Top Ten Reasons Why the Beatles are Better Than Justin BieberFinn-Mordecai-Gumball
The Top Ten
This is so true people are only gonna remember Justin Bieber as is a jerk that used to spit on fans and the Beatles are known as one of the best boy bands there ever was - sweetmadi11
Do we really need this list. (sarcasm) I mean, the Beatles being better than Justin Bieber is common knowledge. - Bronson
This list is absolutely correct. - cosmo
The Beatles were rock not pop - pugiscoolV 20 Comments
Justin Bieber is just a bad person who was late for a concert, peed in a mop bucket, called the Beatles the crap band, called a fan a whale, and much more. - EpicJake
Not to mention he threw up on stage one time while his track was still playing. - Metalhead1997
At least The Beatles members write their own materials. John Lennon wrote many deep substantive with interesting lyrics. Paul McCartney wrote many melodious songs with beautiful melodies and charming lyrics. George Harrison started as an average songwriter, but as time goes by, George Harrison was finally capable to write many good quality songs on par with Lennon-McCartney quality-wise. How about Justin Bieber? He doesn't write his own songs and he always performs the same type of songs oeuvre and over again.
He killed my ears! And what did I ever do to him!?!? - sweetmadi11
Yes.V 21 Comments
So true! The thing is, Justin's songs won't last. His music is filled with auto tune and requires technology. The Beatles didn't have or need any of this to show put their talent into great music! For example, the song "baby" by Justin Bieber - it may have been popular for a few months but I haven't heard about it for years. His music now won't even be heard of in a couple years time. The Beatles music is still being played to this day, and it's almost been 60 years for some of their earliest stuff! This just shows how good their music is. It never gets boring, unlike Justin's songs which get annoying after the third time listening to them.
I'd listen A Day in the Life 100 times instead of having to listen to Mistletoe one time. - MontyPython
Justin's songs are so annoying! At least the Beatles made memorable music. - Wereweegee
Hey Jude > Company - Neonco31V 8 Comments
'Baby is the worst of them all. All he says is "Baby, baby, baby, ooh! '' over and over again. It's not even a song. It's just one really stupid and really annoying line being repeated again and again. I hate how all the real musicians are leaving us and they're being replaced by Justin Bieber and a lot of these other crap musicians of today who are poisoning the music industry with their trash music and equally disgusting personalities.
Yes! I usually don't judge opinions but people who like that song or Justin, should die. - Wereweegee
Yup. This is true. Sure, some may be catchy, but they're annoyingly catchy. - MontyPython
My ears hurt from his crappy songs! - Number18
Yeah. every time I hear a JB song on the radio, I can barely restrain from sreamibg in pain because the music makes my ears bleed and it literally gives me a splitting headache. - Ultron123V 11 Comments
The Beatles are very good looking. And I mean, VERY GOOD LOOKING. Sgt. Peppers or A Hard Day's Night, they were always good looking. But of course, looks don't matter. It's the talent and respect they have. Justin has 0 of those qualities. He doesn't look good, I mean, his baby face... I can't take that seriously. Sure, Paul had a bit of a baby face, but he could still look serious. Justin tries too hard. But then again, Justin doesn't look uglier than the fiery pits of hell, right? - MontyPython
The Beatles were also good looking not just Justin I mean when George Harrison was young he was pretty good looking
So... That means that his only fans are blind? - AnonymousChick
HA the Beatles had talent AND good looks. Justin Bieber just has... decent looks. Chubbacca looks better than him. - NightJinxV 11 Comments
This is true. They don't steal songs. - EpicJake
Yes but they also did really good cover tracks - jmepa1234
They only had 34 cover songs from 1963-1965, after that they wrote every song. So 34 out of 215 ain't bad. 250 if you count they songs they wrote and never released and songs they gave away. They gave away 2 #1 hits - westofohio
Bieber also makes his own songs. He's a singer and a songwriter. - SwagFlicksV 1 Comment
Especially since they can play instruments. - EpicJake
No I'm not a fan, because then I shouldn't be here I guess, but he can play instruments, look it up - Munkepige
This one is a huge one - LizardKing99
They all had amazing talents in the movie industry. Paul McCartney is extremely talented when it comes to writing songs. Plus, they are so meaningful and heartwarming. - NightJinx
Yeah, Justin is talentless.V 2 Comments
It's true. I saw it at the news. - Finn-Mordecai-Gumball
He deserves the hate he gets. He's a sorry excuse for a musician and he's a huge jackass! He's destroying the music industry. He doesn't deserve to be famous.
