Greatest Tennis Players of All TimeA list that gives the top 10 tennis players of all time!
I vote for Federer.
A good player must have the ability to combine effectiveness with fluency and elegance in the execution of the game. Nature knows no reviews. A less effort implies less energy consumed, and if you want effectiveness and results, you have to be an exquisite in sport.
Just pass a look through the pictures of the faces of the players hitting the ball, most completely dislocated by the effort. Then watch Federer, there is NO effort! Even today, nearly 34 years.
I have almost 45 years following this sport, I have never seen anything like it.
To achieve this and to be the current world No. 2, still playing with such Giants of the sport (Djokovic, Murray, Nadal, etc. ), must be more than superlative.
In addition, with more age than the rest.
When another player proves me to be able to transmit that feeling that everything is fluid in tennis, I change my mind.
You can make a case for Nadal at number 1 due to his head to head record vs Federer, especially in the Slams. This case could definitely be made if the day comes when Nadal surpasses Fed's Grand Slam record.
I'm saying that Federer had a 4-5 year run in which he destroyed the competition in a way nobody ever had before. Perhaps he took advantage of a time that lacked top heavy competition, but you can only play what's out there. I've never seen such domination by one player for that length of time.
Federer's game is like watching a machine at work. His greatest strength is his groundstrokes, particularly during his mid to late 20's. He could hit the ball with such power and at such an angle that gave his opponents no chance to stay in the point once a rally began. He had such a complete all around game and very rarely lost a match by beating himself with excessive unforced errors.
And to top it all off, he's been a true sportsman in both victory and defeat, a ...more
Tennis is much as roger federer! ! Nadal has beaten him since,he is been lucky on numerous occasions! If it were faster courts federer would trash Nadal! Nowadays unseeded players are defeating nadal! He is 10th in the world...Federer is 2nd in the world! This shows the shear talent of this guy! Even he is dealing with his age! 34 years and still plays some exceptional tennis! Nadal in the other hand being younger is out of confidence! ! Only a clay master! He cannot be considered as great! Federer although in the shadows of Nadal on clays have reached finals of RG on 4 occasions or more! And he has managed to win at least 4 slams on each surface except On RG..This shows how he is dominent...Nadal shows his dominance only on clay surface...He has managed to win only 1 US open and oz open respectively...That's what all it says...Federer is king of tennis! More over his calmness, agility, geniusness etc separates from rest f d players!
Could have played in any era and still won and much! The game is played on slower courts now with power from the back of the court yet here's a champion whose ability set him aside from all others with tennis that we will probably never see the level of again. A true champion on and off the field and perhaps the greatest sportsman of all time.
Nadal is the greatest due to the fact that he had to compete against Federer at the Maestro's peak prior to 2010s and then again had to deal with the rise of Djokovic during 2010s. And guess what? He is the first male player to reach the record of 21 Grand Slam. What an achievement!
Most Grand Slams, aa truly dominant h2h v both Federer and Djokovic at the Majors and the only one with Olympic Singles Gold, Nadal is by far the Greatest of All Time and it is now not even close.
For me, greatness is a combination of two factors: how good were you at your best and how long did you stay that good? Djokovic at his best is the greatest player the game has ever seen, but he's only performed at or near that level for about 3 years. Federer demonstrated incredible consistency and longevity, remaining at an elite level for nearly 10 years, but even at his best he was a step below the level Nadal and Djokovic have achieved. Nadal is the best combination of longevity (first major in 2005, still going strong 8 years later) and peak performance (winning record against every top competitor of his era, particularly Federer, and the highest overall winning percentage of any player in the open era).
It is very possible that the 3 best male tennis players are all playing (near the top of their games still) right now (2018). I don't think it's possible to rank them yet. As far as careers that are completed, I'd say Pete Sampras is the best ever (and I'm an Agassi fan) - Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are still writing and building their legacy. Federer at 37 years old is still winning majors (which is insane), Nadal at 32 is still #1 (2nd oldest only to Agassi at 33) and Joker is back at his A-game at 31.. If they all retired today, you'd have to put Federer #1, but taking where they are now, and projecting where they'll end up, I'd say Nadal has the best upside. 17 slams to Rogers 20, but he's 5 years younger..It'll be interesting to see where they end up
Difference between popularity and best. Djokovic has 22 Grand Slam titles, major success on all tennis surfaces, the most successful season in history, record 387 weeks at number 1, still grabbing records, only player to hold all 4 slams at once in 50+ years, beaten Federer and Nadal more than anyone, he's undoubtedly the best just not most popular
First guy who broke rivalry between Federer and Nadal, first who came and become biggest rival of Federer, biggest rival of Nadal... He came and tennis started new era, era that shown us that he is biggest trait for Federer and Nadal, not them between each other. Most unique style of play (Nadal is pure athletism with some technique, Federer is pure technique with some mental strenght, Novak is pure mental strengh and both, athletism and technique). Tennis guy from his first ages... Legend already, for everything he done for this great sport! Sorry for my poor english.
