Top 10 Worst Rock Bands of All Time
Rock music: a sprawling, glorious mess of a genre that's given us everything from stadium-shaking anthems to bedroom ballads. It's a musical force that's soundtracked our lives, our loves, and our losses. But let's be real, not every band that's plugged in a guitar and screamed into a microphone has produced music worthy of our ears. In fact, some have created sounds so horrendous that they've earned a special place in the annals of musical infamy.Maybe they assault your eardrums with off-key vocals, or perhaps their lyrics are so mind-numbingly banal that they make you question the meaning of existence. It could be that their stage presence is so cringeworthy that it makes you want to crawl into a hole and hide. Whatever the reason, these bands have failed to strike a chord with listeners and critics alike.
Nickelback, a Canadian rock band formed in 1995, has often been criticized for their formulaic and repetitive music style. Despite their commercial success, they are frequently listed among the worst rock bands due to their perceived lack of originality. I recently watched Todd in the Shadows' newest Trainwreckords episode, which is Nickelback's 2014 release, "No Fixed Address," to further prove my point that Nickelback are nothing but laughingstocks. This album is where the band nearly abandons their pop rock sound for something much worse, straight-up pop, and it's what you would expect. There are a few tracks where they attempt to emulate disco and funk, but they ended up failing miserably.
There's one song where they try to go political, but the message ends up falling on its face. All throughout this album, it's nothing but new ideas being wasted. The only song that sounds closer to their original sound is probably "Make Me Believe Again". At least with other "butt rock" groups like Theory of a Deadman and Daughtry, there's some sense of quality…
The Jonas Brothers, an American pop rock band formed in 2005, are often criticized for their simplistic and juvenile music aimed primarily at a younger audience. Their polished image and commercial pop sound have drawn disdain from many rock music purists. Jonas Brothers play instruments and they can sing, but that doesn't mean they're pop rock. They are mostly popular because of their looks, and all their songs that they don't write are pretty much about the same thing. The lyrics don't promote anything that would ever help listeners in any way.
Also, other people are right. They didn't even work to get where they are. They got famous through Disney, and they are so lucky to be so flexible with their career because of this. Do they realize that? I don't think so.
"High heels, red dress, all by yourself, gotta catch my breath" - a line from one of their songs.
Black Veil Brides, known for their glam-metal image and theatrical performances, often receive negative reviews for their derivative music style. Critics argue that their focus on appearance overshadows their musical substance. I try to accept all types of music, but I just couldn't do that with this band. When I first saw them on a poster at Hot Topic, I honestly thought they were girls. Plus, the name threw me off. When I found out otherwise, it didn't really bother me - just a little. What did bother me was when I heard one of their songs for the first time. I'm pretty sure it was called Fallen Angels or something. The lyrics were way too repetitive and didn't mean much of anything. The creativity wasn't there, and it wasn't original.
Another thing: this list is so not accurate. For example, 30 Seconds to Mars is on this list, but at the same time, it's number 7 on the best rock bands of all time list. So if you're mad that your favorite band is on this list, take it lightly.
Limp Bizkit, an American rap rock band, has been frequently criticized for their abrasive and aggressive musical style. Many consider their music to be emblematic of the worst aspects of the nu-metal genre. This band should get a lot more hate. The only even slightly positive thing I can say about this god-awful band is that Wes Borland is a decent guitarist, not good, just decent. The lyrics are awful, such as "I did it for the Nookie now you can take a cookie." What? They are also rap-rock. If you are serious about being a rock band, you don't rap - or at least don't have the worst rapper ever, and that's what they have in Fred Durst.
I hate Fred Durst. I hate all of Limp Bizkit. In my opinion, they are the worst band ever. And don't get me wrong, I also really hate Nickelback and Creed, but to me, Limp Bizkit sucks more than ever. And also, why are amazing bands like Pink Floyd, Metallica, The Rolling Stones, The Beatles, and Queen above this terrible, terrible band?
