Best Fighter Planes of World War IIIf you were a fighter pilot during WWII and you're going to fly over Europe and the Pacific, you will be in dog fights. You will as an escort for bombers over Europe, and air to ground support in both theatres. You will also strafe ground targets and ships.
Which plane would you want to fly?
Things to consider: Top speed and maneuverability at high and low altitudes. Durability. Visability out of the cockpit. Safety. Armament. Range and overall flying performance.
Mitchell designed this plane based on seaplane entrants for the Schneider cup, which he won. He used this experience and knowledge of fast flying seaplanes to premiere a beautiful mobile and well flying plane, which is the only plane to have continued production from the start to the end of WWII. Emerging from the murk of an era of biplanes, this is the signature plane of the battle of Britain, which paired with the exquisite almost 2000 horsepower griffon Rolls Royce engines really pulled through. An icon of hope and a true masterpiece of British engineering at its prime.
The Spitfire's wing design meant that it gave ample warning of a stall and, even when in a stall, the ailerons were still effective, so comparing statistics is not the whole story. Young inexperienced pilots (that's most of them) could fly the Spitfire to the limit with confidence, whereas with most other aircraft, only a really experienced pilot would dare to take his aircraft to the limit.
Result: Spitfires could perform well irrespective of who flew them, other types were often not being flown to their full potential, unless in the hands of an expert. The horrific accident rates during the war shows the cost of young men in aircraft which were difficult to handle.
To talk about Rolls-Royce-engined Mustangs not coming on stream in numbers until 1944 is rather disingenuous.
Great Britain was at war with Germany in 1939, and the Royal Air Force needed fighter aircraft to compete against Messerschmitts. Thus it was that the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane were borne.
In 1940, those two fighter aircraft between them, defeated the might of Germany's Luftwaffe in what became known as The Battle of Britain. The greatest air battle of the war.
That the outcome of the Battle prevented Hitler from invading Great Britain, which otherwise might have kept the USA out of the War, has to be the greatest point as to what was/were the 'best' fighter aircraft of World War Two.
It's not about speed, armaments, ceiling, range, or any other statistic; it's what the aircraft DID. And between them the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane SAVED GREAT BRITAIN.
Surveys like this constitute opinion. What may be more interesting are the "wanna be" craft which never made it due to design, production and political problems. Interesting to see all these aircraft computer gamed in an impartial environment. Many times comparisons like these are classic "apples versus oranges" scenarios. In other words, one fights with what is given...even the Brewster Buffalo in the hands of Finn and Dutch pilots fared well against ostensibly better aircraft. An Australian Wirraway (down under version of the AT-6 Texan/SNJ/A-27) supposedly shot down a Zero over the Dutch East Indies. Still, one must start somewhere.
The Mustang was invented 1940 when Great Britain was for P-40's under licence from another Company, which was close to compacity. The owner decided to build all new design, and a Legend was born. The first varient, The P-51A had a not so good engine, But the RAF but a Rolls-Royce- Engine in it and well, created Hitlers Nightmare. P-51D's Came out in late 1943 when Germany was in Trouble, But P-51D's Screwed Germany's Chances. And it saw service in the Korean War. The Mustang was OP.
This aircraft defeated the German Air Force over Germany in 1944-5. The Spitfire did not have the range or speed of the Mustang. It could not take the punishment that a P-47 could, but was the best all round air to air fighter in WW2. Not sure how anyone could think a Spitfire was better. I talked with an old guy the flew Spitfires in the Eagle Squadron. When he joined the USAAF in 1942 they converted to P-47s. He told me the P-47 was faster and more powerful than the Spit. He told me the P-51 was only slightly better than a P-47. Due to range and slight edge in speed and handling.
I don't understand the bias of so many people about the Spitfire. The P-51 outclassed the Spit in many ways. The P-51D had no handling issues at any altitude. It was nearly 50 MPH faster than a Spit, was more durable, had a superior wing design, the range was triple that of a Spit. It was not just an interceptor. This aircraft was a tactical ground attack plane and a long range escort fighter as well.
