Top Ten Reasons Why Disney Shouldn't Buy NintendoDisney's already bought enough stuff. But buying Nintendo is the worse idea I've ever heard.
The Top Ten
If they buy Nintendo, my childhood would be ruined rather than Mario doing Fortnite dances but that could happen also since Disney owns Fortnite.
Disney is a greedy pig. That's all I have to say.
I'm afraid that, with all that money they got from their latest box office successes, such as the new Star Wars film being the all-time highest grossing movie in the box office nowadays, I fear that they have enough money to buy a video game company like Nintendo. Do not want.
Agreed. Disney should never buy any more, yet the idea of them buying Nintendo is a horrible idea, also unlikely since Nintendo has been around way longer than Disney has, and the whole Japanese law or something is what keeps a company like Disney from buying a company like Nintendo.
If Link was owned by Disney:
Link walking down the path, going to defeat ganon for the 7,381st time, sees a new boss: DISENY. He uses his master and chops them up into sushi and EATS it. Then he takes the heart eats and it says "YOU GOT A HEART and makes everything normal again.
Like they already ruined and continue to ruin several of their own (Wreck-It Ralph, Toy Story, Frozen, and the Disney Princesses)?
It would suck to see Star Fox ruined. It would be ruined even more if Disney crosses it over with The Lion King if they buy Nintendo. DO NOT WANT.
Even it's a what-if thing, Disney has ruined franchises, such as Lucas Film's Star Wars and Marvel. If Disney gets their hands on anything else. Then entertainment would become childish and boring. But that's my opinion. Don't hate me.
Disney doesn't need Nintendo, Disney is a movie company while Nintendo is a video game company.
Yeah I know Nintendo use to be a toy company and they make toys for some of their franchises. But Disney would just milk it for toys until the cow runs outta milk.
Nintendo makes plushes and toys
Nintendo Was a toy company, so maybe it would work out?
They'd use it as slave until it is destroyed
Nintendo is already kid friendly, but Disney would take it too far.
If they did that crap I would bring all the anti-change Nintendo fans together and form a company called "GameSaviors" and buy back Nintendo. Then I would let Nintendo do whatever it wanted.
And Pokemon Amie/Refresh would get renamed to fit this trope.
Edit: Looks like Nintendo did it without disney making them do it
This sucker got to sixth place?
Well, Pokemon already has a show. And Mario and Zelda had shows in the 1980s. And Kirby has an anime. But Disney would take it to far and milk that cow until the cow has just about had it.
4 words. Well excuse me princess
Gee, it sure is boring around here, MY BOI!
It's Animal Crossing, the T.V show!
'Welcoome to Animal Crossing,
Where everyone's happy!
The mayor is always bossing,
And he's sometimes snappy!
Let's meet Rooosie!
The cutest girl in town!
She's never nosy,
She'll turn your frown upside down!
ANIMAL CROSSING! '
this would be horrible
I actually would love for a kid-friendly movie of "Fire Emblem Awakening", because Lucina is actually a *great* example of a Strong Female Character; better than most such characters out there. At the same time, given their recent track record (content, not box office returns) I don't trust Disney with it. Maybe Sony? No, they wouldn't make a movie about their rival in the game console business.
I would really, really hate to see what Disney would do to Fire Emblem if they get their hands on the franchise; They would turn Karel into a villain (which he never was), and they would turn characters such as Lyn or Hector into people of color for the sake of adding diversity, which is not what the characters intended to be, and they would give one of the main protagonists an annoying comic-relief sidekick, which I'm so sick of. Plus, they would take away what made the series great in the first place and replace them with overused tropes and cliches that we already seen in their movies. That would be just dumb and downright horrible.
Unfortunately, I think Super Mario Odyssey gave them a head start (the ending to that game feels like it was written by the same writer as "Ralph Breaks the Internet").
And put the popular female Nintendo characters (Peach, Zelda, Samus, Daisy, Rosalina, Pauline, Lucina, likely even the female versions of Robin and Corrin) in stupid Hot Topic outfits while reducing them to shallow parodies of themselves. You know, like they did to their own "princesses" in "Ralph Breaks the Internet".