Positive H2H with both Rafa and Roger who are considered as being better than him. Plus he has won all 4 majors in a row which I think nobody will ever do, he is the greatest returner ever to play the game and finally he is the king of saved match points.
The only player in tennis history (since 1877, the amateur era and the Open Era) holding all 4 Majors titles on 3 different surfaces at once! Most complete tennis player ever. The one and only Novak Djokovic!
Federer until recently didn't have the competition that Sampras faced throughout his entire career. Sampras faced Borg, McEnroe, Agassi, Chang, Martin and even Federer himself and if he had continued to play, he would have won more majors.
This guy achived 286 weeks as number 1 in the APT ranking! He is a legend, he made tennis look as an easy sport, and it isn't. If he layed against Roger Federer at his (pete's) best time of his career, he'd win, easily.
Lord I miss this guy's matches. He made it look so easy to win, until the day I picked up a racket and learnt it is quite the opposite.
Based upon the competition he had to play against, and that volley and serve of his, he is the greatest!
Five in row at wimbledon unheard of in a time of conners and mcconroe. The cool swede was blighted with injuries or would have won more.
He only won 8 slams but he played against much tougher competition. In his era, at least six opponents had multiple slam wins. Today, it's the same three guys winning everything.
Great backhand and service return. Excellent footwork and determination.
The real deal - it was like watching a goddess with no weaknesses. Truly astonishing. The way she structured points was so intelligent, like a world champion chess player!. THe movement was supreme..actually even more graceful than the wonderful Roger. Class personified. Thank you Steffi, you are missed ridiculously!
Best in every aspect - only player ever to win all 4 grand slams at least 4 times, best movement ever, most weeks ever at number 1, only player ever to do the "golden" glam slam, won a GS final 6-0 6-0. These facts don't lie...
The reason I play...such an impressive player and pure class as a person. took the woman's game to new heights and had the ability to be top across all surfaces like no other
What idiot would put a person with 22 major champoinships, 107 titles, held the 1 ranking for 377 weeks.. And won at least 4 majors on all surfaces this low? Your post has not validity
Underrated cause he didn't win Wimbledon, records are unbelievable
In my book ...
MARTINA NAVRATILOVA is easily on the woman's tennis TOP 3 list of the greatest female tennis players of all-time ... ever!
She is definitely the most decorated tennis player ever!
Like I said ... she's simply a ...
( All-Time )
... enough Said!
Definitely the greatest tennis player to have ever lived. She ruled the court like an empress. The champion of 18 Grand Slam singles, 31 Grand Slam women's doubles and 10 Grand Slam mixed doubles titles (phew)... Now ask who is the best.
How on earth can Djokovic be placed in front of Navratilova?
He is one of the best and most talented athletes ever. He has an exquisite backhand. Amazing footwork. Strong emotions, and he's crazily passionate about the sport.
He will be a grand slam winner and a legend soon.
I'm noticing comments saying she should be #1. Classic opinion from people who don't follow tennis. Yes, she's a great winner and a great player, but she has the worst sportsmanship in the history of the game. (Maybe it's a three-way tie with John McEnroe and Nick Kyrgios) Besides, Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic are by far the three best athletes of everyone on this list.
Should be no#204 because she lost to he 203rd best player in the world 6 sets to 1 whilst he was drunk.
Cannot understand why she is only at 14 on this list!
Number 1 player of all time... ask McEnroe
Should be number 3 behind Federer and Sampras.
Mac should be higher on this list. His 7 slams aren't spectacular, but he carried the US Davis Cup team for years and is the greatest doubles player on this list, with nobody close. And...he had the prettiest game to watch from a fan's perspective, again nobody close.