Not many people actually comment about what type of ammunition the p-51 had that was different than other planes of that era. The P-51 had the forward facing guns of anywhere from 4 to 8 guns depending on which version and country the plane was to be flown by. The one I am familiar with is the American flown version with 4,20mm guns. But back to the ammo, most planes had either just Armor piercing tracer rounds, or a mixture of non tracer Armor piercing and Tracer. The 20mm allowed for a non-tracer High Explosive round, which tended to take planes down rather quickly. The upside and downside of this is that you can shoot down the enemy quickly, but because there are no tracers at all the only indication that you are hitting the other plane is the other plane going down or catching on fire. Another upside is that the other plane, (Lets just say for instance a zero.) might not know you are there until it is too late.
The Mustang's advantages over 109 are a total myth. To compare the fastest versions that saw service during the war, the P-51D top speed was 437mph, while the boyfriend-109H was 470mph. Range wasn't much different either. P-51 max range with external tanks was 1,650 miles, while the range of the boyfriend-109 was 1,491 miles. Max altitude of the boyfriend-109H was 49,200 feet, while the P-51d's max altitude was 41,900 feet. Firepower isn't even remotely comparable. The mustang was armed with 6 miniscule 12.7mm machine guns, while the 109 was packing up to three 30mm cannons, and two 13mm machine guns. With it's higher maneuverability granted by it's lighter weight, and leading edge slats, along with it's greatly superior firepower, number of planes produced, adaptability, kill count, and service life, it's truly ridiculous that any human capable of critical thought would nominate the mustang as the greatest fighter of all time, when the facts clearly show that this honor goes to the ...more
The 109h was superior to the mustang in every way (speed, firepower, and maneuverability). Yet, the mustang is heralded as the greatest ever. Pure bull, it was fast and had long range but up against a 109h with a German ace at the controls the p51 was as good as dead. Germany had the best pilots up to 1943 but after that attrition began to take it's toll and made the mustang seem better than it really was. It's pretty easy to shoot a messerschmitt out of the sky with a green scared kid at the controls barely able to fly formation or instruments.
The boyfriend 109 was a high altitude fighter that relied on boom and zoom tactics, it was the best at what it did; and what it did really worked. You wouldn't expect the 109 to win a complete turn battle against a Spitfire and you wouldn't expect the spitfire to out climb the 109. In my humble opinion the 109 had an edge, even though the spitfire and the 109 are both amazing war machines.
Best single engine fighter of the war in every respect. speed, check. Maneuverability, check. altitude performance, check. firepower, check. durability, check. numbers, double check. fear factor, off the charts. The Kurfurst model presented, was faster at 460mph than the P-51D mustangs top speed of 437mph, was more maneuverable, thanks to it's lighter weight and leading edge slats, and had vastly superior firepower in the form of three 30mm cannons and two 13mm heavy machine guns, compared to the stangs six dinky 12mm machine guns. the only area in which the runstang was superior, was range, but that doesn't really matter, since both planes were designed for the exact opposite roles. The stang was a long range escort fighter, whereas the 109 was a defensive interceptor. The laminar flow wing of the stang was dangerous, and contrary to popular myth, made it a dangerous aircraft to fly, since laminar flow wings give next to no stall warning. It was hardly the "pilots airplane" ...more
The Focke-Wulf 190 D-9' in my opinion revolutionized air combat for the Germans who, at the time relied heavily on long range fighters (boyfriend 110's) and boyfriend 109's that were already shown to be sub-par when up against later spitfire models. It came at a time when Britain had control of the skies and brought the Germans back into the fight. The D-9 was highly effective and feared by the allied bomber formations and had a certain fear factor to it that played a part in combat. It was really a jack of all trades you might say. Its 30mm cannon had devastating effect on aircraft and ground targets and its great maneuverability gave it the edge in dog fighting less maneuverable bomber escorts like the P-38 and P-47. A wartime winner with a legacy that will live on.