Creed, a rock band from Florida, achieved massive commercial success in the late 1990s and early 2000s but is often derided for their earnest and overly dramatic style. Critics and listeners alike have mocked their bombastic and formulaic approach to rock music. The band itself has been heralded as "Nickelback, but worse" for multiple reasons. They are basically the living, breathing definition of late '90s/early 2000s butt rock. I mean, say what you will about Nickelback. At least you can make fun of their songs and Chad Kroeger's voice. Plus, some of their songs can be tolerable to some people, like "When We Stand Together."
Creed's music is just depressing to listen to. "With Arms Wide Open" has appeared on various "worst #1 singles" lists, alongside the likes of "London Bridge," "(You're) Havin' My Baby," "Glory of Love," and "Afternoon Delight." And don't forget Scott Stapp's voice, which lacks life and passion. Fortunately, the band broke up by the early 2010s, yet they continue to be ridiculed to this day.
Blood on the Dance Floor, an American electronic music group, is widely panned for their controversial lyrics and lack of musical sophistication. Their blend of crass themes and simplistic electronic beats has garnered substantial backlash. Blood on the Dance Floor is the reason Hot Topic is still in business, while at the same time giving it a bad reputation. They are also the reason D-list celebrities find themselves able to break the law and why suicidal teenagers find themselves turning to the "trendy emo" lifestyle. Furthermore, they are why dull and crass phantasms are gussied up and sold as "unique and individual." Blood on the Dance Floor is the reason the outlying social cliques of society are not seen as normal or sane.
Blood on the Dance Floor is a menace to society and the music industry. They are self-destructive and, in doing so, represent those who seek to destroy any real chance of genuine talent being seen and appreciated. Their message is brutal and downright atrocious. They say to their fanbase, "What's the matter, boys and girls? Not feeling too good? Has the world got you down? Well, don't use this opportunity to create a logical response channeled through audible discussion or works of art. Just buy our music and wallow in your own self-pity. Never change for anyone, and never change for yourself, despite the fact that you, along with many others in your situation, can actually do much better. Maybe someday, when you realize you can go no further, you'll be inspired by our music to swallow as many pills as possible and wash it all down with the bottles from under the sink. Or, if you're lucky, you can find the combination to your dad's gun closet and take it all out on the ones who made you this way. It is not your confused emotions or sense of self-entitlement that hurt you. No, it is everyone around you. They are responsible, and either way, they are going to pay. Make all the bad things go away."
Blood on the Dance Floor may not be the worst band from a technical standpoint. However, strictly for what they stand for (in addition to awful music), they are fiendish devils and should never have come to fruition.
Asking Alexandria, a British metalcore band, has faced criticism for their inconsistent sound and frequent lineup changes. Some fans and critics argue that their music lacks cohesion and originality. Complete garbage. I tried giving them a chance, and they blew it with their ear-splitting vocals and terrible single-chord riffs that just about anyone can play. The fanbase is full of annoying people who think this band is the best thing to happen to music since Louis Armstrong. Avoid this steaming pile of auditory garbage at all costs.
There goes screamo, then there goes pop, then screamo again. Almost every song of theirs has the same lyrics like "OH MY GOD!" Songs like "A Prophecy" and "The Final Episode" are examples. Really, they have no talent in songwriting.
Fall Out Boy, an American rock band from Wilmette, Illinois, has faced criticism for their evolution from a pop-punk sound to a more mainstream pop rock style. Some fans and critics feel their later work lacks the authenticity of their early music. It's infuriating that they have the audacity to call themselves alternative when they're clearly just guys singing generic lyrics to a plastic, unimaginative beat. But at least I can have a good laugh watching their fans think they know anything at all about art. They say that Fall Out Boy is not like today's music because they make real music, without realizing they are just as bad as the things they pretend to despise, only a million times more pretentious.
Plus, the lead singer decided he could perform Life On Mars, a masterpiece by King Bowie and one of my favorite songs. Lord, it made my ears vomit.
