Top 10 Things People Feel They Have to Say About Music Even If They Don't Agree

I should've added "Freddie Mercury is the best singer ever". Anyway I know he is talented. But there are other singers better than him (for me). for example I like Robert Plant's singing and M.Shadow's singing more than him. So I'd say they are better than him (my opinion). I mean I can give my reasons why they're favorite to me, more than Freddie. I like Freddie's voice too. But a lot say that he has the greatest voice ever. I honestly think he doesn't have. not the best, one of the best (again my opinion).

I truly think, that he is the best singer, who ever walked on Earth. I know every song from Queen and Freddie's solo album + songs on the Barcelona album with Caballé. I am sure, that he was and is the best singer of all time. I'm listening a lot of music, and love a lot of bands and singers, but nobody can reach Freddie's talent.

I know every song of Queen and Freddie Mercury, and I can say, that it's a fact. He is the greatest singer of all time, no doubt.

Very, very much an acquired taste, one which I don't hate, but I sure as heck don't put at the best.

Yup, whether you listen to them or not, you still gotta agree they're #1. They've done a lot of experimenting and have influenced almost any other band you could think of.

To begin with, it's inaccurate to label
the Beatles as a "rock" band, in part because "rock" has no firm definition. In the beginning, they were largely a rock 'n' roll cover band (rock 'n' roll is NOT rock), and they were excellent. When they began writing in earnest, they effectively founded what was "rock" at the time and for the next decade or so. They got weird in the psychedelic era, yet still offered premium "rock" mixed in with the "concept" stuff. At the end, Lennon's influence was still "rock" and rock 'n' roll, while McCartney became more and more pop. After the split, Lennon remained basically true to his roots, except for catering to Yoko's mindless, horrible, shrieking noise. McCartney became a purveyor of lightweight, sappy pop, and remains so today.

I've found this. People find themselves saying it because it's, well, The Beatles!
I like them but they are overrated.

The Beatles aren't just the greatest rock band of all time. Their also the greatest band of all time

For me there isn't any best guitarist. Jimi Hendrix was great, influential but he wasn't the only guitarist who played good. Classical guitarists were more skilled than him. Even people born before him. Django Reinhardt is surely as much good as Hendrix. Sabicas. There were better guitarists before him. Or at least as equal. There are more skilled guitarists than him now. Plus, he was quite sloppy.

He's the most influential. Not the best.

If the criterion is "one of the greatest," there's no way to argue against.

Same here, I meant on top 5.

100%. Though I don't listen to them as much as other modern rock bands like Radiohead, I do still believe they're #1.

If that's the case, it doesn't say much for rock in the 2000s.

Well, honestly,I don't like John Lennon either.I know he is a great songwriter and singer but still I don't like his songs.But I have to say that he is one of the greatest singers ever.

Again, "one of." Absolutely.

Not even close.

This one doesn't even qualify under the "one of" stipulation.

They created grunge and were arguably the best at it.

Nirvana is also arguably the most successful band of the 90s, Alice In Chains didn't come close to being the most successful Band of the 90s

Correction: one of the greatest.