Designed by Kurt Tank, this fighter/interceptor is among the very top most powerful and fastest single engine fighters of WWII. Nicknamed Dora cause of the D variant designation. The FW-190D were easily identified from other variants by its long nose. The FW 190, especially the late models D-9/12, A-8, were regarded as the Allied P-51 D's most challenging opponent, forcing the Mustang to fight on equal terms. It proved to have higher top speed and horsepower. The Focke Wulf 190 D9 is my favorite fighter of WWII, and believe if Germany manufactured more of these, and made more presents in European Skies it would occupy the P-51s slot as the best fighter of WWII
It is the best airplane in many aspects and the one to impose respect from the allies at all times. Fantastic performance combined with a good pilot made it a perfect fighting machine.
Better acceleration and rate of climb, under WEP, than the allied fighters plus the centrally located cannon and machine guns make it a superb B & Z energy fighter. The D9 retains its energy better than most of the other fighters and what is lost during maneuvering is quickly recovered. It's also a stable gun platform that doesn't suffer as much control surface stiffness from high-speed compressibility as other planes do.
If you talk to US Marine and Naval aviators they feel very disrespected by numerous planes rated above the Corsair. I struggled ranking the Mustang above the Corsair. The Corsair had one tremendous advantage over the Mustang and Spitfire it could take tremendous punishment like a P-47 could due to the air cooled engine. The Corsair was the best carrier plane in the world. This was demonstrated by its adoption by the Royal Navy in 1943-44. It was a tremendously good dog fighter.
This thing could fly 453 MPH, had crazy firepower and could take on pretty much any enemy aircraft. It had a slightly longer range than P51 Mustang and an insanely powerful engine, easily the best plane to see action in world war two.
A Marine pilot in a Corsair saved my father's life when their convoy was attacked by Kamikaze pilots late in the war. Dad was on the bridge manning the earphones and sending fire orders to the various stations when a Kate got through the flack and headed toward the bridge. The Corsair was up in the sun, belly painted gray and near invisible. It did and extreme dive and as he pulled up, cut the Kate in half with the 6 50cal guns. Only a part of the engine nacelle hit the side if the ship doing some minor damage. While all this was happening... My mother was at home in a defense plant... Inspecting riveting on wing sections... For F4U Corsairs. True story.
It can do it all, and do it faster, lets face it the Japanese had superior planes until the arrival of the corsair. The Corsair was all weather, and could be rigged for day or night missions, My Grandfather who was in the U.S. Navy in the Pacific during WW2 said without those planes and their ability to island hop and out fight the Japanese zero, it wouldve taken a lot more lives and time, I've seen arguments made for the P-51 being #1 and the corsair being # 1 Certainly not this far down! In my opinion it should be 1 or 2.
Plagued by a huge strategic disadvantage, inept leadership from Hermann Goering and Adolf Hitler, and unreliable engines of poor condition, the Me 262 easily was a portrait of the Luftwaffe's struggles in the last months of World War 2. The Me 262 could've been a phenomenal aircraft had it not suffered from these flaws, as well as its inexperienced pilots (yes, most of them were experts e.g. Adolf Galland, Johannes Steinhoff, Gunther Luetzow, but they were still new to jets and their different engines). Had it been introduced earlier (its possible the 262 or another jet fighter could've debuted in 1942, not long after the Fw 190! ), its flaws could've been ironed out and its new technique mastered. The Me 262 was still a deadly opponent to bombers and fighters so long as its engines could survive.
It was most vulnerable at low altitude, where a P-51 or P-47 could dive on it, or a Hawker Tempest could easily catch up to it.
