Five Nights at Freddy's Theories that Should Be Erased from Existence
-
Michael Scott possesses Freddy
Complete facepalm. I found this on another list and just died. I'm not even kidding, so let me make this clear: MICHAEL SCOTT AND MICHAEL SCHMIDT ARE TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE!
Also, Michael Schmidt does NOT possess Freddy because Michael Schmidt is still alive. Gabriel, who actually DOES possess Freddy, is NOT alive because he is dead. Sorry, let me rephrase. TO HAVE YOUR SOUL POSSESS ANOTHER PERSON OR OBJECT CAN ONLY BE POSSIBLE IF YOU ARE DEAD.
Michael Scott and Michael Schmidt are two different characters from two different stories, Michael Scott being from The Office, and Michael Schmidt being from Fnaf. I cannot say anymore. I am so done. This theory makes me SO mad.
-
Circus Baby killed Elizabeth on her own accord, not because of William Afton
-
Five Nights at Freddy's was based on Chuck E. Cheese (including bites and deaths)
Um, what?! As far as literally GOD knows, no child was murdered in Chuck E. Cheese. Also, their souls wouldn't be automatically put inside the animatronics unless you summoned their souls back with a Ouija board.
This theory is absolutely insane, but it does have its ups and downs. The concept of FNAF was actually based off of Chuck E. Cheese, like the look of the animatronics, how they looked at night (some workers from the 1970s actually said that the animatronics looked horrifying in the dark), and the fact that the animatronics were put in a pizzeria meant for kids to be entertained.
Not only this, but the fact that Chuck E. Cheese decided to stop using animatronics and switched to new suit-like mascots is another part of creating FNAF. In the game, the animatronics were put away and replaced with background music after the pizzerias were shut down, which was based off of the ending of the Chuck E. Cheese animatronics.
Some people believe that Chuck E. Cheese put away their animatronics because Fnaf made them look demonic. Other people say that Fnaf held some truth to Chuck E. Cheese. NONE OF THESE ARE TRUE THOUGH! FNAF WAS BASED OFF OF THE LOOK OF THE ANIMATRONICS FROM CHUCK E. CHEESE, BUT THERE WERE NO BITES WHATSOEVER!
-
BB and JJ are dating
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This theory just KILLS me!!! Like WHAT????? They both died as TODDLERS who weren't even old enough to have a conscience, which means that they could not date each other. Also, THEY ARE SIBLINGS!!!!! Just because they are opposite genders and look alike doesn't mean that they are instantly dating.
Now, you might argue, "Well, just because they look alike doesn't mean they're twins." True. Funny thing though, I NEVER SAID THEY WERE TWINS!!!!! I said they were SIBLINGS!!!!! Have you ever met a three-year-old child dating someone? Well, some toddlers might say that they have a boyfriend, but they have absolutely NO idea what a boyfriend even is at that point, let alone a BOY in general.
Yes, some people ship them, yes, I USED to ship them, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE INSTANTLY A COUPLE!! Life just doesn't work that way. No. It really doesn't. Get a life, then use it so you can successfully die if you believe in this theory.
-
All of the FNAF 1 kids died in 1987 at the same time
Nooooooo! THEY ALL DIED AT DIFFERENT TIMES!!!! Golden Freddy was possessed in 1983, which is all I need to say to prove my case that this theory is complete bullsh!t. Most of them were murdered in 1987, but not ALL of them. One psychopath serial killer isn't able to kill every child at the exact same time. That's not humanly possible.
He could line each child up against the wall evenly, then take a knife and be a fruit ninja and slice off their heads in one swing, but he can't do that all at the same time. Also, in the lore, it says that screams were heard ringing around the room one by one, each a different voice. Meaning that NOT EVERY CHILD WAS MURDERED AT ONCE!!!!
-
The Puppet is Golden Freddy's mom
No. Just no. This theory is so wrong. I know it says that in the song "It's Been So Long" by The Living Tombstone, but NO! This is SO NOT TRUE!
The song "It's Been So Long" is a song written by a bunch of creeps (well actually, they are amazing, I shouldn't have said that, BUT I DID and I don't mean it) who know absolutely NOTHING about Fnaf (well, maybe they do, but I wasn't told anything). They don't make up the theories. Scott Cawthon does.
-
Mangle is a male character
WHAT?!?! I'm sorry, Mangle is NOT male! Mangle is non-binary because they are possessed by two people. THE VOICE EXPLAINS EVERYTHING! There are two voices, a lower one and a higher one, both slightly covered up with a thick layer of fuzz.
Now, you might be thinking "Erm, what the skibbity eamM, there are two voices because Mangle's recorded voice was messed up because they were ripped apart by a child." This is true, but the double voice was only created because it represents that two children, twins, possess them.
Now, I must say that Mangle is one character possessed by two children. Because Mangle is only ONE, the two children's souls combine into one and possess them as one. So Mangle is neither female nor male, but NON-BINARY!
-
Bonnie is possessed by Jeremy Fitzgerald
Oh my gosh, I have heard this theory so many times because Jeremy (who possesses Bonnie) and Jeremy Fitzgerald (who was a night guard before Michael Schmidt and also was murdered by Toy Bonnie) share a first name. This is like saying that if there are two Johns in your grade, and you claim they are the same person but both look different.
Okay, this theory is so wrong for multiple reasons. First of all, someone cannot get murdered by the thing they are possessing. Second of all, the animatronics were murdered by CHILDREN. Jeremy Fitzgerald is an ADULT.
-
Bon-Bon isn't possessed
Okay, I can kind of understand why we actually have this theory, but I still think it shouldn't exist. I mean, does Jeremy's soul just get lost? Like, what the hell?? No! Even though he sits on Funtime Freddy's hand, that doesn't mean he isn't possessed!
I know that sometimes he tells Funtime Freddy that nobody is there to kill, but that doesn't mean he's not possessed. He wouldn't have any personality if he wasn't possessed. In fact, he wouldn't even be alive or moving at all if he wasn't possessed, especially since they were all supposed to be turned off.
-
Mangle is possessed by a dog
Okay. I can see how some people might believe this because Mangle's look (like all the messed up wires) resembles a perspective of a dog, but no. This theory is not true. Mangle is possessed by TWINS. That's why they have two heads.
Not only does this evidence prove EVERYTHING, but in the picture to the left, Mangle only has one eye. Their other head also only has one eye. Mangle is missing their right eye, and the second head is missing their left. That is because half of Mangle's head was ripped off, and the eyes separated.
This represents how twins are made in the first place. The egg starts to form, then splits in half, making a copy of itself. (Though Mangle is more of a Siamese twin.)
-
Foxy is a good guy
I'm just adding a comment to this because there are none, so here we go! (Try not to crap your pants, y'all.)
To those who say Foxy is a good guy, please understand that God is giving you permission to actually kill them. WHY THE HELL WOULD FOXY TRY TO KILL YOU IF HE WASN'T A BAD GUY???
Yes, Foxy is a great character, but that does not mean he is inherently a good guy. William Afton programmed the animatronics to be evil, so therefore, THEY ARE EVIL! How hard is it for you to understand this? He is quite literally forced to be evil, having no consent or say in the matter, so he is evil.
Fritz, the boy who possesses him, is not evil, but because Afton programmed Foxy to be bad, the programming overrides Fritz's intellect and reasoning, making him evil. I hope I've dumbed my explanation down to the level of all those who think this theory is true.