Top 10 Worst Linux Distros
The distro of choice for Fascists, who wouldn't enjoy being associated with that crowd. /s.
Blatantly racist... what more is there to say?
I prefer dark mode.
I think it's stupid that it's an actual distribution, but I'm somewhat not surprised since Linux is open source, meaning anyone can come and make their own distro, but honestly this distribution is just taking "open source" WAY WAY too far. I'm highly against satanism by the way.
That fact that it exists in the first place is just bad enough.
I can't believe this actually exists, this is licensed?
You must be kidding me.
This one is pretty much crap nothing offensive or disturbing
Kim jung un tried to make a good os.
Sorry kim fatty un.
Here is a cookie
Home to that many privacy violations it isn't Linux. Sorry, Kim.
Red Star OS blatantly plagiarizes macOS and defies the principles of Linux.
A closed-sourced Linux distribution.
Also blatantly racist, makes me wonder why people even make this garbage.
Too unstable for comfort.
One days you boot it and awaful bugs come out of nowhere for no reason.
- "Sorry, Ubuntu xx.xx has experienced an internal error"
- "SeNd A rEpOrT tO hElP fiX tHiS PrObLeM" -
From the Amazon analytics, the Unity desktop, and heavy encouragement to use snaps, Ubuntu has a history of Canonical trying to force what they think is best on its users.
A lot of useless propaganda. "Ubuntu is awesome!" "Ubuntu is awesome!" Grow up, you Ubuntu people.
For those who can't configure Debian...
How to identify an Arch User? They'll tell before you ask.
Never seen an Arch User who do any serious productive work.
Unstable. Updates will make you stressed.
Arch is far too difficult to install for newcomers, and its fanboys are toxic.
Strange and hard difficult to use.
why make things hard?
really a bad direction to go!
I disagree, Arch is made for power users and the brave people who dares to work with the terminal
They want Jesus and God to use it to keep track on what all the humans are doing so that they can know who goes to Heaven.
This distro is hard to install. If you live in the U.S., it is illegal to use the torrent.
Once installed, it is lag.
Only good if your distro is based on it.
I wont say its bad but its kinda dead...
The hard drive installs are always slowly breaking itself...
Running as root sucks.
Pretends to be suitable for beginners only to require advanced knowledge to fix if it breaks down, which it will. They pretend that packages are more stable just because they wait on them for a week for Arch users to report bugs first. Manjaro encourages users to misuse pacman commands and perform partial upgrades that cause more headaches in the long run.
Does the best job of being stable for a while and then suddenly breaking.
The distro of choice for little script kiddies who want to show the whole world that they're Ub3R 133t h4xX0rZz!11! If you actually use Kali Linux for its intended purpose, chances are you probably don't brag that you run it.
Too popular with script kiddies. Besides, who wouldn't want a distro that is root-only, only supports its own software and is used by hackers.
Hey, you think you're a hacker, here's Kali linux. I'm seriously sick of that damn OS
Fails at being a windows clone. I have no idea how you could ruin the kde desktop environment, but the people who made this distro actually figured it out.
An unremarkable distro that uses bots to inflate their Distro Watch score.
Gentoo takes FOREVER to install packages since it compiles everything from source. Setting "USE" flags is a massive pain and it can take an entire weekend to get a desktop environment done.
Kernel headers don't contain all kernel headers.