5 Seconds of Summer, an Australian pop rock band, has been criticized for their transition from a punk-influenced sound to a more polished pop style. Many rock purists dismiss their music as formulaic and lacking in depth. Why are good bands ranked above this poser band? This so-called rock band claims to be pop-punk, but they are not. Most, if not all, of their fans are little girls who have no idea what punk rock is. The only reason this boy band (yes, it is a boy band) is famous is because of One Direction, another boy band.
They write songs about girls all the time, much like One Direction. "She's Kinda Hot" is one of them. What kind of name is that? And yet they're called a rock band. They have an album called "She Looks So Perfect."
If they were truly rock, why would they tour with One Direction? And no, they cannot be compared to Green Day. Stop comparing them to Blink-182 or Green Day.
5 Seconds of Summer is a lame boy band that needs to stop making music for little girls.
If you want to listen to real pop-punk, listen to Green Day, Blink-182, My Chemical Romance, and The Offspring. If you want to listen to true punk rock, listen to Ramones, Sex Pistols, Black Flag, and The Clash.
Maroon 5, originally known for their funk rock roots, has faced criticism for their shift towards a more pop-oriented sound. Many feel that their later work prioritizes commercial appeal over musical quality. And yes, I am a bit sorry that I got a bit carried away with my opinion. I am actually a Chicago fan myself, primarily a fan of the '70s Terry Kath years (Chicago Transit Authority to Chicago XI). During their ongoing modern period, the band really shines brightest when they focus on jam-oriented material, not so much with ballads.
I am certainly not a fan of their '80s period, where Peter Cetera's vocal effects made him sound like a robot at times. And yes, the band nowadays is better than Maroon 5 in terms of quality, and I do know that Cetera's voice is much different than Adam Levine's. It's a stark contrast between a higher-pitched falsetto and a lower-pitched tenor voice.
Falling In Reverse, led by controversial frontman Ronnie Radke, has faced criticism for their genre-blending style and Radke's public persona. Some critics argue that their music is inconsistent and overly theatrical. First of all, I think Nickelback should be nowhere near #1. Sure, some of their songs have questionable lyrics and some may sound poppy, but they actually have very meaningful songs, and also some that are pretty heavy. They're nowhere near the best bands, but they also shouldn't be anywhere near the worst.
That aside, how is this joke band lower than them? Other joke bands like Brokencyde and BOTDF should probably be above this, but Falling in Reverse is probably one of the worst things that ever happened to music. Limp Bizkit and Creed are awful but high enough. Black Veil Brides might even be a bit overhated, but they're still pretty bad. Asking Alexandria, FOB, and 5SOS are also not great.
I like some of 30STM, but they sometimes try to rip off U2, which I don't like. By the way, I also hate U2, along with "classic rock" bands like Queen, the Beatles, and the Rolling Stones. Coldplay is not too good either. I would recommend Lifehouse, The Fray, and OneRepublic for people who want great pop rock. Linkin Park, Daughtry, and HU shouldn't be on the list. Maroon 5 isn't rock.
I don't like Cannibal Corpse or Poison, but Bon Jovi shouldn't be here, even though I don't listen to them. Imagine Dragons are another example of awful pop rock, and Mumford and Sons and Attila are also horrible.
Hollywood Undead, a rap rock band from Los Angeles, is often criticized for their blend of hip-hop and rock, which some find overly aggressive and lacking in depth. Their lyrics, often focused on dark and controversial themes, have also garnered negative attention. I had hoped the worst of this stuff was behind us, but apparently, this band is the biggest thing on MySpace. Where else? Again, this proves that bands rule teenyboppers' hearts. Can you imagine a cross between the worst aspects of rap, emo, and nu-metal? From wannabes wearing cheap masks from Spencer's? How about a combination of Linkin Park, My Chemical Romance, and Limp Bizkit?
These morons make Slipknot look like Tank or Witchfinder General. Everything about this band smacks of repulsive commercialism aimed at the lowest IQ high school dropouts. I live to crush stuff like this. I am now putting Asphyx in the CD player.