The success of the allied (western) campaign is totally related to air superiority. So, a plane able to win THAT aerial supperiority (as ME262 was) is for me the deadliest plane of ww2 beyond any doubt (plane itself speaking and with no consideration of any circumstance not dependant of the plane itself and its performance).
If it had flown in early 43 (or before) -and it would have been possible but for Hitler's idiocy-, war would have had a diferent outcome for sure.
So what are we really debated... there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that ME262 were lightyears ahead of anything the allies had. No doubt that it was the best fighter in the war.
The fact that it came too late when materials was scarse... and the fact that it came so late that it had no chance to make a real impact still doesn't mean that it wasnt the best fighter.. Its STUPID to bring in parametres like "biggest impact" or "ammount produced" when we are debating whats the best fighter...
Limited discussion with people who have intensely studied the Me 262 have stated two strategic problems... Lack of critical engine materials and second slow start-up due to Hitler limited understanding of 20thCentury Air Superiority weaponry. It the title of best in what could have been... Earlier 42... No B-17's crossing the channel to attack Hitler Iron Fortress! Won the war no, delayed yes.
My Uncle was part of the 354th Fighter Group that forcibly turned in their P-51s for P-47s in 1944 and he always said that the P-47 in the hands of an experienced combat pilot was every bit as good a fighter in actual air combat as the P-51. (He passed at 96 in 2015) Yes, the P-47 lacked Range, but when flown by an experienced fighter pilot, it "poured out lead" and could take a beating and continue flying. He didn't want to give up his Mustang, but soon was glad he did. He felt safer in a Jug because he knew it would get him home. Mustang's were the pretty boy's choice, but he loved the P-47 because it kept flying even after tremendous damage. He felt the lower kill ratio was due to many inexperienced pilots flying the Jugs, many who didn't even see the enemy until they were heavily damaged. The Mustang's rarely flew ground attack because they had a vulnerable belly.
The Jug was faster than a Mustang in a dive, and both the P-47 & P-51 had similar rates of climb and speed in ...more
Heard of the A-10 Warthog? Its less known nickname is Thunderbolt II, and its name is from the P-47. Known as the "Jug", the P-47 was one of the heaviest planes to fly by a single propeller engine, weighing around 5 tons when empty. However, it was incredibly fast at high altitude and in a dive, and had a fearsome armament. German pilots remarked it was something "you never wanted to be in front of." The P-47 was incredibly armored as well, with the ability to survive huge amounts of damage and fly home, and had an 18 cylinder R2800 engine, which could continue to work even with some cylinders completely destroyed. The P-47 could also perform ground attack roles, able to carry half the bombload of a B-17 in rockets and bombs. Its only flaws were poor maneuverability and decent range. Many pilots in Korea who flew P-51s for ground attack missions wished they could've flown the heavier and more armored P-47 instead, which was better suited for the role.
The p_47 was built to last it had 8 50cal machine guns, long range and carried a impressive payload not to mention it was one if the biggest fighters that could take hits and still fly! The 262 doesn't deserve to be on top of p-47 because it was introduced to late in the war and it was supposed to be a bomber Hunter, the allies could take out the 262 easily when it turned because it lost so much speed, thus making it a bad "fighter".
Did the most damage of any fighter of WWII. Escort, strafe, bomb and intercept. Best kill ratio, and best pilot retention. The "N" version even outperformed the 51 on long range escort. Climbed adequately after the new prop and dove like hell. Very tough and the R2800 might have been the best motor of the war, even able to take great damage and perform. Much better dog fighter than it looked like. I thought quad fifties were awesome. 47 had two of them.
Like the 109 ruled Europe, the Zero ruled Asia and the Pacific, finding no challenge except from some early American fighters such as the F4F, which it crushed easily. But like the 109 (but a more severe case), it fell out of the throne, and even could've been considered obsolete. After the Allied study of Akutan Zero and the introduction of the F6F Hellcat and F4U Corsair, the Zero's flaws, namely its poor armor, slow speed, and inability to retain any high speed well became apparent, and now its weaknesses could be fully exploited by the much faster Hellcat and Corsair. Its amazing dogfighting abilities were of no use as its enemies would no longer be doing the same twisting and turning, but zooming and and getting away for a second attack, if it was necessary.