Exactly. If Disney got their greedy mouse gloves on, say, Star Fox, then they'll have Fox and his team fight against spotted hyenas instead of the wolves, pigs, monkeys, reptiles, dinosaurs, alien invasion or fish like in the previous Star Fox games, because they think that "the LYIN KING IS the BEST ever! 1".
Just imagine what they'll do to Pokemon if they did that! And don't get me started on what the PETA did with Pokemon Black & Blue! That game was an insult to what Pokemon was all about.
I agree with the comment about Link killing Simba and using his heart as a heart container.
And then Link teleports in with the Ocarina of Time, pulls out the Master Sword, and chops Simba's head off forever, and eats his heart while the Zelda du du du du music plays and displays the message, "You got a heart container! Collect more to increase your life! "
But Simba is awesome although I don't want a crossover with nintendo
Quit lk hater
If you're sick hearing about Disney's ads non-stop, then you better pray they don't buy Nintendo.
Anyways Disney is for losers
OH GOD BEST REASON YET
That's been Disney's "thing" lately. And Lord knows we certainly do not need to see Mario and Luigi grow apart and go their separate ways forever!
Like they did in Wreck it Ralph 2 onwards and even Frozen 2 had the same type of ending.
A movie version of one or both Tellius "Fire Emblem" games (i.e. the ones with Ike), ending with Ike and Soren forever apart, maybe "occasionally" seeing or hearing from each other at "best"? And that because of some "destiny" one or the other must fulfill, or one of them found his "true calling" (and/or "true love") in a situation that doesn't really make sense given his established character? H.E. Double hockey sticks. If. You. See. Kay. NO!
Not all hyenas have to be bad, you know.
It is bad enough that the Pooh's Adventures community does this with every antagonist they see. We just don't want it being turned into "official".
Even Shadow Link...
Including having all Nintendo's iconic female characters get together, preach Tumblr liberal "virtues", and wear stupid American Apparel outfits. Oh yeah, and put one of their normal outfits (and we're talking something like Peach's or Zelda's ballgown here; not, say, Robin's outfit which doesn't change whether Robin is male or female) on a male character just for shock value/cheap laughs. Right, forgot that the Hot Topic-clad girls would have just saved the unfortunate dude just because a man needed their help for once.
It would suck to see what Disney would do with Fire Emblem. Think of ten horrific possibilities:
1. They would depict Karel as a villain or antagonist instead of the anti-hero turned wise mentor he happens to be in Fire Emblem 7: Blazing Sword and Fire Emblem 6: Binding Blade respectively. That would suck, given that he never had an antagonistic role and was an ally to the heroes in both games he's in. In addition, Guy would be seen as the "Saint of Swords" instead of Karel, and would be portrayed as his heroic archenemy instead of his pupil on his same side in the game. That would just suck and would make the series mediocre at best.
2. The lords would recruit Harken in this storyline instead of Karel, while Karel is portrayed as one of the antagonists. Just because you prefer one character over another doesn't make the other character "evil".
3. Lyn would be changed into a black woman for the sake of Disney's obsession with putting diversity ...more
No offense to anyone and I really didn't mean to use the words 'black' or 'white' here. It would be just cringey if Disney race-swapped any of Nintendo's characters in my opinion.
Is Kylo ren sugarcoated?
At least Disney princess are more educated than princess Zelda.
Actually, they didn't do that with Leia or Anya after acquiring Lucasfilm and Fox (respectively), but still wouldn't put it past them.
Quite possibly including the female versions of characters like Robin and Corrin from "Fire Emblem" or Villager from "Animal Crossing". Also making the female versions the ONLY versions.
And given stupid new Forever 21 outfits
Just look what happened when Disney bought out Marvel back in 2009, they somehow race-lifted some of their characters in later issues or such. The characters from the original Marvel comic of Big Hero 6 were an all-Japanese cast, but when Disney made the animated film adaption, they race-lifted those characters into multiple ethnic groups for the sake of the diversity trend. I am worried that, if Disney were to buy a game company such as Nintendo, they would do the same to their characters. This is why they can't buy them. If you really want to add more diversity to a cast, then it's better to make entirely new characters instead of changing existing ones.
