Top Ten Worst Cars
Toyota did whatever it took and went to almost every corner of the world to get the greenest material, but caused more pollution than the car would if it were not a hybrid, and the car itself was nowhere as economical as it would be, and at a bad price. So people waste money to INCREASE global warming, thinking that they're doing the environment good and not losing money as quickly as they think. So one is MUCH better off with an equivalent petrol car, like a Jaguar XFR, even! So are Greenpeace.
This is the most stupidest thing to put as number 1, you guys are so judgmental. First gen was bad but it got better and actually it has good gas mileage and is a great city car and good for a 2 person road trip.
Somehow gets uglier with each redesign, as well as less reliable. Also is the worst car for the environment, making this the official car of hypocrites.
... Come on. Let's be real... The only people who drive enough to actually save a sizable amount of money on gas are the people that drive too often to want to be seen in a car like this.
This car would get better rating if it wasn't imported to usa. Sure it was unreliable, but it was cheap and we couldn't afford good cars back in 80s in Yugoslavia.
I do not speak of this car; it is so utterly useless. I feel sorry for the poor people of Yugoslavia who had to buy one. Thank God they shut down so quickly.
This should be one, not a car that got fifth in the Greatest Car Rankings.
They are so useless. James May had one and it died when he turned it off.
God only knows what kind of drugs they were doing when they designed this.
Ugly looks. That's all that's wrong.
Only good in straight line speed, which you won't be doing except for free way on ramps. Handles poorly and can't go around corners, sub-par gas mileage and is loud when you don't want it to be. Due to the turning circle and size, driving in a city is a pain in the ass as well. All this on top of its unreliability. It's silly to buy this car when you can purchase a much better handling roadster for less.
I owned five or six of these cars, and they all would not handle! I even had a brand new 2011, and two months after I bought it, the trim started fading, and the engine actually lost a couple of pulleys, causing it to overheat! I tell you I got rid of that thing quick as a flash, and got me a Chevy!
Absolutely horrible, the reason why it is so cheap is because ford build it so horribly. When Mercedes build a fast car they put special brakes, steering, etc to handle the speed. Ford does none of that. So if you drive it fast, The brakes won' work properly, the steering wont work properly, etc.
This is a completely crummy car in my opinion. It doesn't even start fast, compared to the Camaro and all those others!
Whoever made this car is right now in a cave trying to lick his elbow
Headlights are super weird
They look like rover cars
These are so that ugly
Absolutely rubbish never seen anything like it in my lift it even slows down once you put wipers or lights or radio on waste of batteries in my opinion
Quite possibly the worst car ever, it has a short battery life, low speed, ugly design and it has poor safety.
Good Jeremy Clarkson for putting this at #8!
This car is just ridiculous.
Indian cars suck butt.
This car is very cheaply made and unreliable since it breaks down a lot. - HoldenFanatic
GOD this thing is embarrassing. it makes me look stupid, because I am fat- and god!
More specificly the 91 cars, the mechanics every driver's nightmare - htoutlaws2012
The convertible version is good, but the normal is a poor attempt at being 40s
The ugliest car ever seen, behold, the PT loser.
Looks like a big teapot, particularly cabriolet version!
AVOID THIS MONSTROSITY. Buy a mazda 3 instead
The only reason that this car has fans is because of the Back To The Future movies. It is a terrible car besides the looks in real life.
Car was slow, unreliable and expensive. You were better off with a corvette c3 or c4. car was so bad that te movie Back to the future could only hold of bakruptcy for a couple moths
What ho put this? This is amazing!
Who ever bought this should kill themself
Its ugly, tiny and looks like a death trap. 'enough said. - ConfederateZephyr
This should be higher. It’s just an ugly car that is cheaply made and can’t even fit families or a group of people. It’s basically a car version of a golf cart. - HoldenFanatic
It’s just a car the size of a golf cart that was cheaply made and can’t even fit a group of people. Even it’s name says it’s for 2 people. - HoldenFanatic
My uncle had one of these; it broke down while trying to get over a speed bump...
Ladas are terrible cars
A car with four doors should at least have 120 horsepower.
As reliable as a cardboard box taped to 2 skateboards
THIS CAR LOOKS LIKE A STUPID BUBBLE AND LOOKS TOO MUCH LIKE A PIECE from an animated movie
They made like 82 of them - bobcards
This car was the final nail in the coffin for Rover, a once heralded car brand that was reduced to a laughing stock.
It was not actually a Rover to begin with; it was a rebadged Tata Indica which is made in India and shipped to England where MG Rover thought that they could sell it in Europe. For many, this confirmed that the future of Rover was bleak after the Rover 75 failed to save the company from demise.
This car was so bad that MG Rover refused to lend one to Top Gear out of fear of a negative review.
Top Gear got around this by asking James May to go undercover and review it without the salesman noticing. He did so successfully and the CityRover was placed under "seriously uncool" on the cool wall without a debate.
Two years later, in 2005, Rover became a thing of the past and the CityRover was discontinued. Not only was it the final nail in the coffin for Rover it was also the final nail for volume car manufacturing in the UK.
Outdated interior, no airbag for front passenger, manual windows for front passengers and no central locking all for £6,495 and this car came out in 2003!
HORRIBLE crash test results - railfan99
Are you sure this isn't the best car list? Because except for all the toyotas and hondas, these are some great cars!
Love it, a classic and should NOT be on the worst list!
I hate this website honda is the best I had a civic and it lasted me 12 years
This is a good car do not insult it.
The civic should not be on this list. It was a famous car back then so its no sopossed to be on this list!
The Civic is the worst car I have ever owned. The clutch wentnout the first month of owning it. And within a year, the passenger side widow came our of the track, the trunk began to leak, and the sun roof wouldn't close right. After someone broke into my Civic, I found out from the police that Civics are the most common cars thieves target. The acceleration sucks, and it handles worse than horse drawn carriage. Just because Hollywood made them look cool, doesn't mean they are good cars. The only advantage was it had.good gas mileage, but ironically, my Mustang had better gas mileage.
You will almost never see a Ford Pinto outside the streets in your lifetime and It will also explode in rear-end collisions
This car is LITERALLY prone to exploding when rear ended! This should be the worst.
Universally considered the worst car of all time
I agree! This car should DEFINITELY be the worst!
Why are both the Honda Accord and Civic even on this list?
I Hated My Dodge Neon So Much. I Bought the car brand new in May of 1995. Then 10 Years later. I Had to sell the car because it started smelling like burned rubber
Worthless worst looking and cheapest car ever made
My mom had a piece of junk 1995 plymouth neon...
One of the worst car ideas on this planet. Butt ugly, weak, expensive, easily breakable and very confusing on its stance.
Oh for heaven's sake! - bobcards
I don't know but it looks awesome to me
Why the hell would the Toyota Camry or Honda Civic be anywhere near this list? Both are extremely reliable for an affordable price. There is a reason why these are two of the best selling cars of all time.
I guess this list was made by some kid who just assumes cars are only about speed
Haha Camry 3rd worst car of all time? Well the list had already lost all credibility after Mustang at #1, but now I am just going to go away... I regret having ever even seen this page.
THANK YOU! This guy deserves a round of applause for actually being sensible about this.
Why did u put same list its already on list - SpencerJC
IT IS ALREADY ON THE LIST AT #4!
Perhaps James May added this car or voted for this car to be this high in this list.
I would like to talk with the maker of this list. Who the heck would think a Ford GT is a bad car?
Hey come on this car is awesome
Ford makes cars that don't last, if you get a ford you will have countless problems