Reasons Why Matpat's Mario is Mental Theory Sucks
I absolutely HATE this theory. It sucks so hard on so many levels but I will be nice and only give out 10 reasons. It's okay the trolls will add reasons for me.Honestly Matpat has kind of became a dead horse by now. The more you beat on a dead horse the deader it gets. This is no exception in all honesty. Plus if people are going to overreact to minor theories made by one person that aren't meant to be taken 100% seriously it just shows how far people will be to desperately find the next hip thing to hate on. This MatPat hate bandwagon has gone too far and is very melodramatic from my perspective. There's far worse YouTubers than him and far worse videos on YouTube than Mario is Mental. I would go in more depth but most of you probably get my point.
Kitten2015 I don't care if you hate on Mario just because of this stupid theory. There are Youtubers debunking this theory and I think you only believe this theory because your a Sonic the Hedgehog Fangirl who wants Sonic to get more attention.
And here is another thing, People only agree with this video just because they are a bunch of Stupid Game Theory Fan
Listen, I hated the "Mario is Mental" theory. But I never seen MatPat be a jerk full out about!
Okay, MatPat, First Of All, Mario Wasn't Even Paying Attention to his Footing cause he was too busy Giving Luigi a Friendly Pat on the Back, So Basically, He Did it on Accident, He Didn't Mean to Do It.
Second, I Find it Strange how You're Triggered by That yet you're totally fine with Wario And Waluigi, Pulling Paratroopa away from his hard earned Trophy(Stares Glaringly at The Waluigi Fanbase.)
Third, Stepping on Luigi's Foot is Not Treating Him Like Garbage. You're Taking a Simple Accidental Foot Grind and comparing it to Stabbing Someone.
Fourth, You Have No Evidence that Mario was thinking of Insulting Luigi at the end of Mario is Missing. For all we know, he could be thinking of Having Spaghetti together with Luigi cause he's so gosh dang hungry after spending all those days trapped in that cell. Heck, they also HUG at the End.
Fifth, You're Saying that Mario Treats Luigi Like Garbage? Let's See, He Gives Luigi a High Five when they win a Doubles Tourney in Mario ...more
Imagine you step on your friend's foot or the door accidentally closed on them. Because of that you are a psychopath. That's this reasoning. The absolute worst in the entire theory
Mario was stepping on Luigi Foot but he was doing as a joke, that’s just how other siblings do that to their (you know) siblings. The balloon took of by itself. Mario never said anything of these insulting words because matpat you haven't seen the gosh darn ending. And thank you Nintendofan126 for showing evidence to why Mario is not a bad brother to Luigi.
" MARIO STEPPED ON LUIGI'S FOOT HE'S A PSYCHOPATH" Chill dude you clearly don't have siblings if you think THAT is evil
Yeah, Like every piece of evidence is false:
1. Mario doesn't punch Yoshi, he just points where to stick out his tongue!
2. Mario is not bullying Luigi, he's just teasing him and just wants his brother to toughen up a little!
3. Mario has 2 girlfriends, but since it's 2020, Pauline is Mario's ex by now.
4. Mario is just bored of having to be the center of attention, so he wants Luigi to have the spotlight by making HIM the hero in Mario is Missing!
If you guys agree, please comment and share your ideas about MatPat being the mental sociopath. - Joshtition24
Imagine your favorite waifu was turned to a brick and you don't even know that the brick was her. You used it to build your house. Because I unknowingly used a person as a brick, I am now a pyschopath. That is the logic of this entire theory
Most of it is based on fact but some of it you have to admit is just insane. Even Patrick can see right through it.
No. A lot of his evidence is real. Sometimes he can get his facts messed up. He's only human.
Remind me again who pushes the button to make Mario abandon Yoshi?
Here's the problem with this evidence. It's in the manual that the Toads were turned into bricks I get it. What MatPat fails to understand for this as well as most of the other pieces of evidence is that the PLAYER is the one controlling Mario! For being a "Game" channel he sure is stupid to not know that! He also makes the assumption that Mario already knows about the Toads being turned into bricks. HOWEVER he can't prove that is the case. ALSO considering the fact that the Toads were magically turned to bricks it logically makes sense that they are dead. Nice try MatPat
While the toads were dead, this is still valid evidence. Why? Because Gametheorysucks, IT'S NOT OK TO DESTROY DEAD BODIES. Jesus.
The toads are bricks so they were already dead
How the hell was mario supposed to know?
It's astonishing that MatPat fails to understand that the player controls Mario.
Already on the list but yeah it's just a friendly competitive gesture by Mario it's not like he's chasing Luigi with a power saw or anything.
It's debatable whether it is Mario or Jumpman but DK was the one to steal Pauline in the first place. By that logic Mario is a psychopath for rescuing Peach from Bowser! Here's the problem: Bowser kidnap princess peach in the first place! DK captured Pauline in the first place! Also Mario/Jumpman didn't abuse Donkey Kong Jr either because DK Jr had the choice to not rescue his father Mario/Jumpman did not force him to. As for Mario abusing DK in the circus? Well he could have been in the audience! Even if he was the director of the circus keep in mind that this was on a game and watch therefore it is technically not cannon with the Mario universe and so therefore this evidence is irrelevant. Nice try MatPat! Mario isn't Mental maybe you should do some research next time
So according to that logic self defense makes you a psycopath. Wiggler was a boss and therefore Mario would have died otherwise
Mario had nio Idea about the wiggler there and it tried to kill hem and the sunshine one was evil and killed piantas
Wiggler had a power star. Mario would have died otherwise.
You said their was a Pauline toy but no peach toy and you look at the footage there actually is a peach toy in the game
So what though? Pauline was Mario's first girlfriend then Daisy (in one game) then Peach.
So Mario was not Saying “Oh Daisy Daisy” to greet her, He was saying that to see if she was okay and Daisy was going straight up to Mario to kiss but Mario did not kiss Daisy back you know
Sometimes I see YouTube Videos Mario being evil, I see people saying that Matpat was right but that’s not true they should realize those are just YouTube videos
You don't know that could be his paycheck.