Yay! He deserved this! - TwilightKitsune
2014 and up - NightJinxV 2 Comments
Screaming fangirls chasing Bieber? Oh please. The Beatles had to go on stage from a HELICOPTER once, then couldn't even hear themselves sing! So... Who wins here? I think The Fab Four themselves. - MontyPython
The Beatles had to disguise themselves on trains, planes, on the street, etc. Does Bieber have too? No. I think the Beatles win here. No one can beat the Beatles
Probably 100 times more fans than Justin Bieber. - nko32
Yes!V 7 Comments
He spits at his fans. The Beatles never did that.
The Beatles appreciated their fans, unlike someone who cares about himself - VenomxShocker
I can't believe this jackass even has fans! He doesn't deserve to!
That whiny brat has fans? Kill me.V 4 Comments
Justin Bieber made only 3 albums in 5 years. The Beatles made 10 in the same time. - SammySpore
Justin's relatively new compared to the Beatles. You're acting like he should put out three albums every year. - SwagFlicks
And this matters why? That's WatchMojo logic. You don't throw a bunch of feces to the wall to see what sticks. I'm not saying that this means the Beatles are worse, but... - WonkeyDude98
And Ringo is the most happy-go lucky of The Beatles! - Pony
Thomas the train was one of my favorite shows when I was 2-6 Ringo is awesome - MrQuaz680
Ringo is a cool ass dude who can at least joke about himself and doesn't take himself too seriously, unlike Justin Bieber. Besides, Ringo was not only the "beat" part of "The Beatles", he had a rather successful solo career.
Hell! "Don't Pass Me By" is better than anything Justin ever did! Billions of fans of The Beatles compared to maybe millions of annoying fans of J.B.. Who ever made the list "Why Justin is better than The Beatles" did not do their research. - westofohioV 3 Comments
Not the best reason but ok. - Userguy44
I bet a million dollars that even if they had internet that won't do THAT. I really hate Justin beiber.
Because in The Beatles era Internet didn't exist yet. - malamJONES
I can't picture the beatles nude
Well, John did get nude with Yoko Ono on one album cover... - Hotheart123V 3 Comments
The Beatles are not only better musicians, but they're better people too. Justin Beiber is the definition of a jackass!
The Beatles first album took one day to complete. Compare that with Justin Beiber
Justin is just cute and can only dance and was picked up by Usher yonks ago the Beatles really worked for this opportunity and are still viral-my dad loves them
At least The Beatles moved on from pop songs, and became an amazing band, while Justin is just staying with insipid pop. - RogerWatersfan1999
Comparing justin beaver's "music" to nails on a chalkboard is a blatant insult to chalkboards!
Justin Bieber: Ruining everything to do with music since 1994
Justin has also a movie, but I don't call it a 'movie' because it's HORRIBLE - Number18
The Beatles had MORE than 1 movie, actually. - Pony
Yellow Submarine, Help, Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be, A Hard Day's Night. - SammySpore
Justin does too, but The Beatles’ movies are so much better! - 3DG20V 5 Comments
I agree with this one. I bet the only thing Justin can play is a DJ booth so he can auto tune his music, while The Beatles were playing pretty much every instrument in existence - KingSlayer93316
YOU CAN'T HATE ANYONE FOR THAT!
DEFINITELY! - Metalhead1997
Nobody needed dance in those times to be popular.
