Top Ten Reasons that is disapointing because the Spider-Man trilogy is not continuing
The Top Ten
We never even got to see the lizard or vulture or black cat who were supposed to appear in the 4th film and the sinister six who was supposed to appear in the 5th film
The Lord Of The Rings?
Star Wars chapters 4, 5 and 6?
The Hunger Games? (Count the two parts of mockingjay)
Harry Potter Movies?
And the most importatan of all time...
THE DARK KNIGHT?
Well now there is a new Spiderman series bitch.
Not only that, it was also only 5 years since Spider-Man 3.
The three were great movies, good video games were made for them... - rock2metal
And when I seen the first episode I said :Thanks Sam Raimi - MatrixGuy
Spider-Man (2002) $806,700,000
Spider-Man 2 (2004) $783,577,893
Spider-Man 3 (2007) $885,430,303 - MatrixGuy
In Spider-Man when Peter is trying to recover his power: realizes he may have recovered his powers he says "I'm back! I'm back! " and than falls down on a car, saying: "My back. My back... " - MatrixGuy
Venom died. - Dman1972
Yeah, if you read the news reports about spider-man 4, they were moving full speed ahead with using Carnage, which would have been a great follow up seeing how Venom was in Spider-Man 3
Seriously, in 90 minutes the movie got all the relation and scenes that mary jane and peter was in the three movies, with gwen and peter, and harry and max don't appear enough in the movie
This movie made me go "seriously! This is the franchise that replaced the original? " It's not nearly as good
This movie isn't the next spiderman movie, is the NEXT TWILIGHT SUPERHERO MOVIE