick them, and also who's to say it isn't just magic? But what people are saying is worse. Normal Zelda and Phantom Zelda are completely different, and composing them and letting Zelda just summon a phantom and jump into it as spirit Zelda right before is disappears would just make this even more inaccurate. I say summon a phantom because there would be no way to get one in their area. Besides Phantoms can be stopped in Wind Waker by attacking the red strings at the back of their armor. Try to make it more accurate by including other sources then Zelda just becomes more illogical and inconsistent than Peach, which really says something.
This is all I hear about disagreements here: Phantom Zelda, Hyrule Warriors, Light Arrows, Sheik. Mostly the last two. They talk about nothing actually important or outcome changing, and more about how "Athletic" Sheik is, even though Peach is also extremely Athletic as well. And you ask why Peach doesn't fight Bowser with her powers, well if Sheik is SO important then why didn't Zelda, in TP, transform into Sheik, knock out Zant when he invaded her castle, and acrobat the hell out of there? Shows just how much this death battle was littered with Zelda fans who know absolutely nothing about the opposing character...
"Tails is stronger too, he can lift 10 tons while Luigi struggles to lift a radish." The radish thing was just a dream, and Luigi can lift a castle and kick it with ease. Inside the castle was big too, and since Tails is afraid of lightning, Luigi can use his Thunderhand abilities to scare away Tails. Luigi tanked a supernova and a black hole without a scratch. Mr. L curbstomps Tails too, and they ignored that Luigi fought and defeated Dreamy Bowser who is universal or multiversal. Bowser also tried to erase Luigi too and nothing happened. Luigi can scale to Mario, who can harm Dimentio in base form. Dimentio was going to end the whole Marioverse, and Mario fought Culex, who controls time. And in Mario-Kun, Bowser defeated the author of the manga. Yet, Luigi still defeats him. The Pure Hearts and Star Rod would end Tails. Heck, not even Archie Tails could beat Luigi!
They said Luigie can't lift a vegetable from a game in a dream. Luigi should be compare to Mario and tails should be compare to sonic and Mario beat Sonic so why wouldn't Luigi
Honestly they mention that Starscream is crazy smart and then have him use no strategy. Also he's done space travel, so he's gotta be fast right?
Starscream was way more durable to tank any of Rainbow Dash's attacks. They also ignored so many feats of Starscream and downplaying the hell out of him.
Starscream has traveled from Cybertron and back in Jet mode on multiple occasions, he is at least lightspeed.
Starscream's intelligence also seemed severely underplayed.
There's also the simple fact that Starscream cannot die and Rainbow dash has no way to bypass Starsceam's immortality hax.
They are idiots if they think that Hyper sonic would be overkill on Mario. Even Super Sonic is enough to beat the plumber.
Plus, inconsistent and very linear research. They clearly only did this battle again so that Mario could win.
The superstar lasted way too long, and hyper sonic should have crushed Mario anyway. AND you can only have 5 clones. Seriously. Sonic crushes Mario easily. The 2011 version is more accurate, for heaven's sake.
Though I don't want to insert full opinion, as much as I prefer Mario I think Sonic wins due to MASSIVE speed advantage and other stuff.
Why did Zoro win? Erza had better defenses and only lost because she took off her armor. Why did she do that again? Zorro is just a guy with a bunch of swords
They, didn't do enough research on pit, saying sora is faster, while pit is faster and not letting pit use his full potential.
Especially funny now that Sora is in Smash Bros, and Pit now has Palutena's Guidance on him.
Pit has fourth wall breaking skills that surpass deadpool in some aspects. like he has knowledge of many other video game characters that appeared on nintendo consoles. sora did do that, so there is a chance he knows who sora is and all of soras weaknesses.
"One Touch" right because Wonder Woman has never done a single fight without her full strength.
I'm not sure a split-second of contact would really do anything to wonder woman.
Season 1 be like
Shadow was heavily downplayed. DB claimed that the super form can only last a few minutes even though that's false. Sonic was able to stay in his super form for days in Sonic Advance. They also left out Shadow's feat in defeating the past version of Solaris who was a super dimensional deity that was going to devour all timelines in the Sonic multiverse. Even then, they had Vegeta win simply due to plot-induced stupidity. When Shadow was teleporting Vegeta, he could've just teleported him into the sun and the fight would be over.
