Top Ten Reasons Why Disney Shouldn't Buy NintendoDisney's already bought enough stuff. But buying Nintendo is the worse idea I've ever heard.
The Top Ten Reasons Why Disney Shouldn't Buy Nintendo
If they buy Nintendo, my childhood would be ruined rather than Mario doing Fortnite dances but that could happen also since Disney owns Fortnite.
If Link was owned by Disney:
Link walking down the path, going to defeat ganon for the 7,381st time, sees a new boss: DISENY. He uses his master and chops them up into sushi and EATS it. Then he takes the heart eats and it says "YOU GOT A HEART and makes everything normal again. - GamerXS
Disney is a greedy pig. That's all I have to say.
I'm afraid that, with all that money they got from their latest box office successes, such as the new Star Wars film being the all-time highest grossing movie in the box office nowadays, I fear that they have enough money to buy a video game company like Nintendo. Do not want.
Agreed. Disney should never buy any more, yet the idea of them buying Nintendo is a horrible idea, also unlikely since Nintendo has been around way longer than Disney has, and the whole Japanese law or something is what keeps a company like Disney from buying a company like Nintendo.
Like they already ruined and continue to ruin several of their own (Wreck-It Ralph, Toy Story, Frozen, and the Disney Princesses)?
It would suck to see Star Fox ruined. It would be ruined even more if Disney crosses it over with The Lion King if they buy Nintendo. DO NOT WANT.
Even it's a what-if thing, Disney has ruined franchises, such as Lucas Film's Star Wars and Marvel. If Disney gets their hands on anything else. Then entertainment would become childish and boring. But that's my opinion. Don't hate me.
Disney doesn't need Nintendo, Disney is a movie company while Nintendo is a video game company.
Yeah I know Nintendo use to be a toy company and they make toys for some of their franchises. But Disney would just milk it for toys until the cow runs outta milk. - nintendofan126
Nintendo makes plushes and toys
Nintendo Was a toy company, so maybe it would work out? - bjinmaro64
They'd use it as slave until it is destroyed - TwilightKitsune
Nintendo is already kid friendly, but Disney would take it too far. - GamerXS
If they did that crap I would bring all the anti-change Nintendo fans together and form a company called "GameSaviors" and buy back Nintendo. Then I would let Nintendo do whatever it wanted. - 404_name_missing
And Pokemon Amie/Refresh would get renamed to fit this trope.
Edit: Looks like Nintendo did it without disney making them do it
kek - 404_name_missing
This sucker got to sixth place?
Wow! - 404_name_missing
Well, Pokemon already has a show. And Mario and Zelda had shows in the 1980s. And Kirby has an anime. But Disney would take it to far and milk that cow until the cow has just about had it. - nintendofan126
4 words. Well excuse me princess
Gee, it sure is boring around here, MY BOI! - bjinmaro64
It's Animal Crossing, the T.V show!
'Welcoome to Animal Crossing,
Where everyone's happy!
The mayor is always bossing,
And he's sometimes snappy!
Let's meet Rooosie!
The cutest girl in town!
She's never nosy,
She'll turn your frown upside down!
ANIMAL CROSSING! '
this would be horrible
I actually would love for a kid-friendly movie of "Fire Emblem Awakening", because Lucina is actually a *great* example of a Strong Female Character; better than most such characters out there. At the same time, given their recent track record (content, not box office returns) I don't trust Disney with it. Maybe Sony? No, they wouldn't make a movie about their rival in the game console business.
Unfortunately, I think Super Mario Odyssey gave them a head start (the ending to that game feels like it was written by the same writer as "Ralph Breaks the Internet").
And put the popular female Nintendo characters (Peach, Zelda, Samus, Daisy, Rosalina, Pauline, Lucina, likely even the female versions of Robin and Corrin) in stupid Hot Topic outfits while reducing them to shallow parodies of themselves. You know, like they did to their own "princesses" in "Ralph Breaks the Internet".
I would really, really hate to see what Disney would do to Fire Emblem if they get their hands on the franchise; They would turn Karel into a villain (which he never was), and they would turn characters such as Lyn or Hector into people of color for the sake of adding diversity, which is not what the characters intended to be, and they would give one of the main protagonists an annoying comic-relief sidekick, which I'm so sick of. Plus, they would take away what made the series great in the first place and replace them with overused tropes and cliches that we already seen in their movies. That would be just dumb and downright horrible.