I do not believe the Zero deserves a place in the list. By 1945 it was abysmal, being crushed by the US and British pilots, as it was far too slow to be effective. However, the Japanese land fighters of the late war, the ...more
At the start of the war, not Allied plane could touch it either for maneuverability, firepower, or range. The most advanced plane of its time. It would be at the top of this list if this wasn't an English site. A Spitfire, Mustang or boyfriend-109 aren't fit enough to share airspace with a Zero.
At the start of the war there was no better fighter on either side of the ocean. It had the Americans playing catch up. I've seen one of the few left in the world in Kure, Hiroshima. It was a beaut!
The fighter was *not* made of wood. It did possess an excellent rate of climb, though in absolute climb speed it was not that fast. It was a steep climber.
The arrival of this plane played a huge role in allowing America to turn the tide against Japan. It was the first American fighter to have a firm advantage over the Zero and was easier to fly than the Corsair. It also shot down more planes than any other Allied aircraft during the war and accounted for around 75% of aircraft downed during the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot of 1944.
This is the plane that took the US to the gates of Tokyo nothing else matters, you have to look at the rate of climb of the F8 Bearcat and its left side roll under high throttle, it will run rings around other planes.
There were 305 American pilots that became aces behind the stick of this aircraft, more than any other American fighter plane in history. It is credited with 5,000 + aerial victories. Need I say more?
Everyone overlooks the F6F. Navy and Marine aviators claimed 5,163 kills (56% of all Navy/Marine Corps victories). 19:1 kill ratio, 305 Hellcat aces, Capt David McCampbell scored 34 victories flying Hellcats, enough said.
Called the best Axis fighter overall in 1943 by the Luftwaffe.
Level speed was 417 with WEP; 590 mph dive. Very good high altitude handling, aerobatics, and performance. Critical altitude was 8 Km for speed.
Some had 5 Mauser 20mm cannons! Great for intercepting heavies.
More robust than the Re2005 and without it's vibration/flutter.
Best for mass production of the Italian type 5 fighters and most suitable to upgrade to the larger DB603 engine.
Good rear view unlike the boyfriend 109.
It even had faster dive acceleration than the Gustav!
Chosen to be the standard ANR Italian fighter since the others were inferior at more altitudes.
Quoted best axis fighter until the end of 1943, and for good reason. And I chose this because I don't like German or English planes and American planes are not really as good as they say they are.
Just read Goering...he said it was much better than other DB605 planes and much more robust, production was tiny in Italy so they were planning to mas produce it in Germany but DDay happened too soon...
This fighter is better than Spitfire
Most ww2 aviation enthusiasts talk about how outclassed Japanese fighters were near the end of the war, but there were quite a few that were more than a match for there American counterparts. The N1K Shiden was one of those fighters. It was fast, extremely maneuverable and very heavily armed, and armored. Many people talk about how the Hellcat was the Zero killer, but few know about the aircraft which was the hellcat killer. With a top speed in excess of 400mph, a heavy armament of four 20mm cannons, high maneuverability, and unlike most previous Japanese fighters armor protection for the pilot, along with self sealing fuel tanks made this aircraft a highly potent force to be reckoned with.
By far one of the best planes Japan ever produced. It was more than a match for anything america could throw at it. The N1K had a killer armament of 4x20mm cannons that would tear thru bombers and fighters alike. It also had one of the best climb rates out of any planes in ww2, with the high altitude performance to boot. With Japan's belief to keep the maneuverability of fighters high, so that they could out turn any American fighters, with the application of that belief to the N1K it only helped enhance it's killing abilities.