Cannibal Corpse, an American death metal band, is frequently criticized for their extremely graphic and violent lyrics. While they have a dedicated fan base in the death metal community, many find their music inaccessible and disturbing. As much as I like metal, this band is terrible. This is one of the main reasons why people hate metal. Their album covers are scary and disgusting. They sing about death. The vocals sound more like screaming than singing.
The main issue is that the people who like this band hate Taylor Swift because of her breakup songs, which is ironic when these guys write about death and sex with a dead body. How can breakup songs be much worse than songs about sex with dead bodies!
I mean, look at some of their song titles. This band tries too hard to be shocking and doesn't try hard enough to make music that you can actually listen to when you're not on a murder spree.
Brokencyde, a crunkcore band from New Mexico, is widely panned for their abrasive blend of screamo and crunk music. Their controversial lyrics and perceived lack of musical talent have made them a frequent target of ridicule. Brokencyde? More like Brokencrap! This has got to be the worst "band" ever! No, forget this! They shouldn't be called a band because they're lower than the worst. Radiohead is an OK band, and I kind of like them, but they shouldn't be on this list. Brokencyde should be number one! Here are some reasons why:
1. The Lyrics
I like songs with good lyrics that either convey emotion and/or a message, tell a story, or all of the above. But their songs have the worst lyrics ever written! Even Blink-182 and Maroon 5 have better lyrics than those sick freaks. Their lyrics aren't even generic and mediocre at best. They're disgusting, gross, inappropriate, terrible, and even nonsensical! A 3-year-old could write better lyrics. Here's an example from their song "Freaxx":
"You make my pee pee hard." Really? Pee pee? This lyric is both disgusting and nonsensical!
2. The Vocals
The vocals are just as terrible as the lyrics. There's no harmony, and the singer uses a lot of autotune and pointlessly screams for no reason whatsoever! I can't believe their deluded fans call them metal just because they scream for no reason at all! If Bruce Dickinson, Rob Halford, or even James Hetfield ever hear this from their fans, they're going to be so furious! If you want good and REAL metal, listen to Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Exodus, Anthrax, Slayer, Metallica, Lamb of God, Pantera, Megadeth, Dio, and Nightwish. Not this crap! They're a disgrace to music, metal, and even humanity! I don't know what they're like in person, but musically, they're terrible.
3. The Tune
The melody and tune in their songs are as terrible as both the lyrics and vocals combined. It's just some synthesizers with buttons pushed. I appreciate old-school electronic music like Kraftwerk, Nine Inch Nails, Chemical Brothers, The Prodigy, Little Dragon, and some Gorillaz songs because it's creative and meaningful. The tune sounds like someone flushing a toilet combined with... more
Insane Clown Posse, a rap rock duo from Detroit, is often criticized for their outrageous personas and controversial lyrics. Their music, characterized by horror-themed storytelling, has garnered a cult following but is frequently dismissed by mainstream critics. Insane Clown Posse is quite possibly the only band I have seen on this entire list that is worthy of the "Worst Rock Band" honor, and even then, they're more rap than rock.
This list is otherwise an indication that the voters have no taste in rock of any stripe. Metallica might be the most overplayed band on commercial radio (Mandatory Metallica, anyone?), but Metallica, more than any other band during the '80s, made thrash metal a rock staple. To call them among the worst just jars me.
Seeing U2, Nirvana, Queen, Kiss, and The Rolling Stones in the top 10 only shows me that this poll has been hijacked by a bunch of idiots who don't know what rock is about. I'm guessing the voters probably think clichéd no-talents like Theory of a Dead Man are cool.
Linkin Park, known for their fusion of nu-metal and electronic elements, has faced backlash for their shift towards a more pop-oriented sound in later albums. While they have a dedicated fan base, some critics feel their music became overly commercial and lost its original edge. I feel ashamed to call this a band. Some people have even said that Chester (God forgive me for writing this name) is a good singer. He is the worst. I can't imagine who accepted him as the singer. Metallica and Zeppelin are the greatest musicians the world will ever see.