Worst DEATH BATTLE! Ever! They said that Vegeta would last long enough to survive Super Shadow but Sonic was able to stay in his super form for days, so Shadow could've done the same. And Super Shadow is multiversal+ as he defeated Solaris who eats dimensions and timelines for lunch. Vegeta can't touch that, and Shadow scales to Sonic.
They factored in that Solaris feat which makes the Super Hedgehogs low multiversal since Solaris is a being that exists in all 3 timelines and has been stated that he can destroy dimensions and other universes. Since it did take 3 Super Hedgehogs to beat him, low multiversal would be a level that would make more sense than automatically making all of them multiversal. Plus this fight came out in 2011 which means that it came out WAY before Battle of Gods and Resurrection F. In a real fight, Shadow would make "VEGETAble soup for dinner!"
I never understood why people think Superman can beat goku. Doomsday literally destroys Superman although being significantly slower than him and goku has extreme strength just like doomsday being faster AND being a better fighter. How did it ever make sense for Superman to win?
They took pre crisis supes feats but were fighting with post crisis supes, they also low balled goku by not including that in his fight with beerus he nearly shattered a universe 9 times bigger than our own in SSG.
They really should have waited until after Resurrection F came out. As of that movie, I feel like Goku would actually have a shot.
Gray was immune to cold in his devil form, this was confirmed in Fairy Tail.
The reason for them to give Doomsday the victory is that he will wear Hulk"s healing factor and thus weaken him.
This is all under the assumption that Doomsday could compare to Sentry and Zeus but both would crush the kryptonian monster.
Doomsday has never been shown to be immune to being killed by brute force.
I think what they meant was due to Doomsday"s superior speed his attacks would quote unquote outrun Hulk"s healing factor.
However Hulk has shown to have feats such as destroying an entire planet and surviving a supernova so i suppose Hulk could put Doomsday down before his healing factor is overtaxed.
To make it short Hulk should have won as soon as he went Worldbreaker.
At least they din"t include the healing factor shtick in Hulk vs Broly.
This is a PEAK example of their composite-maker fallacy. Doomsday has been smacked up by blunt force plenty of times, and World Breaker got NEUTURED for this video.
How is this one so far down? Whether you think Superman should've won or not, this DB was fraught with poor research. Siting multiple canons, non-canons, and using feats from Saiyan Saga Goku and calling Superman "limitless" even though he's not. Again, not necessarily implying that Goku should have won, just that they wanked Superman to the point of borderline omnipotence while using speed feats from early DBZ for Goku. If you are a DBZ fan, you have the right to be upset at this gross misrepresentation of the character you favoured. And if you are a Superman fan, you should be dissatisfied by the hollow victory presented in this Death Battle, because if Superman really is the better player, then you deserve a true victory.
At base Dbz he was strong enough to destroy planets, with a 400x ssj3 increase and then another 10 times increase with ssj4. Because dbz doesn't follow logic it does not look like the power increases that much, but by the math goku's power is increased by 4000x his base.
Generally hated the match-up in general. Not much correlation other than electricity, decent animation, and a flatout illogical death. Wasn't funny, either. Still better than Yang vs Tifa in my humble opinion.
God, I hate this Battle, Not only was it Unfair, Unfunny, and a terrible Matchup. But Pikachu Should of Stomped, He defeated Legendary Pokemon and when he was trained by Ash, Who was Blanka trained by? DAN HIBIKI!
This is a difficult one to measure and they shouldn't have done it because there is no direct power scaling.
Okay I know that "the animations don't always portray how the fight would actually go" but they had Yang get smacked up by a FULL limit break and live? yeah okay, that thing had enough damage to kill the Red Dragon 3 times over, but Yang survives it with being barely dazed, and still with enough sense to get mad over her hair? This is an ad disguised as a fight, but the fight is just three ads in a trench coat.
This is easily the episode I despite the most, not just because of the inaccurate outcome but because how Yang is portrayed in the fight. She behaves like a violent sociopathic during the fight and kills Tifa for doing her job. Worse still instead of punching Tifa in to oblivion ( which would have been a much better KO) Yang snaps Tifa's neck. Straight up murdering her. DB got everything wrong here. The math, the lore and the characters. Plus looking at the music that played, stuff in the background it's obvious the we're favoring Yang and promoting Rwby.