Personally, I think if I had the choice out of any prop plane to fly during ww2 it would be the N1K.
Absolutely the best Japanese naval fighter of the war, if the Shiden Kai was produced massively it could have probably changed the results of the war. Good firepower, not to mention the awesome maneuverability. This plane was hard to defeat in a P51, the second plane in this Top Ten. Definitely under rated.
First rate fighter that was a match for anything the Americans could throw at it. Hellcat's, Corsair's, Mustang's, Lightning's, Thunderbolt's, all fell to it's cannon's when a competent pilot was at the stick.
Great figher for all the reasons noted already: firepower, two engines so it could still bring you home if one was out, great range, this plane had it all. Maybe not the best "pure fighter" but was much more adaptable than any fighter. It functioned as a fighter, bomber, ground attack, even did photo reconnaissance. This was such a great plane that even Charles Lindberg was able to score a kill in the Pacific theater, and he was not a trained combat pilot.
Top two American aces flew, P-51s. Before transferring to P-51s, Robin Olds shot down 5 German planes on two different occasions.
The large two engined P-38 looks nothing like your typical World War 2 fighter, looking more like a heavy fighter, but the Lightning (namesake of the F-35 Lightning II), or Fork Tailed Devil to the Germans and Two Planes One Pilot to the Japanese was an extremely fast and maneuverable plane. With a heavy armament packed into the nose, getting hit by a P-38 would mean defeat or a serious problem. German pilots were told to "never go head on with a P-38." The P-38, while not as iconic as the P-51 or Spitfire, achieved many important things. It produced America's top ace, Richard Bong, and avenged Pearl Harbor when it shot down Admiral Yamamoto's transport plane.
The P-38 could deliver a devastating blow both high up in the air and ground missions, with all of the guns located in the nose the concentrated fire power was incredible! Even the mighty Tiger tank's knew they were in trouble once they spotted the flying killing machines, just using the amazing concentrated guns turned those tanks in to twisted metal.
Agreed with the description already rendered. Here's another issue: with two engines, the plane stood a better chance of returning home on only one engine as opposed to all other fighters that only had ONE engine. Max firepower, speed and maneuverability - this plane rocked like no other.
A superb dogfighter. As Flight Lieutenant Pete Brothers observed. It was only slightly slower than the boyfriend 109E. He should know, he caught two boyfriend 109s over Dover in a turning battle and shot them down.
Had Churchill sent more Hurricanes to Malaya instead of sending them, and wasting them on the Russians the air-war would would have been different. As Terence Kelly observed (258 Squadron) one used the technique developed by the 'flying tigers' and once things got sticky one could drop out of combat and the Japanese could not follow one down either in the Zero or the Ki 43 (falcon).
Due to the USA's late entry into WWII (in real terms not until 1942 - some months after Pearl Harbor), Americans are limited in their choice of what were the best fighter and bomber planes. Because unless they know that Britain's RAF destroyed Germany's mighty Luftwaffe in 1940 in the Battle of Britain, with their superb Hawker Hurricanes and Supermarine Spitfires, they are at a disadvantage. Americans will also not know that Britain's mighty heavy bomber, the Lancaster, was bombing German sites a full three-and-a-half-years before a US bomber saw service over Germany.
Of course, Americans MUST choose the Mustang as their favourite because it was the only really good fighter plane they had - even though it didn't see real service until 1944, because national pride enters the equation. The Mustang was indeed a brilliant long-range plane, built to a British Air Ministry requirement, but useless until the US-built engine was replaced with the matchless, British, Rolls Royce Merlin ...more
It shot down more german planes than the spitfires and anti aircraft guns together.. Over 3000 were used by russian forces and the reliability was unmatched
While hurry WAS a fantastic plane you guys are missing THE great plane of ww2, the Mosquito, could and did it all fighter, bomber, pinpoint low level action, pathfinder, etc.
Largest, and heaviest aircraft of WWII, and the best flying boat of it's day.