Exactly. If Disney got their greedy mouse gloves on, say, Star Fox, then they'll have Fox and his team fight against spotted hyenas instead of the wolves, pigs, monkeys, reptiles, dinosaurs, alien invasion or fish like in the previous Star Fox games, because they think that "the LYIN KING IS the BEST ever! 1".
Just imagine what they'll do to Pokemon if they did that! And don't get me started on what the PETA did with Pokemon Black & Blue! That game was an insult to what Pokemon was all about.
If you're sick hearing about Disney's ads non-stop, then you better pray they don't buy Nintendo. - nintendofan126
Anyways Disney is for losers
OH GOD BEST REASON YET - spodermanfan1000
I agree with the comment about Link killing Simba and using his heart as a heart container.
And then Link teleports in with the Ocarina of Time, pulls out the Master Sword, and chops Simba's head off forever, and eats his heart while the Zelda du du du du music plays and displays the message, "You got a heart container! Collect more to increase your life! "
But Simba is awesome although I don't want a crossover with nintendo - VideoGamefan5
Quit lk hater - BoyGenius234
That's been Disney's "thing" lately. And Lord knows we certainly do not need to see Mario and Luigi grow apart and go their separate ways forever!
Like they did in Wreck it Ralph 2 onwards and even Frozen 2 had the same type of ending.
A movie version of one or both Tellius "Fire Emblem" games (i.e. the ones with Ike), ending with Ike and Soren forever apart, maybe "occasionally" seeing or hearing from each other at "best"? And that because of some "destiny" one or the other must fulfill, or one of them found his "true calling" (and/or "true love") in a situation that doesn't really make sense given his established character? H.E. Double hockey sticks. If. You. See. Kay. NO!
Not all hyenas have to be bad, you know.
It is bad enough that the Pooh's Adventures community does this with every antagonist they see. We just don't want it being turned into "official".
Disney already has their movies being made into tie in games on mobile such as Frozen 2: The Game, Wreck it Ralph 2: The Game and Toy Story 4: The Game.
It was "Ralph Breaks the Internet" and "Toy Story 4" that made me not trust Disney
Or Nintendo making a video game based on a Disney property, such as The Lion Guard? I hope not.
After Frozen and Big Hero 6 (don't judge), I don't trust Disney. - TwilightKitsune
Is Kylo ren sugarcoated?
Including having all Nintendo's iconic female characters get together, preach Tumblr liberal "virtues", and wear stupid American Apparel outfits. Oh yeah, and put one of their normal outfits (and we're talking something like Peach's or Zelda's ballgown here; not, say, Robin's outfit which doesn't change whether Robin is male or female) on a male character just for shock value/cheap laughs. Right, forgot that the Hot Topic-clad girls would have just saved the unfortunate dude just because a man needed their help for once.
It would suck to see what Disney would do with Fire Emblem. Think of ten horrific possibilities:
1. They would depict Karel as a villain or antagonist instead of the anti-hero turned wise mentor he happens to be in Fire Emblem 7: Blazing Sword and Fire Emblem 6: Binding Blade respectively. That would suck, given that he never had an antagonistic role and was an ally to the heroes in both games he's in. In addition, Guy would be seen as the "Saint of Swords" instead of Karel, and would be portrayed as his heroic archenemy instead of his pupil on his same side in the game. That would just suck and would make the series mediocre at best.
2. The lords would recruit Harken in this storyline instead of Karel, while Karel is portrayed as one of the antagonists. Just because you prefer one character over another doesn't make the other character "evil".
3. Lyn would be changed into a black woman for the sake of Disney's obsession with putting diversity ...more
No offense to anyone and I really didn't mean to use the words 'black' or 'white' here. It would be just cringey if Disney race-swapped any of Nintendo's characters in my opinion.
Actually, they didn't do that with Leia or Anya after acquiring Lucasfilm and Fox (respectively), but still wouldn't put it past them.
Quite possibly including the female versions of characters like Robin and Corrin from "Fire Emblem" or Villager from "Animal Crossing". Also making the female versions the ONLY versions.
And given stupid new Forever 21 outfits
Like they've been doing with their own characters (Ariel and Lady's owner are black now)
Just look what happened when Disney bought out Marvel back in 2009, they somehow race-lifted some of their characters in later issues or such. The characters from the original Marvel comic of Big Hero 6 were an all-Japanese cast, but when Disney made the animated film adaption, they race-lifted those characters into multiple ethnic groups for the sake of the diversity trend. I am worried that, if Disney were to buy a game company such as Nintendo, they would do the same to their characters. This is why they can't buy them. If you really want to add more diversity to a cast, then it's better to make entirely new characters instead of changing existing ones.