How would Kratos win this exactly? Infinity strength and speed Kratos with absolutely nonsensical narrations and indirect media? Oh wait they already did the same thing to Dragonborn.
This was also right, Spawn destroys Kratos.
Spawn, survives a supernova unharmed and climbs out of a black hole
Kratos makes transparently false boasts
I agree that Kirby would defeat Buu (assuming you don't powerscale Buu to ridiculous levels that are far superior to anything he's displayed, as the DBZ community loves to do), the explanation was weak at best. They mention Kirby is physically equal and, at points, superior to Buu. While this is likely true (he did punch a moon-sized meteor so hard it was sent flying away four thousand times faster than it arrived, defeated an omnipotent being in what was basically an arm wrestle, and threw a monster out of the galaxy) they showcased...none of these feats. In fact, the only two they mentioned were both of them surviving planet-explosions (and somehow thinking it meant for for Kirby than it did for Buu) and Kirby throwing a 3 ton monster at escape velocity, a feat Buu has already far surpassed. Love the animation, but the explanation could have used plenty of work. Heck, they didn't even mention that Buu was weak to positive energy, which Kirby is literally composed of.
Kirby effortlessly beats Buu.
Okay, I like both, but Pokemon is not necessarily "better" than Digimon unless you're comparing the games. Digimon has a better anime with new villains, while Pokemon anime adds new villains, but they don't even battle Ash because of repetitive Team Rocket. I just hate Team Rocket already, and I ALWAYS hated Meowth. Digimon doesn't have as many good games compared to Pokemon, but still, Digimon are stronger than Pokemon. They can digivolve into something much more powerful than Pokemon's evolution. Now, don't get me wrong, I like Pokemon and its games (kind of its anime), but NOT Pokemon Go. I just don't like that game. I am NOT saying that I hate Pokemon Go or anyone who plays Pokemon Go; I am just saying that I don't like Pokemon Go.
Zeedmillenniummon could beat all of Pokemon.
P.S. I am not a huge watcher of anime, but that does NOT mean I hate or dislike anime; I just don't watch it that much.
Yoshi is my favorite game character of all, but I seriously think they loved Yoshi too much and just wanted to keep him alive. Riptor is a brutal fighter who would have killed Yoshi right away.
This is also right. Yoshi effortlessly kills everyone in Killer Instinct.
Yoshi couldn't even fight Toad. That's how weak he is.
If they've read both of their comics, they should know that although Batman defeated other super soldiers, Captain America actually fought other soldiers that are 2 to 10 time as powerful as he is. They downplayed the super soldier/leader of the Avengers while giving the Dark Knight too many advantages despite the fact that even though he could beat other skilled combatants, he isn't the individual who can beat powerful or close-to-powerful beings without having or using their weaknesses (ex., he can't beat Superman without using or having Kryptonite).
How does spiderman beat batman but captain America can't?
Remember the part where Rock Lee dropped the weights and STILL got outsped? Remember the part where Rock Lee was fast enough to make Naruto lose sight of him? Remember the part where Toph moved anything faster than Human Sprinting speed? Oh you DON'T remember that part? huh that's wild!
Yup. A guy who can intercept amaterasu, catch a meteor, and block a city buster after it detonated loses to a girl much slower than sound who once held a sinking building, and once fell in a hole and could barely hold a couple tons of dirt and rocks from caving in. If they both tried to fight over the same grain of sand, Gara wouldn't even notice the amount of force she can apply...if she were fast enough to apply any before she died.
Garra is a ninja, Sand isn't the only thing he can use, In death battle they should have used strongest version of garra which is with Shukkaku, Garaa has taken an attack that could have caused massive destruction to the hidden sand village, far more than anyone in ATLA except for Aang.
In the Batman vs Ironman fight, Batman uses his hell at suit, which they completely left out of this fight, and which would have decapitated Spider-Man in a single hit. Batman would destroy black panther as well with the same suit.
Nope, this one is right. Batman is just some rich dude with some fancy toys. Spider-Man on the other hand is not. He's got superhuman strength and abilities. And two words: Spider Sense
Long live spider man
This one was incredibly dumb. They should've been putting Thor against Superman instead. Wonder Woman isn't like Thor anyways.
They lowballed Thor just so Wonder Woman could win.
Thor probably wins. I'm not an expert tho