Not really a fighter, but I love it
In the end it was the opinion of pilots that matter. When the German pilots were told to "avoid combat below five thousand metres with Yakovlev fighters lacking an oil cooler intake beneath the nose! ", it is obvious the Germans were terrified of this plane. When it came to most other planes they had a plan of attack which was effective, but against the Yak 3 it was simply: 'RUN! ' Additionally when the French pilots serving with the Soviet Air Force were offered any British, American or Russian airplane to fly and chose the Yak-3 over all others. Albeit I don't know if these pilots were the best ever, they may have developed bias for the plane they few in the soviet front, but it is still a great testimonial for the plane. Because of these reasons I will always consider the Yak-3 to be the best fighter of WW2.
The lightest fighter of the War, it was reported by Soviet pilots to be a dream to fly, and German pilots were routinely ordered not to engage it in any circumstance below 5km. When the top scoring French Ace of the war was given the option to choose any allied fighter plane, including the P-51 and Spitfire, he went with the Yak-3.
I would have to place the YaK-3 over the others simply for the sheer agility, high speed approaching that of the Mustang, and good armament. When it started to appear in noticeable numbers, it absolutely crushed the 109 and 190 in most encounters.
The YAK-3 was reported by many to be the best handling and most maneuverable of WWII fighters. It was comparable to the rest of the best in other areas. From what I understand, maneuvering in air combat trumps all. I like it's look too.
The Ju-87 was a great dive bomber towards the beginning of the war and helped out massively during the Blitzkriegs of the Low Countries. It was an amazing tank buster during the later years of the war and it was great from a psychological standpoint with the infamous "Jericho Trumpet".
Fantastic aircraft, obsolete as dive bomber, lethal as tank buster
The REAL "first" jet fighter, and the first aircraft to feature an ejection seat. With a top speed of 570mph, it was faster than the ME-262, and the production version would have been more heavily armed, with 6 20mm cannons to the 262's four 30mm. It was also more maneuverable than the FW-190A, as proven during mock dogfights between the two. Range was the only advantage of the 262. Was also an incredibly rugged aircraft, that could take tremendous punishment.
The Soviets mostly used this one and gave it the praise it deserved. Sometimes I think America made a mistake not using this one.
Made in america and flown mostly by soviets, is it any wonder this very capable fighter never got the press it deserved!
This plane and it's simaler counterpart the p-63, were very good planes indeed.
So beloved by Red Army fly boys and kept Soviets in the game early in the war. Roomy cockpit, very good competitive with Fritz at low altitude. Gave great punch with its 37mm cannon, 2 12.7 Brownings and 4 0.30 cal. or 2 12.7 under the wing.
Okay this wasn't the best of the best. It wasn't better than the Mustangs in some opinions. But it still held off the Japanese and was probably the most important American aircraft. Which aircraft responded at Pearl Harbor? Not the Mustang.
The main land based fighter of the US until it was replaced by the P-51, P-47, and P-39. It played a big role in the defense in China and Burma as Chennault's well known Flying Tigers. The P-40 was the third most produced American fighter.
Held off superior aircraft until the allies could get the new aircraft in the air. Same is true of the Wildcat
A well rounded aircraft that allowed the U.S. to get newer aircraft in the air. Not the best but a durable aircraft
A feared and respected adversary of allied pilots. Preferred over boyfriend 109 by Jagdwaffe pilots. An Italian aircraft that excelled in speed, power and climb and also very nimble and maneuverable, allowing it to fight on equal terms with top allied fighters.
Great climb ratio. A pair of 20mm cannons and a pair of 12.7mm MG. Extremely manuevreable at low altitude, even outpeforming the legendary P-51 Mustang. Just as good as the Mustang at high altitudes. It could fight on equal terms with the top Allied fighters.
Extremely maneuverable at low altitude with adequate performance at high. High ate of climb, being able to outclimb every allied fighter.