They made five great albums, and just that alone is enough to call them great. I saw the highly appreciated No More Sorrow performance, and I am sure there is some computer work going on. Artists today can't record anything without software. Unfortunately, Chester sounds awful, weak, and loose even in that recorded music.
Listen to In the End carefully, and you'll notice a loose note at the end of the song. So, I must say that they don't even know they are bad singers. Every performance that I've ever seen from this band was really painful to my ears. I urge youngsters to please stop listening to such bands so that they will ultimately collapse and not destroy the musical peace of this world. Listen to other bands like System of a Down, for instance.
Blink-182, a pop-punk band from California, has been criticized for their juvenile humor and simplistic music. While they have a significant following, some view their work as lacking depth and maturity. The lack of musical ability and/or talent is so blatant and obvious that it almost makes you want to burst out laughing when you listen to their music. I heard one of the members talking about a song they wrote called "Natives." He said, "Travis came up with this beat, and it took me the longest time to figure out where beat one was." Beat one was offset by one eighth note.
When you're not able to recognize a beat only because it has one eighth note offset, I think that's a pretty clear sign that you shouldn't be a professional musician.
Daughtry, led by American Idol finalist Chris Daughtry, is often criticized for their mainstream and radio-friendly rock sound. Some critics argue that their music is generic and lacks the innovation found in more critically acclaimed rock bands. Just garbage. This particular artist and their fans upset me for some reason. It makes me wonder what intrigues mainstream listeners and brings me great feelings of despair about the future generations of the art of music.
I don't know why, but I've never been into Daughtry, even though everyone I know is mad for them. While I agree with 1D and the Jonas Brothers, they aren't rock bands. There's no way Nirvana is a worse band than Daughtry.
Why the hell are U2, Coldplay, Nirvana, and Fall Out Boy ahead of Daughtry on the worst list? At least these bands didn't use American Idol to get famous!
30 Seconds to Mars, fronted by actor Jared Leto, is often criticized for their pretentious and overblown musical style. Despite their theatrical performances, many feel their music is overly dramatic and lacks substance. The past 10-15 years have witnessed a boatload of U2 rip-offs. No band has ever ripped off U2 as badly as these guys. If I were Bono, I'd outright sue these guys for even picking up musical instruments.
Jared Leto prances about the stage, putting 13- and 14-year-old girls (yes, that's the majority of their fan base) into a trance-like state, convincing them that he is Jesus reincarnated. Bono may have had a lot of charisma, but he didn't do that. Seriously, this band should be abolished, and I don't care how "epic" "Kings and Queens" is. Just pick up a U2 Rattle & Hum tour video, and you'll see what I mean.
30 Seconds to Mars may not be the worst band ever when compared to Nickelback, One Direction, and a lot of the other bad acts on this list, but I just have to give them their punishment for being such copycats to such an ignorant generation that doesn't even know what U2 is, besides "Beautiful Day."
Get this: One of their songs, "Stranger in a Strange Land," even has the same title as a U2 song (it's a very little-known U2 song. They probably thought they could get away with it without anyone noticing). They even did a cover of "Where the Streets Have No Name," further proving the incredible lengths Leto and his gang will go to just to be the next U2. Seriously, I understand inspiration, but be yourself.
Coldplay, a British rock band formed in 1996, has faced criticism for their often melancholy and anthemic sound, which some find repetitive and uninspired. Despite their popularity, detractors argue that their music lacks the edge and innovation of other rock bands. Coldplay is not the worst, but neither are they the best. They are always the same, with some catchy solos (examples: Violet Hill, Lost!) and catchy piano intros (examples: Clocks, Speed of Sound, Trouble). One piano intro even follows almost the exact rhythm of "Imagine," but with a few more chords so nobody notices. "Magic" sounds like "Madness" by Muse - not a lot of guitar, only one guitar solo, and a prominent bassline.