Daisy doesn't need to become a Muslim
You know how FE Heroes has versions of various characters in alternate outfits like wedding dresses, Santa Claus outfits, and swimwear like you'd see at a modern day beach or water park? Well, if Disney gets involved, we'll get characters (particularly the females) in grubby close-fit T-shirts with either leggings or shorts that would be called "panties" if they were made of a different material. Worse, the shirts would have some image or catchphrase that at "best" shows a very shallow, stereotypical view of the character. Then again, maybe the "Wrecked Princesses"/"comfy squad" trend has finally passed.
They'd probably make someone LGBTQ even though there already are such characters in "Fire Emblem" (Ike, Soren, like 25% of the cast of "Fates")
Dare I wonder who'll they'd make black and/or LGBTQ for the sake of "representation"
You mean turn every single female character, possibly including the female versions of Robin, Corrin, and Byleth, into obnoxious radfem Tumblrinas? When meanwhile even Lyn and Sully were nothing like that.
Have nothing against preschool but there are some franchises that are not suited for that genre in the first place. But the worst case scenario is that it would have hinted dark and explicit overtones like The Lion Guard did. That would just suck. It would be even worse if it were to crossover with that show.
I mean, Preschool shows aren't that bad for kids the way they are now, but a POKEMON PRESCHOOL SHOW! THAT'S JUST OUTRAGEOUS!
Yoshi's Island: the T.V. Series? No thank you.
Noo! No LOZ remakes. There to special!
The sequels wouldn't have to be direct to video, either. Disney did in fact release several subpar sequels theatrically in recent years.
I am so sick of Disney milking everything to death. Hope this does not happen to beloved video games of the non-Disney side.
Much as I'd love to beat up their recent "gotta love them because their so progressive" characters (e.g. Judy Hopps, Shank) with my Smash mains, Imma have to say no to this.
NGL, I wanted "Wreck-It Ralph" content (fighters, stages, Assist Trophies) in "Smash for 3DS/Wii U", the "Smash Bros" game released closest to "Ralph's" theatrical run. But any more Disney representation in "Smash" (including Sora), no thank you.
What is wrong with that is because The Lion King would be involved in the crossover, and we don't want that.
Disney in Super Smash Bros.? No thanks.
Disney, stop being greedy and buying everything you see... You have your own studio. Stop buying everything that doesn't belong to you.
When was the last time Disney had a good reality show? The only reason people watch Disney is because of Gravity Falls. Nobody's gonna watch any of the reality shows based off Nintendo if they make them. (And I hope they don't) - nintendofan126
A Nintendo version of Descendants? No thanks.
Disney bought Marvel, didn't turn it into a reality show. Disney bought Star Wars, didn't turn it into a reality show. So I don't see this happening if Disney buys Nintendo. - MrCoolC
Noo please don't do it don't ruin Mario or Zelda or animal crossing or geez I'm ranting
Disney Channel "stars" and big "flavor of the month" celebrities like Gal Gadot (who better not voice Lucina or Zelda)
No. That would be absolutely horrible and put me of Disney forever.
They already kill the atmosphere of all their shows. Just wait till they get their hands on an Animal Crossing or Kirby show
Now this is legitimately the first REAL issue on this board.
This terrifies me, because when there were rumors when Disney would buy Hasbro, I thought it would be true. The MLP movie is out, and it can, if not, WILL happen. I'm just terrified if Nintendo gets into that sort of pickle.
Some Nintendo characters that are heroes, allies, friends of the hero, or even anti-heroes would be considered 'villainous' in Disney standards due to their appearance or personality. This kind of worries me, since I like some of those Nintendo 'heroes' and I'm worried about them getting the 'Kaa treatment'. (Kaa was actually one of Mowgli's friends or mentors in the original Jungle Book novel that Disney's movie of the same name was based on. Disney just changed it to a villain because they couldn't accept a snake as a heroic character) I'm especially worried about a certain 'Sword Demon' getting this treatment if Disney would dare to get their hands on Fire Emblem and make an adaption of it; I don't think he would fit.
They wouldn't like T-rated games either and they would make Zelda into a game for 3 year olds!
They would also ban shooters on Nintendo consoles.
