Top Ten Reasons Why the Beatles are Better Than Justin BieberFinn-Mordecai-Gumball
The Top Ten
This is so true people are only gonna remember Justin Bieber as is a jerk that used to spit on fans and the Beatles are known as one of the best boy bands there ever was - sweetmadi11
This list is absolutely correct. - cosmo
Do we really need this list. (sarcasm) I mean, the Beatles being better than Justin Bieber is common knowledge. - Bronson
Even if the Beatles are no longer around, their songs are timeless...V 11 Comments
So true! The thing is, Justin's songs won't last. His music is filled with auto tune and requires technology. The Beatles didn't have or need any of this to show put their talent into great music! For example, the song "baby" by Justin Bieber - it may have been popular for a few months but I haven't heard about it for years. His music now won't even be heard of in a couple years time. The Beatles music is still being played to this day, and it's almost been 60 years for some of their earliest stuff! This just shows how good their music is. It never gets boring, unlike Justin's songs which get annoying after the third time listening to them.
I'd listen A Day in the Life 100 times instead of having to listen to Mistletoe one time. - MontyPython
Justin's songs are so annoying! At least the Beatles made memorable music. - Wereweegee
The Beatles will live on forever, unlike Bieber who won't last long - VenomxShockerV 7 Comments
Justin Bieber is just a bad person who was late for a concert, peed in a mop bucket, called the Beatles the crap band, called a fan a whale, and much more. - EpicJake
He killed my ears! And what did I ever do to him!?!? - sweetmadi11
This is one of the best reasons on the whole list. Justin Bieber's so called 'music' is trash (Baby is the worst), he's proven a million times over that he's a complete and total douchebag, even towards his own fans, and he's not as cute as his dumbass fan girls try to make him out to be. I can't believe that this jackass even has any fans. He's ruining the music industry with his crap music and equally disgusting personality. He doesn't deserve to be famous. He's a joke!
The Beatles promoted world peace and what does Justin Beiber promote? Drugs? Tattoos?V 12 Comments
'Baby is the worst of them all. All he says is "Baby, baby, baby, ooh! '' over and over again. It's not even a song. It's just one really stupid and really annoying line being repeated again and again. I hate how all the real musicians are leaving us and they're being replaced by Justin Bieber and a lot of these other crap musicians of today who are poisoning the music industry with their trash music and equally disgusting personalities.
Yes! I usually don't judge opinions but people who like that song or Justin, should die. - Wereweegee
Yup. This is true. Sure, some may be catchy, but they're annoyingly catchy. - MontyPython
My ears hurt from his crappy songs! - Number18
Bieber's songs always left bad aftertaste on my ears.V 11 Comments
This is true. They don't steal songs. - EpicJake
Yes but they also did really good cover tracks - jmepa1234
Exactly, almost 100% of all Beatles music was completely original. They didn't need to have other artist "feated" in their music so people would like it.
Bieber also makes his own songs. He's a singer and a songwriter. - SwagFlicks
He deserves the hate he gets. He's a sorry excuse for a musician and he's a huge jackass! He's destroying the music industry. He doesn't deserve to be famous.V 3 Comments
The Beatles are very good looking. And I mean, VERY GOOD LOOKING. Sgt. Peppers or A Hard Day's Night, they were always good looking. But of course, looks don't matter. It's the talent and respect they have. Justin has 0 of those qualities. He doesn't look good, I mean, his baby face... I can't take that seriously. Sure, Paul had a bit of a baby face, but he could still look serious. Justin tries too hard. But then again, Justin doesn't look uglier than the fiery pits of hell, right? - MontyPython
The Beatles were also good looking not just Justin I mean when George Harrison was young he was pretty good looking
So... That means that his only fans are blind? - AnonymousChick
Paul McCartney was a good looking when he was young, so I don't think that Justin Bieber looks "hotter" than any of the Beatles members.V 9 Comments
Screaming fangirls chasing Bieber? Oh please. The Beatles had to go on stage from a HELICOPTER once, then couldn't even hear themselves sing! So... Who wins here? I think The Fab Four themselves. - MontyPython
The Beatles had to disguise themselves on trains, planes, on the street, etc. Does Bieber have too? No. I think the Beatles win here. No one can beat the Beatles
Probably 100 times more fans than Justin Bieber. - nko32
Even people of my age (I am 22 years old) love the Beatles.V 2 Comments
Especially since they can play instruments. - EpicJake
No I'm not a fan, because then I shouldn't be here I guess, but he can play instruments, look it up - MunkepigeV 1 Comment
And Ringo is the most happy-go lucky of The Beatles! - Pony
Thomas the train was one of my favorite shows when I was 2-6 Ringo is awesome - MrQuaz680
Ringo's not even bad! RINGO STARR IS BADASS! - MontyPython
by a mile
He spits at his fans. The Beatles never did that.
The Beatles appreciated their fans, unlike someone who cares about himself - VenomxShocker
I can't believe this jackass even has fans! He doesn't deserve to!
Justin Bieber made only 3 albums in 5 years. The Beatles made 10 in the same time. - SammySpore
Justin's relatively new compared to the Beatles. You're acting like he should put out three albums every year. - SwagFlicks
And this matters why? That's WatchMojo logic. You don't throw a bunch of feces to the wall to see what sticks. I'm not saying that this means the Beatles are worse, but... - WonkeyDude98
Justin has also a movie, but I don't call it a 'movie' because it's HORRIBLE - Number18
The Beatles had MORE than 1 movie, actually. - Pony
Yellow Submarine, Help, Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be, A Hard Day's Night. - SammySpore
Well, Justin Bieber does have a movie. But it's a documentary! Yes, the Beatles did have Let it Be, which was a ROCKumentary, but all the other Beatles movies were AMAZING! Every single one!V 3 Comments
I bet a million dollars that even if they had internet that won't do THAT. I really hate Justin beiber.
Because in The Beatles era Internet didn't exist yet. - malamJONES
I can't picture the beatles nudeV 3 Comments
I wish Justin Bieber were boycotted the same way The Beatles were when they literally compared themselves to God!
And they are real unlike Jesus and Bieber
The Beatles first album took one day to complete. Compare that with Justin Beiber
Justin is just cute and can only dance and was picked up by Usher yonks ago the Beatles really worked for this opportunity and are still viral-my dad loves them
This is a big one and the reason I hate music nowadays. - Doom
I'm not much for the Beatles myself, but they're definitely a lot better than this ass. If these were the only musicians left on the planet, I would take the Beatles over this jackass any day!
You mean a month? Just kidding, considering Sorry still plays on the radio every 10 minutes, but definitely less than 50 years!
You mean a year? - doodie
Hopefully maybe he will.
No kidding? - 12cc
Related ListsTop Ten Reasons Why the List "Top Ten Reasons Why Justin Bieber Is Better Than the Beatles" Is Inaccurate Top Ten Reasons Why Justin Bieber Is Better Than the Beatles Top Ten Signs the List "Top Ten Reasons Why Justin Bieber Is Better Than the Beatles" Is a Joke Top 10 Reasons Why the Beatles Are Better Than Justin Bieber and Ke$ha Best Reasons One Direction is Way better than Justin Bieber
List StatsUpdated 20 Feb 2017
1 year, 334 days old
Top Remixes (11)
2. Justin Bieber is a disgrace to music
3. Justin Bieber hates his fans
2. The Beatles didn't post nude pictures of themselves on the internet
3. Bieber never performed on The Ed Sullivan show
2. Their songs are better
3. Justin Bieber is a disgrace to music
View All 11