Top 10 Movies that Did Not Need a Sequel but Got One Anyway
The Top Ten
I'm SORRY! THIS FILM ALWAYS NEED SEQUALS! YOU ALL ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS FILM BEINGA FRANCHISE! YOU DON'T GET TO SAY THIS DOESN'T NEED A SEQUALS! THIS IS SUPPOSED TO AND ALWAYS NEED SEQUALS! CARS HATERS MUST BE DEAD RIGHT NOW!
What are you talking about? Of course it did, watch the ending!
Really? Avengers didn't need a sequel? Gimme a break.
I did think Finding Dory was a good movie, but that movie wasn't really needed. - TheFourthWorld
I agree, Monsters University is terrible! Frozen was much better than that garbage!
It had a prequel
Same as Finding Dory, I thought Monsters, Inc.'s sequel was good, but it wasn't needed. - TheFourthWorld
To be fair, Frozen 2 I think is even better than this overrated mess!
None of the films that came after it really lived up to its potential (the closest is Rodrick Rules). Also, I'm not going to mention the atrocity that is the fifth film. Ugh. - Gg2000
The 5th one is diary of an awesome friendly kid which isn't even out yet - toptenser11
I'm sorry, but I despised the sequel to How to Train Your Dragon. Not only was the villain racist and the plot riddled with more holes than a fishnet, but it also pretty much pushed Stoic off a cliff so that Hiccup could become the village leader. - Synchronocity