Cause deadpool doesn't exist
Such things as Fatal Frame, Zombiu, Dementium, The Call, Resident Evil Revelations, Resident evil Archives a new SIlent Hill, not even New MOnster Hunters or maybe without the blood cause damn children, yeah there is splatoon but its not the first game I came to buy the Wii U or a new Horror game would never appear not even considered on current and new Nintendo consoles, who knows maybe even take oout the Virtual console roms.
Though losing Snake, Bayonetta, Cloud, and all the Undertale and Cuphead stuff wouldn't be a bad thing at all, I'd hate to lose Simon Belmont and Terry Bogard.
That's definitely a downgrade but still not horrible.
Smash Bros has Sonic, and Sonic isn't from Nintendo. - MrCoolC
As a SSB fan, this is a nightmare that I seriously don't want becoming a reality. I do not like KH and Sora would not be a good addition to SSB. Sora4Smash? No chance! Sorry.
Like the company that already put a foul mouthed btch-slt into Smash Bros pretending it was what fans wanted needs Disney's help there
Yah I agree with this Disney has lots of subliminal messages
Please leave Nintendo anlone
What the hells wrong with that.
What's wrong with that?
Disney in Super Smash Bros sounds really awesome
They already have a Disney Store in Times Square...
That would suck if they got their greedy mouse gloves on that franchise.
Isn't this already on here?
Right. This is one of the reasons why Disney should never buy Nintendo.
Not every gamer loves the Walt Disney Company to tell the truth, and the thought of Disney buying Nintendo would be very upsetting to Nintendo's non-Disney fanbase.
I like Disney and Nintendo but Disney buying Nintendo is a BIG FAIL
A lot of people love they non greedy nintendo though - bjinmaro64
Nintendo has been around way before Disney (in the late 1800's, this is way before they went to the video game industry), while the Disney company was founded in 1923. Chances are, Nintendo may be a large corporation of it's own, and would be way too expensive for someone like Disney to acquire them, no matter how much money they have.
If so, then all the characters would have to sing songs, the Disney way. Not all fictional characters are singers, you know.
Uhh I would hate that it would suck to see the legend of Zelda turned into a musical or maybe Mario bros. This better not happ n
Scar and the Kingdom Hearts villains are terrible excuses for villains, enough said.
Or they'd make the anti-heroes more villainous. Which I'm also worried about.
WORST Zelda GAME EVER:
Link: Stop doing that! It's mean.
Ganon: Okay, I'll stop.
Yeah, Cause villains like Scar, the kingdom heart villains, Bill cipher don't exist.
That would suck.
So true. I wish more people (and the companies themselves) would realize that.
True. Disney ruins so many video games. It's sickening. Just don't let them acquire any more properties.
Just let this speak for itself. - GengarGuy
That would just suck. It's bad enough that some of Nintendo shuts down fan projects and hasn't made a new F-Zero game (or a new game of any obscure IP of theirs) for a heck of a long time, but to make them as greedy and corrupt as Disney is now, is not right. Nintendo is not the same as Disney, people. There is no "Sisi Ni Sawa" between the two at all.
*Shudders* If they do that, I will be so mad, I might just work together with other angry Nintendo fans to buy nintendo back. - 404_name_missing
Another problem would be that Disney executives would pressure them into changing the species of characters into something they aren't just to fit into the same doggone Disney formula and overused 'good animal, evil animal species' tropes and cliches over and over and over again. Fact? In the original Basil of Baker Street books that the movie, The Great Mouse Detective, was based on, Professor Ratigan was a mouse. Yet, Disney had to change him into a rat to not only fit his namesake, but also because of the old and tired "mice are good, rats are bad" formula that is in too many movies and such to mention. And in the original Edgar Rice Burroughs ' Tarzan stories, Sabor was a lion, but in Disney's movie version, she was changed to a leopard. WHY CAN'T THEY SEE THEM AS WHAT THEY ARE AND NOT CHANGE THEM INTO SOMETHING MORE STEREOTYPICAL?! I hope this never happens to our favorite Nintendo characters and such, or else that would suck.
Never, in my life could I see anyone but anyone who sings in the game, singing some high note. That would end the world, Link, Zelda and the rest of them would drown in hate thanks to the Dicky mouse makers.
And the worst case scenario for this? Karel from Fire Emblem: Blazing Blade as an antagonist working alongside Sephiroth and/or the Heartless and Nobodies. That would suck.
And that's another reason why that American company should have no purchased the Power Rangers, Lucasfilm, and Marvel Comics.
There would be super smash Bros ultimate live on ice