And they are real unlike Jesus and Bieber
I wish Justin Bieber were boycotted the same way The Beatles were when they literally compared themselves to God!
Only because John Lennon said so. - Metalhead1997
The person who side and they are real unlike Jesus and beiber has a jay z percent of atheism but you are right about BieberV 1 Comment
I'm not much for the Beatles myself, but they're definitely a lot better than this ass. If these were the only musicians left on the planet, I would take the Beatles over this jackass any day!
This is a big one and the reason I hate music nowadays. - Doom
You mean a month? Just kidding, considering Sorry still plays on the radio every 10 minutes, but definitely less than 50 years!
You mean a year? - doodie
He is already forgettable! - westofohio
You mean like right now? - Metalhead1997V 2 Comments
I bet the only reason why Justin Bieber befriended Chris Brown is because he beat up Rihanna. So thus Justin Bieber beat up Selena Gomez and Nat Wolff beat up Vanessa Hudgens. The Beatles will be revolting.
Justin Bieber is a nobody. Selena Gomez and Ariana Grande should get their throats cut off for fighting over Justin Bieber's heart.
I seen a toddler with a much better face than this abomination of mankind. - Gehenna
Even the picture explains it
Yah on A LOT OF LISTS IS JUSTIN BEIBER
Go talk to John's first wife... - lavashooter
JUSTIN BIEBER BEAT UP SELENA GOMEZ LIKE CHRIS BROWN BEAT UP RIHANNA IN 2012 INCLUDING BITING HER EAR VICIOUSLY, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD! THANK GOD HE BECAME NICE IN MANY WAYS DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE STILL TRIES TOO HARD TO HAVE SELENA GOMEZ BE HIS girlfriend! >8( - The Ultimate Daredevil
Actually, John Lennon was known to physically abuse his own wife. Just bringing that out.
Not only that, Justin called one of his fans fat at one point, the Beatles would never do that! - RogerWatersfan1999
Of course because Ariana wasn't alive when The Beatles were together...
The Beatles didn't know Ariana Grande in the 60s. - waraypiso
Justin Bieber (in the second quarter of the 2010s): HOW DARE YOU REFUSE TO DEFEND ARIANA GRANDE FOR LEAVING HER GERMS ON THE DOUGHNUTS SHE LICKED!
The Beatles: We don't quite mind Ariana Grande, but we honestly do not tolerate the Arianators' constant demands.
*sigh* Remove him from the Hall of Fame. - Metalhead1997
Tsk tsk tsk - Jiorl
If The Beatles or Justin Bieber were gay I would not hold them back for it. Why is being gay a reason for bad music. WAKE UP HOMOPHOBES! - westofohio
Being gay is not a bad thing. Being a girly girl when you think you are a boy is. Wake up homophobes.
They are well-behave and more mature than that kind of azz baztard whigga. - waraypiso
Honestly this one shouldn't be here. - Metalhead1997
It was canceled decades before he was born! - lavashooter
Just because you're more famous doesn't mean you're better. But the Beatles are better than JB, yes. - Metalhead1997
So? That doesn’t mean they’re better than JB (although The Beatles are better than JB in many other ways) - KingSlayer93316
Related ListsReasons Why Justin Bieber Is a Better Rapper Than Kendrick Lamar Top Ten Things You Could Be Doing Instead of Looking at the List of Reasons Why Justin Bieber Is a Better Rapper Than Kendrick Lam Top 10 Reasons Why Marilyn Manson Is a Better Role Model Than Justin Bieber Why Ariana Grande is Way Better Than Justin Bieber Top Ten Reasons Why Lizardking's Hair Is Much Nicer Than Justin Bieber's
3 years, 299 days old
Top Remixes (11)
2. Justin Bieber is a disgrace to music
3. Justin Bieber's music isn't even music
2. Their songs are better
3. Justin Bieber's songs are annoying
2. Their songs are better
3. Justin Bieber is a disgrace to music
View All 11