The problem with Coldplay is that they are not innovative. They keep producing the same "happy, sad, melodic" material with a lack of complex instrumentation. Have you ever looked at the tab for the Violet Hill solo? It's just notes. No hammer-ons, slides, pull-offs, bends, or tapping. A 6-year-old could play it! Ghost Stories isn't their best album, but it's way more different than the others. We don't need more Coldplay albums if they're going to keep doing the same stuff over and over. They should stop.
Simple Plan, a Canadian pop-punk band, is often dismissed for their simplistic and formulaic approach to the genre. Their music, aimed primarily at a younger audience, is frequently criticized for lacking originality and depth. I'm not a fan of pop-punk in general, but this band is one of the few rock bands I genuinely dislike. Not only does the vocalist sound whiny, but also very fake and phony. The lyrics seem as though they were written by some middle school teenager who doesn't respect their parents. This teen tries to be rebellious towards them and constantly plays the victim if caught.
Jeez, considering I actually liked them, I'm embarrassed. Though they do have a few good songs, and that's in only one album.
The reason why I hold a strong prejudice against pop-punk almost entirely.
Boys Like Girls, known for their emo-pop sound, have faced criticism for their predictable and commercially driven music. Critics often describe their songs as lacking the emotional and musical complexity of more esteemed bands in the genre. Not a great band. They sound like a poor man's Good Charlotte, who themselves are a poor man's Blink-182 to some extent. In other words, they sound like a replica of a replica of a replica.
Poison, a glam metal band from the 1980s, is frequently derided for their superficial and flashy image. Critics argue that their music is emblematic of the excesses and lack of depth associated with the glam metal era. People who like Poison (who the hell knows why) are the ones who dislike Nirvana because Nirvana put them out of the music industry. All Poison had was big hair and instruments that they didn't know how to use. I'm happy they're on this list.
They are just a cheesy glam metal band. This and Bon Jovi are the cheesiest of all. Their music sounds generic and annoying. Their songs sound like a watered-down version of another glam song.
"Talk Dirty to Me" was great, like a Raspberries record on steroids. "Every Rose Has Its Thorn" was pathetic, like a Partridge Family record on heroin. That's all I have to say.
Imagine Dragons, known for their anthemic pop rock sound, often receive criticism for their formulaic and commercially driven music. Despite their widespread popularity, some detractors feel their songs are overly repetitive and lack artistic innovation. To be honest, I would be fine with this band if only they weren't overplayed. The radio plays their generic, unoriginal, cheesy, mediocre garbage about every two hours, every single day. I just want to shoot my radio whenever I hear them. Come on, people, their music is not that good. It's mediocre if not poor.
There are far better modern rock bands that are getting overshadowed by this mediocre band, bands with much more originality and far less generic, cheesy lyrics. This band deserves its hate. People dislike them for many of the same reasons they hated Nickelback. Their music is weak, generic, cheesy, unoriginal, uninspiring, and sounds more pop than rock. Most of all, they get way too much radio airplay, just like Nickelback did in the 2000s. Nowadays, I'd rather listen to four hours of Nickelback than four seconds of Imagine Dragons, and that's saying something. So, dear radio stations, quit playing this garbage.
Radiohead, an English rock band, has a polarizing reputation with some critics and listeners who find their experimental and often melancholic music challenging. While they have a devoted following, their avant-garde style is not universally appreciated. Radiohead of the '90s? Yes! Radiohead of the '00s? Nah!
I totally agree! Radiohead is nothing if not mediocre now. They started out great with Pablo Honey, The Bends, and OK Computer. It took me a while to get into that album, but once I did, it took my breath away. They started going downhill ever since they hit the '00s. Kid A... You know what the A stands for, don't you? Awful!
Then came Amnesiac, followed by Hail to the Thief, and then In Rainbows. What are they all about? The Bends was their best album! So yes, I agree with you. In every top 100 albums of the '00s, Kid A is always listed high, even though it's terrible. I did like their I Might Be Wrong: Live Recordings, but aside from that, Radiohead has been, in my opinion, going downhill ever since Kid A. Come on, Thom, get back to basics like you did with Pablo Honey. That's the Radiohead I fell in love with!