Like they've been doing with their own characters (Ariel and Lady's owner are black now)
Daisy doesn't need to become a Muslim
Disney already has their movies being made into tie in games on mobile such as Frozen 2: The Game, Wreck it Ralph 2: The Game and Toy Story 4: The Game.
It was "Ralph Breaks the Internet" and "Toy Story 4" that made me not trust Disney
Or Nintendo making a video game based on a Disney property, such as The Lion Guard? I hope not.
After Frozen and Big Hero 6 (don't judge), I don't trust Disney.
The sequels wouldn't have to be direct to video, either. Disney did in fact release several subpar sequels theatrically in recent years.
I am so sick of Disney milking everything to death. Hope this does not happen to beloved video games of the non-Disney side.
You know how FE Heroes has versions of various characters in alternate outfits like wedding dresses, Santa Claus outfits, and swimwear like you'd see at a modern day beach or water park? Well, if Disney gets involved, we'll get characters (particularly the females) in grubby close-fit T-shirts with either leggings or shorts that would be called "panties" if they were made of a different material. Worse, the shirts would have some image or catchphrase that at "best" shows a very shallow, stereotypical view of the character. Then again, maybe the "Wrecked Princesses"/"comfy squad" trend has finally passed.
They'd probably make someone LGBTQ even though there already are such characters in "Fire Emblem" (Ike, Soren, like 25% of the cast of "Fates")
Dare I wonder who'll they'd make black and/or LGBTQ for the sake of "representation"
You mean turn every single female character, possibly including the female versions of Robin, Corrin, and Byleth, into obnoxious radfem Tumblrinas? When meanwhile even Lyn and Sully were nothing like that.
Have nothing against preschool but there are some franchises that are not suited for that genre in the first place. But the worst case scenario is that it would have hinted dark and explicit overtones like The Lion Guard did. That would just suck. It would be even worse if it were to crossover with that show.
I mean, Preschool shows aren't that bad for kids the way they are now, but a POKEMON PRESCHOOL SHOW! THAT'S JUST OUTRAGEOUS!
Yoshi's Island: the T.V. Series? No thank you.
Noo! No LOZ remakes. There to special!
Disney, stop being greedy and buying everything you see... You have your own studio. Stop buying everything that doesn't belong to you.
Much as I'd love to beat up their recent "gotta love them because their so progressive" characters (e.g. Judy Hopps, Shank) with my Smash mains, Imma have to say no to this.
NGL, I wanted "Wreck-It Ralph" content (fighters, stages, Assist Trophies) in "Smash for 3DS/Wii U", the "Smash Bros" game released closest to "Ralph's" theatrical run. But any more Disney representation in "Smash" (including Sora), no thank you.
What is wrong with that is because The Lion King would be involved in the crossover, and we don't want that.
Disney in Super Smash Bros.? No thanks.
When was the last time Disney had a good reality show? The only reason people watch Disney is because of Gravity Falls. Nobody's gonna watch any of the reality shows based off Nintendo if they make them. (And I hope they don't)
A Nintendo version of Descendants? No thanks.
Noo please don't do it don't ruin Mario or Zelda or animal crossing or geez I'm ranting
Disney bought Marvel, didn't turn it into a reality show. Disney bought Star Wars, didn't turn it into a reality show. So I don't see this happening if Disney buys Nintendo.
Disney Channel "stars" and big "flavor of the month" celebrities like Gal Gadot (who better not voice Lucina or Zelda)
No. That would be absolutely horrible and put me of Disney forever.
They already kill the atmosphere of all their shows. Just wait till they get their hands on an Animal Crossing or Kirby show
Now this is legitimately the first REAL issue on this board.
This terrifies me, because when there were rumors when Disney would buy Hasbro, I thought it would be true. The MLP movie is out, and it can, if not, WILL happen. I'm just terrified if Nintendo gets into that sort of pickle.