American pilots who flew the captured Macchi thought the were better than their Mustangs
Actually it was a very good fighter. Pierre Closterman rode her to fame as the best French born fighter pilot of the war. She was mas heavy, but made up for it with an engine that could pull a fully loaded bomber. And she carried enough armor to stop nearly everything fired into her. She had one drawback. The torque of her engine killed large numbers of its rookie pilots. Both take off and landing, the engine would simply roll the plane onto its back and dig her into the ground if the pilot wasn't aware applying hard opposite rudder. She killed more of her own pilots than the Germans shot down pilots flying the Typhoon.
While I do prefer the spitfire as it was just a legend, the typhoon were fewer and more deadly at the end of 1941 and throughout the rest of the war. Also because it could carry up to 12 7.7mm browning machine guns or 4 20mm cannons made it a challenge for most German planes. So year typhoon for the win
Think of this plane as air borne artillery and an army asset rather than air to air combat - although could hold it's own in that fight as well.
If you were a ground troop this is the fighter you would fear.
Best over fighter of WWII. Excellent range, excellent overall performance, and as a fighter bomber 2nd to none. Not as good for pilot safety (armor) than a P-47 but safer than others 2 engines. More versatile armament than others. Pilots that flew both P-38 and P-51 seemed to side with the P-38 after the war. For some reason the P-38 seems to not have good press over the decades after the war which I cannot understand. And in pure scare factor nothing scared one as much as when a "forked tailed devil" attacked you.
An average fighter with good long range and high altitude performance. She was slower by 50 mph than nearly every other fighter in the air at the time. She was less maneuverable than both the Messerschmidt and Focke Wulf families of aircraft, and the Ta-152 would have made toast out of her. She's more legend than fact.
Fast, heavy fire power and just a all alround powerhouse war machine that conquerd the air around it. Also was one of the moat beautifull planes of wwii
This plane concept seems very good. It's a shame it doesn't get more notice.
Simply the best piston engine fighter of the war. Faster than any Allied fighter by 50 mph. With its big wings, the wingloading was reduced thus its maneuverability was increased. It turned better than the P-38, Mustang, and Spitfire. It is an unrecognized masterpiece of engineering.
This high altitude fighter is a beast. Master piece made by Kurt Tank. Fw190 D series was nothing but a stepping stone for this long nosed, large winged beauty. Shame that it was built in small number. It could have done way more if enough number was produced.
Superior to the Mustang in every way. During a low altitude flight test, Kurt Tank himself was bounced by a formation of Mustang's who attempted to shoot him down. He simply pushed the throttle forward and left them in the dust. :P
Hitler failed to realize this majestic plane was built solely for high altitudes. The fighter made little to no impact on the war due its misuse in low altitude operations and lack of production.
An amazing plane, which although outdated in the second half of the war it still performed admirable.
A Luftwaffe major who tested it in March 1941 had this to say about the IAR 80
Takeoff and landing are very good. It's 20 30 km h slower than the boyfriend 109E. The climb to 5000 meters is equivalent. In a dogfight, the turns are also equivalent, although the long nose reduces the visibility. In a dive it's outclassed by the boyfriend 109E, because it lacks an automated propeller pitch regulator. It's a fighter adequate to modern needs.
It was one of the most important planes on the Eastern Front, but forgotten today.
The IAR 80 was a Romanian World War II low-wing, monoplane, all-metal monocoque fighter and ground-attack aircraft. When it first flew, in 1939, it was comparable to contemporary designs such as the German Messerschmitt boyfriend 109B, the British Hawker Hurricane Mk. I, and the American Curtiss P-40B/Tomahawk Mk. I and superior to the Dutch Fokker D. XXI and Polish PZL P.24. However, production problems and lack of available armament delayed entry of the IAR 80 into service until 1941. It remained in front-line use until 1944
An unknown country that produced a world beating aircraft
Armed with nothing but death.