Laver won the grand slam (all 4 majors) as an amateur in 1962. He then turned professional and as a result was banned from playing the 4 grand slam tournaments for 5 years. He was allowed back in 1969 when tennis turned professional and duly won the grand slam again in 1969. How many grand slams would he have won if he wasn't banned for 5 years? He is the only player to win the grand slam twice and the only player (male or female) to win the grand slam in the open era. He also won the doubles grand slam 6 times and the mixed doubles grand slam twice. He was won the Davis Cup 5 times as a member of the Australian team. How's he going so far?
2 Grand Slams - Unbelievable. Most of those in the list above Rod have never achieved one Grand Slam! - John McEnroe had the best touch and was by far the most entertaining but Rod Laver has it on achievements.
How many grand slams would he have won during the 5 year ban.
I would estimate at least 12 so that would rank him as the greatest ever
which he was and absolute natural and a great gent.
Did the unthinkable and calendar Grand Slam twice!
Without a doubt, the greatest womens tennis player in the game at her time. Even Martina Navratilova went to Florida to bring Monica Back to the game after her stabbing, that says allot.
EVERY SINGLE ''Grand Slam'' that she entered... and Guess What?
She would ALWAYS make it to the FINAL!
100% of the time...
IF she entered a tournament, at a Grand Slam... 100% of the time -- she would always make it to the FINAL Championship Match in 100% of her Grand Slam tournament appearances!
AND she was only a little TEENAGER!
This little TEEN girl was pure dominance!
She was pure... ''MAGIC''!
AND as a young TEENAGER... there was NOBODY in the World that could keep up with her HIGH LEVEL of intensity... of Greatness!
And as I previously said... MONICA SELES was PURE DOMINANCE! She was literally... One-Of-A-Kind... and she had ascended to a level beyond the norm... she had ascended to GREATNESS and to Legendary Status, during her Teenage years!
Indeed... she was simply in... a League of her own!
In essence... she was basically:
"The Michael Jordan of Tennis!"
Without the stabbing would have dominated as Graf before her, unconventional but steely! A true champion.
A true champion. One of the hardest fighters the game has ever seen.
Margaret Court was measurably faster than the players of today beating the best Australian female sprinters over 100 meters. She bench pressed greater weights than the current female players. After having a child she serve volleyed on clay to beat Chris Evert in the French Open stopping the longest clay court run for a woman. Her doubles skills with serve volley tennis added to her Grand Slam showed she was a multi skilled tennis player. She won more slams than anyone.
She has won 24 Grand Slams, a record and the highest of both genders, so she should at least be in the top 5.
Did better than most people against Evert on clay - which is saying a lot.
An all time great. She changed how women played tennis and she was the first teenage terror.
There were a spate of Chrissie clones and the modern day game has the mark of Evert. She started it. When she started in the early '70's, her game and poker face demeanor was a novelty and opponents could figure out neither her game nor her!
She destroyed top players and their reputations from age 15 and instilled a sense of fear and helplessness in opponents including the top women. She rarely lost to someone she was not supposed to lose to, and often won 6-0,6-1.
She sowed doubts in the minds of serve and volleyers through excellent anticipation and service returns, followed by lobs and passing shots. She made them look silly - with her lobs when they rushed the net and with her drop shot when they stayed back. And boy... she made them run side to side, and front to back. Tiring and demoralizing! On the other hand Evert seemed to never run and never sweat. It was ...more
One of the greatest ever in women's tennis. Changed how the game was played and laid the foundations of the modern game. Right from the outset at age 15 in 1970, she built winning records against all the top players of the time - Margaret Court, Billie Jean King, Rosie Casals, Virginia Wade and Francoise Durr. And she did it in style often demolishing them with her baseline game, lobs and passing shots. Younger players such as Evonne Goolagong were also ruthlessly put down and she remained dominant through most of the 70's and remained in the top 2 through 1985.
I agree. Back in the 1970's, The other top women were scared of playing her. Chris tended to dish out several bagels and sticks! Most women just wanted to get a few games against her and avoid total embarrassment!
Evert laid the foundation of the modern game. And she did this almost 50 years ago! Imagine the havoc she created back then with her novel game. She won 0 and 1 regularly and terrorized the other women in the 70's.
She's so good and an Abo
He is one of the most aggressive tennis players ever. Once he has confidence he can sometimes be unstoppable.
Jo fights until the end, for example, against Roger Federer in Wimbledon 2011 when he was 2 sets down, and in the 3rd set he built up his confidence, and in the 4th and 5th he was ripping winners to Roger Federer.