Top 10 Best Music Debates
There have always been music debates. Here's some of them.Please add more.
Both are great songs. Stairway to Heaven tells a story and is very iconic (and no, they did not steal it - it has been confirmed). It's one of my favorite songs, with one of the greatest guitar solos.
However, I prefer Bohemian Rhapsody because it is unlike any other music from that time. It's unique and fun to sing along with.
Both are good. Stairway tells a story and is very iconic (and no, they did not steal it - it is confirmed). It's one of my favorite songs, along with one of the greatest guitar solos. But I prefer Bohemian Rhapsody because it is nothing like other music made in those days. It is unique and fun to sing along with.
Elvis. Michael is good too, but I just don't seem to really enjoy him.
Michael. Elvis is good too, but I just don't really enjoy his music.
Elvis! And I'm not a fan of either of them.
Lennon's range was once mind-boggling, but McCartney's voice was much more distinctive, with qualities suited to several sub-genres.
McCartney's range was once mind-boggling, but Lennon's voice was much more distinctive, with qualities suited to several sub-genres.
Paul McCartney has a better range, but John Lennon has an iconic soft voice. Paul McCartney still wins.
Elvis was a more influential rock artist.
Freddie had better singing abilities.
Elvis was a more influential rock artist.
Freddie had better singing abilities.
Freddie. I love Elvis, but Freddie had an amazing vocal range.
Freddie was the best singer, and we all know it. However, Robert Plant had very good vocals, even though his singing technique wasn't the best.
Definitely Freddie, but Plant is very good too.
Definitely Freddie, but Plant is very good too.
Iron Maiden went downhill in the '90s and haven't really recovered. Metallica had Blaze Bayley for a while, but even then, they produced some of their best live songs, like Sign of the Cross and The Clansman. Check out the Rock in Rio live versions because they will blow your mind. The studio versions are good too.
Metallica's band members also have better and more likable personalities.
Metallica went downhill in the '90s and haven't really gotten back up. Iron Maiden had Blaze Bayley for a while, but even then, they produced some of their best live songs, such as Sign of the Cross and The Clansman. Check out the Rock in Rio live versions of both of those songs - they will blow your mind. The studio versions are good too.
Maiden's band members also have better and more likable personalities.
I'll go with Metallica. Megadeth is a great thrash band, but Metallica did other styles well too, just not as well as they did thrash. Plus, Metallica's success led to the creation of Megadeth.
I'll go with Metallica. Megadeth is a great thrash band, but Metallica did stuff other than thrash well, just not as good as they did thrash. Plus, Metallica caused Megadeth to be created.
Metallica definitely has a better singer, but Megadeth was slightly more talented. Rust in Peace is one of the best metal albums of all time, both lyrically and instrumentally.
Rebecca is only hated for Friday. Justin has some decent songs, and Nicki has nothing to redeem her.
Rebecca is only hated for Friday. Nicki has some decent songs, and Justin has nothing to redeem him.
If you're talking pure rock 'n' roll (with inherent forays into R&B), it's the Stones every time.
Led Zeppelin, definitely. The Stones aren't bad at all, but they weren't as talented as Zep.
I like Led Zeppelin more, but the Stones are also awesome.
Ritchie Blackmore. Page is extremely overrated.
Page. Ritchie Blackmore is extremely overrated.
The Newcomers
Both songs are quite mediocre, but In The End has better lyrics, so I'll go with that.
Meh, Linkin Park has had better songs, and I'm beginning to like Minutes to Midnight and The Hunting Party more than their first two albums.
Neither, because both songs suck.
Neither. When Eric Clapton quit the Yardbirds, he was replaced by Jeff Beck, and nobody missed Clapton. When Jeff Beck left the Yardbirds, he was replaced by Jimmy Page, and everybody wanted Jeff Beck to come back. Out of frustration, Page changed the group's name to Led Zeppelin.
Guys, that's why I made this list. All of them/these are very famous and almost close to their competitors. These are ongoing debates.
Anyway, I prefer Page over Clapton. He could play more genres of rock than Clapton. He also created some hardcore guitar riffs and solos, which led hard rock to heavy metal.
Deep Purple. Black Sabbath played heavy blues rock in the '70s (confirmed by Tony Iommi himself), but metal has nothing to do with blues. Heavy metal and heavy blues rock are stylistically different - metal uses classical scales, not blues scales. For the same reason, Led Zeppelin have never been a metal band - they were also blues-inspired. So, Deep Purple is the answer - they had classically inspired songs.
I wish someone had added Led Zeppelin to the debate.
Deep Purple and what Metal_Treasure said.
I can't choose - both are awesome. But Gillan started it all, especially in metal singing, so Halford himself was influenced by Gillan. Gillan was also Bruce Dickinson's vocal idol.
Brian is more energetic.
Rush, because they're more original. Led Zeppelin plagiarizes out of sheer laziness.
Led Zeppelin is a tighter band. However, Rush is, overall, more talented.
Those who prefer vocals usually choose Axl, while those who enjoy guitar more often choose Slash.
I like guitar, but I think Axl is better for me.
Slash's guitar solos sound very soothing, while Axl's voice can get quite grating.
I have no idea. Both are equally talented.
Of those choices, Whitney Houston easily takes the cake.
Personally, I can only tolerate the first two.
Well, most people would say Madonna. Some argue that it's Janet Jackson, though.