Top 10 Reasons Why Nirvana is Better Than Stone Temple Pilots

I know that people don't like comparison lists. I honestly don't blame them and trust me this will be the only comparison list I'll ever make. If you disagree with me that's fine just don't be a douche about it.

The Top Ten

1 Better instrumentation

I'm sorry, but this list is just a big fat no. Almost everything on this list applies more to Stone Temple Pilots than it does Nirvana. Scott Weiland had a much more diverse vocal range than Kurt. Just listen to his vocals on Core and Purple, then compare them to the vocals on Tiny Music. It practically sounds like a different singer, that's how wide Scott's Vocal range is. Also, STP is far more creative, incorporating elements of psychedelia, and experimenting much more than Nirvana. Sure, Nirvana is more raw, but STP has much more grand and lush production. If you prefer Nirvana, that's fine, I love Nirvana as well. But almost every reason on this list can apply to STP even more so. - mtndewlord

2 Better vocals
3 Better lyrics
4 Nirvana is more talented
5 Plush is one of the most mediocre songs ever made
6 Nirvana's raw and aggressive while Stone Temple Pilots is polished and dull
7 Stone Temple Pilots is one of the most mediocre Grunge bands of all time
8 Kurt Cobain was more creative than Scott Weiland
9 Scott Weiland is a average and mediocre singer
10 Nirvana's better live

The Contenders

11 Nirvana has more good albums

The only decent Stone Temple Pilots album in my opinion was High Rise, everything else bores me to pieces. Plus Bleach and In Utero are better than half of their damn discrography.

BAdd New Item